M. HERZOG: You dispute the testimony of General Von Falkenhausen?

SAUCKEL: In this version, yes, because the institution...

M. HERZOG: This statement was given under oath, and your testimony today

is given under oath. The Tribunal will take note of it.

SAUCKEL: I say with full consciousness that to the best of my

recollection this version is not completely correct. Laws regarding

labor in occupied territories were not made on my order but on the order

of the Führer, and I did not have any argument about it with General Von

Falkenhausen. We discussed it in a very friendly way, and he introduced

the law. I do not remember having had any difficulties in this

connection. And in another paragraph he states here that at that time he

gave all his instructions on Hitler’s orders. I myself had neither

arguments nor difficulties with him.

M. HERZOG: Is it correct that in Holland the deportation of Dutch

workers for forced labor was under the jurisdiction of the

Reichskommissariat?

SAUCKEL: Please, would you hear the Defendant Seyss-Inquart about that?

The expression jurisdiction is entirely new to me. In France, Belgium,

and Holland this matter was dealt with through the administration of the

labor departments, that is to say...

Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremburg, 14 November 1945-1 October 1946, Volume 15 · 第 48 / 130 题