M. HERZOG: Do you deny the fact that you imposed this law by pressure?

SAUCKEL: That I imposed this law by pressure, that I do deny. I

negotiated about it.

M. HERZOG: Do you not remember that you gave an account to the Führer of

the mission which you carried out in Paris in January 1944?

SAUCKEL: It was my duty to report when I made such journeys for I was

carrying out the Führer’s orders.

M. HERZOG: I submit to you this report, Document Number 556-PS, which

was submitted to the Tribunal under Exhibit Number RF-67. Twice in the

course of this report you speak of German demands. Do you not think that

to give an account to the Führer of German demands having been accepted

is to give an account to him of the success of the pressure which you

exerted?

SAUCKEL: I cannot conceive in what other way a basis for negotiations

could be found. The German Government made demands, and because of those

demands there were negotiations with the French Government which had to

be considered by me as _de jure_.

M. HERZOG: Do you admit, therefore, that the German Government and you,

who were its agent, were making demands? Please answer “yes” or “no.”

SAUCKEL: The German Government was making demands; yes, that is true.

M. HERZOG: Thank you. And those demands, did they not, at times, take

the form of a veritable ultimatum?

SAUCKEL: I am, not aware of that. I can only say that I was very polite

and accommodating when talking to the French Premier and that our

negotiations ran very smoothly. He often mentioned that, and it is in

the record.

M. HERZOG: When you took action concerning the mobilization of the 1944

class, do you not remember that you demanded this mobilization in a

veritable ultimatum? Answer “yes” or “no.”

SAUCKEL: I cannot say so from memory.

THE PRESIDENT: M. Herzog, I think you might put to him the last sentence

in the letter of the 25th of January 1944, 556-PS.

M. HERZOG: “I have, however, allowed no doubts to remain that

further and more severe measures will be taken if the demands

for the transfer of workers is not met.”

SAUCKEL: Yes, I probably said that, though not in the form in which it

is put down in this letter.

M. HERZOG: Do you remember that on 6 June 1944, the day of the dawn of

our liberation, you addressed a letter to Ambassador Abetz?

SAUCKEL: I cannot tell you that from memory.

M. HERZOG: Well, I am going to produce this letter. It is the French

document, Number F-822, which I submit to the Tribunal under Exhibit

Number RF-1513:

“6 June 1944. Paris.

“Your Excellency and dear Party Comrade Abetz:

“The long-expected invasion has finally begun. Thus ends also

for the Allocation of Labor a period of waiting which up to now

has served as an obvious, sometimes tacit, pretext for saying

that the sending of workers into the Reich was impossible owing

to the political atmosphere in the country.”

Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremburg, 14 November 1945-1 October 1946, Volume 15 · 第 43 / 130 题