CHAPTER XIV.

SUCCESSION OF PHILOSOPHERS IN GREECE.

The Greeks say, that after Orpheus and Linus, and the most ancient

of the poets that appeared among them, the seven, called wise, were

the first that were admired for their wisdom. Of whom four were of

Asia--Thales of Miletus, and Bias of Priene, Pittacus of Mitylene, and

Cleobulus of Lindos; and two of Europe, Solon the Athenian, and Chilon

the Lacedæmonian; and the seventh, some say, was Periander of Corinth;

others, Anacharsis the Scythian; others, Epimenides the Cretan, whom

Paul knew as a Greek prophet, whom he mentions in the Epistle to Titus,

where he speaks thus: “One of themselves, a prophet of their own, said,

_The Cretans are always liars, evil beasts, slow bellies._ And

this witness is true.”[925] You see how even to the prophets of the

Greeks he attributes something of the truth, and is not ashamed, when

discoursing for the edification of some and the shaming of others,

to make use of Greek poems. Accordingly to the Corinthians (for this

is not the only instance), while discoursing on the resurrection of

the dead, he makes use of a tragic Iambic line, when he said, “What

advantageth it me if the dead are not raised? Let us eat and drink, for

to-morrow we die. Be not deceived;

_Evil communications corrupt good manners._”[926]

Others have enumerated Acusilaus the Argive among the seven wise

men; and others, Pherecydes of Syros. And Plato substitutes Myso the

Chenian for Periander, whom he deemed unworthy of wisdom, on account

of his having reigned as a tyrant. That the wise men among the Greeks

flourished after the age of Moses, will, a little after, be shown. But

the style of philosophy among them, as Hebraic and enigmatical, is now

to be considered. They adopted brevity, as suited for exhortation, and

most useful. Even Plato says, that of old this mode was purposely in

vogue among all the Greeks, especially the Lacedæmonians and Cretans,

who enjoyed the best laws.

The expression, “Know thyself,” some supposed to be Chilon’s. But

Chamæleon, in his book _About the Gods_, ascribes it to Thales;

Aristotle to the Pythian. It may be an injunction to the pursuit of

knowledge. For it is not possible to know the parts without the essence

of the whole; and one must study the genesis of the universe, that

thereby we may be able to learn the nature of man. Again, to Chilon the

Lacedæmonian they attribute, “Let nothing be too much.”[927] Strato,

in his book _Of Inventions_, ascribes the apophthegm to Stratodemus of

Tegea. Didymus assigns it to Solon; as also to Cleobulus the saying, “A

middle course is best.” And the expression, “Come under a pledge, and

mischief is at hand,” Cleomenes says, in his book _Concerning Hesiod_,

was uttered before by Homer in the lines:

“Wretched pledges, for the wretched, to be pledged.”[928]

The Aristotelians judge it to be Chilon’s; but Didymus says the advice

was that of Thales. Then, next in order, the saying, “All men are bad,”

or, “The most of men are bad” (for the same apophthegm is expressed

in two ways), Sotades the Byzantian says that it was Bias’s. And the

aphorism, “Practice conquers everything,”[929] they will have it to

be Periander’s; and likewise the advice, “Know the opportunity,” to

have been a saying of Pittacus. Solon made laws for the Athenians,

Pittacus for the Mitylenians. And at a late date, Pythagoras, the pupil

of Pherecydes, first called himself a philosopher. Accordingly, after

the fore-mentioned three men, there were three schools of philosophy,

named after the places where they lived: the Italic from Pythagoras,

the Ionic from Thales, the Eleatic from Xenophanes. Pythagoras was

a Samian, the son of Mnesarchus, as Hippobotus says: according to

Aristoxenus, in his life of Pythagoras and Aristarchus and Theopompus,

he was a Tuscan; and according to Neanthes, a Syrian or a Tyrian. So

that Pythagoras was, according to the most, of barbarian extraction.

Thales, too, as Leander and Herodotus relate, was a Phœnician; as

some suppose, a Milesian. He alone seems to have met the prophets of

the Egyptians. But no one is described as his teacher, nor is any one

mentioned as the teacher of Pherecydes of Syros, who had Pythagoras

as his pupil. But the Italic philosophy, that of Pythagoras, grew old

in Metapontum in Italy. Anaximander of Miletus, the son of Praxiades,

succeeded Thales; and was himself succeeded by Anaximenes of Miletus,

the son of Eurustratus; after whom came Anaxagoras of Clazomenæ, the

son of Hegesibulus. [930] He transferred his school from Ionia to

Athens. He was succeeded by Archelaus, whose pupil Socrates was.

“From these turned aside, the stone-mason;

Talker about laws; the enchanter of the Greeks,”

says Timon in his _Satirical Poems_, on account of his quitting physics

for ethics. Antisthenes, after being a pupil of Socrates, introduced

the Cynic philosophy; and Plato withdrew to the Academy. Aristotle,

after studying philosophy under Plato, withdrew to the Lyceum, and

founded the Peripatetic sect. He was succeeded by Theophrastus, who

was succeeded by Strato, and he by Lycon, then Critolaus, and then

Diodorus. Speusippus was the successor of Plato; his successor was

Xenocrates; and the successor of the latter, Polemo. And the disciples

of Polemo were Crates and Crantor, in whom the old Academy founded by

Plato ceased. Arcesilaus was the associate of Crantor; from whom, down

to Hegesilaus, the Middle Academy flourished. Then Carneades succeeded

Hegesilaus, and others came in succession. The disciple of Crates

was Zeno of Citium, the founder of the Stoic sect. He was succeeded

by Cleanthes; and the latter by Chrysippus, and others after him.

Xenophanes of Colophon was the founder of the Eleatic school, who,

Timæus says, lived in the time of Hiero, lord of Sicily, and Epicharmus

the poet; and Apollodorus says that he was born in the fortieth

Olympiad, and reached to the times of Darius and Cyrus. Parmenides,

accordingly, was the disciple of Xenophanes, and Zeno of him; then came

Leucippus, and then Democritus. Disciples of Democritus were Protagoras

of Abdera, and Metrodorus of Chios, whose pupil was Diogenes of Smyrna;

and his again Anaxarchus, and his Pyrrho, and his Nausiphanes. Some say

that Epicurus was a scholar of his.

Such, in an epitome, is the succession of the philosophers among the

Greeks. The periods of the originators of their philosophy are now to

be specified successively, in order that, by comparison, we may show

that the Hebrew philosophy was older by many generations.

It has been said of Xenophanes that he was the founder of the Eleatic

philosophy. And Eudemus, in the _Astrological Histories_, says

that Thales foretold the eclipse of the sun, which took place at the

time that the Medians and the Lydians fought, in the reign of Cyaxares

the father of Astyages over the Medes, and of Alyattus the son of

Crœsus over the Lydians. Herodotus in his first book agrees with him.

The date is about the fiftieth Olympiad. Pythagoras is ascertained to

have lived in the days of Polycrates the tyrant, about the sixty-second

Olympiad. Mnesiphilus is described as a follower of Solon, and was a

contemporary of Themistocles. Solon therefore flourished about the

forty-sixth Olympiad. For Heraclitus, the son of Bauso, persuaded

Melancomas the tyrant to abdicate his sovereignty. He despised the

invitation of king Darius to visit the Persians.

The writings of Clement of Alexandria, Vol. 1 (of 2) · 第 14 / 29 章