FOR THE REFORM OF ENGLISH SPELLING.

Many Representative Men Associated

With the New Movement to

Simplify Orthography.

Andrew Carnegie's latest activity is to champion a movement for the reform

of English spelling. He has promised to finance a campaign by the

Simplified Spelling Board. The greater part of the actual campaign work

will be done by the following executive committee of the board: Professor

Brander Matthews, chairman; Dr. Charles P.G. Scott, secretary; Dr. William

Hayes Ward, Henry Holt, Dr. I.K. Funk, and Colonel H.B. Sprague. With Mr.

Carnegie's backing, far-reaching results are likely to be gained.

Movements for reformed spelling are no new thing, but this is the first

one that has been adequately financed.

Word comes from England that the poet Swinburne denounces the Carnegie

plan as "a monstrous, barbarous absurdity." But the American press, on the

whole, seems favorable. For example, the New York _Times_ says:

The number of people who are vehemently in love with the

difficulties, absurdities, inconsistencies--and crystallized

ignorances--of our present spelling is very small, and

neither their denunciation nor their ridicule will weigh at

all heavily upon the great majority, who look upon spelling

as a means to an end, and to an end quite different from the

preservation of etymological history in the most clumsy,

expensive, and deceptive of forms.

One might imagine, from the way in which the enemies of this

reform run on, that any changes made now would be the first

to which English spelling had ever been subjected--would be

the establishment of an evil precedent instead of merely a

slight hastening, in the interest of convenience and

economy, of a process that has been going on steadily ever

since the day when English became a written language.

One of our correspondents said yesterday that, in his

opinion, "before we try to monkey further with so good an

instrument as the English language we ought to try to use it

properly."

Well, not necessarily. With a little, or even with a lot, of

"monkeying" an amount of time almost incalculably large, now

devoted to the learning of such utterly useless and imbecile

things as the arrangement of the vowels in "siege" and

"seize," could be used on the task which our correspondent

wisely intimated is so important.

The personality of the Simplified Spelling Board is

guarantee that the demand for an improved orthography is not

an outgrowth of ignorance or irreverence. These men have

more than a little affection for the history of words, and

they are not at all likely to do anything that will hide or

distort it. They will, however, put and keep that history in

its proper place.

How Dr. Johnson Takes It.

It would seem, however, that the shades of former lexicographers are

incensed by the threat of "fonetic speling." The New York _Globe_

describes the reception of the news in the land across the Styx:

It has been the practise at the Cheshire Cheese Inn in the

trans-Styx London, where post-mortem encyclopedists have

their "clubs," to make light of the modern verbal reformers

and "simplifiers." It was immediately seen, however, that

Andrew's addition to the reformer's fold put a very

different complexion on the case.

"Sir," said the doctor to Boswell, in his best "bow-wow"

manner, "I have never slept an hour less nor eat an ounce

less meat on account of these caitiffs, but now that the

Scotch barbarian, that futile Highland Cherokee, has

supplied them with money, they may ruin the language in a

twelvemonth."

"I don't see, sir," replied Boswell, "why my countryman did

not confine his charities to libraries and hero funds."

"Because, sir," thundered the doctor, "he is insane on the

subject of charity; he could not make a worse use of his

money than thus to threaten the integrity and purity of the

great vehicle of expression."

"There is, however, sir," replied Boswell, "something to be

said in their favor; thru saves three letters over through,

catalog saves two, becaws one; they take less ink, and less

room on a page; think of----"

"Well, sir," said the doctor, "suppose they do; what of

that? A man with his arms and legs off would take up less

room. You take up less room than I. Does that make you any

more valuable to the world?"

"I can see no logical objection, sir," replied Boswell, "to

the omission of silent letters. They do no good----"

"No good, sir!" snarled the doctor. "There are some letters,

sir, as there are some men, who do themselves more credit,

sir, when they are silent."

The Scrap Book, Volume 1, No. 3 May 1906 · 第 10 / 146 题