SOCIALISM'S LATEST MILLIONAIRE CONVERT.

Views Expressed by J.M. Patterson, of

Chicago, Who Has Resigned Office

Because of His Convictions.

One of the most recent converts to Socialism is Joseph Medill Patterson,

of Chicago. Though he is now only twenty-seven years of age, Mr. Patterson

has had a strong taste of public life as commissioner of public works in

Chicago. In the local campaign of 1905 he supported Judge (now Mayor)

Dunne, who, after election, gave him his important appointment. He has now

resigned the commissionership. In his letter of resignation he says:

It was through a common belief in the cause of municipal

ownership of municipal utilities that I first became

acquainted with you, and in this letter of resignation I

desire to express publicly just how my views on this subject

have changed. They have not diminished. They have enlarged.

I used to believe that many of the ills under which the

nation suffers, and by which it is threatened, would be

prevented or avoided by the general inauguration of public

ownership of public utilities. But my experience in the

Department of Public Works has convinced me that this policy

would not be even one-fourth of the way sufficient.

He then goes on to say that in Great Britain--where municipal trading has

been highly developed--the problem of the unemployed is becoming very

intense; while in Germany--where municipal and government ownership of

public utilities has become almost the rule--the gap between the

possessions of the rich and the poor grows wider every day. The letter

concludes:

The universal ballot gives every male citizen an equal

political opportunity. The common ownership of all the means

of production and distribution would give everybody an equal

chance at music, art, sport, study, recreation, travel,

self-respect, and the respect of others. I, for one, cannot

see why those things should be concentrated more and more in

the hands of a few.

Two hundred years ago a proposition for equal political

opportunity would have seemed more absurd than to-day seems

the proposition for equal opportunity in all things on this

earth for which men strive.

I have hardly read a book on socialism, but that which I

have just enunciated I believe in general to be its theory.

If it be its theory, I am a socialist. You will find, and

other advanced liberals and radicals who believe as I do

will also find, that you are merely paltering with skin-deep

measures when you stop short of socialism.

Interviewed regarding his conversion to socialism, Mr. Patterson adds:

When we say that things should be divided equally we mean

that every man should have a chance. Men like Schwab and

Carnegie have risen from poor young men to wealth; but they

are the extraordinary young men. The ordinary young man is

not able to rise above his birth, and the extraordinary

young man is one in a million.

I don't mean that all the money in the country should be cut

up into equal parts. What I mean is that the people should

own in common all the means of production, the sources of

wealth, and divide the results. The talk of economical

equality is no more ridiculous now than was the talk of

social equality years ago.

Suppose Alfred G. Vanderbilt has five million dollars

invested in his railroads. Say there are twenty-five

thousand employees. Out of his investment he receives, say,

five per cent, which is two hundred and fifty thousand

dollars a year. He doesn't turn a wheel, he doesn't move a

locomotive, he doesn't do a thing for the railroad. He

simply owns it. He doesn't contribute toward making the road

safe. Those men earn so much money for him. Suppose he

should give them what they earn, instead of taking it

himself?

My idea is to have things equally divided so that when a man

dies his children shall not inherit wealth.

Mr. Patterson is a son of a wealthy family. His father, Robert W.

Patterson, proprietor of the Chicago _Tribune_, is a conservative, opposed

to his son's beliefs. But he adds: "I am a firm believer in letting

everybody think as he pleases, including my son." He says, however, that

if the young man runs for office on the socialistic ticket, the _Tribune_

certainly will not support him.

The Scrap Book, Volume 1, No. 3 May 1906 · 第 7 / 146 题