[1213] Published in 1759.

[1214] Published in 1760-1.

[1215] See his Epitaph in Westminster Abbey, written by Dr. Johnson.

BOSWELL.

'Qui nullum fere scribendi genus

Non tetigit,

Nullum quod tetigit non ornavit.'

_Post_, under June 22, 1776.

[1216] In allusion to this, Mr. Horace Walpole, who admired his

writings, said he was 'an inspired ideot;' and Garrick described him

as one

'----for shortness call'd Noll,

Who wrote like an angel, and

talk'd like poor Poll.'

Sir Joshua Reynolds mentioned to me that he frequently heard Goldsmith

talk warmly of the pleasure of being liked, and observe how hard it

would be if literary excellence should preclude a man from that

satisfaction, which he perceived it often did, from the envy which

attended it; and therefore Sir Joshua was convinced that he was

intentionally more absurd, in order to lessen himself in social

intercourse, trusting that his character would be sufficiently supported

by his works. If it indeed was his intention to appear absurd in

company, he was often very successful. But with due deference to Sir

Joshua's ingenuity, I think the conjecture too refined. BOSWELL.

Horace Walpole's saying of the 'inspired ideot' is recorded in Davies's

_Garrick_, ii. 151. Walpole, in his _Letters_, describes Goldsmith as 'a

changeling that has had bright gleams of parts,' (v. 458); 'a fool, the

more wearing for having some sense,' (vi. 29); 'a poor soul that had

sometimes parts, though never common sense,' (_ib_. p. 73); and 'an

idiot, with once or twice a fit of parts,' (_ib_. p. 379).

Garrick's lines--

'Here lies Nolly Goldsmith, for shortness called Noll,

Who wrote like an angel, but talked like poor Poll,'

are his imaginary epitaph on Goldsmith, which, with the others, gave

rise to _Retaliation_. Forster's _Goldsmith_, ii. 405.

[1217] Rousseau accounting for the habit he has 'de balbutier

promptement des paroles sans idées,' continues, 'je crois que voilà de

quoi faire assez comprendre comment n'étant pas un sot, j'ai cependant

souvent passé pour l'être, même chez des gens en état de bien juger....

Le parti que j'ai pris d'écrire et de me cacher est précisément celui

qui me convenait. Moi présent on n'aurait jamais su ce que je valois, on

ne l'aurait pas soupconné même.' _Les Confessions_, Livre iii. See

_post_, April 27, 1773, where Boswell admits that 'Goldsmith was often

very fortunate in his witty contests, even when he entered the lists

with Johnson himself:' and April 30, 1773, where Reynolds says of him:

'There is no man whose company is more liked.'

[1218] Northcote, a few weeks before his death, said to Mr.

Prior:--'When Goldsmith entered a room, Sir, people who did not know him

became for a moment silent from awe of his literary reputation; when he

came out again, they were riding upon his back.' Prior's _Goldsmith_, i.

440. According to Dr. Percy:--'His face was marked with strong lines of

thinking. His first appearance was not captivating; but when he grew

easy and cheerful in company, he relaxed into such a display of good

humour as soon removed every unfavourable impression.' Goldsmith's

_Misc. Works_, i. 117.

[1219] 'Dr. Goldsmith told me, he himself envied Shakespeare.' Walpole's

_Letters_, vi. 379. Boswell, later on (_post_, May 9, 1773), says:--'In

my opinion Goldsmith had not more of it [an envious disposition] than

other people have, but only talked of it freely.' See also _post_, April

12, 1778. According to Northcote, 'Sir Joshua said that Goldsmith

considered public notoriety or fame as one great parcel, to the whole of

which he laid claim, and whoever partook of any part of it, whether

dancer, singer, slight of hand man, or tumbler, deprived him of his

right.' Northcote's _Reynolds_, i. 248. See _post_, April 7, 1778, where

Johnson said that 'Goldsmith was not an agreeable companion, for he

talked always for fame;' and April 9, 1778.

[1220] Miss Hornecks, one of whom is now married to Henry Bunbury, Esq.,

and the other to Colonel Gwyn. BOSWELL.

[1221] 'Standing at the window of their hotel [in Lisle] to see a

company of soldiers in the Square, the beauty of the sisters Horneck

drew such marked admiration, that Goldsmith, heightening his drollery

with that air of solemnity so generally a point in his humour and so

often more solemnly misinterpreted, turned off from the window with the

remark that elsewhere _he_ too could have his admirers. The Jessamy

Bride, Mrs. Gwyn, was asked about the occurrence not many years ago;

remembered it as a playful jest; and said how shocked she had

subsequently been "to see it adduced in print as a proof of his envious

disposition."' Forster's _Goldsmith_, ii. 217.

[1222] Puppets.

[1223] He went home with Mr. Burke to supper; and broke his shin by

attempting to exhibit to the company how much better he could jump over

a stick than the puppets. BOSWELL. Mr. Hoole was one day in a coach with

Johnson, when 'Johnson, who delighted in rapidity of pace, and had been

speaking of Goldsmith, put his head out of one of the windows to see

they were going right, and rubbing his hands with an air of satisfaction

exclaimed:--"This man drives fast and well; were Goldsmith here now he

would tell us he could do better."' Prior's _Goldsmith_, ii. 127.

[1224] See _post_, April 9, 1773; also April 9, 1778, where Johnson

says, 'Goldsmith had no settled notions upon any subject.'

[1225] I am willing to hope that there may have been some mistake as to

this anecdote, though I had it from a Dignitary of the Church. Dr. Isaac

Goldsmith, his near relation, was Dean of Cloyne, in 1747. BOSWELL. This

note first appears in the second edition.

[1226] Mr. Welsh, in _A Bookseller of the Last Century_, p. 58, quotes

the following entry from an account-book of B. Collins of Salisbury, the

printer of the first edition of the _Vicar_:--'_Vicar of Wakefield_, 2

vols. 12mo., 1/3rd. B. Collins, Salisbury, bought of Dr. Goldsmith, the

author, October 28, 1762, £21.' Goldsmith, it should seem from this, as

Collins's third share was worth twenty guineas, was paid not sixty

pounds, but sixty guineas. Collins shared in many of the ventures of

Newbery, Goldsmith's publisher. Mr. Welsh says (_ib_. p. 61) that

Collins's accounts show 'that the first three editions resulted in a

loss.' If this was so, the booksellers must have been great bunglers,

for the book ran through three editions in six or seven months.

Forster's _Goldsmith_, i. 425.

[1227] The Traveller (price one shilling and sixpence) was published in

December 1764, and _The Vicar of Wakefield_ in March 1766. In August

1765 the fourth edition of _The Traveller_ appeared, and the ninth in

the year Goldsmith died. He received for it £21. Forster's _Goldsmith_,

i. 364, 374, 409. See _ante_, p. 193, note i.

[1228] '"Miss Burney," said Mrs. Thrale [to Dr. Johnson], "is fond of

_The Vicar of Wakefield_, and so am I. Don't you like it, Sir?" "No,

madam, it is very faulty; there is nothing of real life in it, and very

little of nature. It is a mere fanciful performance."' Mme. D'Arblay's

_Diary_, i. 83. 'There are a hundred faults in this Thing,' said

Goldsmith in the preface, 'and a hundred things might be said to prove

them beauties. But it is needless. A book may be amusing with numerous

errors, or it may be very dull without a single absurdity.' See _post_,

April 25, 1778.

[1229] _Anecdotes of Johnson_, p. 119. BOSWELL.

[1230] _Life of Johnson_, p. 420. BOSWELL.

[1231] In his imprudence he was like Savage, of whom Johnson says

(_Works_, viii. 161):--'To supply him with money was a hopeless attempt;

for no sooner did he see himself master of a sum sufficient to set him

free from care for a day, than he became profuse and luxurious.' When

Savage was 'lodging in the liberties of the Fleet, his friends sent him

every Monday a guinea, which he commonly spent before the next morning,

and trusted, after his usual manner, the remaining part of the week to

the bounty of fortune.' _Ib_. p. 170.

[1232] It may not be improper to annex here Mrs. Piozzi's account of

this transaction, in her own words, as a specimen of the extreme

inaccuracy with which all her anecdotes of Dr. Johnson are related, or

rather discoloured and distorted:--'I have forgotten the year, but it

could scarcely, I think, be later than 1765 or 1766 that he was _called

abruptly from our house after dinner_, and returning _in about three

hours_, said he had been with an enraged authour, whose landlady pressed

him for payment within doors, while the bailiffs beset him without; that

he was _drinking himself drunk_ with Madeira, to drown care, and

fretting over a novel, which, when _finished_, was to be his _whole

fortune_, but _he could not get it done for distraction_, nor could he

step out of doors to offer it for sale. Mr. Johnson, therefore, sent

away the bottle, and went to the bookseller, recommending the

performance, and _desiring some immediate relief_; which when he brought

back to the writer, _he called the 'woman of the house directly to

partake of punch, and pass their time in merriment.' Anecdotes of Dr.

Johnson_, p. 119. BOSWELL. The whole transaction took place in 1762, as

is shown, _ante_, p. 415, note 1; Johnson did not know the Thrales

till 1764.

[1233] Through Goldsmith Boswell became acquainted with Reynolds. In his

_Letter to the People of Scotland_ (p. 99), he says:--'I exhort you, my

friends and countrymen, in the words of my departed _Goldsmith_, who

gave me many nodes _Atticae_, and gave me a jewel of the finest

water--the acquaintance of Sir Joshua Reynolds.'

[1234] See _post_, July 30, 1763.

[1235] See _post_, March 20, 1776, and Boswell's _Hebrides_, Oct. 17,

1773.

[1236] See _post_, March 15, 1776.

[1237] 'Dr. Campbell was an entertaining story-teller, which [_sic_]

sometimes he rather embellished; so that the writer of this once heard

Dr. Johnson say:--"Campbell will lie, but he never lies on paper."'

_Gent. Mag_. for 1785, p. 969.

[1238] I am inclined to think that he was misinformed as to this

circumstance. I own I am jealous for my worthy friend Dr. John Campbell.

For though Milton could without remorse absent himself from publick

worship [Johnson's _Works_, vii. 115] I cannot. On the contrary, I have

the same habitual impressions upon my mind, with those of a truely

venerable Judge, who said to Mr. Langton, 'Friend Langton, if I have not

been at church on Sunday, I do not feel myself easy.' Dr. Campbell was a

sincerely religious man. Lord Macartney, who is eminent for his variety

of knowledge, and attention to men of talents, and knew him well, told

me, that when he called on him in a morning, he found him reading a

chapter in the Greek New Testament, which he informed his Lordship was

his constant practice. The quantity of Dr. Campbell's composition is

almost incredible, and his labours brought him large profits. Dr. Joseph

Warton told me that Johnson said of him, 'He is the richest authour that

ever grazed the common of literature.' BOSWELL.

[1239] See _post_, April 7, 1778. Campbell complied with one of the

_Monita Padagogica_ of Erasmus. 'Si quem praeteribis natu grandem,

magistratum, sacerdotem, doctorem.... memento aperire caput.... Itidem

facito quum praeteribis asdem sacram.' Erasmus's _Colloquies_, ed.

1867, i. 36.

[1240] Reynolds said of Johnson:--'He was not easily imposed upon by

professions to honesty and candour; but he appeared to have little

suspicion of hypocrisy in religion.' Taylor's _Reynolds_, ii. 459.

Boswell, in one of his penitent letters, wrote to Temple on July 21,

1790:--'I am even almost inclined to think with you, that my great

oracle Johnson did allow too much credit to good principles, without

good practice.' _Letters of Boswell_, p. 327.

[1241] Campbell lived in 'the large new-built house at the

north-west-corner of Queen Square, Bloomsbury, whither, particularly on

a Sunday evening, great numbers of persons of the first eminence for

science and literature resorted for the enjoyment of conversation.'

Hawkins's _Johnson_, p. 210.

[1242] Churchill, in his first poem, _The Rosciad_ (Poems, i. 4),

mentions Johnson without any disrespect among those who were thought

of as judge.

'For Johnson some, but Johnson, it was feared,

Would be too grave; and Sterne too gay appeared.'

In The Author (ib. ii. 36), if I mistake not, he grossly alludes to the

convulsive disorder to which Johnson was subject. Attacking the

pensioners he says--the italics are his own:--

'Others, _half-palsied_ only, mutes become,

And what makes Smollett write makes Johnson dumb.'

[1243] See _post_, April 6, 1772, where Johnson called Fielding a

blockhead.

[1244] Churchill published his first poem, _The Rosciad_, in March or

April 1761 (_Gent. Mag_. xxxi. 190); _The Apology_ in May or June (_Ib_.

p. 286); _Night_ in Jan. 1762 (_Ib_. xxxii. 47); The First and Second

Parts of The Ghost in March (_ib_. p. 147); The Third Part in the autumn

(_ib_. p. 449); _The Prophecy of Famine _in Jan. 1763 (_ib_. xxxiii.

47), and _The Epistle to Hogarth_ in this month of July (_ib_. p. 363).

He wrote the fourth part of _The Ghost_, and nine more poems, and died

on Nov. 4, 1764, aged thirty-two or thirty-three.

[1245] 'Cowper had a higher opinion of Churchill than of any other

contemporary writer. "It is a great thing," he said, "to be indeed a

poet, and does not happen to more than one man in a century; but

Churchill, the great Churchill, deserved that name." He made him, more

than any other writer, his model.' Southey's _Cowper_, i. 87, 8.

[1246] Mr. Forster says that 'Churchill asked five guineas for the

manuscript of _The Rosciad_ (according to Southey, but Mr. Tooke says he

asked twenty pounds).' Finding no purchaser he brought the poem out at

his own risk. Mr. Forster continues:--'The pulpit had starved him on

forty pounds a year; the public had given him a thousand pounds in two

months.' Forster's _Essays_, ii. 226, 240. As _The Rosciad _was sold at

one shilling a copy, it seems incredible that such a gain could have

been made, even with the profits of _The Apology_ included. 'Blotting

and correcting was so much Churchill's abhorrence that I have heard from

his publisher he once energetically expressed himself, that it was like

cutting away one's own flesh.' D'Israeli's _Curiosities of Literature_,

ed. 1834, iii. 129. D'Israeli 'had heard that after a successful work he

usually precipitated the publication of another, relying on its

crudeness being passed over by the public curiosity excited by its

better brother. He called this getting double pay, for thus he secured

the sale of a hurried work.'

[1247] In the opening lines of _Gotham,_ Bk. iii, there is a passage of

great beauty and tenderness.

[1248] In 1769 I set Thornton's burlesque _Ode_. It was performed at

Ranelagh in masks, to a very crowded audience, as I was told; for I then

resided in Norfolk. BURNEY. Dr. Burney's note cannot be correct. He came

to reside in London in 1760 (_Memoirs of Dr. Burney_, i. 133) The Ode is

in the list of 'new books, published' in the _Gent. Mag_. for June 1763,

and is described as having been performed at Ranelagh.

[1249] _The Connoisseur_ was started by Thornton and Colman in 1754.

Cowper and Lloyd were contributors. Southey's _Cowper_, i. 46, 49, 65.

[1250] See _ante_, p. 350, note.

[1251] See _post_, Aug. 2, 1763, and Oct. 26, 1769.

[1252] See _post_. Sept. 20, 1777, note.

[1253] The northern bard mentioned page 421. When I asked Dr. Johnson's

permission to introduce him, he obligingly agreed; adding, however, with

a sly pleasantry, 'but he must give us none of his poetry.' It is

remarkable that Johnson and Churchill, however much they differed in

other points, agreed on this subject. See Churchill's _Journey_.

['Under dark Allegory's flimsy veil

Let Them with Ogilvie spin out a tale

Of rueful length,'

Churchill's _Poems_, ii. 329.]

It is, however, but justice to Dr. Ogilvie to observe, that his _Day of

Judgement_ has no inconsiderable share of merit. BOSWELL.

[1254] 'Johnson said:--"Goldsmith should not be for ever attempting to

_shine_ in conversation."' _Post_, April 27, 1773. See also _post_,

May 7, 1773.

[1255] Fifteen years later Lord George Germaine, Secretary of State,

asserted in a debate 'that the King "was his own Minister," which

Charles Fox took up admirably, lamenting that His Majesty "was his own

_unadvised_ Minister."' Walpole's _Journal of the Reign of George

III_, ii. 314.

[1256] 'The general story of mankind will evince that lawful and settled

authority is very seldom resisted when it is well employed.... Men are

easily kept obedient to those who have temporal dominion in their hands,

till their veneration is dissipated by such wickedness and folly as can

neither be defended nor concealed.' _The Rambler_, No. 50. See _post_,

March 31, 1772.

[1257] 'It is natural to believe ... that no writer has a more easy task

than the historian. The philosopher has the works of omniscience to

examine.... The poet trusts to his invention.... But the happy historian

has no other labour than of gathering what tradition pours down before

him, or records treasure for his use.' _The Rambler_, No. 122.

[1258] See Boswell's _Hebrides_, Aug. 21, 1773.

[1259] 'Arbuthnot was a man of great comprehension, skilful in his

profession, versed in the sciences, acquainted with ancient literature,

and able to animate his mass of knowledge by a bright and active

imagination; a scholar with great brilliancy of wit; a wit, who in the

crowd of life retained and discovered a noble ardour of religious zeal.'

Johnson's _Works_, viii. 296.

[1260] Goldsmith wrote from Edinburgh in 1753:--'Shall I tire you with a

description of this unfruitful country, where I must lead you over their

hills all brown with heath, or their vallies scarce able to feed a

rabbit? Man alone seems to be the only creature who has arrived to the

natural size in this poor soil. Every part of the country presents the

same dismal landscape.' Forster's _Goldsmith_, i. 433.

[1261] See Boswell's _Hebrides_, Nov. 10, 1773.

[1262] Johnson would suffer none of his friends to fill up chasms in

conversation with remarks on the weather: 'Let us not talk of the

weather.' BURNEY.

[1263] See _ante_, p. 332.

[1264] Boswell wrote to Temple on Sept. 9, 1767:--'How unaccountable is

it that my father and I should be so ill together! He is a man of sense

and a man of worth; but from some unhappy turn in his disposition he is

much dissatisfied with a son whom you know. I write to him with warmth,

with an honest pride, wishing that he should think of me as I am; but my

letters shock him, and every expression in them is interpreted

unfavourably. To give you an instance, I send you a letter I had from

him a few days ago. How galling is it to the friend of Paoli to be

treated so! I have answered him in my own style; I will be myself.'

_Letters of Boswell_, p. 110. In the following passage in one of his

_Hypochondriacks_ he certainly describes his father. 'I knew a father

who was a violent Whig, and used to attack his son for being a Tory,

upbraiding him with being deficient in "noble sentiments of liberty,"

while at the same time he made this son live under his roof in such

bondage, that he was not only afraid to stir from home without leave,

like a child, but durst scarcely open his mouth in his father's

presence. This was sad living. Yet I would rather see such an excess of

awe than a degree of familiarity between father and son by which all

reverence is destroyed.' _London Mag_. 1781, p. 253.

[1265] Boswell, the day after this talk, wrote:--'I have had a long

letter from my father, full of affection and good counsel. Honest man!

he is now very happy: it is amazing to think how much he has had at

heart, my pursuing the road of civil life.' _Letters of Boswell_, p. 25.

[1266] Gray, says Nicholls, 'disliked all poetry in blank verse, except

Milton.' Gray's _Works_, ed. 1858, v. 36. Goldsmith, in his _Present

State of Polite Learning_ (ch. xi.), wrote in 1759:--'From a desire in

the critic of grafting the spirit of ancient languages upon the English

have proceeded of late several disagreeable instances of pedantry. Among

the number, I think, we may reckon blank verse. Nothing but the greatest

sublimity of subject can render such a measure pleasing; however, we now

see it used upon the most trivial occasions.' On the same page he speaks

of 'the tuneless flow of our blank verse.' See _post_, 1770, in Dr.

Maxwell's _Collectanea_ and the beginning of 1781, under _The Life of

Milton_, for Johnson's opinion of blank verse.

[1267] 'Johnson told me, that one day in London, when Dr. Adam Smith was

boasting of Glasgow, he turned to him and said, "Pray, Sir, have you

ever seen Brentford?'" Boswell's _Hebrides_, Oct. 29, 1773. See _post_,

April 29, 1778.

[1268] 'He advised me to read just as inclination prompted me, which

alone, he said, would do me any good; for I had better go into company

than read a set task. He said, too, that I should prescribe to myself

five hours a day, and in these hours gratify whatever literary desires

may spring up.' _Letters of Boswell_, p. 28. The Editor of these

_Letters_ compares Tranio's advice:--

'No profit grows where is no pleasure ta'en:

In brief, Sir, study what you most affect.'

_Taming of the Shrew_, act i. sc. I.

'Johnson used to say that no man read long together with a folio on his

table. "Books," said he, "that you may carry to the fire, and hold

readily in your hand, are the most useful after all."' Johnson's _Works_

(1787), xi. 197. See also _The Idler_, No. 67, and _post_, April 12,

1776, and under Sept. 22, 1777.

[1269] Wilkes, among others, had attacked him in Aug. 1762 in _The North

Briton_, Nos. xi. and xii.

[1270] When I mentioned the same idle clamour to him several years

afterwards, he said, with a smile, 'I wish my pension were twice as

large, that they might make twice as much noise.' BOSWELL.

[1271] In one thing at least he was changed. He could now indulge in the

full bent, to use his own words (_Works_, viii. l36), 'that

inquisitiveness which must always be produced in a vigorous mind, by an

absolute freedom from all pressing or domestick engagements.'

[1272] See _post_, April 13, 1773, Sept. 17 and 19, 1777, March 21,

1783, and June 9, 1784. Lord Shelburne says:--'After the Revolution the

Tory and Jacobite parties had become almost identified by their together

opposing the Court for so many years, and still more by the persecution

which they suffered in common, for it was the policy of Sir Robert

Walpole to confound them as much as possible, so as to throw the

Jacobite odium upon every man who opposed government.' Fitzmaurice's

_Shelburne_, i. 35. Lord Bolingbroke (_Works_, iii. 28) complains that

the writers on the side of the ministry 'frequently throw out that every

man is a friend to the Pretender who is not a friend of Walpole.'

[1273] See _post_, April 6, 1775

[1274] _Journal of a Tour to the Hebrides_, 3rd edit. p. 402 [Nov. 10].

BOSWELL.

[1275] Mr. Walmsley died in 1751 (_ante_, p. 81). Johnson left Lichfield

in 1737. Unless Mr. Walmsley after 1737 visited London from time to

time, he can scarcely be meant.

[1276] See _ante_, p. 336.

Life of Johnson, Volume 1 1709-1765 · 第 55 / 59 段