[959] 'On Mr. Thrale's attack of apoplexy in 1779, Johnson wrote to Mrs.

Thrale:--'I remember Dr. Marsigli, an Italian physician, whose seizure

was more violent than Mr. Thrale's, for he fell down helpless, but his

case was not considered as of much danger, and he went safe home, and is

now a professor at Padua.' _Piozzi Letters_, ii. 48.

[960] 'Now, or late, Vice-Chancellor.' WARTON.--BOSWELL. He was

Vice-Chancellor when Johnson's degree was conferred (_ante_, p. 282),

but his term of office had now come to an end.

[961] 'Mr. Warton was elected Professor of Poetry at Oxford in the

preceding year.' WARTON.-BOSWELL.

[962] 'Miss Jones lived at Oxford, and was often of our parties. She was

a very ingenious poetess, and published a volume of poems; and, on the

whole, was a most sensible, agreeable, and amiable woman. She was a

sister to the Reverend River Jones, Chanter of Christ Church Cathedral

at Oxford, and Johnson used to call her the _Chantress_. I have heard

him often address her in this passage from _Il Penseroso_:

"Thee, Chantress, oft the woods among I woo," etc.

She died unmarried.' WHARTON

[963] Tom. iii. p. 482. BOSWELL.

[964] Of _Shakspeare_. BOSWELL.

[965] This letter is misdated. It was written in Jan. 1759, and not in

1758. Johnson says that he is forty-nine. In Jan. 1758 he was

forty-eight. He mentions the performance of _Cleane_, which was at the

end of 1758; and he says that 'Murphy is to have his _Orphan of China_

acted next month.' It was acted in the spring of 1759.

[966] _Juvenal_, Sat. iii. 1.

'Though grief and fondness in my breast rebel,

When injured Thales bids the town farewell,

Yet still my calmer thoughts his choice commend,

I praise the hermit, but regret the friend;

Resolved at length from vice and London far

To breathe in distant fields a purer air,

And fixed on Cambria's solitary shore

Give to St. David one true Briton more.'

Johnson's _London_, l. 1.

[967] Mr. Garrick. BOSWELL.

[968] Mr. Dodsley, the Authour of _Cleone_. BOSWELL. Garrick, according

to Davies, had rejected Dodsley's _Cleone_, 'and had termed it a cruel,

bloody, and unnatural play.' Davies's _Garrick_, i. 223. Johnson himself

said of it:--'I am afraid there is more blood than brains.' _Post_,

1780, in Mr. Langton's _Collection_. The night it was brought out at

Covent Garden, Garrick appeared for the first time as Marplot in the

_Busy Body_ at Drury Lane. The next morning he wrote to congratulate

Dodsley on his success, and asked him at the same time to let him know

how he could support his interest without absolutely giving up his own.

To this Dodsley returned a cold reply. Garrick wrote back as follows:--

'Master Robert Dodsley,

When I first read your peevish answer to my well-meant proposal to you,

I was much disturbed at it--but when I considered, that some minds

cannot bear the smallest portion of success, I most sincerely pitied

you; and when I found in the same letter, that you were graciously

pleased to dismiss me from your acquaintance, I could not but confess so

apparent an obligation, and am with due acknowledgements,

Master Robert Dodsley,

Your most obliged

David Garrick.'

Garrick _Corres_., i. 80 (where the letters that passed are wrongly

dated 1757). Mrs. Bellamy in her _Life_ (iii. 109) says that on the

evening of the performance she was provoked by something that Dodsley

said, 'which,' she continues, 'made me answer that good man with a

petulance which afterwards gave me uneasiness. I told him that I had a

reputation to lose as an actress; but, as for his piece, Mr. Garrick had

anticipated the damnation of it publicly, the preceding evening, at the

Bedford Coffee-house, where he had declared that it could not pass

muster, as it was the very worst piece ever exhibited.' Shenstone

(_Works_, iii. 288) writing five weeks after the play was brought out,

says:--'Dodsley is now going to print his fourth edition. He sold 2000

of his first edition the very first day he published it.' The price was

eighteen-pence.

[969] Mrs. Bellamy (_Life_, iii. 108) says that Johnson was present at

the last rehearsal. 'When I came to repeat, "Thou shalt not murder," Dr.

Johnson caught me by the arm, and that somewhat too briskly, saying, at

the same time, "It is a commandment, and must be spoken, Thou shalt

_not_ murder." As I had not then the honour of knowing personally that

great genius, I was not a little displeased at his inforcing his

instructions with so much vehemence.' The next night she heard, she

says, amidst the general applause, 'the same voice which had instructed

me in the commandment, exclaim aloud from the pit, "I will write a copy

of verses upon her myself." I knew that my success was insured.' See

_post_, May 11, 1783.

[970] Dodsley had published his _London_ and his _Vanity of Human

Wishes_ (_ante_, pp. 124, 193), and had had a large share in the

_Dictionary_, (_ante_, p. 183).

[971] It is to this that Churchill refers in the following lines:--

'Let them [the Muses] with Glover o'er Medea doze;

Let them with Dodsley wail Cleone's woes,

Whilst he, fine feeling creature, all in tears,

Melts as they melt, and weeps with weeping Peers.'

_The Journey_. _Poems_, ii. 328.

[972] See _post_ p. 350, note.

[973] Mr. Samuel Richardson, authour of _Clarissa_. BOSWELL.

[974] In 1753 when in Devonshire he charged five guineas a head

(Taylor's _Reynolds_, i. 89); shortly afterwards, when he removed to

London, twelve guineas (_ib_. p. 101); in 1764, thirty guineas; for a

whole length 150 guineas (_ib_. p. 224). Northcote writes that 'he

sometimes has lamented the being interrupted in his work by idle

visitors, saying, "those persons do not consider that my time is worth

to me five guineas an hour."' Northcote's _Reynolds_, i. 83.

[975] 'Miss Reynolds at first amused herself by painting miniature

portraits, and in that part of the art was particularly successful. In

her attempts at oil-painting, however, she did not succeed, which made

Reynolds say jestingly, that her pictures in that way made other people

laugh and him cry; and as he did not approve of her painting in oil, she

generally did it by stealth.' _Ib_. ii. 160.

[976] Murphy was far from happy. The play was not produced till April;

by the date of Johnson's letter, he had not by any means reached the end

of what he calls 'the first, and indeed, the last, disagreeable

controversy that he ever had with Mr. Garrick.' Murphy's _Garrick_,

p. 213.

[977] This letter was an answer to one in which was enclosed a draft for

the payment of some subscriptions to his _Shakspeare_. BOSWELL.

[978] In the Preface he says:--(_Works_, v. 52) 'I have not passed over

with affected superiority what is equally difficult to the reader and to

myself, but where I could not instruct him, have owned my ignorance.'

[979] Northcote gives the following account of this same garret in

describing how Reynolds introduced Roubiliac to Johnson. 'Johnson

received him with much civility, and took them up into a garret, which

he considered as his library; where, besides his books, all covered with

dust, there was an old crazy deal table, and a still worse and older

elbow chair, having only three legs. In this chair Johnson seated

himself, after having, with considerable dexterity and evident practice,

first drawn it up against the wall, which served to support it on that

side on which the leg was deficient.' Northcote's _Reynolds_, i. 75.

Miss Reynolds improves on the account. She says that 'before Johnson had

the pension he literally dressed like a beggar; and, from what I have

been told, he as literally lived as such; at least as to common

conveniences in his apartments, wanting even a chair to sit on,

particularly in his study, where a gentleman who frequently visited him,

whilst writing his _Idlers_, constantly found him at his desk, sitting

on one with three legs; and on rising from it, he remarked that Dr.

Johnson never forgot its defect, but would either hold it in his hand,

or place it with great composure against some support, taking no notice

of its imperfection to his visitor. It was remarkable in Johnson, that

no external circumstances ever prompted him to make any apology, or to

seem even sensible of their existence.' Croker's _Boswell_, p. 832.

There can be little question that she is describing the same room--a

room in a house in which Miss Williams was lodged, and most likely Mr.

Levet, and in which Mr. Burney dined; and in which certainly there must

have been chairs. Yet Mr. Carlyle, misled by her account, says:--'In his

apartments, at one time, there were unfortunately no chairs.' Carlyle's

_Miscellanies_, ed. 1872, iv. 127.

[980] In his _Life of Pope_ (_Works_, viii. 272) Johnson calls Theobald

'a man of heavy diligence, with very slender powers.' In the Preface to

Shakspeare he admits that 'what little he did was commonly right.' _Ib_.

v. 137. The Editors of the _Cambridge Shakespeare_ on the other hand

say:--'Theobald, as an Editor, is incomparably superior to his

predecessors, and to his immediate successor Warburton, although the

latter had the advantage of working on his materials. Many most

brilliant emendations are due to him.' On Johnson's statement that

'Warburton would make two-and-fifty Theobalds, cut into slices,' they

write:--'From this judgment, whether they be compared as critics or

editors, we emphatically dissent.' _Cambridge Shakespeare_, i., xxxi.,

xxxiv., note. Among Theobald's 'brilliant emendations' are 'a'babbled of

green fields' (_Henry V_, ii. 3), and 'lackeying the varying tide.'

(_Antony and Cleopatra_, i.4).

[981] '_A familiar epistle_ [by Lord Bolingbroke] _to the most impudent

man living_, 1749.' _Brit. Mus. Catal_.

[982] 'Mallet, by address or accident, perhaps by his dependence on the

prince [of Wales], found his way to Bolingbroke, a man whose pride and

petulance made his kindness difficult to gain or keep, and whom Mallet

was content to court by an act, which, I hope, was unwillingly

performed. When it was found that Pope had clandestinely printed an

unauthorised number of the pamphlet called _The Patriot King_,

Bolingbroke, in a fit of useless fury, resolved to blast his memory, and

employed Mallet (1749) as the executioner of his vengeance. Mallet had

not virtue, or had not spirit, to refuse the office; and was rewarded

not long after with the legacy of Lord Bolingbroke's works.' Johnson's

_Works_, viii. 467. See _ante_, p. 268, and Walpole's _Letters_,

ii. 159.

[983] _A View of Lord Bolingbroke's Philosophy in Four Letters to a

Friend_, 1754-5.

[984] A paper under this name had been started seven years earlier. See

_Carter and Talbot Corres_., ii. 33.

[985] In the two years in which Johnson wrote for this paper it saw many

changes. The first _Idler_ appeared in No. 2 of the _Universal Chronicle

or Weekly Gazette_, which was published not by Newbery, but by J. Payne.

On April 29, this paper took the title of _Payne's Universal Chronicle_,

etc. On Jan. 6, 1759, it resumed the old title and was published by R.

Stevens. On Jan. 5, 1760, the title was changed to _The Universal

Chronicle and Westminster Journal_, and it was published by W. Faden and

R. Stevens. On March 15, 1760, it was published by R. Stevens alone. The

paper consisted of eight pages. _The Idler_, which varied in length,

came first, and was printed in larger characters, much like a leading

article. The changes in title and ownership seem to show that in spite

of Johnson's contributions it was not a successful publication.

[986] 'Those papers may be considered as a kind of syllabus of all

Reynolds's future discourses, and certainly occasioned him some thinking

in their composition. I have heard him say, that Johnson required them

from him on a sudden emergency, and on that account, he sat up the whole

night to complete them in time; and by it he was so much disordered,

that it produced a vertigo in his head.' Northcote's _Reynolds_, i. 89,

Reynolds must have spoken of only one paper; as the three, appearing as

they did on Sept. 29, Oct. 20, and Nov. 10, could not have been required

at one time.

[987] 'To be idle and to be poor have always been reproaches, and

therefore every man endeavours with his utmost care to hide his poverty

from others, and his idleness from himself.' _The Idler_, No. 17.

[988] Prayers and Meditations, p. 30 [36], BOSWELL.

[989] In July, 1759.

[990] This number was published a few days after his mother's death. It

is in the form of a letter, which is thus introduced:-'The following

letter relates to an affliction perhaps not necessary to be imparted to

the publick; but I could not persuade myself to suppress it, because I

think I know the sentiments to be sincere, and I feel no disposition to

provide for this day any other entertainment.'

[991] In the table of contents the title of No. 58 is, 'Expectations of

pleasure frustrated.' In the original edition of _The Idler_ no titles

are given. In this paper he shews that 'nothing is more hopeless than a

scheme of merriment.'

[992] In this paper he begins by considering, 'why the only thinking

being of this globe is doomed to think merely to be wretched, and to

pass his time from youth to age in fearing or in suffering calamities.'

He ends by asserting that 'of what virtue there is, misery produces far

the greater part.'

[993] 'There are few things,' he writes, 'not purely evil, of which we

can say, without some emotion of uneasiness, _this is the last_.... The

secret horrour of the last is inseparable from a thinking being, whose

life is limited, and to whom death is dreadful.'

[994] 'I asked him one day, why the _Idlers_ were published without

mottoes. He replied, that it was forborne the better to conceal himself,

and escape discovery. "But let us think of some now," said he, "for the

next edition. We can fit the two volumnes in two hours, can't we?"

Accordingly he recollected, and I wrote down these following (nine

mottoes) till come friend coming in, in about five minutes, put an end

to our further progress on the subject.' _Piossi Letters_, ii. 388.

[995] See _post_, July 14 and 26, 1763, April 14, 1775, and Aug. 2,

1784, note for instances in which Johnson ridicules the notion that

weather and seasons have any necessary effect on man; also April 17,

1778. In the _Life of Milton_ (_Works_. vii. 102), he writes:--'this

dependence of the soul upon the seasons, those temporary and periodical

ebbs and flows of intellect, may, I suppose, justly be derided as the

fumes of vain imagination. _Sapiens dominabitur astro_. The author that

thinks himself weather-bound will find, with a little help from

hellebore, that he is only idle or exhausted. But while this notion has

possession of the head, it produces the inability with it supposes. Our

powers owe much of their energy to our hopes; _possunt quin posse

vidertur_.' Boswell records, in his _Hebrides_ (Aug. 16, 1773), that

when 'somebody talked of happy moments for composition,' Johnson

said:--'Nay, a man may write at any time, if he will set himself

_doggedly_ to it.' Reynolds, who Alas! avowed how much he had learnt

from Johnson (_ante_, p. 245), says much the same in his _Seventh

Discourse_: 'But when, in plain prose, we gravely talk of courting the

Muse in shady bowers; waiting the call and inspiration of Genius ... of

attending to times and seasons when the imagination shoots with the

greatest vigour, whether at the summer solstice or the vernal equinox

... when we talk such language or entertain such sentiments as these, we

generally rest contented with mere words, or at best entertain notions

not only groundless but pernicious.' Reynolds's _Works_, i. 150. On the

other hand, in 1773 Johnson recorded:--'Between Easter and Whitsuntide,

having always considered that time as propitious to study, I attempted

to learn the Low-Dutch language.' _Post_, under May 9, 1773. In _The

Rambler_, No. 80, he says:--'To the men of study and imagination the

winter is generally the chief time of labour. Gloom and silence produce

composure of mind and concentration of ideas.' In a letter to Mrs.

Thrale, written in 1775, he says:--'Most men have their bright and their

Cloudy days, at least they have days when they put their powers into

act, and days when they suffer them to repose.' _Piozzi Letters_, i.

265. In 1781 he wrote:--'I thought myself above assistance or

obstruction from the seasons; but find the autumnal blast sharp and

nipping, and the fading world an uncomfortable prospect.' _Ib_. ii. 220.

Again, in the last year of his life he wrote:--'The: weather, you know,

has not been balmy. I am now reduced to think, and am at least content

to talk, of the weather. Pride must have a fall.' _Post_, Aug. 2, 1784.

[996] Addison's _Cato_, act i. sc. 4.

[997] Johnson, reviewing the Duchess of Marlborough's attack on Queen

Mary, says (_Works_, vi. 8):--'This is a character so different from all

those that have been hitherto given of this celebrated princess, that

the reader stands in suspense, till he considers that ... it has

hitherto had this great advantage, that it has only been compared with

those of kings.'

[998] Johnson had explained how it comes to pass that Englishmen talk so

commonly of the weather. He continues:--'Such is the reason of our

practice; and who shall treat it with contempt? Surely not the attendant

on a court, whose business is to watch the looks of a being weak and

foolish as himself, and whose vanity is to recount the names of men, who

might drop into nothing, and leave no vacuity.... The weather is a

nobler and more interesting subject; it is the present state of the

skies and of the earth, on which plenty and famine are suspended, on

which millions depend for the necessaries of life.' 'Garrick complained

that when he went to read before the court, not a look or a murmur

testified approbation; there was a profound stillness--every one only

watched to see what the king thought.' Hazlitt's _Conversations of

Northcote_, p. 262.

[999] _The Idler_, No. 90. See _post_, April 3, 1773, where he declaims

against action in public speaking.

[1000] He now and then repeats himself. Thus, in _The Idler_, No. 37, he

moralises on the story, how Socrates, passing through the fair at

Athens, cried out:--'How many things are here which I do not need!'

though he had already moralised on it in _the Adventurer_, Nos. 67, 119.

[1001] No. 34.

[1002] _Poems on Several Occasions_, by Thomas Blacklock, p. 179. See

_post_, Aug. 5, 1763, and Boswell's _Hebrides_, Aug. 17, 1773.

[1003] 'Among the papers of Newbery, in the possession of Mr. Murray, is

the account rendered on the collection of _The Idler_ into two small

volumes, when the arrangement seems to have been that Johnson should

receive two-thirds of the profits.

_The Idler_.

'DR. £. s. d.

Paid for Advertising.. 20 0 6

Printing two vols., 1,500 41 13 0

Paper. . . . . . . 52 3 0

* * * * *

£113 16 6

Profit on the edition . 126 3 6

* * * * *

£240 0 0

* * * * *

'CR. £. s. d.

1,500 Sets at 16£ per 100 240 0 0

* * * * *

Dr. Johnson two-thirds 84 2 4

Mr. Newbery one-third. 42 1 2

* * * * *

£126 3 6

* * * * *

Forster's _Goldsmith_, i. 204.

If this account is correctly printed, the sale must have been slow. The

first edition (2 vols. 5s.) was published in Oct. 1761, (_Gent. Mag_.

xxxi. 479). Johnson is called Dr. in the account; but he was not made an

LL.D. till July 1765. Prior, in his _Life of Goldsmith_ (i. 459),

publishes an account between Goldsmith and Newbery in which the first

entry is:--

'1761. Oct. 14, 1 set of

_The Idler_. . . . . £0 50 0.'

Johnson, as Newbery's papers show, a year later bought a copy of

Goldsmith's _Life of Nash_; _ib_. p. 405.

[1004] See _ante_, p. 306.

[1005] This paper may be found in Stockdale's supplemental volume of

Johnson's _Miscellaneous Pieces_. BOSWELL. Stockdale's supplemental

volumes--for there are two--are vols. xii. and xiii. of what is known as

'Hawkins's edition.' In this paper (_Works_, iv. 450) he represents in a

fable two vultures speculating on that mischievous being, man, 'who is

the only beast who kills that which he does not devour,' who at times is

seen to move in herds, while 'there is in every herd one that gives

directions to the rest, and seems to be more eminently delighted with a

wide carnage.'

[1006] 'Receipts for _Shakespeare_.' WARTON.--BOSWELL.

[1007] 'Then of Lincoln College. Now Sir Robert Chambers, one of the

Judges in India.' WARTON.--BOSWELL.

[1008] Old Mr. Langton's niece. See _post,_ July 14, 1763.

[1009] 'Mr. Langton.' WARTON.--BOSWELL.

[1010] Boswell records:--'Lady Di Beauclerk told me that Langton had

never been to see her since she came to Richmond, his head was so full

of the militia and Greek. "Why," said I, "Madam, he is of such a length

he is awkward and not easily moved." "But," said she, "if he had lain

himself at his length, his feet had been in London, and his head might

have been here _eodem die_."' _Boswelliana_, p. 297.

[1011] 'Part of the impression of the _Shakespeare_, which Dr. Johnson

conducted alone, and published by subscription. This edition came out in

1765.' WARTON.--BOSWELL.

[1012] Stockdale records (_Memoirs_, ii. 191), that after he had entered

on his charge as domestic tutor to Lord Craven's son, he called on

Johnson, who asked him how he liked his place. On his hesitating to

answer, he said: 'You must expect insolence.' He added that in his youth

he had entertained great expectations from a powerful family. "At

length," he said, "I found that their promises, and consequently my

expectations, vanished into air.... But, Sir, they would have treated me

much worse, if they had known that motives from which I paid my court to

them were purely selfish, and what opinion I had formed of them." He

added, that since he knew mankind, he had not, on any occasion, been the

sport of such delusion and that he had never been disappointed by anyone

but himself.'

[1013] This, and some of the other letters to Langton, were not received

by Boswell till the first volume of the second edition had been carried

through the press. He gave them as a supplement to the second volume.

The date of this letter was there wrongly given as June 27, 1758. In the

third edition it was corrected. Nevertheless the letter was misplaced as

if the wrong date were the right one. Langton, as I have shewn (_ante_,

p. 247), subscribed the articles at Oxford on July 7, 1757. He must have

come into residence, as Johnson did (_ante_, p. 58), some little while

before this subscription.

[1014] Major-General Alexander Dury, of the first regiment of

foot-guards, who fell in the gallant discharge of his duty, near St.

Cas, in the well-known unfortunate expedition against France, in 1758.

His lady and Mr. Langton's mother was sisters. He left an only son,

Lieutenant-Colonel Dury, who has a company in the same regiment.

BOSWELL. The expedition had been sent against St. Malo early in

September. Failing in the attempt, the land forces retreated to St. Cas,

where, while embarking, they were attacked by the French. About 400 of

our soldiers were made prisoners, and 600 killed and wounded. _Ann.

Reg_.i.68.

[1015] See _post_, 1770, in Dr. Maxwell's _Collectanea_.

[1016] Hawkins's _Life of Johnson_, p. 365. BOSWELL. 'In the beginning

of the year 1759 an event happened for which it might be imagined he was

well prepared, the death of his mother, who had attained the age of

ninety; but he, whose mind had acquired no firmness by the contemplation

of mortality, was as little able to sustain the shock, as he would have

been had this loss befallen him in his nonage.'

Life of Johnson, Volume 1 1709-1765 · 第 50 / 59 段