M. HERZOG: Under Paragraph IV, on Page 8:

“As regards the employment of European labor and the problems,

methods, and means for the same, Timm made the following

remarks: 1) Northern Europe; 2) Southeast; 3) Italy; 4) France.”

Then we come to the passage about which I am asking you for an

explanation, because you made this statement. Will you answer that? Do

you still deny your knowledge of the fact that these deportations were

forced?

TIMM: I have no intention of denying anything. I can only say that

Sauckel probably had powers from the Führer to use all reasonable means

to speed up the procurement of workers.

Measures were introduced and carried out in France which, even if they

were approved by Laval, the Premier at the time, might nevertheless be

termed compulsory.

M. HERZOG: Thank you. I have one last question to ask you. In this

quotation you say, “The Führer has approved....” If the Führer approved

something, it means, that something was suggested to him. Is that not a

fact?

TIMM: As far as I can remember, Gauleiter Sauckel always reported the

results of his talks in Paris to the Führer. It is possible that he

reported to the Führer the question of recruiting methods which he had

discussed with Laval; and it was customary for him, as I have already

said in my testimony, always to make sure of the Führer’s approval, so

that he did not work against the Führer’s ideas.

Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremburg, 14 November 1945-1 October 1946, Volume 15 · 第 107 / 130 题