EARLY HISTORY OF THE TELEGRAPH.

Although the electric telegraph is, comparatively speaking, a recent

invention, yet methods of communication at a distance, by means of

signals, have probably existed in all ages and in all nations. There

is reason to believe that among the Greeks a system of telegraphy was

in use, as the burning of Troy was certainly known in Greece very soon

after it happened, and before any person had returned from Troy.

Polybius names the different instruments used by the ancients for

communicating information--"pyrsia," because the signals were always

made by means of fire lights. At first they communicated information

of events in an imperfect manner, but a new method was invented by

Cleoxenus, which was much improved by Polybius, as he himself informs

us, and which may be described as follows:

Take the letters of the alphabet and arrange them on a board in five

columns, each column containing five letters; then the man who signals

would hold up with his left hand a number of torches which would

represent the number of the column from which the letter is to be

taken, and with his right hand a number of torches that will represent

the particular letter in that column that is to be taken. It is thus

easy to understand how the letters of a short sentence are

communicated from station to station as far as required. This is the

pyrsia or telegraph of Polybius.

It seems that the Romans had a method of telegraphing in their walled

cities, either by a hollow formed in the masonry, or by a tube fixed

thereto so as to confine the sound, in order to convey information to

any part they liked. This method of communicating is in the present

age frequently employed in the well known speaking tubes. It does not

appear that the moderns had thought of such a thing as a telegraph

until 1661, when the Marquis of Worcester, in his "Century of

Inventions," affirmed that he had discovered a method by which a man

could hold discourse with his correspondent as far as they could

reach, by night as well as by day; he did not, however, describe this

invention.

Dr. Hooke delivered a discourse before the Royal Society in 1684,

showing how to communicate at great distances. In this discourse he

asserts the possibility of conveying intelligence from one place to

another at a distance of 120 miles as rapidly as a man can write what

he would have sent. He takes to his aid the then recent invention of

the telescope, and explains how characters exposed at one station on

the top of one hill may be made visible to the next station on the top

of the next hill. He invented twenty-four simple characters, each

formed of a combination of three deal boards, each character

representing a letter by the use of cords; these characters were

pushed from behind a screen and exposed, and then withdrawn behind the

screen again. It was not, however, until the French revolution that

the telegraph was applied to practical purposes; but about the end of

1703 telegraphic communication was established between Paris and the

frontiers, and shortly afterward telegraphs were introduced into

England.

The history of the invention and introduction of the electric

telegraph by Prof. Morse is one of inexhaustible interest, and every

incident relating to it is worthy of preservation. The incidents

described below will be found of special interest. The article is from

the pen of the late Judge Neilson Poe, and was the last paper written

by him. He prepared it during his recent illness, the letter embodied

in it from Mr. Latrobe being of course obtained at the time of its

date. It is as follows:

On the 5th of April, 1843, when the monthly meeting of the directors

of the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company was about to adjourn, the

President, the Hon. Louis McLane, rose with a paper in his hand which

he said he had almost overlooked, and which the Secretary would read.

It proved to be an application from Prof. Morse for the privilege of

laying the wires of his electric telegraph along the line of the

railroad between Baltimore and Washington, and was accompanied by a

communication from B.H. Latrobe, Esq., Chief Engineer, recommending

the project as worthy of encouragement.

On motion of John Spear Nicholas, seconded by the Hon. John P.

Kennedy, the following resolution was then considered:

_Resolved_, "That the President be authorized to afford Mr. Morse such

facilities as may be requisite to give his invention a proper trial

upon the Washington road, provided in his opinion and in that of the

engineer it can be done without injury to the road and without

embarrassment to the operations of the company, and provided Mr. Morse

will concede to the company the use of the telegraph upon the road

without expense, and reserving to the company the right of

discontinuing the use if, _upon experiment_, it should prove _in any

manner injurious_."

"Whatever," said Mr. McLane, "may be our individual opinions as to the

feasibility of Mr. Morse's invention, it seems to me that it is our

duty to concede to him the privilege he asks, and to lend him all the

aid in our power, especially as the resolution carefully protects the

company against all present or future injury to its works, and secures

us the right of requiring its removal at any time."

[In view of the fact that no railroad can now be run safely without

the aid of the telegraph, the cautious care with which the right to

remove it if it should become a nuisance was reserved, strikes one at

this day as nearly ludicrous.]

A short pause ensued, and the assent of the company was about to be

assumed, when one of the older directors, famed for the vigilance with

which he watched even the most trivial measure, begged to be heard.

He admitted that the rights and interests of the work were all

carefully guarded by the terms of the resolution, and that the company

was not called upon to lay out any of its means for the promotion of

the scheme. But notwithstanding all this, he did not feel, as a

conscientious man, that he could, without further examination, give

his vote for the resolution. He knew that this idea of Mr. Morse,

however plausible it might appear to theorists and dreamers, and

so-called men of science, was regarded by all practical people as

destined, like many other similar projects, to certain failure, and

must consequently result in loss and possibly ruin to Mr. Morse. For

one, he felt conscientiously scrupulous in giving a vote which would

aid or tempt a visionary enthusiast to ruin himself.

Fortunately, the views of this cautious, practical man did not

prevail. A few words from the mover of the resolution, Mr. Nicholas,

who still lives to behold the wonders he helped to create, and from

Mr. Kennedy, without whose aid the appropriation would not have passed

the House of Representatives, relieved the other directors from all

fear of contributing to Mr. Morse's ruin, and the resolution was

adopted. Of the President and thirty directors who took part in this

transaction, only three, Samuel W. Smith, John Spear Nicholas, and the

writer, survive. Under it Morse at once entered upon that test of his

invention whose fruits are now enjoyed by the people of all the

continents.

It was not, however, until the spring of 1844 that he had his line and

its appointments in such a condition as to allow the transmission of

messages between the two cities, and it was in May of that year that

the incident occurred which has chiefly led to the writing of this

paper.

Scientific American Supplement, No. 441, June 14, 1884. · 第 35 / 60 题