'SAM. JOHNSON.'

'June 28, 1757[1013].'

'TO BENNET LANGTON, ESQ., AT LANGTON, NEAR SPILSBY,

LINCOLNSHIRE.

'DEAR SIR,

'I should be sorry to think that what engrosses the attention of my

friend, should have no part of mine. Your mind is now full of the fate

of Dury[1014]; but his fate is past, and nothing remains but to try what

reflection will suggest to mitigate the terrours of a violent death,

which is more formidable at the first glance, than on a nearer and more

steady view. A violent death is never very painful; the only danger is

lest it should be unprovided. But if a man can be supposed to make no

provision for death in war, what can be the state that would have

awakened him to the care of futurity? When would that man have prepared

himself to die, who went to seek death without preparation? What then

can be the reason why we lament more him that dies of a wound, than him

that dies of a fever? A man that languishes with disease, ends his life

with more pain, but with less virtue; he leaves no example to his

friends, nor bequeaths any honour to his descendants. The only reason

why we lament a soldier's death, is, that we think he might have lived

longer; yet this cause of grief is common to many other kinds of death

which are not so passionately bewailed. The truth is, that every death

is violent which is the effect of accident; every death, which is not

gradually brought on by the miseries of age, or when life is

extinguished for any other reason than that it is burnt out. He that

dies before sixty, of a cold or consumption, dies, in reality, by a

violent death; yet his death is borne with patience only because the

cause of his untimely end is silent and invisible. Let us endeavour to

see things as they are, and then enquire whether we ought to complain.

Whether to see life as it is, will give us much consolation, I know not;

but the consolation which is drawn from truth, if any there be, is solid

and durable; that which may be derived from errour must be, like its

original, fallacious and fugitive. I am, dear, dear Sir, your most

humble servant,

'SAM. JOHNSON.'

'Sept. 21, 1758.'

[Page 339: The death of Johnson's mother. Ætat 50.]

1759: ÆTAT. 50.--In 1759, in the month of January, his mother died at

the great age of ninety, an event which deeply affected him[1015]; not

that 'his mind had acquired no firmness by the contemplation of

mortality[1016];' but that his reverential affection for her was not

abated by years, as indeed he retained all his tender feelings even to

the latest period of his life[1017]. I have been told that he regretted

much his not having gone to visit his mother for several years, previous

to her death[1018]. But he was constantly engaged in literary labours which

confined him to London; and though he had not the comfort of seeing his

aged parent, he contributed liberally to her support[1019].

[Page 340: Rasselas. A.D. 1759.]

Soon after this event, he wrote his _Rasselas_[1020], _Prince of

Abyssinia_; concerning the publication of which Sir John Hawkins guesses

vaguely and idly[1021], instead of having taken the trouble to inform

himself with authentick precision. Not to trouble my readers with a

repetition of the Knight's reveries, I have to mention, that the late

Mr. Strahan the printer told me, that Johnson wrote it, that with the

profits he might defray the expence of his mother's funeral, and pay

some little debts which she had left. He told Sir Joshua Reynolds that

he composed it in the evenings of one week, sent it to the press in

portions as it was written, and had never since read it over[1022]. Mr.

Strahan, Mr. Johnston, and Mr. Dodsley purchased it for a hundred

pounds[1023], but afterwards paid him twenty-five pounds more, when it came

to a second edition.

[Page 342: Rasselas and Candide. A.D. 1759.]

Considering the large sums which have been received for compilations,

and works requiring not much more genius than compilations[1024], we cannot

but wonder at the very low price which he was content to receive for

this admirable performance; which, though he had written nothing else,

would have rendered his name immortal in the world of literature. None

of his writings has been so extensively diffused over Europe; for it has

been translated into most, if not all, of the modern languages[1025]. This

Tale, with all the charms of oriental imagery, and all the force and

beauty of which the English language is capable, leads us through the

most important scenes of human life, and shews us that this stage of our

being is full of 'vanity and vexation of spirit[1026].' To those who look

no further than the present life, or who maintain that human nature has

not fallen from the state in which it was created, the instruction of

this sublime story will be of no avail. But they who think justly, and

feel with strong sensibility, will listen with eagerness and admiration

to its truth and wisdom. Voltaire's _Candide_, written to refute the

system of Optimism, which it has accomplished with brilliant success, is

wonderfully similar in its plan and conduct to Johnson's _Rasselas_;

insomuch, that I have heard Johnson say[1027], that if they had not been

published so closely one after the other that there was not time for

imitation, it would have been in vain to deny that the scheme of that

which came latest was taken from the other. Though the proposition

illustrated by both these works was the same, namely, that in our

present state there is more evil than good, the intention of the writers

was very different. Voltaire, I am afraid, meant only by wanton

profaneness to obtain a sportive victory over religion, and to discredit

the belief of a superintending Providence: Johnson meant, by shewing the

unsatisfactory nature of things temporal, to direct the hopes of man to

things eternal. _Rasselas_, as was observed to me by a very accomplished

lady, may be considered as a more enlarged and more deeply philosophical

discourse in prose, upon the interesting truth, which in his _Vanity of

Human Wishes_ he had so successfully enforced in verse.

The fund of thinking which this work contains is such, that almost every

sentence of it may furnish a subject of long meditation. I am not

satisfied if a year passes without my having read it through; and at

every perusal, my admiration of the mind which produced it is so highly

raised, that I can scarcely believe that I had the honour of enjoying

the intimacy of such a man.

[Page 343: Apparitions. Ætat 50.]

I restrain myself from quoting passages from this excellent work, or

even referring to them, because I should not know what to select, or

rather, what to omit. I shall, however, transcribe one, as it shews how

well he could state the arguments of those who believe in the appearance

of departed spirits; a doctrine which it is a mistake to suppose that he

himself ever positively held[1028]:

'If all your fear be of apparitions, (said the Prince,) I will promise

you safety: there is no danger from the dead; he that is once buried

will be seen no more.

'That the dead are seen no more, (said Imlac,) I will not undertake to

maintain, against the concurrent and unvaried testimony of all ages, and

of all nations. There is no people, rude or learned, among whom

apparitions of the dead are not related and believed. This opinion,

which prevails[1029] as far as human nature is diffused, could become

universal only by its truth; those that never heard of one another,

would not have agreed in a tale which nothing but experience can make

credible. That it is doubted by single cavillers, can very little weaken

the general evidence; and some who deny it with their tongues, confess

it by their fears.'

Notwithstanding my high admiration of _Rasselas_, I will not maintain

that the 'morbid melancholy[1030]' in Johnson's constitution may not,

perhaps, have made life appear to him more insipid and unhappy than it

generally is; for I am sure that he had less enjoyment from it than I

have. Yet, whatever additional shade his own particular sensations may

have thrown on his representation of life, attentive observation and

close enquiry have convinced me, that there is too much of reality in

the gloomy picture. The truth, however, is, that we judge of the

happiness and misery of life differently at different times, according

to the state of our changeable frame. I always remember a remark made to

me by a Turkish lady, educated in France, '_Ma foi, Monsieur, notre

bonheur dépend de la façon que notre sang circule_.' This have I learnt

from a pretty hard course of experience, and would, from sincere

benevolence, impress upon all who honour this book with a perusal, that

until a steady conviction is obtained, that the present life is an

imperfect state, and only a passage to a better, if we comply with the

divine scheme of progressive improvement; and also that it is a part of

the mysterious plan of Providence, that intellectual beings must 'be

made perfect through suffering[1031];' there will be a continual recurrence

of disappointment and uneasiness. But if we walk with hope in 'the

mid-day sun' of revelation, our temper and disposition will be such,

that the comforts and enjoyments in our way will be relished, while we

patiently support the inconveniences and pains. After much speculation

and various reasonings, I acknowledge myself convinced of the truth of

Voltaire's conclusion, '_Après tout c èst un monde passable_[1032].' But we

must not think too deeply;

'Where ignorance is bliss, 'tis folly to be wise[1033],'

is, in many respects, more than poetically just. Let us cultivate, under

the command of good principles, '_la théorie des sensations agréables_;'

and, as Mr. Burke once admirably counselled a grave and anxious

gentleman, 'live pleasant[1034].'

[Page 344: 'Live pleasant.' A.D. 1759.]

The effect of _Rasselas_, and of Johnson's other moral tales, is thus

beautifully illustrated by Mr. Courtenay:

'Impressive truth, in splendid fiction drest,

Checks the vain wish, and calms the troubled breast;

O'er the dark mind a light celestial throws,

And sooths the angry passions to repose;

As oil effus'd illumes and smooths the deep,

When round the bark the swelling surges sweep[1035].'

[Page 345: The Idler pirated. Ætat 50.]

It will be recollected, that during all this year he carried on his

Idler[1036], and, no doubt, was proceeding, though slowly, in his edition

of _Shakspeare_. He, however, from that liberality which never failed,

when called upon to assist other labourers in literature, found time to

translate for Mrs. Lennox's English version of Brumoy, 'A Dissertation

on the Greek Comedy,'[dagger] and 'The General Conclusion of the

book.'[dagger]

An inquiry into the state of foreign countries was an object that seems

at all times to have interested Johnson. Hence Mr. Newbery found no

great difficulty in persuading him to write the Introduction[*] to a

collection of voyages and travels published by him under the title of

_The World Displayed_; the first volume of which appeared this year, and

the remaining volumes in subsequent years.

[Page 346: Parental tyranny. A.D. 1759.]

I would ascribe to this year[1037] the following letter to a son of one of

his early friends at Lichfield, Mr. Joseph Simpson, Barrister, and

authour of a tract entitled _Reflections on the Study of the Law_.

[Page 347: An excursion to Oxford. Ætat 50.]

'If you married imprudently, you miscarried at your own hazard, at an

age when you had a right of choice. It would be hard if the man might

not choose his own wife, who has a right to plead before the Judges of

his country.

'If your imprudence has ended in difficulties and inconveniences, you

are yourself to support them; and, with the help of a little better

health, you would support them and conquer them. Surely, that want which

accident and sickness produces, is to be supported in every region of

humanity, though there were neither friends nor fathers in the world.

You have certainly from your father the highest claim of charity, though

none of right; and therefore I would counsel you to omit no decent nor

manly degree of importunity. Your debts in the whole are not large, and

of the whole but a small part is troublesome. Small debts are like small

shot; they are rattling on every side, and can scarcely be escaped

without a wound: great debts are like cannon; of loud noise, but little

danger. You must, therefore, be enabled to discharge petty debts, that

you may have leisure, with security, to struggle with the rest. Neither

the great nor little debts disgrace you. I am sure you have my esteem

for the courage with which you contracted them, and the spirit with

which you endure them. I wish my esteem could be of more use. I have

been invited, or have invited myself, to several parts of the kingdom;

and will not incommode my dear Lucy by coming to Lichfield, while her

present lodging is of any use to her. I hope, in a few days, to be at

leisure, and to make visits. Whither I shall fly is matter of no

importance. A man unconnected is at home every where; unless he may be

said to be at home no where. I am sorry, dear Sir, that where you have

parents, a man of your merits should not have an home. I wish I could

give it you. I am, my dear Sir,

'Affectionately yours,

'SAM. JOHNSON.'

He now refreshed himself by an excursion to Oxford, of which the

following short characteristical notice, in his own words, is

preserved:--

'----[1039] is now making tea for me. I have been in my gown ever since I

came here[1040]. It was, at my first coming, quite new and handsome. I have

swum thrice, which I had disused for many years. I have proposed to

Vansittart[1041], climbing over the wall, but he has refused me. And I have

clapped my hands till they are sore, at Dr. King's speech[1042].'

[Page 348: The great CHAM of literature. A.D. 1759.]

His negro servant, Francis Barber, having left him, and been some time

at sea, not pressed as has been supposed, but with his own consent, it

appears from a letter to John Wilkes, Esq., from Dr. Smollet, that his

master kindly interested himself in procuring his release from a state

of life of which Johnson always expressed the utmost abhorrence. He

said, 'No man will be a sailor who has contrivance enough to get himself

into a jail; for being in a ship is being in a jail, with the chance of

being drowned[1043].' And at another time, 'A man in a jail has more room,

better food, and commonly better company[1044].' The letter was as

follows:--

[Page 349: Johnson's black servant at sea. Ætat 50.]

'Chelsea, March 16, 1759.

'DEAR SIR,

'I am again your petitioner, in behalf of that great CHAM[1045] of

literature, Samuel Johnson. His black servant, whose name is Francis

Barber, has been pressed on board the Stag Frigate, Captain Angel, and

our lexicographer is in great distress. He says the boy is a sickly lad,

of a delicate frame, and particularly subject to a malady in his throat,

which renders him very unfit for his Majesty's service. You know what

manner of animosity the said Johnson has against you[1046]; and I dare say

you desire no other opportunity of resenting it than that of laying him

under an obligation. He was humble enough to desire my assistance on

this occasion, though he and I were never cater-cousins; and I gave him

to understand that I would make application to my friend Mr. Wilkes,

who, perhaps, by his interest with Dr. Hay and Mr. Elliot, might be able

to procure the discharge of his lacquey. It would be superfluous to say

more on the subject, which I leave to your own consideration; but I

cannot let slip this opportunity of declaring that I am, with the most

inviolable esteem and attachment, dear Sir,

'Your affectionate, obliged, humble servant,

'T. SMOLLET.'

Mr. Wilkes, who upon all occasions has acted, as a private gentleman,

with most polite liberality, applied to his friend Sir George Hay, then

one of the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty; and Francis Barber was

discharged, as he has told me, without any wish of his own. He found his

old master in Chambers in the Inner Temple[1047], and returned to his

service.

[Page 350: Life in Inner Temple-lane. A.D. 1759.]

What particular new scheme of life Johnson had in view this year, I have

not discovered; but that he meditated one of some sort, is clear from

his private devotions, in which we find[1048], 'the change of outward

things which I am now to make;' and, 'Grant me the grace of thy Holy

Spirit, that the course which I am now beginning may proceed according

to thy laws, and end in the enjoyment of thy favour.' But he did not, in

fact, make any external or visible change[1049].

[Page 351: Blackfriars-bridge. Ætat 50.]

At this time, there being a competition among the architects of London

to be employed in the building of Blackfriars-bridge, a question was

very warmly agitated whether semicircular or elliptical arches were

preferable. In the design offered by Mr. Mylne the elliptical form was

adopted, and therefore it was the great object of his rivals to attack

it. Johnson's regard for his friend Mr. Gwyn induced him to engage in

this controversy against Mr. Mylne[1050]; and after being at considerable

pains to study the subject, he wrote three several letters in the

_Gazetteer_, in opposition to his plan.

If it should be remarked that this was a controversy which lay quite out

of Johnson's way, let it be remembered, that after all, his employing

his powers of reasoning and eloquence upon a subject which he had

studied on the moment, is not more strange than what we often observe in

lawyers, who, as _Quicquid agunt homines_[1051] is the matter of law-suits,

are sometimes obliged to pick up a temporary knowledge of an art or

science, of which they understood nothing till their brief was

delivered, and appear to be much masters of it. In like manner, members

of the legislature frequently introduce and expatiate upon subjects of

which they have informed themselves for the occasion.

[Page 353: Relief of the French Prisoners. Ætat 51.]

1760: ÆTAT. 51].--In 1760 he wrote _An Address of the Painters to

George III. on his Accession to the Throne of these Kingdoms_,[dagger]

which no monarch ever ascended with more sincere congratulations from

his people. Two generations of foreign princes had prepared their minds

to rejoice in having again a King, who gloried in being 'born a

Briton[1052].' He also wrote for Mr. Baretti, the dedication[dagger] of

his _Italian and English Dictionary_ to the Marquis of Abreu, then

Envoy-Extraordinary from Spain at the Court of Great Britain.

[Page 354: Mary Queen of Scots. A.D. 1760.]

Johnson was now neither very idle, nor very busy with his _Shakspeare_;

for I can find no other public composition by him except an introduction

to the proceedings of the Committee for cloathing the French

Prisoners[1053];[*] one of the many proofs that he was ever awake to the

calls of humanity; and an account which he gave in the Gentlemen's

Magazine of Mr. Tytler's acute and able vindication of Mary Queen of

Scots.[*] The generosity of Johnson's feelings shines forth in the

following sentence:--

"It has now been fashionable, for near half a century, to defame and

vilify the house of Stuart and, to exalt and magnify the reign of

Elizabeth. The Stuarts have found few apologists, for the dead cannot

pay for praise; and who will, without reward, oppose the tide of

popularity? Yet there remains still among us, not wholly extinguished, a

zeal for truth, a desire of establishing right in opposition to

fashion[1054]".

In this year I have not discovered a single private letter, written by

him to any of his friends. It should seem, however, that he had at this

period a floating intention of writing a history of the recent and

wonderful successes of the British arms in all quarters of the globe;

for among his resolutions or memorandums, September 18, 'send for books

for Hist. of War[1055].' How much is it to be regretted that this intention

was not fulfilled. His majestick expression would have carried down to

the latest posterity the glorious achievements of his country with the

same fervent glow which they produced on the mind of the time. He would

have been under no temptation to deviate in any degree from truth, which

he held very sacred, or to take a licence, which a learned divine told

me he once seemed, in a conversation, jocularly to allow to historians.

[Page 355: Consecrated lies. Ætat 51.]

'There are (said he) inexcusable lies, and consecrated lies. For

instance, we are told that on the arrival of the news of the unfortunate

battle of Fontenoy, every heart beat, and every eye was in tears. Now we

know, that no man eat his dinner the worse[1056], but there _should_ have

been all this concern; and to say there _was_, (smiling) may be reckoned

a consecrated lie.'

This year Mr. Murphy, having thought himself ill-treated by the Reverend

Dr. Francklin, who was one of the writers of _The Critical Review_,

published an indignant vindication in _A Poetical Epistle to Samuel

Johnson, A.M_., in which he compliments Johnson in a just and elegant

manner:

Transcendant Genius! whose prolific vein

Ne'er knew the frigid poet's toil and pain;

To whom APOLLO opens all his store,

And every Muse presents her sacred lore;

Say, pow'rful JOHNSON, whence thy verse is fraught

With so much grace and such energy of thought;

Whether thy JUVENAL instructs the age

In chaster numbers, and new-points his rage;

Or fair IRENE sees, alas! too late.

Her innocence exchang'd for guilty state;

Whatever you write, in every golden line

Sublimity and elegance combine;

Thy nervous phrase impresses every soul,

While harmony gives rapture to the whole.'

[Page 356: Arthur Murphy. A.D. 1760.]

Again, towards the conclusion:

'Thou then, my friend, who seest the dang'rous strife

In which some demon bids me plunge my life,

To the Aonian fount direct my feet,

Say where the Nine thy lonely musings meet?

Where warbles to thy ear the sacred throng,

Thy moral sense, thy dignity of song?

Tell, for you can, by what unerring art

You wake to finer feelings every heart;

In each bright page some truth important give,

And bid to future times thy RAMBLER live[1057]?

I take this opportunity to relate the manner in which an acquaintance

first commenced between Dr. Johnson and Mr. Murphy. During the

publication of _The Grays-Inn Journal_, a periodical paper which was

successfully carried on by Mr. Murphy alone, when a very young man, he

happened to be in the country with Mr. Foote; and having mentioned that

he was obliged to go to London in order to get ready for the press in

one of the numbers of that _Journal_, Foote said to him, 'You need not

to go on that account. Here is a French magazine, in which you will find

a very pretty oriental tale; translate that, and send it to your

printer.' Mr. Murphy having read the tale, was highly pleased with it,

and followed Foote's advice. When he returned to town, this tale was

pointed out to him in _The Rambler_, from whence it had been translated

into the French magazine. Mr. Murphy then waited upon Johnson, to

explain this curious incident. His talents, literature, and

gentleman-like manners, were soon perceived by Johnson, and a friendship

was formed which was never broken[1058].

[Page 357: Letter to Mr. Langston. Ætat 51.]

'To BENNET LANGTON, ESQ., AT LANGTON, NEAR SPILSBY, LINCOLNSHIRE.

'DEAR SIR,

'You that travel about the world, have more materials for letters, than

I who stay at home; and should, therefore, write with frequency equal to

your opportunities. I should be glad to have all England surveyed by

you, if you would impart your observations in narratives as agreeable as

your last. Knowledge is always to be wished to those who can communicate

it well. While you have been riding and running, and seeing the tombs of

the learned, and the camps of the valiant, I have only staid at home,

and intended to do great things, which I have not done. Beau[1059] went

away to Cheshire, and has not yet found his way back. Chambers passed

the vacation at Oxford.

Life of Johnson, Volume 1 1709-1765 · 第 21 / 59 段