THE DEFENSE
The case for the defense opened on Monday morning of April 2nd when
Vanderveer, directly facing the judge and witness chair from the
position vacated by the prosecution counsel, moved for a directed
verdict of not guilty on the ground that there had been an absolute
failure of evidence upon the question of conspiracy, any conspiracy of
which murder was either directly or indirectly an incident, and there
was no evidence whatever to charge the defendant directly as a principal
in causing the death of Jefferson Beard. The motion was denied and an
exception taken to the ruling of the court.
Fred Moore made the opening statement for the defense. In his speech he
briefly outlined the situation that had existed in Everett up to and
including November 5th and explained to the jury the forces lined up
against each other in Everett's industrial warfare. Not for an instant
did the attention of the jury flag during the recital.
Herbert Mahler, secretary of the I. W. W. in Seattle during the series
of outrages in Everett, was the first witness placed upon the stand.
Mahler told of the lumber workers' convention and the sending of
organizer James Rowan to make a survey of the industrial situation in
the lumber centers, Everett being the first point because of its
proximity to Seattle and not by reason of any strikes that may have
existed there. The methods of conducting the free speech fight, the
avoidance of secrecy, the ardent desire for publicity of the methods of
the lumber trust as well as the tactics of the I. W. W., were clearly
explained.
Cooley cross-examined Mahler regarding the song book with reference to
the advocacy and use of sabotage, asking the witness:
"How about throwing a pitchfork into a threshing machine? Would that be
all right?"
"There are circumstances when it would be, I suppose," replied Mahler.
"If there was a farmer deputy who had been at Beverly Park, I think they
certainly would have a right to destroy his threshing machine."
"You think that would justify it?" inquired Cooley.
"Yes," said the witness, "I think that if the man had abused his power
as an officer and the person he abused had no other way of getting even
with him and that justice was denied him in the courts, I fully believe
that he would be. That would not hurt anybody; it would only hurt his
pocketbook."
"Now what is this Joe Hill Memorial Edition?"
"Joe Hillstrom, known as Joe Hill, had written a number of songs in the
I. W. W. Song Book and he was murdered in Utah and the song book was
gotten out in memory of him," responded Mahler.
"He was executed after having been convicted of murder in the first
degree, and sentenced to death. And you say he was murdered?" said
Cooley.
"Yes," said Mahler with emphasis. "Our contention has been that
Hillstrom did not have a fair trial and we are quite capable of proving
it. I may say that President Wilson interceded in his behalf and was
promptly turned down by Governor Spry of Utah. Hillstrom was offered a
commutation of sentence and he refused to take it. He wanted a retrial
or an acquittal. When the President of the United States had interceded
with the Governor of Utah, when various labor organizations asked that
he be given a retrial, and a man's life is to be taken from him, and
people all over the country ask for a retrial, that certainly should be
granted to him."
James P. Thompson was placed upon the stand to explain the principles of
the I. W. W. The courtroom was turned into a propaganda meeting during
the examination of the witness. One of the first features was the
reading and explanation of state's exhibit "K," the famous I. W. W.
preamble which has been referred to on various occasions as the most
brutally scientific exposition of the class struggle ever penned:
I. W. W. PREAMBLE
The working class and the employing class have nothing in common.
There can be no peace so long as hunger and want are found among
millions of the working people and the few, who make up the
employing class, have all the good things of life.
Between these two classes a struggle must go on until the workers
of the world organize as a class, take possession of the earth and
the machinery of production, and abolish the wage system.
We find that the centering of the management of industries into
fewer and fewer hands makes the trade unions unable to cope with
the ever growing power of the employing class. The trade unions
foster a state of affairs which allow one set of workers to be
pitted against another set of workers in the same industry, thereby
helping defeat one another in wage wars. Moreover, the trade unions
aid the employing class to mislead the workers into the belief that
the working class have interests in common with their employers.
These conditions can be changed and the interests of the working
class upheld only by an organization formed in such a way that all
its members in any one industry, or in all industries, if
necessary, cease work whenever a strike or lockout is on in any
department thereof, thus making an injury to one an injury to all.
Instead of the conservative motto, "A fair day's wage for a fair
day's work," we must inscribe on our banner the revolutionary
watchword, "Abolition of the wage system."
It is the historic mission of the working class to do away with
capitalism. The army of production must be organized, not only for
the every day struggle with capitalists, but also to carry on
production when capitalism shall have been overthrown. By
organizing industrially we are forming the structure of the new
society within the shell of the old.
"Men in society represent economic categories," said Thompson. "By that
I mean that in the world of shoes there are shoemakers, and in the world
of boats there are seamen, and in this society there are economic
categories called the employing class and the working class. Now,
between them as employing class and working class there is nothing in
common. Their interests are diametrically opposed as such. It is not the
same thing as saying that human beings have nothing in common. The
working class and the employing class have antagonistic interests, and
the more one gets the less remains for the other.
"Labor produces all wealth," continued Thompson, "and the more the
workers have to give up to anyone else the less remains for themselves.
The more they get in wages the less remains for the others in the form
of profits. As long as labor produces for the other class all the good
things of life there will be no peace; we want the products of labor
ourselves and let the other class go to work also.
"The trades unions are unable to cope with the power of the employers
because when one craft strikes the others remain at work and by so doing
help the company to fill orders, and that is helping to break the
strike. If a group of workers strike and win, other workers are
encouraged to do likewise: if they strike and lose, other workers are
discouraged and employers are encouraged to do some whipping on their
own account.
"We believe in an industrial democracy; that the industry shall be owned
by the people and operated on a co-operative plan instead of the wage
plan; that there is no such thing as a fair day's pay; that we should
have the full product of our labor in the co-operative system as
distinguished from the wage system.
"Furthermore," went on the witness, as the jury leaned forward to catch
his every word, "our ideas were suggested to us by conditions in modern
industry, and it is the historical mission of the workers to organize,
not only for the preliminary struggles, but to carry on production
afterward."
"We object to this!" shouted Mr. Cooley, and the court sustained the
objection.
Despite continual protests from the prosecution Thompson gave the ideas
of the I. W. W. on many questions. Speaking of free speech the witness
said:
"Free speech is vital. It is a point that has been threshed out and
settled before we were born. If we do not have free speech, the children
of the race will die in the dark."
The message of industrial unionism delivered thru the sworn testimony of
a labor organizer was indeed an amazing spectacle. Judge Ronald never
relaxed his attention during the entire examination, the jury was
spell-bound, and it was only by an obvious effort that the spectators
kept from applauding the various telling points.
"There is overwork on one hand," said Thompson, "and out-of-work on the
other. The length of the working day should be determined by the amount
of work and the number of workers. You have no more right to do eight or
ten or twelve hours of labor when others are out of work, despondent,
committing suicide, than you have to drink all the water, if that were
possible, while others are dying of thirst.
"Solidarity is the I. W. W. way to get their demands. We do not advocate
that the workers should organize in a military way and use guns and
dynamite. The most effective weapon of labor is economic power: the
modern wage workers are the living parts of industry and if they fold
their arms, they immediately precipitate a crisis, they paralyze the
world. No other class has that power. The other class can fold their
arms, and they do most of the time, but our class has the economic
power. The I. W. W. preaches and teaches all the time that a far more
effective weapon than brickbats or dynamite is solidarity.
"We have developed from individual production, to social production, yet
we still have private ownership of the means of production. One class
owns the industries and doesn't operate them, another class operates the
industries and does not own them. We are going to have a revolution. No
one is more mistaken than those who believe that this system is the
final state of society. As the industrial revolution takes place, as the
labor process takes on the co-operative form, as the tool of production
becomes social, the idea of social ownership is suggested, and so the
idea that things that are used collectively should be owned
collectively, presents itself with irresistible force to the people of
the twentieth century. So there is a struggle for industrial democracy.
We are the modern abolitionists fighting against wage slavery as the
other abolitionists fought against chattel slavery. The solution for our
modern problems is this, that the industries should be owned by the
people, operated by the people for the people, and the little busy bees
who make the honey of the world should eat that honey, and there should
be no drones at all in the hives of industry.
"When we have industrial democracy you will know that the mills, the
mines, the factories, the earth itself, will be the collective property
of the people, and if a little baby should be born that baby would be as
much an owner of the earth as any other of the children of men. Then the
war, the commercial struggles, the clashes between groups of conflicting
interests, will be a night-mare of the past. In the place of capitalism
with its one class working and its other class enjoying, in the place of
the wages system with its strife and strikes, lockouts and grinding
poverty, we will have a co-operative system where the interests of one
will be to promote the interests of all--that will be Industrial
Democracy."
Thompson explained the meaning of the sarcastic song, "Christians at
War," to the evident amusement of the jury and spectators. The witness
was then asked about Herve's work on anti-patriotism in this question by
attorney Moore:
"What is the attitude of your organization relative to internationalism
and national patriotism?"
"We object to that as incompetent and immaterial," cried Veitch of the
prosecution.
"What did you put this book in for then?" said Judge Ronald in a testy
manner as he motioned the witness to proceed with his answer.
"In the broader sense," answered Thompson, "there is no such thing as a
foreigner. We are all native born members of this planet, and for the
members of it to be divided into groups or units and to be taught that
each nation is better than the other leads to clashes and the world war.
We ought to have in the place of national patriotism--the idea that one
people is better than another,--a broader conception, that of
international solidarity. The idea that we are better than others is
contrary to the Declaration of Independence which declares that all men
are born free and equal. The I. W. W. believes that in order to do away
with wars we should remove the cause of wars; we should establish
industrial democracy and the co-operative system instead of
commercialism and capitalism and the struggles that come from them. We
are trying to make America a better land, a land without child slaves, a
land without poverty, and so also with the world, a world without a
master and without a slave."
When the lengthy direct examination of Thompson had been finished, the
prosecution questioned him but five minutes and united in a sigh of
relief as he left the stand.
The next witness called was Ernest Nordstrom, companion of Oscar Carlson
who was severely wounded on the Verona. Nordstrom testified rather out
of his logical order in the trial by reason of the fact that he was
about to leave on a lengthy fishing trip to Alaska. His testimony was
that he purchased a regular ticket at the same time as his friend
Carlson, but these tickets were not taken up by the purser. The original
ticket of this passenger was then offered in evidence. The witness
stated that the first shot came from almost the same place on the dock
as did the words "You can't land here." He fell to the deck and saw
Carlson fall also. Carlson tried to rise once, but a bullet hit him and
he dropped; there were nine bullet holes in him. Nordstrom was asked:
"Did you have a gun?"
"No sir."
"Did Carlson have a gun?"
"No sir."
"Did you see anybody with a gun on the boat?"
"No. I didn't."
Organizer James Rowan then gave his experiences in Everett, ending with
a vivid recital of the terrible beating he had received at the hands of
deputies near Silver Lake. Upon telling of the photograph that was taken
of his lacerated back he was asked by Veitch:
"What was the reason you had that picture taken?"
"Well," said Rowan, in his inimitable manner, "I thought it would be a
good thing to get that taken to show up the kind of civilization that
they had in Everett."
Dr. E. J. Brown, a Seattle dentist, and Thomas Horner, Seattle attorney,
corroborated Rowan's testimony as to the condition of his back. They had
seen the wounds and bruises shortly after the beating had been
administered and were of the opinion that a false light was reflected on
the photograph in such a way that the severest marks did not appear as
bad as they really were.
Otto Nelson, Everett shingle weaver, gave testimony regarding the
shingle weavers' strikes of 1915 and 1916 but was stopped from going
into detail by the rulings of the court. He told also of the peaceful
character of all the I. W. W. meetings in Everett, and stated that on
one occasion police officer Daniels had fired two shots down one of the
city streets at an I. W. W. man who had been made to run the gauntlet.
H. P. Whartenby, owner of a five-ten-fifteen cent store in Everett, said
that the I. W. W. meetings were orderly, and further testified that he
had been ordered out of the Commercial Club on the evening of November
5th but not until he had seen that the club was a regular arsenal, with
guns stacked all over the place.
To establish the fact that the sidewalks were kept clear, that there was
no advocacy of violence, that no resistance was offered to arrest, and
that the I. W. W. meetings were well conducted in every particular, the
defense put on in fairly rapid succession a number of Everett citizens:
Mrs. Ina M. Salter, Mrs. Elizabeth Maloney, Mrs. Letelsia Fye, Bruce J.
Hatch, Mrs. Dollie Gustaffson, Miss Avis Mathison, Mrs. Peter Aiken,
Mrs. Annie Pomeroy, Mrs. Rebecca Wade, F. G. Crosby, and Mrs. Hannah
Crosby. The fact that these citizens, and a number of other women who
were mentioned in the testimony, attended the I. W. W. meetings quite
regularly, impressed the jury favorably. Some of these women witnesses
had been roughly handled by the deputies. Mrs. Pomeroy stated that the
deputies, armed with clubs and distinguished by white handkerchiefs
around their necks, invaded one meeting and struck right and left. "And
they punched me at that!" said the indignant witness.
"Punched you where?" inquired Vanderveer in order to locate the injury.
"They punched me on the sidewalk!" answered the witness, and the solemn
bailiff had to rap for order in the court room.
Cooley caught a Tartar in his cross-examination of Mrs. Crosby. He
inquired:
"Did you hear the I. W. W.'s say that when they got a majority of the
workers into this big union they would take possession of the
industries and run them themselves?"
"Why certainly!"
"You did hear them say they would take possession?"
"Why certainly!" flashed back the witness. "That's the way the North did
with the slaves, isn't it? They took possession without ever asking
them. My people came from the South and they had slaves taken away from
them and never got anything for it, and quite right, too!"
"Then you do believe it would be all right, yourself?" said Cooley.
"I believe that confiscation would be perfectly right in the case of
taking things that are publicly used for the public good of the
people----."
"That's all," hastily cut in Cooley.
"That they should be used then by the people and for the people!"
finished the witness.
"That's all!" cried Cooley loudly and more anxiously.
Frank Henig, the next witness, told of having been blackjacked by
Sheriff McRae and exhibited the large scar on his forehead that plainly
showed where the brutal blow had landed. He stated that he had tried to
secure the arrest of McRae for the entirely unwarranted attack but was
denied a warrant.
Jake Michel, secretary of the Everett Building Trades Council, gave
evidence regarding a number of the I. W. W. street meetings. He was
questioned at length about what he had inferred from the speeches of
Rowan, Thompson and others. Replying to one question he said:
"I think the American Federation of Labor uses the most direct action
that any organization could use."
"In a strike?"
"Yes."
"And by that you mean a peaceful strike?" said Cooley suggestively.
"Well, I haven't seen them carry on very many peaceful ones yet,"
replied Michel.
Cooley asked Michel whether Rowan had said that "the workers should form
one great industrial union and declare the final and universal strike;
that is, that they should remain within the industrial institutions and
lock the employers out for good as owners?"
"I never heard him mention anything about locking anyone out; I think he
wanted to lock them in and make them do some of the work!" answered
Michel.
"You haven't any particular interest in this case, have you?" asked
Cooley with a sneer.
"Yes, I have!" replied Michel with emphasis.
When asked what this particular interest was, Michel caused
consternation among the ranks of the prosecution by replying:
"The reason I have that interest is this; I have two sons and two
daughters. I want to see the best form of organization so that the boys
can go out and make a decent living; I don't want my girls to become
prostitutes upon the streets and my boys vagabonds upon the highways!"
Harry Feinberg, one of the free speech prisoners named on the first
information with Watson and Tracy, was then placed on the stand and
questioned as to the beating he had received at the hands of deputies,
as to the condition of Frank Henig after McRae's attack, and upon
matters connected with various street meetings at which he had been the
speaker. Mention of the name of George Reese brought forth an argument
from the prosecution that it had not been shown that Reese was a
detective. After an acrimonious discussion Vanderveer suddenly declared:
"Just to settle this thing and settle it for now and all the time, I
will ask a subpoena forthwith for Philip K. Ahern and show who Reese is
working for."
The subpoena was issued and a recess taken to allow it to be served. As
Vanderveer stepped into the hall, detective Malcolm McLaren said to him,
"You can't subpoenae the head of the Pinkerton Detective Agency!"
"I have subpoenaed him," responded Vanderveer shortly as he hurried to
the witness room.
While awaiting the arrival of this witness, Feinberg was questioned
further, and was then taken from the stand to allow the examination of
two Everett witnesses, Mrs. L. H. Johnson and P. S. Johnson, the latter
witness being withdrawn when Ahern put in an appearance.
Vanderveer was very brief, but to the point, in the examination of the
local head of the Pinkerton Agency.
"Mr. Ahern, on the fifth day of November you had in your employ a man
named George Reese?"
"Yes sir."
"For whom was he working, thru you, at that time?"
"For Snohomish County."
"That's all!" said Vanderveer triumphantly.
Cooley did not seem inclined to cross-examine the witness at any length
and Vanderveer in another straightforward question brought out the fact
that Reese was a Pinkerton employe during the Longshoremen's
strike--this being the time that Reese also was seated as a delegate to
the Seattle Trades Council of the A. F. of L.
A portion of the testimony of Mrs. L. H. Johnson was nearly as important
as that concerning Reese. She recited a conversation with Sheriff McRae
as follows:
"McRae said he would stop the I. W. W. from coming to Everett if he had
to call out the soldiers. And I told him the soldiers wouldn't come out
on an occasion like this, they were nothing but Industrial Workers of
the World and they had a right to speak and get people to join their
union if they wanted to. And he said he had the backing of the millmen
to keep them out of the city, and he was going to do it if he had to
call the soldiers out and shoot them down when they landed there, when
they came off the dock."
[Illustration: Cutting off top of tree to fit block for flying machine.]
This clearly indicated the bloodthirsty designs of the millmen and the
sheriff at a time long before November 5th.
G. W. Carr, Wilfred Des Pres, and J. M. Norland testified to the
breaking up of peaceably conducted I. W. W. meetings, Des Pres also
telling of rifles having been transported from the Pacific Hardware
Company to the dock on November 5th. All three were Everett citizens.
Black asked Norland if he knew what sabotage was, to which Norland
replied:
"Everybody that follows the labor movement knows what sabotage is."
There was a sensation in court at this question for it was the first and
only time that any of the prosecution counsel correctly pronounced the
word sabotage!
W. W. Blain, secretary of the Commercial Club, altho an unwilling
witness, gave much information of value to the defense. He was forced to
produce the minutes of the "open shop committee" and give up the story
of how control of the club was purchased by the big interests, how the
boycott was invoked against certain publications, and finally to tell of
the employment of Pinkerton detectives prior to November 5th, and to
give a list of the deputies furnished by the Commercial Club.
During the examination of this witness some telegrams, in connection
with the testimony, were handed up to the judge. While reading these
Judge Ronald was interrupted by a foolish remark from Black to
Vanderveer. Looking over his glasses the judge said:
"Every time I start to read anything, you gentlemen get into a quarrel
among yourselves. I am inclined to think that the 'cats,' some of them,
are here in the courtroom."
"I will plead guilty for Mr. Black, Your Honor!" said Vanderveer
quickly, laughing at the reference to sabotage.
Testimony to further establish the peaceable character of the I. W. W.
meetings and the rowdyism of the police and deputies was given by
witnesses from Everett: Gustaf Pilz, Mrs. Leota Carr, J. E. McNair, Ed
Morton, Michael Maloney, Verne C. Henry and Morial Thornburg. The
statements of these disinterested parties regarding the clubbings given
to the speakers and to citizens of their acquaintance proved very
effective.
Attorney H. D. Cooley for the prosecution was placed upon the witness
stand and Vanderveer shot the question at him:
"By whom were you employed in this case, Mr. Cooley?"
"Objected to as immaterial!" cried Veitch, instantly springing to his
feet.
But the damage had been done! The refusal to allow an answer showed that
there were interested parties the prosecution wished to hide from the
public.
Levi Remick related the story of the deportation from Everett, and was
followed on the witness stand by Edward Lavelly, James Dwyer, and Thomas
Smye, who testified to different atrocities committed in Everett by
McRae and the citizen deputies. Their evidence had mainly to do with the
acts of piracy committed against the launch "Wanderer" and the
subsequent abuse of the arrested men. A little later in the trial this
testimony was fully corroborated by the statements of Captain Jack
Mitten. During Mitten's examination by Black the old Captain continually
referred to the fact that the life preservers and other equipment of his
boat had been stolen while he was in jail. The discomfiture of the
youthful prosecutor was quite evident.
J. H. Buel impeached the testimony of state's witness Judge Bell who had
made the claim that a filer at the Clark-Nickerson mill had been
assaulted by a member of the I. W. W. Vanderveer asked this witness:
"What was the name of the man assaulted?"
"Jimmy Cain."
"Who did it?"
"I did."
"Are you an I. W. W.?"
"No sir."
"Were you ever?"
"No sir."
Louis Skaroff followed with a detailed story of the murderous attack
made upon him by Mayor Merrill in the Everett jail, his story being
unshaken when he was recalled and put thru a grilling cross-examination.
William Roberts, who had been beaten and deported with Harry Feinberg,
related his experience. The childish questions of Black in regard to the
idea of abolishing the wages system nettled this witness and caused him
to exclaim, "the trouble is that you don't understand the labor
movement."
James Orr then told of having his money stolen by the officials so they
might pay the fares of twenty-two deported men, and John Ovist followed
with the tale of the slugging he had received upon the same occasion
that Feinberg, Roberts and Henig were assaulted.
Attorneys George W. Loutitt and Robert Faussett, of Everett, stated that
the reputation of McRae for sobriety was very bad. Both of these lawyers
had resigned from the Commercial Club upon its adoption of an open shop
policy.
Thomas O'Niel testified regarding street meetings and other matters in
connection with the case. Cooley asked the witness how many people
usually attended the meetings.
"It started in with rather small meetings," said the witness, "and then
every time, as fast as they were molested by the police, the crowd kept
growing until at last the meetings were between two and three thousand
people."
The witness said he had read considerable about industrial unionism, and
tho he was shocked at first he had come to believe in it.
"Until now you are satisfied that their doctrines taken as a whole are
proper and should be promulgated and adopted by the working class?"
inquired Cooley.
"In this way," answered O'Niel, "it was not the I. W. W. literature that
convinced me so much as the actions of the side that was fighting them."
"That is, you believe they were right because of the actions of the
people on the other side?" said Cooley.
"Yes," responded the witness, "because I think there are only two people
interested in this movement, the people carrying on the propaganda and
the people fighting the propaganda, and I saw the people who were
fighting the propaganda use direct action, sabotage, and every power,
political and industrial, they used it all to whip this organization,
and then I asked myself why are they fighting this organization. And the
more deeply I became interested, the more clearly I saw why they were
doing it, and that made me a believer in the I. W. W."
Mrs. Louise McGuire followed this witness with testimony about injuries
she had received thru the rough treatment accorded her by citizen
deputies engaged in breaking up a street meeting.
W. H. Clay, Everett's Commissioner of Finance, was brought on the stand
to testify that he was present and active at the conference that
resulted in the formation of the citizen deputies.
John Berg then related his experiences at the time he was taken to the
outskirts of Everett and deported after McRae had kicked him in the
groin until a serious injury resulted. Owing to the fact that the jury
was a mixed one Berg was not permitted to exhibit the rupture. This
witness also told his experience on the "Wanderer" and his treatment in
the jail upon his arrest.
Oscar Lindstrom then took the stand and corroborated the stories of the
witnesses who had testified about the shooting up of the "Wanderer" and
the beating and jailing of its passengers. H. Sokol, better known as
"Happy," also told of his experience on the "Wanderer" and gave the
facts of the deportation that had taken place on August 23rd.
Irving W. Ziegaus, secretary to Governor Lister, testified that the
letter concerning Everett sent from the Seattle I. W. W. had been
received; Steven M. Fowler identified certain telegrams sent from
Everett to Seattle officials by David Clough on November 5th; after
which Chester Micklin, who had been jailed in Everett following the
tragedy, corroborated parts of the story of Louis Skaroff.
The evidence of state's witness, Clyde Gibbons, was shattered at this
stage of the trial by the placing of Mrs. Lawrence MacArthur on the
stand. This witness, the proprietor of the Merchants Hotel in Everett,
produced the hotel register for November 4th and showed that Mrs.
Frennette had registered at that time and was in the city when Gibbons
claimed she was holding a conversation in an apartment house on Yesler
Way in Seattle.
The defense found it necessary to call witnesses who logically should
have been brought forward by the prosecution on their side of the case.
Among these was the famous "Governor" Clough, citizen deputy and open
shop mill owner. David Clough unwillingly testified to having been
present at the deportation of twenty-two I. W. W. members on August
23rd, having gone down to the dock at 8:30 that morning, and also to his
interest in Joseph Schofield, the deputy who had been injured by his
brother outlaws on the dock just before the Beverly Park deportations.
Mahler and Micklin were recalled for some few additional questions, and
were followed on the stand by Herman Storm, who gave testimony about the
brutal treatment received by himself and his fellow passengers on the
launch "Wanderer." John Hainey and Joseph Reaume also gave details of
this outrage.
"Sergeant" J. J. Keenan, who had become a familiar figure because of his
"police" duty in the outer court corridor from the inception of the
trial, then took the witness stand and recounted his experiences at
Snohomish and Maltby, his every word carrying conviction that the
sheriff and his deputies had acted with the utmost brutality in spite of
the advanced age of their victim. John Patterson and Tom Thornton
corroborated Keenan's testimony.
A surprise was sprung upon the prosecution at this juncture by the
introduction on the witness stand of George Kannow, a man who had been a
deputy sheriff in Everett and who had been present when many of the
brutalities were going on. He told of the treatment of Berg after the
"Wanderer" arrests.
"He was struck and beaten and thrown down and knocked heavily against
the steel sides of the tank, his head striking on a large projecting
lock. He was kicked by McRae and he hollered 'My God, you are killing
me,' and McRae said he didn't give a damn whether he died or not, and
kicked him again and then shoved him into the tank."
The gauntlet at the county jail was described in detail and the spirit
of the free speech fighters was shown by this testimony:
"Yes, I heard some of them groan. They all took their medicine well,
tho. They didn't holler out but some of them would groan; some of them
would go down pretty near to their knees and then get up, then they
would get sapped again as they got up. But they never made any real
outcries."
The witness stated that "Governor" Clough was a regular attendant at the
deportation parties and so also were W. R. Booth, Ed Hawes, T. W.
Anguish, Bill Pabst, Ed Seivers, and Will Taft. He described McRae's
drunken condition and told of drunken midnight revels held in the county
jail. His testimony was unshaken on cross-examination.
Mrs. Fern Grant, owner of the Western Hotel and Grant's Cafe, testified
that Mrs. Frennette was in her place of business in Everett on the
morning of the tragedy, thus adding to the evidence that Clyde Gibbons
had perjured himself in testifying for the prosecution.
A party of Christian Scientists, who had attended a lecture in Everett
by Bliss Knapp, told of the frightful condition of the eight men who had
taken the interurban train to Seattle following their experience at
Beverly Park. Mrs. Lou Vee Siegfried, Christian Science practitioner,
Thorwald Siegfried, prominent Seattle lawyer, Mrs. Anna Tenelli and Miss
Dorothy Jordan were corroborated in their testimony by Ira Bellows,
conductor on the interurban car that took the wounded men to Seattle.
Another break in the regular order of the trial was made at this point
by the placing on the stand of Nicholas Conaieff, member of the I. W.
W., who was to leave on the following day with a party of Russians
returning to their birthplace to take part in the revolution then in
progress. Conaieff stated that the first shot came from the dock. His
realistic story of the conditions on the Verona moved many in the
courtroom to tears. In his description Conaieff said:
"I was wounded myself. But before I was wounded and as we were lying
there three or four deep I saw a wounded man at my feet in a pool of
blood. Then I saw a man with his face up, and he was badly wounded,
probably he was dead. There were three or four wounded men alongside of
me. The conditions were so terrible that it was hard to control one's
self, and a young boy who was in one pile could not control himself any
longer; he was about twenty years old and had on a brown, short, heavy
coat, and he looked terrified and jumped up and went overboard into the
water and I didn't see him any more."
Mrs. Edith Frennette testified to her movements on the day of the
tragedy and denied the alleged threats to Sheriff McRae. Lengthy
cross-examination failed to shake her story.
Members of the I. W. W. who had been injured at Beverly Park then
testified. They were Edward Schwartz, Harry Hubbard, Archie Collins, C.
H. Rice, John Downs, one of the defendants, Sam Rovinson and Henry
Krieg. Any doubt as to the truth of their story was dispelled by the
testimony of Mrs. Ruby Ketchum, her husband Roy Ketchum, and her
brother-in-law Lew Ketchum, all three of whom heard the screams of the
victims and witnessed part of the slugging near their home at Beverly
Park. Some members of the investigation committee who viewed the scene
on the morning after the outrage gave their evidence as to the finding
of bits of clothing, soles of shoes, bloodstained hats and loose
hat-bands, and blotches of blood on the paved roadway and cattle guard.
These witnesses were three ministers of the gospel of different
denominations, Elbert E. Flint, Joseph P. Marlatt, and Oscar H. McGill.
The last named witness also told of having interviewed Herbert Mahler,
secretary of the I. W. W. in Seattle, following a conference with
Everett citizens, with the object of having a large public demonstration
in Everett to expose the Beverly Park affair and to prevent its
repetition. It was after this interview that the call went out for the
I. W. W. to hold a public meeting in Everett on Sunday, November 5th.
Mahler was recalled to the stand to verify McGill's statement in the
matter of the interview.
This testimony brought the case up to the events of November 5th and the
defense, having proven each illegal action of the sheriff, deputies and
mill owners, and disproven the accusations against the I. W. W.,
proceeded to open to the gaze of the public and force to the attention
of the jury the actual facts concerning the massacre on the Verona.
An important witness was Charles Miller, who viewed the tragedy from a
point about four hundred feet from the Verona while on the deck of his
fishing boat, the "Scout." He stated that the Verona tilted as soon as
the first shots came. Miller placed the model of the boat at the same
relative position it had occupied as the firing started on Bloody Sunday
and the prosecution could not tangle up this witness on this important
point. The "identification" witnesses of the prosecution were of
necessity liars if the stern of the Verona was at the angle set by
Miller.
C. M. Steele, owner of apartment houses and stores in Everett, stated
that he had been in a group who saw an automobile load of guns
transported to the dock prior to the docking of the Verona, this auto
being closely followed by a string of other machines. The witness tried
to get upon the dock but was prevented by deputies who had a rope
stretched clear across the entrance near the office of the American Tug
Boat Company. He saw the boat tilt as the firing started and noticed
that the stern swung out at the time. This testimony was demonstrated
with the model. Harry Young, chauffeur, corroborated this testimony and
told of rifle fire from the dock.
Mrs. Mabel Thomas, from a position on Johnson's float quite near the
Verona, told of the boat listing until the lower deck was under water,
almost immediately after the firing started. Mrs. Thomas testified that
"one man who was facing toward the Improvement Dock, raised his hands
and fell overboard from the hurricane deck as tho he were dead. His
overcoat held him to the top of the water for a moment and then he went
down. One jumped from the stern and then there were six or seven in the
water. One got up thru the canvas and crawled back in. One man that fell
in held up his hands for a moment and sank. There were bullets hitting
all around him."
Mr. Carroll Thomas, husband of the preceding witness, gave the same
testimony about the men in the water and stated that he saw armed men on
the Improvement Dock.
The testimony of Ayrold D. Skinner, a barber in Everett at the time of
the tragedy and who had been brought from California to testify, was
bitterly attacked by Veitch but to no avail. When the Verona landed
Skinner was so situated as to command a view of the whole proceedings.
He told of the boat listing, the men falling in the water and being
shot, and his testimony about a man on board the tug "Edison" firing a
rifle directly across the open space on the dock in the direction of the
Verona was unshakeable. This witness also testified that about ten
deputies with rifles were running back and forth in a frightened manner
and were firing from behind the Klatawa slip. The witness saw Dick
Hembridge, superintendent of the Canyon Lumber Company, Carl Tyre,
timekeeper, Percy Ames, the boom man, and a Dr. Hedges. The last two
came up to where the witness was, each bearing a rifle. Skinner stated
that he said to Ames, "Percy, what is the world coming to?" and Ames
broke down as tho he felt something were wrong. Then Dr. Hedges came
running up from where the boat was, he was white in the face, and he
cried "Don't go down there, boys; they are shooting wild, you don't know
where in hell the shots are coming from."
Carl Ryan, night watchman of the Everett Shingle Company, N. C. Roberts,
an Everett potter, Robert Thompson and Edward Thompson testified about
the angle of the boat, as to rifles on the dock, the shooting from the
tug "Edison" and from the Improvement Dock, in support of witnesses who
had previously testified.
Alfred Freeman, I. W. W. member who was on the Verona, testified about
the movements of those who made the trip to Everett and told of the
conditions on the boat. His testimony, and that of numerous other I. W.
W. witnesses, disproved the charges of conspiracy.
I. W. McDonald, barber, John Josephson, lumber piler, and T. M. Johnson,
hod carrier, all of Everett, stated that the shots from the boat did not
come until after there had been considerable firing from the dock. These
witnesses were among the thousands of citizens who overlooked the scene
from the hillside by the Great Northern depot.
[Illustration: VERONA AT EVERETT DOCK.
under same tide condition as at time of Massacre.]
On Wednesday, April 18th, the jury, accompanied by Judge Ronald, the
attorneys for both sides, the defendant, Thomas Tracy, and the court
stenographer, went in automobiles to Everett to inspect the various
places mentioned in the court proceedings. The party stopped on the way
to Everett to look over the scene of the Beverly Park outrages of
October 30th. No one spoke to the jury but Judge Ronald, who pointed out
the various features at the request of the attorneys in the background.
After visiting the corner of Hewitt and Wetmore Avenues, the party went
to the city dock. Both warehouses were carefully examined, the
bulletholes, tho badly whittled, being still in evidence. Bulletholes in
the floor, clock-case, and in the walls still showed quite plainly that
the firing from within the warehouse and waiting room had been wild.
Bullets imbedded in the Klatawa slip on the side toward the Bay also
gave evidence of blind firing on the part of the deputies. In the floor
of the dock, between the ship and the open space near the waiting room,
were several grooves made by bullets fired from the shore end of the
dock. These marks indicated that the bullets had taken a course directly
in line with the deputies who were in the front ranks as the Verona
landed.
The party boarded the Verona and subjected the boat to a searching
examination, discovering that the stairways, sides, and furnishings were
riddled with shot holes. The pilot house, in particular, was found to
have marks of revolver and high power rifle bullets, in addition to
being closely marked with small shot holes, some of the buck-shot still
being visible.
The captain swung the boat out to the same angle as it had been on
November 5th, this being done at a time when it was computed that the
tide would be relatively the same as on the date of the tragedy. Someone
assumed the precise position at the cabin window that Tracy was alleged
to have been in while firing. The jury members then took up the
positions which the "identification witnesses" had marked on a diagram
during their testimony. The man in the window was absolutely invisible!
A photograph was then taken from the point where "Honest" John Hogan
claimed to have been when he saw Tracy firing and another view made by
a second camera to show that the first photograph had been taken from
the correct position. These were later introduced as evidence.
No testimony was taken in Everett but on the re-opening of court in
Seattle next morning Frank A. Brown, life insurance solicitor, testified
that McRae dropped his hand just before the first shot was fired from
somewhere to the right of the sheriff. He also identified a Mr.
Thompson, engineer of the Clark-Nickerson mill, and a Mr. Scott, as
being armed with guns having stocks. Mike Luney, shingle weaver, told of
a fear-crazed deputy running from the dock with a bullethole in his ear
and crying out that one of the deputies had shot him. Fred Bissinger, a
boy of 17, told of the deputies breaking for cover as soon as they had
fired a volley at the men on the boat. It was only after the heavy
firing that he saw a man on the boat pull a revolver from his pocket and
commence to shoot. He saw but two revolvers in action on the Verona.
One of the most dramatic and clinching blows for the defense was struck
when there was introduced as a witness Fred Luke, who was a regular
deputy sheriff and McRae's right-hand man. Luke's evidence of the
various brutalities, given in a cold, matter-of-fact manner, was most
convincing. He stated that the deputies wore white handkerchiefs around
their necks so they would not be hammering each other. He contradicted
McRae's testimony about Beverly Park by stating positively that the
sheriff had gone out in a five passenger car, and not in a roadster as
was claimed, and that they had both remained there during the entire
affair. He told how he had swung at the I. W. W. men with such force
that his club had broken from its leather wrist thong and disappeared
into the woods. When questioned about the use of clubs in dispersing
street crowds at the I. W. W. meetings he said:
"I used my sap as a club and struck them and drove them away with it."
"Why didn't you use your hands and push them out?" asked Cooley.
"I didn't think we had a right to use our hands," said the big
ex-deputy.
"What do you mean by that?" said the surprised lawyer.
"Well," replied the witness, "what did they give us the saps for?"
Cooley also asked this witness why he had struck the men at Beverly
Park.
"Well," replied the ex-deputy, "if you want to know, that was the idea
of the Commercial Club. That was what they recommended."
Luke, who was a guard at the approach to the dock on November 5th, told
of having explained the workings of a rifle to a deputy while the
shooting was in progress. The state at first had contended that there
were no rifles on the dock and later had made the half-hearted plea that
none of the rifles which were proven to have been there were fired.
Following this important witness the defense introduced Fird Winkley, A.
E. Amiott, Dr. Guy N. Ford, Charles Leo, Ed Armstrong, mate of the
Verona and a witness for the state, and B. R. Watson, to corroborate the
already convincing evidence that the stern of the Verona was swung quite
a distance from the dock.
Robert Mills, business agent of the Everett Shingle Weavers, who had
been called to the stand on several occasions to testify to minor
matters, was then recalled. He testified that it was his hand which
protruded from the Verona cabin window in the photographs, and that his
head was resting against the window jamb on the left hand side as far
out as it would be possible to get without crawling out of the window.
As Mills was a familiar figure to the entire jury and was also possessed
of a peculiarly unforgettable type of countenance, the state's
identification of Tracy was shown to have been false.
The Chief of Police of Seattle, Charles Beckingham, corroborated
previous testimony by stating that the identification and selection of
I. W. W. men had been made from a dark cell by two Pinkerton men, Smith
and Reese, aided by one of the defendants, I. P. McDowell, alias Charles
Adams.
Malcolm McLaren was then placed upon the stand and the admission secured
that he was a detective and had formerly been connected with the Burns
Agency. Objection was made to a question about the employment of McLaren
in the case, to which Vanderveer replied that it was the purpose of the
defense to prove that the case was not being prosecuted by the State of
Washington at all. In the absence of the jury Vanderveer then offered to
prove that McLaren had been brought from Los Angeles and retained in the
employ of certain mill owners, among them being "Governor" Clough and
Mr. Moody of the First National Bank, and that McLaren had charge of the
work of procuring the evidence introduced by the state. He offered to
prove that Veitch and Cooley were employed by the same people. The court
sustained the objection of the state to the three offers.
Testimony on various phases of the case was then given by Mrs. Fannie
Jordan, proprietor of an apartment house in Seattle, Nick Shugar, Henry
Luce, Paul Blakenship, Charles W. Dean, and later on by Oliver Burnett.
Captain Chauncey Wiman was called to the stand, but it happened that he
had gone into hiding so soon after the boat landed that he could testify
to nothing of particular importance. From his appearance on the witness
stand it seemed that he was still nearly scared to death.
Another surprise for the prosecution was then sprung by placing Joseph
Schofield on the witness stand. Schofield told of having been beaten up
at the city dock by Joseph Irving, during the time they were lining up
the forty-one I. W. W. men for deportation. The witness displayed the
scar on his head that had resulted from the wound made by the gun butt,
and described the drunken condition of McRae and other deputies on the
occasion of his injury. And then he told that "Governor" Clough had gone
to his wife just a couple of days before he took the witness stand and
had given her $75.00. This deputy witness was on the dock November 5th,
and he described the affair. He swore that McRae had his gun drawn
before any shooting started, that there were rifles in use on the dock,
that a man was firing a Winchester rifle from the tug Edison. He was
handed a bolt action army rifle to use but made no use of it. Schofield
voluntarily came from Oregon to testify for the defense.
Chief Beckingham resumed the stand and was asked further about McDowell,
alias Adams. He said:
"We sent a man in with this man Adams, who was in constant fear that
somebody might see him, and he would stand way back that he might tip
this man with him and this man's fingers came out to identify the I. W.
W. men who were supposed to have guns."
"What inducements were made to this man Adams?" asked Vanderveer.
"In the presence of Mr. Cooley and Mr. Webb and Captain Tennant and
myself he was told that he could help the state and there would be no
punishment given him. He was taken to Everett with the impression that
he would be let out and taken care of."
Another ex-deputy, Fred Plymale, confirmed the statements of Fred Luke
in regard to McRae's use of a five passenger car at Beverly Park and
showed that it was impossible for the sheriff to have attended a dance
at the hour he had claimed. The efforts of the prosecution to shake the
testimony that had been given by Fred Luke was shown by this witness who
testified that he had been approached by Mr. Clifford Newton, as agent
for Mr. Cooley, and that at an arranged conversation McRae had tried to
have him state that the runabout had been used to go to the slugging
party.
Walter Mulholland, an 18 year old boy, and Henry Krieg, both of whom
were members of the I. W. W. and passengers on the Verona, then
testified in detail about the shattering gun fire and the wounding of
men on board the boat. Mulholland told of wounds received, one bullet
still being in his person at that time. Krieg, not being familiar with
military terms, stated that there were many shells on the deck of the
Verona after the trouble, and the prosecution thought they had scored
quite a point until re-direct examination brought out the fact that
Henry meant the lead bullets that had been fired from the dock.
E. Carl Pearson, Snohomish County Treasurer, rather unwillingly
corroborated the testimony of ex-deputies Luke and Plymale in regard to
the actions of McRae at Beverly Park.
The witness chair seemed almost to swallow the next nine witnesses who
were boys averaging about twelve years in age. These lads had picked up
shells on and beneath the dock to keep as mementos of the "Battle."
Handfuls of shells of various sizes and description, from revolver,
rifle and shotgun, intermingled with rifle clips and unfired
copper-jacketed rifle cartridges, were piled upon the clerk's desk as
exhibits by these youthful witnesses. After the various shells had been
classified by L. B. Knowlton, an expert in charge of ammunition sales
for the Whiton Hardware Company of Seattle for six years, the boys were
recalled to the stand to testify to the splintered condition of the
warehouses, their evidence proving that a large number of shots had been
fired from the interior of the warehouses directly thru the walls. The
boys who testified were Jack Warren, Palmer Strand, Rollie Jackson,
William Layton, Eugene Meives, Guy Warner, Tom Wolf, Harvey Peterson,
and Roy Jensen. Veitch, by this time thoroly disgusted with the turn
taken by the case, excused these witnesses without even a pretense of
cross-examination.
Completely clinching this link in the evidence against the citizen
deputies was the testimony of Miss Lillian Goldthorpe and her mother,
Hannah Goldthorpe. Miss Goldthorpe, waitress in the Commercial Club
dining room, picked up some rifle shells that had fallen from the rifles
stacked in the office, and also from the pocket of one of the hunting
coats lying on the floor. She took these home to her mother who
afterward turned them over to Attorney Moore. She also identified
certain murderous looking blackjacks as being the same as those stored
in the Club. It is hardly necessary to state that the open-shop
advocates who continually prate about the "right of a person to work
when and where they please" were not slow about taking away Lillian's
right to work at the Commercial Club after she had given this truthful
testimony!
James Hadley, I. W. W. member on the Verona, told how he had dived
overboard to escape the murderous fire and had been the only man in the
water to regain a place on the boat.
"I saw two go overboard and I didn't see them any more," said Hadley.
"Then I saw another man four feet from me and he seemed to be swimming
all right, and all of a sudden he went down and I never saw him any
more. I was looking right at him and he just closed his eyes and sank."
Mario Marino, an 18 year old member of the I. W. W., then told of the
serious wounds he had received on the boat. He was followed by Brockman
B. Armstrong, another member of the union, who was close to the rail on
the port side of the boat. He saw a puff of smoke slightly to the rear
of McRae directly after the sound of the first shot. A rifle bullet cut
a piece out of his forehead and a second went thru his cap and creased
his scalp, felling him to his knees. Owen Genty was shot thru the kidney
on the one side of him, and Gust Turnquist was hit in the knee on the
other. As he lay in the heap of wounded men a buckshot buried itself in
the side of his head near the temple. As the Verona was pulling out he
tried to crawl to shelter and was just missed by a rifle bullet from the
dock situated to the south.
Archie Collins, who had previously testified about Beverly Park, was
then called to the stand to tell of the trip to Everett and the trouble
that resulted. Prosecutor Black displayed his usual asininity by asking
in regard to preparations made by Verona passengers:
"What were they taking or not taking?"
"There might be two or three million things they were not taking," cut
in Judge Ronald chidingly.
Black's examination of the various witnesses was aptly described by
Publicity Agent Charles Ashleigh in the Industrial Worker, as follows:
"His examinations usually act as a soporific; heads are observed nodding
dully thruout the courtroom and one is led to wonder whether, if he were
allowed to continue, there would not be a sort of fairy-tale scene in
which the surprised visitor to the court would see audience, jury,
lawyers, judge, prisoner and functionaries buried in deep slumber
accompanied only by a species of hypnotic twittering which could be
traced eventually to a dignified youth who was lulled to sleep by his
own narcotic burblings but continued, mechanically, to utter the same
question over and over again."
During this dreamy questioning Black asked about the men who were
cleaning up the boat on its return trip, with a view to having the
witness state that there were empty shells all over the deck. His
question was:
"Did you pick anything up from the floor?"
Instantly the courtroom was galvanized into life by Collin's startling
answer:
"I picked up an eye, a man's eye."
The witness had lifted from the blood-stained deck a long splinter of
wood on which was impaled a human eye!
The story of Fred Savery was typical of the unrecognized empire builders
who make up the migratory class. Fred was born in Russia, his folks
moving to Austria and then migrating to Canada when the lad was but two
years old. At the age of nine he started at farm work and at twelve he
was big enough to handle logs and work in the woods. Savery took the
stand in his uniform of slavery, red mackinaw shirt, stagged-off pants,
caulked shoes, and a battered slouch hat in his hand. The honest
simplicity of his halting French-Canadian speech carried more weight
than the too smooth flowing tales told by the well drilled citizen
deputies on whom the prosecution depended for conviction.
Cooley dwelt at great length on the constant travel of this witness, a
feature incidental to the life of every migratory worker. Even the judge
tired of these tactics and told the prosecution that there was no way to
stop them from asking the interminable questions but it was merely a
waste of time. But all of Cooley's dilatory tactics could not erase from
the minds of the listeners the simple, earnest, sincere story Fred
Savery told of the death of his fellow worker, Hugo Gerlot.
Charles Ashleigh was then placed upon the witness stand to testify to
having been selected as one of the speakers to go to Everett on November
5th. He stated that he had gone over on the Interurban and had returned
that afternoon at four o'clock. After the prosecution had interrogated
him about certain articles published subsequent to the tragedy Ashleigh
was excused.
To impeach the testimony of William Kenneth, wharfinger at the City
Dock, the defense then introduced Peter Aikken of Everett. Following
this witness Owen Genty, one of the I. W. W. men wounded on the Verona,
gave an account of the affair and stated that the first shot came from a
point just to the rear of the sheriff.
Raymond Lee, a youth of 19 years, told of having gone to Everett on the
day of the Beverly Park affair in order to mail free speech pamphlets
directly to a number of Everett citizens. He went to the dock at the
time of the deportation, getting past the deputies on a plea of wanting
to see his uncle, his youth and neat appearance not being at all in
accord with the current idea of what an I. W. W. member looked like. Lee
was cross-questioned at great length by Veitch. This witness told the
story of the death of Abraham Rabinowitz on the Verona in these few,
simple words:
[Illustration: View of Beverly Park, showing County Road.]
"Rabinowitz was lying on top of me with his head on my leg. I felt my
leg getting wet and I reached back to see what it was, and when I pulled
my hand away it was covered with blood. He was shot in the back of the
brain."
James McRoden, I. W. W. member who was on the Verona, gave corroborative
testimony about the first shot having been from the dock.
James Francis Billings, one of the free speech prisoners, testified that
he was armed with a Colts 41 revolver on the Verona, and shortly after
the shooting started he went to the engineer of the boat and ordered him
to get the Verona away from the dock. He threw the gun overboard on the
return trip to Seattle. Black tried to make light of the serious
injuries this witness had received at Beverly Park by asking him if all
that he received was not a little brush on the shin. The witness
answered:
"No sir. I had a black eye. I was beaten over both eyes as far as that
is concerned. My arms were held out by one big man on either side and I
was beaten on both sides. As Sheriff McRae went past me he said 'Give it
to him good,' and when I saw what was coming I dropped in order to save
my face, and the man on the left hand side kicked me from the middle of
my back clear down to my heels, and he kept kicking me until the fellow
on the right told him to kick me no more as I was all in. My back and my
hip have bothered me ever since."
Black tried to interrupt the witness and also endeavored to have his
answer stricken from the testimony but the judge answered his objection
by saying:
"I told you to withdraw the question and you didn't do it."
Vanderveer asked Billings the question:
"Why did you carry a gun on the fifth of November?"
"I took it for my own personal benefit," replied Billings. "I didn't
intend to let anybody beat me up like I was beaten on October 30th in
the condition I was in. I was in bad condition at the time."
Harvey E. Wood, an employe of the Jamison Mill Company, took the stand
and told of a visit made by Jefferson Beard to the bunkhouse of the mill
company on the night of November 4th and stated that at the time there
were six automatic shot guns and three pump guns in the place. These
were for the use of James B. Reed, Neal Jamison, Joe Hosh, Roy Hosh,
Walter S. Downs, and a man named McCortell. This witness had acted as a
strikebreaker up until the time he was subpoenaed.
Two of the defendants, Benjamin F. Legg and Jack Leonard, fully verified
the story told by Billings.
Leland Butcher, an I. W. W. member who was on the Verona, told of how he
had been shot in the leg. When asked why he had joined the I. W. W. he
answered:
"I joined the I. W. W. to better my own condition and to make the
conditions my father was laboring under for the last 25 years, with
barely enough to keep himself and family, a thing of the past."
Another of the defendants, Ed Roth, who had been seriously wounded on
the Verona, gave an unshaken story of the outrage. Roth testified that
he had been shot in the abdomen at the very beginning of the trouble and
because of his wounded condition and the fact that there were wounded
men piled on top of him he had been unable to move until some time after
the Verona had left the dock. This testimony showed the absurdity of
McRae's pretended identification of the witness. Roth was a member of
the International Longshoremen's Association and had joined the I. W. W.
on the day before the tragedy.
John Stroka, a lad of 18, victim of the deputies at Beverly Park and a
passenger on the Verona, gave testimony regarding the men wounded on the
boat.
The next witness was Ernest P. Marsh, president of the State Federation
of Labor, who was called for the purpose of impeaching the testimony of
Mayor Merrill and also to prove that Mrs. Frennette was a visitor at the
Everett Labor Temple on the morning of November 5th, this last being
added confirmation of the fact that Clyde Gibbons had committed perjury
on the stand.
To the ordinary mind--and certainly the minds of the prosecution lawyers
were not above the ordinary--the social idealist is an inexplicable
mystery. Small wonder then that they could not understand the causes
that impelled the next witness, Abraham Bonnet Wimborne, one of the
defendants, to answer the call for fighters to defend free speech.
Wimborne, the son of a Jewish Rabbi, told from the witness stand how he
had first joined the Socialist Party, afterward coming in contact with
the I. W. W., and upon hearing of the cruel beating given to James
Rowan, had decided to leave Portland for Everett to fight for free
speech. Arriving in Seattle on November 4th, he took passage on the
steamer Verona the next day.
Prosecutor Black asked the witness what were the preparations made by
the men on the boat.
"Don't misunderstand my words, Mr. Black," responded Wimborne, "when I
say prepared, I mean they were armed with the spirit of determination.
Determined to uphold the right of free speech with their feeble
strength; that is, I never really believed it would be possible for the
outrages and brutalities to come under the stars and stripes, and I
didn't think it was necessary for anything else."
"Then when these men left they were determined?" inquired Black.
"Yes, determined that they would uphold the spirit of the Constitution;
if not, go to jail. There were men in Everett who would refuse the right
of workingmen to come and tell the workers that they had a way whereby
the little children could get sufficient clothing, sufficient food, and
the right of education, and other things which they can only gain--how?
By organizing into industrial unions, sir, that is what I meant. We do
not believe in bloodshed. Thuggery is not our method. What can a handful
of workers do against the mighty forces of Maxim guns and the artillery
of the capitalist class?"
"Did you consider yourself a fighting member?" questioned Black.
"If you mean am I a moral fighter? yes; but physically--why, look at me!
Do I look like a fighter?" said the slightly built witness.
"Did you or did you not expect to go to jail when you left Portland?"
asked the prosecutor.
"My dear Mr. Black, I didn't know and I didn't care!" responded Wimborne
with a shrug of his shoulders.
Wimborne joined the I. W. W. while in the Everett County Jail.
Michael J. Reilley, another of the defendants, testified as to the
firing of the first shot from the dock and also gave the story of the
death of Abraham Rabinowitz. Vanderveer asked him the question:
"Do you know why you are a defendant?"
"Yes, sir," replied Reilley, "because I didn't talk to them in the city
jail in Seattle. I was never picked out."
Attorney H. D. Cooley was recalled to the stand and was made to admit
that he was a member of the Commercial Club and a citizen deputy on the
dock November 5th. He was asked by Vanderveer:
"Did you see any guns on the dock?"
"Yes sir."
"Did you see any guns fired on the dock?"
"Yes sir."
"Did you see any guns fired on the boat?"
"No sir."
"Did you see a gun on the boat?"
"I did not."
"You were in full view of the boat?"
"I was."
Yet the ethics of the legal profession are such that this attorney could
justify his actions in laboring for months in an endeavor to secure, by
any and all means, the conviction of the men on the boat!
Defendant Charles Black testified that McRae dropped his hand to his
gun and pulled it just as one of the deputies fired from a point just
behind the sheriff. Black ran down the deck and into the cabin, passing
in front of the windows from which the deputies had sworn that heavy
firing was going on.
Leonard Broman, working partner with Abraham Rabinowitz, then took the
stand and told his story. When asked what were the benefits he received
from having joined the I. W. W., the witness replied:
"They raised the wages and shortened the hours. Before I joined the I.
W. W. the wages I received in Ellis, Kansas, was $3.00 for twelve hours
and last fall the I. W. W. got $3.50 for nine hours on the same work."
Ex-deputy Charles Lawry told of various brutalities at the jail and also
impeached McRae's testimony in many other particulars.
Dr. Grant Calhoun, who had attended the more seriously injured men who
were taken from the Verona on its return to Seattle, told of the number
and nature of the wounds that had been inflicted. On eight of the men
examined he had found twenty-one serious wounds, counting the entrance
and exit of the same bullet as only one wound. Veitch conducted no
cross-examination of the witness.
Joe Manning, J. H. Beyers, and Harvey Hubler, all three of them
defendants, gave their testimony. Manning told of having been seated in
the cabin with Tracy when the firing commenced, after which he sought
cover behind the smokestack and was joined by Tracy a moment later.
Beyers identified Deputy Bridge as having stood just behind McRae with
his revolver drawn as tho firing when the first shot was heard. This
witness also corroborated the story of Billings in regard to demanding
that the engineer take the boat away from the dock. Hubler verified the
statements about conditions on the Verona and also told of being taken
from his jail cell by force on an order signed by detective McLaren in
an attempt to have him discharge the defense attorneys and accept an
alleged lawyer from Los Angeles.
[Illustration: THOMAS H. TRACY]
Harry Parker and C. C. England told of injuries sustained on the
Verona, and John Riely stated there was absolutely no shooting from the
cabin windows, that being impossible because the men on the boat had
crowded the entire rail at that side.
Jerry L. Finch, former deputy prosecuting attorney of King County, gave
impeaching testimony against Wm. Kenneth and Charles Tucker. Cooley
asked this witness about his interviews with the different state's
witnesses:
"If you talked with all of them, you would probably have something on
all of them?"
The judge would not let Finch answer the question, but there is no doubt
that Cooley had the correct idea about the character of the witnesses on
his side of the case.
In detailing certain arrests Sheriff McRae had claimed that men taken
from the shingleweavers' picket line were members of the I. W. W. B.
Said was one of the men so mentioned. Said took the witness stand and
testified that he was a member of the longshoremen's union and was not
and had not been a member of the I. W. W.
J. G. Brown, president of the International Shingleweavers' Union,
testified that the various men arrested on the picket line in Everett
were either members of the shingle weavers' union or else were
longshoremen from Seattle, none of the men named by McRae being members
of the I. W. W. The testimony of Brown was also of such a nature as to
be impeaching of the statements of Mayor Merrill on the witness stand.
Charles Gray, Robert Adams, and Joe Ghilezano, I. W. W. men on the
Verona, then testified, Adams telling of having been shot thru the
elbow, and Ghilezano giving the details of the way in which his kneecap
had been shot off and other injuries received.
The murderous intentions of the deputies were further shown by the
testimony of Nels Bruseth, who ran down to the shore to launch a boat
and rescue the men in the water. He was stopped in this errand of mercy
by the deputies.
Civil Engineer F. Whitwith, Jr., of the firm of Rutherford and Whitwith,
surveyed the dock and the steamer Verona and made a report in court of
his findings. His evidence clearly showed that there was rifle, shotgun
and revolver fire of a wild character from the interior of the
warehouses and from many points on the dock. He stated that there were
one hundred and seventy-three rifle or revolver bullet marks, exclusive
of the B-B and buckshot markings which were too numerous to count, on
the Verona, these having come from the dock, the shore, and the
Improvement Dock to the south. There were sixteen marks on the boat that
appeared as tho they might have been from revolver fire proceeding from
the boat itself. There were also small triangular shaped gouges in the
planking of the dock, the apex of the triangles indicating that bullets
had struck there and proceeded onward from the Klatawa slip to the open
space on the dock where deputies had been stationed. The physical facts
thus introduced were incontrovertible.
Defendant J. D. Houlihan gave positive testimony to the effect that he
had not spoken privately with "Red" Doran in the I. W. W. hall on the
morning of November 5th, that he had received no gun from Doran or
anyone else, that he did not have the conversation which Auspos imputed
to him, that he had no talk with Auspos on the return trip. All efforts
to confuse this witness failed of their purpose.
In verification of the testimony about deputies firing on the Verona
from the Improvement Company Dock the defense brought Percy Walker upon
the stand. Walker had been cruising around the bay in a little gasoline
launch and saw men armed with long guns, probably rifles or shotguns,
leaning over a breastwork of steel pipes and firing in the direction of
the Verona.
Lawrence Manning, Harston Peters, and Ed. J. Shapeero, defendants, told
their simple straightforward stories of the "battle." Peters stated
that as he lay under cover and heard the shots coming from the dock he
"wished to Christ that he did have a gun." Shapeero told of the wounds
he had received and of the way the uninjured men cared for the wounded
persons on the boat.
Mrs. Joyce Peters testified that she had gone to Everett on the morning
of November 5th in company with Mrs. Lorna Mahler. The reason she did
not go on the Verona was because the trip by water had made Mrs. Mahler
ill on previous occasions. She saw Mrs. Frennette in Everett only when
they were on the same interurban car leaving for Seattle after the
tragedy.
Albert Doninger, W. B. Montgomery and Japheth Banfield, I. W. W. men who
were on the Verona, all placed the first shot as having come from the
dock immediately after the sheriff had cried out "You can't land here."
N. Inscho, Chief of Police of Wenatchee, testified that during the time
the I. W. W. carried on their successful fight for free speech in his
city there were no incendiary fires, no property destroyed, no assaults
or acts of violence committed, and no resistance to arrest.
H. W. Mullinger, lodging house proprietor, John M. Hogan, road
construction contractor, Edward Case, railroad grading contractor,
William Kincaid, alfalfa farmer, and John Egan, teamster, all of North
Yakima and vicinity, were called as character witnesses for Tracy, the
defendant having worked with or for them for a number of years.
The defense followed these witnesses with Oscar Carlson, the passenger
on the Verona who had been fairly riddled with bullets. Carlson
testified that he was not and never had been a member of the I. W. W.,
that he had gone to Everett with his working partner, Nordstrom, as a
sort of an excursion trip, that he had purchased a one way ticket which
was taken up by the captain after the boat had left Seattle, that he
intended returning by way of the Interurban, and that the men on the
boat were orderly and well behaved. He told of having gone to the very
front of the boat as it pulled into Everett from which point he heard
the first shot, which was fired from the dock. He fell immediately and
while prostrate was struck with bullet after bullet. He then told of
having entered suit against the Vashon Navigation Company for $50,000.00
on account of injuries received. Robert C. Saunders, of the law firm of
Saunders and Nelson, then testified that he was handling the case for
Carlson and had made out the affidavit of complaint himself and was
responsible for the portion that alleged that a lawless mob were on the
boat, Carlson having made no such statement to him at any time.
Charles Ashleigh was recalled to the stand to testify to having
telephoned to the Seattle newspapers on November 4th, requesting them to
send reporters to Everett the next day. He was followed on the stand by
John T. Doran, familiarly known as "Red" on account of the color of his
hair. Doran stated that he was the author of the handbill distributed in
Everett prior to the attempted meeting of November 5th. He positively
denied having given a gun to Houlihan or anyone else on November 5th.
Upon cross-examination he said that he was in charge of the work of
checking the number of men who went on the Verona to Everett, and had
paid the transportation of the men in a lump sum.
As the next to the last witness on its side of the long-drawn out case
the defense placed on the stand the defendant, Thomas H. Tracy. The
witness told of having been one of a working class family, too large to
be properly cared for and having to leave home and make his own way in
the world before he was eleven years old. From that time on he had
followed farming, teaming and construction work in all parts of the
west, his bronzed appearance above the prison pallor giving evidence of
his outdoor life.
Tracy told of having been secretary of the I. W. W. in Everett for a
short time, that being the only official position he had ever held in
the organization. He explained his position on the boat at the time it
docked, stating that the first shot apparently came from the dock and
struck close to where he was sitting. Immediately the boat listed and
threw him away from the window, after which he sought a place of safety
behind the smokestack. He denied having been in any way a party to a
conspiracy to commit an act of violence, or to kill anyone.
"You are charged here, Mr. Tracy," said Vanderveer, "with having aided
and abetted an unknown man in killing Jefferson Beard. Are you guilty or
not guilty?"
"I am not guilty," replied Tracy without a trace of emotion.
The cross-questioning of the defendant in this momentous case was
conducted by citizen-deputy Cooley. His questions to the man whom he and
his fellow conspirators on the dock had not succeeded in murdering were
of the most trivial nature, clearly proving that arch-sleuth McLaren had
been unable to discover or to manufacture anything that would make
Tracy's record other than that of a plain, unassuming, migratory worker.
"Where did you vote last?" asked Cooley.
"I never voted," responded Tracy.
"Never voted in your life?" queried Cooley.
"No!" replied the defendant who for the time represented the entire
migratory class. "I was never in one place long enough!"
Then, acting on the class theory that it is an honor to be a
"globe-trotter" but a disgrace to be a "blanket-stiff," the prosecutor
brought out Tracy's travels in minute detail. This examination of the
railroad construction worker brought home to the listeners the truth of
the little verse:
"He built the road;
With others of his class he built the road;
Now o'er its weary length he packs his load,
Chasing a Job, spurred on by Hunger's goad,
He walks and walks and walks and walks,
And wonders why in Hell he built the road!"
Then there hobbled into the court room on crutches a stripling with an
empty trouser leg, his face drawn with suffering, and who was able to
get into the witness chair only by obviously painful efforts with the
assistance of Vanderveer and Judge Ronald. This was Harry Golden, whose
entire left leg had been amputated after having been shattered by a
high-power rifle bullet fired by a "law and order" deputy.
Golden stated that he had been born in Poland twenty-two years before,
and had come to the United States at the age of sixteen. He was asked:
"Why did you come to this country?"
"I came to the United States," said the witness, "because it is supposed
to be a free country."
"We object to that as immaterial!" cried prosecutor Veitch.
The witness described the firing of the first shot and told of his
attempts to find a place of safety. He said he was wounded in the hand
as he attempted to climb into a life boat. He remained on the starboard
side of the starboard life boat until the Verona had backed out into the
bay. Then just as he was starting to raise up a rifle bullet struck his
leg, taking a course thru the limb and emerging at the knee.
"That is on your left--?"
"On my left, yes, which I ain't got; I lost it!" said the witness.
"Did I understand you to say you stood up to see something before you
were shot?" asked Veitch.
"Why, sure!" replied Golden contemptuously. "I had my two legs then."
Veitch wished to learn the exact location of the witness at the time he
was shot and to that end referred to the model with the remark:
"Look here. Here is the boat as it was at the dock."
"I don't like to look at it!" said Golden heatedly. "I lost my leg on
that boat!"
[Illustration: EVERETT from the water. To the left G. N. Depot from
where bystanders viewed battle.]
The witness was in evident pain during the examination, having just had
a hospital treatment applied to his raw stump, and was rather irritable
as a consequence. He answered several questions rather sharply and
proceeded to explain his answers. At one of these interruptions Judge
Ronald exclaimed to the witness angrily:
"When he asks you a question answer yes or no! If you want to live in
this country try and live like an American!"
"I take an exception to Your Honor's remarks!" said Moore emphatically.
The judge grudgingly allowed an exception to his uncalled for statement.
In concluding his examination Veitch asked the witness:
"What is your name in Polish?"
"I am not Polish; I am a Jew," replied Golden. "Well, what is your
family name in Poland?" asked the prosecutor.
"Goldenhaul, or something like that. Now I call myself Golden. When we
come to this country--."
"Never mind," interposed Veitch hurriedly.
"When we come to this country for good luck we always change the name,
you know," finished Golden, and added bitterly, "I sure did have good
luck!"
This ended the case in chief for the defense, the marshalling of such a
mass of testimony from a host of disinterested witnesses, men, women and
children, putting it on an entirely different footing from the
prejudiced testimony brought forward by the prosecution.
In rebuttal of testimony produced by the defense the prosecution
introduced a series of witnesses. As in their case in chief every one of
the parties who testified were in some way concerned in the case as
deputies, jailers, police officers, dance hall habitues, detectives, and
the like. The witnesses were W. P. Bell, Dr. F. R. Hedges, E. E. Murphy,
Charles Hall, Rudolph Weidaur, W. J. Britt, Percy Ames, Harry Blackburn,
Reuben Westover, Harry Groger, W. M. Maloney, Albert Burke, W. R.
Conner, A. E. Andrews, David D. Young, Howard Hathaway, George Leonard
Mickel, Paul Hill, E. C. Mony, B. H. Bryan, all of whom were deputies,
D. C. Pearson, W. H. Bridge, and "Honest" John Hogan, all three jailers
and deputies, Robert C. Hickey, city jailer, David Daniels and Adolph
Miller, police officers, Charles Manning and J. T. Rogers, personal
friends of McRae, Oscar Moline, dance hall musician, Albert McKay, of
the Ocean Food Products Company located on the Everett Improvement Dock,
T. J. McKinnon, employe of McKay, R. B. Williams, contractor, John
Flynn, agent Everett Improvement Dock, W. W. Blain and F. S. Ruble,
secretary and bookkeeper respectively of the Commercial Club and also
deputies, A. E. Ballew, Great Northern depot agent, H. G. Keith, Great
Northern detective, Charles Auspos, who was shown to be in receipt of
favors as state's witness, and George Reese, Pinkerton informer and
"stool pigeon."
One deputy, H. S. Groger, stated on cross-examination that he
continuously fired at a man on the boat who appeared to be trying to
untie the spring line. Outside of this evidence of a desire for
wholesale slaughter nothing developed of sufficient importance to
warrant the production of sur-rebuttal witnesses, except in the
testimony of Auspos and Reese.
Auspos testified that defendant Billings in the presence of John
Rawlings had stated in the Everett County jail that he had a gun that
made a noise like a cannon. This was intended to controvert the
testimony of Billings.
Reese related a conversation that Tracy was alleged to have carried on
in his presence on the Verona as it was bound for Everett. He stated
that a launch was seen approaching and someone remarked that it was
probably coming to head them off, to which Tracy replied "Let them come;
they will find we are ready for them, and we will give them something
they are not looking for." This was intended as impeachment of Tracy.
Cross-examination of this informer brought out the fact that he was a
Pinkerton agent at the time he was holding the office of delegate to the
Central Labor Council of the American Federation of Labor. Reese stated
that he was employed on the waterfront during the longshoremen's strike
with instructions to "look for everybody who was pulling the rough
stuff, such as threatening to burn or attempting to burn warehouses, and
shooting up non-union workers, and beating them up and so forth." He had
been in the employ of the Pinkerton Agency for six weeks this last time
before he was ordered to go down and join the I. W. W. He stated in
answer to a question by Vanderveer:
"I was instructed to go down there and find out who these fellows were
that was handling this phosphorus and pulling off this sabotage and the
only way I could find out was to get a card and get in and get
acquainted with them."
Attorney Moore in the absence of the jury offered to prove that Reese
had practically manufactured this job for himself by promoting the very
things he was supposed to discover. Moore stated some of the things he
would prove if permitted by the court:
"That on or about August 1st Reese went to one J. M. Wilson, an official
of the longshoremen's union, and endeavored to get $10.00 with which to
buy dynamite to blow up a certain city dock; that on September 20th the
witness gave Percy May, a member of the longshoremen's union, a bottle
of phosphorus with instructions to start a fire at Pier 5; that in the
month of July the witness opposed a settlement of the longshoremen's
strike and when members of the union argued that they could remain out
no longer as they had no money, Reese clapped his pockets and said, 'you
fellows wouldn't be starving if you had the nerve that I have got. Why
don't you go out and get it, take it off the scabs the way I do;' that
in September Feinberg had to make Reese leave the speaker's stand in
Everett because he was talking on matters harmful to industrial union
propaganda; that on November 4th the witness went to the place where
Feinberg was employed and left a suit of clothes to be pressed, saying
to Feinberg, after he had ascertained that Feinberg was thinking of
going to Everett on the following day, "mark the bill 'paid' so I will
have a receipt if you don't come back;" that on August 16th, the day
before the big dock fire in Seattle, Reese went to the down-town office
of the same dye works in which Walker C. Smith was manager and in charge
of the purchase of chemicals and tried to get Smith to purchase for him
some carbon disulphide to be used in connection with phosphorus; that in
the month of November in the Labor Temple, in the presence of Sam
Sadler, Reese had said to Albert Brilliant that if the longshoremen had
any guts they would go out with guns and clean up the scabs on the
waterfront; and that Reese tried to get other men to co-operate with him
in a scheme to capture a Government boat lying in the Sound during the
progress of the longshoremen's strike."
The court refused to allow the defense to go into these matters so the
only showing of the true character of Reese was confined to examination
as to the perjury he had committed in his initial sworn statement to the
defense.
The sur-rebuttal of the defense occupied but a few minutes. It was
admitted that Mr. Garver, the court reporter, would swear that Reese had
made an initial statement to the defense counsel and that the same had
been taken down stenographically and sworn to. Charles Tennant, captain
of the detective force of the Seattle police department, testified to
having telephoned to the sheriff's office in Everett on November 5th to
give the information that a boatload of I. W. W. men had left for
Everett. He did not describe the body of men in any way and had not said
that they were armed. This was for the purpose of showing that somewhere
between the time that Jefferson Beard received the message and the time
it was transmitted to the deputies some one had inserted the statement
that the men on the boat were heavily armed. John Rawlings, defendant,
testified that no such conversation as that related by Auspos had
occurred in the presence of defendant Billings. Thomas H. Tracy denied
making the threats ascribed to him by Reese, and this closed the
hearing of evidence in the case.
Outside the courtroom on the day the last of the evidence was introduced
there was in progress one of the largest demonstrations of Labor ever
held in the Pacific Northwest. The date was May first, and International
Labor Day was celebrated by the united radicals of the entire city and
surrounding district. Meeting at the I. W. W. hall at 10:30 in the
morning, thousands of men and women fell into a marching line of fours,
a committee pinning a red rose or carnation on each marcher. Fifteen
solid blocks of these marchers, headed by Wagner's Band, then wended
their way thru the streets to Mount Pleasant Cemetery and grouped
themselves around the graves of Baran, Gerlot and Looney--Labor's
martyred dead.
There, upon the hillside, in accordance with his final wishes, the ashes
of Joe Hill were scattered to the breeze, and with them were cast upon
the air and on the graves beneath, the ashes of Jessie Lloyd and Patrick
Brennan, two loyal fighters in the class struggle who had died during
the year just passed.
A fitting song service, with a few simple words by speakers in English,
Russian, Swedish, Hungarian and Italian, in commemoration of those who
had passed away, completed the tribute to the dead.
Nor were the living forgotten! The great crowd drifted from the
graveside, but hundreds of them reassembled almost automatically and
marched to the King County jail. Standing there, just outside of the
very heart of the great city, the crowd, led by the I. W. W. choir, sang
song after song from the revolutionary hymnal--the little red song book,
each song being answered by one from the free speech prisoners confined
in the jail. The service lasted until late in the day and, to complete
the one labor day that is as broad as the world itself, a meeting was
held in one of the largest halls of the city. At this meeting the final
collection for the Everett Prisoners' Defense was taken and at the
request of the imprisoned men one half of the proceeds was sent to aid
in the liberation of Tom Mooney and his fellow victims of the Merchants'
and Manufacturers' Association in San Francisco.
There remained but the reading of the instructions of the court and the
addresses by the counsel for either side to complete this epoch making
case and place it in the hands of the jury for their final verdict.