CONCLUSION.

I trust what I have written has convinced the reader that we are,

as was said in opening, at last beginning to move. Professor Weldon

declares he has “no wish to belittle the importance of Mendel’s

achievement”; he desires “simply to call attention to a series of

facts which seem to him to suggest fruitful lines of inquiry.” In

this purpose I venture to assist him, for I am disposed to think that

unaided he is--to borrow Horace Walpole’s phrase--about as likely to

light a fire with a wet dish-clout as to kindle interest in Mendel’s

discoveries by his tempered appreciation. If I have helped a little in

this cause my time has not been wasted.

In these pages I have only touched the edge of that new country which

is stretching out before us, whence in ten years’ time we shall

look back on the present days of our captivity. Soon every science

that deals with animals and plants will be teeming with discovery,

made possible by Mendel’s work. The breeder, whether of plants or

of animals, no longer trudging in the old paths of tradition, will

be second only to the chemist in resource and in foresight. Each

conception of life in which heredity bears a part--and which of them is

exempt?--must change before the coming rush of facts.

Mendel's principles of heredity: A defence · 第 73 / 82 题