'I have lately seen Mr. Stratico, Professor of Padua, who has told me of

your quarrel with an Abbot of the Celestine order; but had not the

particulars very ready in his memory. When you write to Mr. Marsili[1103],

let him know that I remember him with kindness.

'May you, my Baretti, be very happy at Milan[1104], or some other place

nearer to, Sir,

'Your most affectionate humble servant,

'SAM. JOHNSON.'

[Page 372: The accession of George III. A.D. 1762.]

[Page 373: Johnson's pension. Ætat 53.]

The accession of George the Third to the throne of these kingdoms,

opened a new and brighter prospect to men of literary merit, who had

been honoured with no mark of royal favour in the preceding reign. His

present Majesty's education in this country, as well as his taste and

beneficence, prompted him to be the patron of science and the arts; and

early this year Johnson, having been represented to him as a very

learned and good man, without any certain provision, his Majesty was

pleased to grant him a pension of three hundred pounds a year[1105]. The

Earl of Bute, who was then Prime Minister, had the honour to announce

this instance of his Sovereign's bounty, concerning which, many and

various stories, all equally erroneous, have been propagated:

maliciously representing it as a political bribe to Johnson, to desert

his avowed principles, and become the tool of a government which he held

to be founded in usurpation. I have taken care to have it in my power to

refute them from the most authentick information. Lord Bute told me,

that Mr. Wedderburne, now Lord Loughborough, was the person who first

mentioned this subject to him[1106]. Lord Loughborough told me, that the

pension was granted to Johnson solely as the reward of his literary

merit, without any stipulation whatever, or even tacit understanding

that he should write for administration. His Lordship added, that he was

confident the political tracts which Johnson afterwards did write, as

they were entirely consonant with his own opinions, would have been

written by him though no pension had been granted to him[1107].

[Page 374: Johnson's interview with Lord Bute. A.D. 1762.]

Mr. Thomas Sheridan and Mr. Murphy, who then lived a good deal both with

him and Mr. Wedderburne, told me, that they previously talked with

Johnson upon this matter, and that it was perfectly understood by all

parties that the pension was merely honorary. Sir Joshua Reynolds told

me, that Johnson called on him after his Majesty's intention had been

notified to him, and said he wished to consult his friends as to the

propriety of his accepting this mark of the royal favour, after the

definitions which he had given in his _Dictionary_ of _pension_ and

_pensioners_[1108]. He said he would not have Sir Joshua's answer till next

day, when he would call again, and desired he might think of it. Sir

Joshua answered that he was clear to give his opinion then, that there

could be no objection to his receiving from the King a reward for

literary merit; and that certainly the definitions in his _Dictionary_

were not applicable to him. Johnson, it should seem, was satisfied, for

he did not call again till he had accepted the pension, and had waited

on Lord Bute to thank him. He then told Sir Joshua that Lord Bute said

to him expressly, 'It is not given you for anything you are to do, but

for what you have done.' His Lordship, he said, behaved in the

handsomest manner. He repeated the words twice, that he might be sure

Johnson heard them, and thus set his mind perfectly at ease. This

nobleman, who has been so virulently abused, acted with great honour in

this instance, and displayed a mind truly liberal. A minister of a more

narrow and selfish disposition would have availed himself of such an

opportunity to fix an implied obligation on a man of Johnson's powerful

talents to give him his support.

[Page 375: Murphy's account of the pension. Ætat 53.]

Mr. Murphy and the late Mr. Sheridan severally contended for the

distinction of having been the first who mentioned to Mr. Wedderburne

that Johnson ought to have a pension. When I spoke of this to Lord

Loughborough, wishing to know if he recollected the prime mover in the

business, he said, 'All his friends assisted:' and when I told him that

Mr. Sheridan strenuously asserted his claim to it, his Lordship said,

'He rang the bell.' And it is but just to add, that Mr. Sheridan told

me, that when he communicated to Dr. Johnson that a pension was to be

granted him, he replied in a fervour of gratitude, 'The English language

does not afford me terms adequate to my feelings on this occasion. I

must have recourse to the French. I am _pénétré_ with his Majesty's

goodness.' When I repeated this to Dr. Johnson, he did not contradict

it[1109].

His definitions of _pension_ and _pensioner_, partly founded on the

satirical verses of Pope[1110], which he quotes, may be generally true; and

yet every body must allow, that there may be, and have been, instances

of pensions given and received upon liberal and honourable terms. Thus,

then, it is clear, that there was nothing inconsistent or humiliating in

Johnson's accepting of a pension so unconditionally and so honourably

offered to him.

[Page 376: Johnson's letter to Lord Bute. A.D. 1762.]

But I shall not detain my readers longer by any words of my own, on a

subject on which I am happily enabled, by the favour of the Earl of

Bute, to present them with what Johnson himself wrote; his lordship

having been pleased to communicate to me a copy of the following letter

to his late father[1111], which does great honour both to the writer, and

to the noble person to whom it is addressed:

'TO THE RIGHT HONOURABLE THE EARL OF BUTE.

'MY LORD,

'When the bills[1112] were yesterday delivered to me by Mr. Wedderburne,

I was informed by him of the future favours which his Majesty has, by

your Lordship's recommendation, been induced to intend for me.

'Bounty always receives part of its value from the manner in which it is

bestowed; your Lordship's kindness includes every circumstance that can

gratify delicacy, or enforce obligation. You have conferred your favours

on a man who has neither alliance nor interest, who has not merited them

by services, nor courted them by officiousness; you have spared him the

shame of solicitation, and the anxiety of suspense.

[Page 377: A visit to Devonshire. Ætat 53.]

'What has been thus elegantly given, will, I hope, not be reproachfully

enjoyed; I shall endeavour to give your Lordship the only recompense

which generosity desires,--the gratification of finding that your

benefits are not improperly bestowed. I am, my Lord,

'Your Lordship's most obliged,

'Most obedient, and most humble servant,

'SAM. JOHNSON.'

'July 20, 1762.'

This year his friend Sir Joshua Reynolds paid a visit of some weeks to

his native country, Devonshire, in which he was accompanied by Johnson,

who was much pleased with this jaunt, and declared he had derived from

it a great accession of new ideas[1113]. He was entertained at the seats

of several noblemen and gentlemen in the West of England[1114]; but the

greatest part of the time was passed at Plymouth, where the magnificence

of the navy, the ship-building and all its circumstances, afforded him a

grand subject of contemplation. The Commissioner of the Dock-yard paid

him the compliment of ordering the yacht to convey him and his friend to

the Eddystone, to which they accordingly sailed. But the weather was so

tempestuous that they could not land[1115].

[Page 378: Johnson at Plymouth. A.D. 1762.]

Reynolds and he were at this time the guests of Dr. Mudge[1116], the

celebrated surgeon, and now physician of that place, not more

distinguished for quickness of parts and variety of knowledge, than

loved and esteemed for his amiable manners; and here Johnson formed an

acquaintance with Dr. Mudge's father, that very eminent divine, the

Reverend Zachariah Mudge[1117], Prebendary of Exeter, who was idolised

in the west, both for his excellence as a preacher and the uniform

perfect propriety of his private conduct. He preached a sermon purposely

that Johnson might hear him; and we shall see afterwards that Johnson

honoured his memory by drawing his character[1118]. While Johnson was at

Plymouth, he saw a great many of its inhabitants, and was not sparing of

his very entertaining conversation. It was here that he made that frank

and truly original confession, that 'ignorance, pure ignorance,' was the

cause of a wrong definition in his _Dictionary_ of the word _pastern_

[1119], to the no small surprise of the Lady who put the question

to him; who having the most profound reverence for his character, so as

almost to suppose him endowed with infallibility, expected to hear an

explanation (of what, to be sure, seemed strange to a common reader,)

drawn from some deep-learned source with which she was unacquainted.

[Page 379: An enemy of the Dockers. Ætat 53.]

Sir Joshua Reynolds, to whom I was obliged for my information concerning

this excursion, mentions a very characteristical anecdote of Johnson

while at Plymouth. Having observed that in consequence of the Dock-yard

a new town[1120] had arisen about two miles off as a rival to the old;

and knowing from his sagacity, and just observation of human nature, that

it is certain if a man hates at all, he will hate his next neighbour; he

concluded that this new and rising town could not but excite the envy

and jealousy of the old, in which conjecture he was very soon confirmed;

he therefore set himself resolutely on the side of the old town, the

_established_ town, in which his lot was cast, considering it as a kind

of duty to _stand by_ it. He accordingly entered warmly into its

interests, and upon every occasion talked of the _dockers_, as the

inhabitants of the new town were called, as upstarts and aliens.

Plymouth is very plentifully supplied with water by a river brought into

it from a great distance, which is so abundant that it runs to waste in

the town. The Dock, or New-town, being totally destitute of water,

petitioned Plymouth that a small portion of the conduit might be

permitted to go to them, and this was now under consideration. Johnson,

affecting to entertain the passions of the place, was violent in

opposition; and, half-laughing at himself for his pretended zeal where

he had no concern, exclaimed, 'No, no! I am against the _dockers_; I am

a Plymouth-man. Rogues! let them die of thirst. They shall not have a

drop[1121]!'

[Page 380: Johnson's third letter to Baretti. A.D. 1762.]

Lord Macartney obligingly favoured me with a copy of the following

letter, in his own hand-writing, from the original, which was found, by

the present Earl of Bute, among his father's papers.

'To THE RIGHT HONOURABLE THE EARL OF BUTE.

'MY LORD,

'That generosity, by which I was recommended to the favour of his

Majesty, will not be offended at a solicitation necessary to make that

favour permanent and effectual.

'The pension appointed to be paid me at Michaelmas I have not received,

and know not where or from whom I am to ask it. I beg, therefore, that

your Lordship will be pleased to supply Mr. Wedderburne with such

directions as may be necessary, which, I believe, his friendship will

make him think it no trouble to convey to me.

'To interrupt your Lordship, at a time like this, with such petty

difficulties, is improper and unseasonable; but your knowledge of the

world has long since taught you, that every man's affairs, however

little, are important to himself. Every man hopes that he shall escape

neglect; and, with reason, may every man, whose vices do not preclude

his claim, expect favour from that beneficence which has been extended

to,

'My Lord,

'Your Lordship's

'Most obliged

'And

'Most humble servant,

'Temple Lane 'SAM. JOHNSON.'

'Nov. 3, 1762.'

'TO MR. JOSEPH BARETTI, AT MILAN.

'London, Dec. 21, 1762.

SIR,

[Page 381: Love and marriage. Ætat 53.]

'You are not to suppose, with all your conviction of my idleness, that I

have passed all this time without writing to my Baretti. I gave a letter

to Mr. Beauclerk, who, in my opinion, and in his own, was hastening to

Naples for the recovery of his health[1122]; but he has stopped at Paris,

and I know not when he will proceed. Langton is with him.

'I will not trouble you with speculations about peace and war. The good

or ill success of battles and embassies extends itself to a very small

part of domestick life: we all have good and evil, which we feel more

sensibly than our petty part of publick miscarriage or prosperity[1123].

I am sorry for your disappointment, with which you seem more touched than

I should expect a man of your resolution and experience to have been,

did I not know that general truths are seldom applied to particular

occasions; and that the fallacy of our self-love extends itself as wide

as our interest or affections. Every man believes that mistresses are

unfaithful, and patrons capricious; but he excepts his own mistress, and

his own patron. We have all learned that greatness is negligent and

contemptuous, and that in Courts life is often languished away in

ungratified expectation; but he that approaches greatness, or glitters

in a Court, imagines that destiny has at last exempted him from the

common lot.

'Do not let such evils overwhelm you as thousands have suffered, and

thousands have surmounted; but turn your thoughts with vigour to some

other plan of life, and keep always in your mind, that, with due

submission to Providence, a man of genius has been seldom ruined but by

himself[1124]. Your Patron's weakness or insensibility will finally do

you little hurt, if he is not assisted by your own passions. Of your love

I know not the propriety, nor can estimate the power; but in love, as in

every other passion, of which hope is the essence, we ought always to

remember the uncertainty of events. There is, indeed, nothing that so

much seduces reason from vigilance, as the thought of passing life with

an amiable woman; and if all would happen that a lover fancies, I know

not what other terrestrial happiness would deserve pursuit. But love and

marriage are different states. Those who are to suffer the evils

together, and to suffer often for the sake of one another, soon lose

that tenderness of look, and that benevolence of mind, which arose from

the participation of unmingled pleasure and successive amusement. A

woman, we are sure, will not be always fair; we are not sure she will

always be virtuous: and man cannot retain through life that respect and

assiduity by which he pleases for a day or for a month. I do not,

however, pretend to have discovered that life has any thing more to be

desired than a prudent and virtuous marriage; therefore know not what

counsel to give you.

[Page 382: Johnson's Life of Collins. A.D. 1763.]

'If you can quit your imagination of love and greatness, and leave your

hopes of preferment and bridal raptures to try once more the fortune of

literature and industry, the way through France is now open[1125]. We

flatter ourselves that we shall cultivate, with great diligence, the

arts of peace; and every man will be welcome among us who can teach us

any thing we do not know[1126]. For your part, you will find all your

old friends willing to receive you.

'Reynolds still continues to increase in reputation and in riches. Miss

Williams, who very much loves you, goes on in the old way. Miss Cotterel

is still with Mrs. Porter. Miss Charlotte is married to Dean Lewis, and

has three children. Mr. Levet has married a street-walker[1127]. But the

gazette of my narration must now arrive to tell you, that Bathurst went

physician to the army, and died at the Havannah[1128].

'I know not whether I have not sent you word that Huggins[1129] and

Richardson[1130] are both dead. When we see our enemies and friends

gliding away before us, let us not forget that we are subject to the

general law of mortality, and shall soon be where our doom will be fixed

for ever.

'I pray GOD to bless you, and am, Sir,

'Your most affectionate humble servant,

'SAM. JOHNSON.'

'Write soon.'

[Page 383: A dedication to the Queen. Ætat 54.]

1763: ÆTAT. 54.--In 1763 he furnished to _The Poetical Calendar_,

published by Fawkes and Woty, a character of Collins[*], which he

afterwards ingrafted into his entire life of that admirable poet[1131],

in the collection of lives which he wrote for the body of English poetry,

formed and published by the booksellers of London. His account of the

melancholy depression with which Collins was severely afflicted, and

which brought him to his grave, is, I think, one of the most tender and

interesting passages in the whole series of his writings[1132]. He also

favoured Mr. Hoole with the Dedication of his translation of _Tasso to

the Queen_,[*] which is so happily conceived and elegantly expressed,

that I cannot but point it out to the peculiar notice of my readers[1133].

[Page 384: Boswell's youthful compositions. A.D. 1763.]

[Page 385: Johnson's quarrel with Sheridan. Ætat 54.]

This is to me a memorable year; for in it I had the happiness to obtain

the acquaintance of that extraordinary man whose memoirs I am now

writing; an acquaintance which I shall ever esteem as one of the most

fortunate circumstances in my life. Though then but two-and-twenty[1134], I

had for several years read his works with delight and instruction, and

had the highest reverence for their authour, which had grown up in my

fancy into a kind of mysterious veneration[1135], by figuring to myself a

state of solemn elevated abstraction, in which I supposed him to live in

the immense metropolis of London. Mr. Gentleman, a native of Ireland,

who passed some years in Scotland as a player, and as an instructor in

the English language, a man whose talents and worth were depressed by

misfortunes[1136], had given me a representation of the figure and manner

of DICTIONARY JOHNSON, as he was then generally called[1137]; and during

my first visit to London, which was for three months in 1760, Mr. Derrick

the poet[1138], who was Gentleman's friend and countryman, flattered me

with hopes that he would introduce me to Johnson, an honour of which I

was very ambitious. But he never found an opportunity; which made me

doubt that he had promised to do what was not in his power; till Johnson

some years afterwards told me, 'Derrick, Sir, might very well have

introduced you. I had a kindness for Derrick, and am sorry he is dead.'

In the summer of 1761 Mr. Thomas Sheridan was at Edinburgh, and

delivered lectures upon the English Language and Publick Speaking to

large and respectable audiences. I was often in his company, and heard

him frequently expatiate upon Johnson's extraordinary knowledge,

talents, and virtues, repeat his pointed sayings, describe his

particularities, and boast of his being his guest sometimes till two or

three in the morning. At his house I hoped to have many opportunities of

seeing the sage, as Mr. Sheridan obligingly assured me I should not be

disappointed.

[Page 386: Sheridan's pension. A.D. 1763.]

When I returned to London in the end of 1762, to my surprise and regret

I found an irreconcileable difference had taken place between Johnson

and Sheridan. A pension of two hundred pounds a year had been given to

Sheridan. Johnson, who, as has been already mentioned, thought

slightingly of Sheridan's art, upon hearing that he was also pensioned,

exclaimed, 'What! have they given _him_ a pension? Then it is time for

me to give up mine.' Whether this proceeded from a momentary

indignation, as if it were an affront to his exalted merit that a player

should be rewarded in the same manner with him, or was the sudden effect

of a fit of peevishness, it was unluckily said, and, indeed, cannot be

justified. Mr. Sheridan's pension was granted to him not as a player,

but as a sufferer in the cause of government, when he was manager of the

Theatre Royal in Ireland, when parties ran high in 1753[1139]. And it

must also be allowed that he was a man of literature, and had

considerably improved the arts of reading and speaking with distinctness

and propriety.

Besides, Johnson should have recollected that Mr. Sheridan taught

pronunciation to Mr. Alexander Wedderburne[1140], whose sister was

married to Sir Harry Erskine[1141], an intimate friend of Lord Bute, who

was the favourite of the King; and surely the most outrageous Whig will

not maintain, that, whatever ought to be the principle in the disposal of

_offices_, a _pension_ ought never to be granted from any bias of court

connection. Mr. Macklin[1142], indeed, shared with Mr. Sheridan the honour

of instructing Mr. Wedderburne; and though it was too late in life for a

Caledonian to acquire the genuine English cadence, yet so successful

were Mr. Wedderburne's instructors, and his own unabating endeavours,

that he got rid of the coarse part of his Scotch accent, retaining only

as much of the 'native wood-note wild[1143],' as to mark his country;

which, if any Scotchman should affect to forget, I should heartily

despise him. Notwithstanding the difficulties which are to be

encountered by those who have not had the advantage of an English

education, he by degrees formed a mode of speaking to which Englishmen

do not deny the praise of elegance. Hence his distinguished oratory,

which he exerted in his own country as an advocate in the Court of

Session, and a ruling elder of the _Kirk_, has had its fame and ample

reward, in much higher spheres. When I look back on this noble person at

Edinburgh, in situations so unworthy of his brilliant powers, and behold

LORD LOUGHBOROUGH at London, the change seems almost like one of the

metamorphoses in _Ovid_; and as his two preceptors, by refining his

utterance, gave currency to his talents, we may say in the words of that

poet, '_Nam vos mutastis_[1144],'

[Page 387: Lord Loughborough. Ætat 54.]

I have dwelt the longer upon this remarkable instance of successful

parts and assiduity; because it affords animating encouragement to other

gentlemen of North-Britain to try their fortunes in the southern part of

the Island, where they may hope to gratify their utmost ambition; and

now that we are one people by the Union, it would surely be illiberal to

maintain, that they have not an equal title with the natives of any

other part of his Majesty's dominions.

[Page 388: Sheridan's attack on Johnson. A.D. 1763.]

[Page 389: Mrs. Sheridan. Ætat 54.]

Johnson complained that a man who disliked him repeated his sarcasm to

Mr. Sheridan, without telling him what followed, which was, that after a

pause he added, 'However, I am glad that Mr. Sheridan has a pension, for

he is a very good man.' Sheridan could never forgive this hasty

contemptuous expression. It rankled in his mind; and though I informed

him of all that Johnson said, and that he would be very glad to meet him

amicably, he positively declined repeated offers which I made, and once

went off abruptly from a house where he and I were engaged to dine,

because he was told that Dr. Johnson was to be there[1145]. I have no

sympathetick feeling with such persevering resentment. It is painful

when there is a breach between those who have lived together socially

and cordially; and I wonder that there is not, in all such cases, a

mutual wish that it should be healed. I could perceive that Mr. Sheridan

was by no means satisfied with Johnson's acknowledging him to be a good

man[1146]. That could not sooth his injured vanity. I could not but smile,

at the same time that I was offended, to observe Sheridan in _The Life

of Swift_[1147], which he afterwards published, attempting, in the

writhings of his resentment, to depreciate Johnson, by characterising

him as 'A writer of gigantick fame in these days of little men;' that

very Johnson whom he once so highly admired and venerated.

[Page 390: Mr. Thomas Davies. A.D. 1763.]

Life of Johnson, Volume 1 1709-1765 · 第 23 / 59 段