We now proceed to consider the powers which the ancient poets might

have discovered in the air, in the clouds, and, more particularly, in

those meteoric conflicts which by thunder, lightning, darkness,

storms, and showers of rain must have taught man that very important

lesson that he was not alone in this world. Many philosophers, as you

know, believe that all religion arose from fear or terror, and that

without thunder and lightning to teach us, we should never have

believed in any gods or god. This is a one-sided and exaggerated view.

Thunderstorms, no doubt, had a large share in arousing feelings of

awe and terror, and in making man conscious of his weakness and

dependence. Even in the Veda, Indra is introduced as saying: "Yes,

when I send thunder and lightning, then you believe in me." But what

we call religion would never have sprung from fear and terror alone.

_Religion is trust_, and that trust arose in the beginning from the

impressions made on the mind and heart of man by the order and wisdom

of nature, and more particularly by those regularly recurring events,

the return of the sun, the revival of the moon, the order of the

seasons, the law of cause and effect, gradually discovered in all

things, and traced back in the end to a cause of all causes, by

whatever name we choose to call it.

Still the meteoric phenomena had, no doubt, their important share in

the production of ancient deities; and in the poems of the Vedic

Rishis they naturally occupy a very prominent place. If we were asked

who was the principal god of the Vedic period, we should probably,

judging from the remains of that poetry which we possess, say it was

Indra, the god of the blue sky, the Indian Zeus, the gatherer of the

clouds, the giver of rain, the wielder of the thunder-bolt, the

conqueror of darkness, and of all the powers of darkness, the bringer

of light, the source of freshness, vigor, and life, the ruler and lord

of the whole world. Indra is this, and much more in the Veda. He is

supreme in the hymns of many poets, and may have been so in the

prayers addressed to him by many of the ancient septs or village

communities in India. Compared with him the other gods are said to be

decrepit old men. Heaven, the old Heaven or Dyaus, formerly the father

of all the gods, nay the father of Indra himself, bows before him, and

the Earth trembles at his approach. Yet Indra never commanded the

permanent allegiance of all the other gods, like Zeus and Jupiter;

nay, we know from the Veda itself that there were skeptics, even at

that early time, who denied that there was any such thing as

Indra.[223]

By the side of Indra, and associated with him in his battles, and

sometimes hardly distinguishable from him, we find the representatives

of the wind, called Vata or Vayu, and the more terrible storm-gods,

the Maruts, literally the Smashers.

When speaking of the Wind, a poet says:[224] "Where was he born?

Whence did he spring? the life of the gods, the germ of the world!

That god moves about where he listeth, his voices are heard, but he is

not to be seen."

The Maruts are more terrible than Vata, the wind. They are clearly the

representatives of such storms as are known in India, when the air is

darkened by dust and clouds, when in a moment the trees are stripped

of their foliage, their branches shivered, their stems snapped, when

the earth seems to reel and the mountains to shake, and the rivers are

lashed into foam and fury. Then the poet sees the Maruts approaching

with golden helmets, with spotted skins on their shoulders,

brandishing golden spears, whirling their axes, shooting fiery arrows,

and cracking their whips amid thunder and lightning. They are the

comrades of Indra, sometimes, like Indra, the sons of Dyaus or the

sky, but also the sons of another terrible god, called Rudra, or the

Howler, a fighting god, to whom many hymns are addressed. In him a new

character is evolved, that of a healer and saviour--a very natural

transition in India, where nothing is so powerful for dispelling

miasmas, restoring health, and imparting fresh vigor to man and

beast, as a thunderstorm, following after weeks of heat and drought.

All these and several others, such as Par_g_anya and the _Ri_bhus, are

the gods of mid-air, the most active and dramatic gods, ever present

to the fancy of the ancient poets, and in several cases the prototypes

of later heroes, celebrated in the epic poems of India. In battles,

more particularly, these fighting gods of the sky were constantly

invoked.[225] Indra is the leader in battles, the protector of the

bright Aryans, the destroyer of the black aboriginal inhabitants of

India. "He has thrown down fifty thousand black fellows," the poet

says, "and their strongholds crumbled away like an old rag." Strange

to say, Indra is praised for having saved his people from their

enemies, much as Jehovah was praised by the Jewish prophets. Thus we

read in one hymn that when Sudas, the pious king of the T_ri_tsus, was

pressed hard in his battle with the ten kings, Indra changed the flood

into an easy ford, and thus saved Sudas.

In another hymn we read:[226] "Thou hast restrained the great river

for the sake of Turviti Vayya: the flood moved in obedience to thee,

and thou madest the rivers easy to cross." This is not very different

from the Psalmist (78:13): "He divided the sea, and caused them to

pass through; and he made the waters to stand as an heap."

And there are other passages which have reminded some students of the

Veda of Joshua's battle,[227] when the sun stood still and the moon

stayed, until the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies.

For we read in the Veda also, as Professor Kaegi has pointed out (l.

c. p. 63), that "Indra lengthened the days into the night," and that

"the Sun unharnessed its chariot in the middle of the day."[228]

In some of the hymns addressed to Indra his original connection with

the sky and the thunderstorm seems quite forgotten. He has become a

spiritual god, the only king of all worlds and all people,[229] who

sees and hears everything,[230] nay, who inspires men with their best

thoughts. No one is equal to him, no one excels him.

The name of Indra is peculiar to India, and must have been formed after

the separation of the great Aryan family had taken place, for we find it

neither in Greek, nor in Latin, nor in German. There are Vedic gods, as

I mentioned before, whose names must have been framed before that

separation, and which occur therefore, though greatly modified in

character, sometimes in Greek, sometimes in Latin, sometimes in the

Celtic, Teutonic, and Slavonic dialects. D y a u s, for instance, is the

same word as Zeus or Jupiter, U s h a s is Eos, N a k t a is Nyx, S u r

y a is Helios, A g n i is ignis, B h a g a is Baga in Old Persian, B o g

u in Old Slavonic, V a r u _n_ a is Uranos, V a t a is Wotan, V a _k_ is

vox, and in the name of the _Maruts_, or the storm-gods, the germs of

the Italic god of war, Mars, have been discovered. Besides these direct

coincidences, some indirect relations have been established between

Hermes and S a r a m e y a, Dionysos and D y u n i _s_ y a, Prometheus

and p r a m a n t h a, Orpheus and _R i_ b h u, Erinnys and S a r a _n_

y u, Pan and P a v a n a.[231]

But while the name of Indra as the god of the sky, also as the god of

the thunderstorm, and the giver of rain, is unknown among the

north-western members of the Aryan family, the name of another god who

sometimes acts the part of Indra (Indra_h_ Par_g_anyatma), but is much

less prominent in the Veda, I mean Par_g_anya, must have existed

before that of Indra, because two at least of the Aryan languages have

carried it, as we shall see, to Germany, and to the very shores of the

Baltic.

Sometimes this Par_g_anya stands in the place of Dyaus, the sky. Thus

we read in the Atharva-Veda, XII. 1, 12:[232] "The Earth is the

mother, and I am the son of the Earth. Par_g_anya is the father; may

he help us!"

In another place (XII. 1, 42) the Earth, instead of being the wife of

Heaven or Dyaus, is called the wife of Par_g_anya.

Now who or what is this Par_g_anya? There have been long controversies

about him,[233] as to whether he is the same as Dyaus, Heaven, or the

same as Indra, the successor of Dyaus, whether he is the god of the

sky, of the cloud, or of the rain.

To me it seems that this very expression, god of the sky, god of the

cloud, is so entire an anachronism that we could not even translate it

into Vedic Sanskrit without committing a solecism. It is true, no doubt,

we must use our modern ways of speaking when we wish to represent the

thoughts of the ancient world; but we cannot be too much on our guard

against accepting the dictionary representative of an ancient word for

its real counterpart. Deva, no doubt, means "gods" and "god," and P a r

_g_ a n y a means "cloud," but no one could say in Sanskrit p a r _g_ a

n y a s y a d e v a _h_, "the god of the cloud." The god, or the divine,

or transcendental element, does not come from without, to be added to

the cloud or to the sky or to the earth, but it springs from the cloud

and the sky and the earth, and is slowly elaborated into an independent

concept. As many words in ancient languages have an undefined meaning,

and lend themselves to various purposes according to the various

intentions of the speakers, the names of the gods also share in this

elastic and plastic character of ancient speech. There are passages

where Par_g_anya means cloud, there are passages where it means rain.

There are passages where Par_g_anya takes the place which elsewhere is

filled by Dyaus, the sky, or by Indra, the active god of the atmosphere.

This may seem very wrong and very unscientific to the scientific

mythologist. But it cannot be helped. It is the nature of ancient

thought and ancient language to be unscientific, and we must learn to

master it as well as we can, instead of finding fault with it, and

complaining that our forefathers did not reason exactly as we do.

There are passages in the Vedic hymns where Par_g_anya appears as a

supreme god. He is called father, like Dyaus, the sky. He is called

a s u r a, the living or life-giving god, a name peculiar to the oldest

and the greatest gods. One poet says,[234] "He rules as god over the

whole world; all creatures rest in him; he is the life (atma) of all

that moves and rests."

Surely it is difficult to say more of a supreme god than what is here

said of Par_g_anya. Yet in other hymns he is represented as performing

his office, namely that of sending rain upon the earth, under the

control of Mitra and Varu_n_, who are then considered as the highest

lords, the mightiest rulers of heaven and earth.[235]

There are other verses, again, where par_g_anya occurs with hardly any

traces of personality, but simply as a name of cloud or rain.

Thus we read:[236] "Even by day the Maruts (the storm-gods) produce

darkness with the cloud that carries water, when they moisten the

earth." Here cloud is par_g_anya, and it is evidently used as an

appellative, and not as a proper name. The same word occurs in the

plural also, and we read of many par_g_anyas or clouds vivifying the

earth.[237]

When Devapi prays for rain in favor of his brother, he says:[238] "O

lord of my prayer (B_ri_haapati), whether thou be Mitra or Varu_n_a or

Pushan, come to my sacrifice! Whether thou be together with the

Adityas, the Vasus or the Maruts, let the cloud (par_g_anya) rain for

_S_antanu."

And again: "Stir up the rainy cloud" (par_g_anya).

In several places it makes no difference whether we translate

par_g_anya by cloud or by rain, for those who pray for rain, pray for

the cloud, and whatever may be the benefits of the rain, they may

nearly all be called the benefits of the cloud. There is a curious

hymn, for instance, addressed to the frogs who, at the beginning of

the rains, come forth from the dry ponds, and embrace each other and

chatter together, and whom the poet compares to priests singing at a

sacrifice, a not very complimentary remark from a poet who is himself

supposed to have been a priest. Their voice is said to have been

revived by par_g_anya, which we shall naturally translate "by rain,"

though, no doubt, the poet may have meant, for all we know, either a

cloud, or even the god Par_g_anya himself.

I shall try to translate one of the hymns addressed to Par_g_anya,

when conceived as a god, or at least as so much of a god as it was

possible to be at that stage in the intellectual growth of the human

race.[239]

1. "Invoke the strong god with these songs! praise

Par_g_anya, worship him with veneration! for he, the roaring

bull, scattering drops, gives seed-fruit to plants.

2. "He cuts the trees asunder, he kills evil spirits; the

whole world trembles before his mighty weapon. Even the

guiltless flees before the powerful, when Par_g_anya

thundering strikes down the evil-doers.

3. "Like a charioteer, striking his horses with a whip, he

puts forths his messenger of rain. From afar arise the

roarings of the lion, when Par_g_anya makes the sky full of

rain.

4. "The winds blow, the lightnings[240] fly, plants spring

up, the sky pours. Food is produced for the whole world,

when Par_g_anya blesses the earth with his seed.

5. "O Par_g_anya, thou at whose work the earth bows down,

thou at whose work hoofed animals are scattered, thou at

whose work the plants assume all forms, grant thou to us thy

great protection!

6. "O, Maruts, give us the rain of heaven, make the streams

of the strong horse run down! And come thou hither with thy

thunder, pouring out water, for thou (O Par_g_anya) art the

living god, thou art our father.

7. "Do thou roar, and thunder, and give fruitfulness! Fly

around us with thy chariot full of water! Draw forth thy

water-skin, when it has been opened and turned downward, and

let the high and the low places become level!

8. "Draw up the large bucket, and pour it out; let the

streams pour forth freely! Soak heaven and earth with

fatness! and let there be a good draught for the cows!

9. "O Par_g_anya, when roaring and thundering thou killest

the evil-doers, then everything rejoices, whatever lives on

earth.

10. "Thou hast sent rain, stop now! Thou hast made the

deserts passable, thou hast made plants grow for food, and

thou hast obtained praise from men."

This is a Vedic hymn, and a very fair specimen of what these ancient

hymns are. There is nothing very grand and poetical about them, and

yet, I say, take thousands and thousands of people living in our

villages, and depending on rain for their very life, and not many of

them will be able to compose such a prayer for rain, even though three

thousand years have passed over our heads since Par_g_anya was first

invoked in India. Nor are these verses entirely without poetical

conceptions and descriptions. Whoever has watched a real thunderstorm

in a hot climate will recognize the truth of those quick sentences:

"the winds blow, the lightnings fly, plants spring up, the hoofed

cattle are scattered." Nor is the idea without a certain drastic

reality, that Par_g_anya draws a bucket of water from his well in

heaven, and pours out skin after skin (in which water was then

carried) down upon the earth.

There is even a moral sentiment perceptible in this hymn. "When the

storms roar, and the lightnings flash and the rain pours down, even

the guiltless trembles, and evil-doers are struck down." Here we

clearly see that the poet did not look upon the storm simply as an

outbreak of the violence of nature, but that he had a presentiment of

a higher will and power which even the guiltless fears; for who, he

seems to say, is entirely free from guilt?

If now we ask again, Who is Par_g_anya? or What is Par_g_anya? we can

answer that par_g_anya was meant originally for the cloud, so far as

it gives rain; but as soon as the idea of a giver arose, the visible

cloud became the outward appearance only, or the body of that giver,

and the giver himself was somewhere else, we know not where. In some

verses Par_g_anya seems to step into the place of Dyaus, the sky, and

P_ri_thivi, the earth, is his wife. In other places,[241] however, he

is the son of Dyaus or the sky, though no thought is given in that

early stage to the fact that thus Par_g_anya might seem to be the

husband of his mother. We saw that even the idea of Indra being the

father of his own father did not startle the ancient poets beyond an

exclamation that it was a very wonderful thing indeed.

Sometimes Par_g_anya does the work of Indra,[242] the Jupiter Pluvius

of the Veda; sometimes of Vayu, the wind, sometimes of Soma, the giver

of rain. Yet with all this he is not Dyaus, nor Indra, nor the Maruts,

nor Vayu, nor Soma. He stands by himself, a separate person, a

separate god, as we should say--nay, one of the oldest of all the

Aryan gods.

His name, par_g_anya, is derived from a root par_g_, which, like its

parallel forms pars and parsh, must (I think) have had the meaning of

sprinkling, irrigating, moistening. An interchange between final _g_,

_s_, and sh, may, no doubt, seem unusual, but it is not without parallel

in Sanskrit. We have, for instance, the roots pi_ng_, pingere; pish, to

rub; pi_s_, to adorn (as in pe_s_as, [Greek: poikilos], etc.); m_rig_,

to rub, m_ri_sh, to rub out, to forget; m_ris_, mulcere.

This very root m_rig_ forms its participle as m_ri_sh-_t_a, like

ya_g_, ish_t_a, and vi_s_, vish_t_a; nay there are roots, such as

druh, which optionally take a final lingual or guttural, such as

dhru_t_ and dhruk.[243]

We may therefore compare par_g_ in par_g_anya with such words as

p_ri_shata, p_ri_shati, speckled, drop of water;[244] also par_s_u,

cloud, p_ris_ni, speckled, cloud, earth; and in Greek [Greek: prox(o)],

[Greek: perknos], etc.[245]

If derived from par_g_, to sprinkle, Par_g_anya would have meant

originally "he who irrigates or gives rain."[246]

When the different members of the Aryan family dispersed, they might

all of them, Hindus as well as Greeks and Celts, and Teutons and

Slaves, have carried that name for cloud with them. But you know that

it happened very often that out of the commonwealth of their ancient

language, one and the same word was preserved, as the case might be,

not by all, but by only six, or five, or four, or three, or two, or

even by one only of the seven principal heirs; and yet, as we know

that there was no historical contact between them, after they had once

parted from each other, long before the beginning of what we call

history, the fact that two of the Aryan languages have preserved the

same finished word with the same finished meaning, is proof sufficient

that it belonged to the most ancient treasure of Aryan thought.

Now there is no trace, at least no very clear trace, of Par_g_anya, in

Greek, or Latin, or Celtic, or even in Teutonic. In Slavonic, too, we

look in vain, till we come to that almost forgotten side-branch called

the _Lettic_, comprising the spoken _Lituanian_ and _Lettish_, and the

now extinct _Old Prussian_. Lituania is no longer an independent

state, but it was once, not more than six centuries ago, a Grand

Duchy, independent both of Russia and Poland. Its first Grand Duke was

Ringold, who ruled from 1235, and his successors made successful

conquests against the Russians. In 1368 these grand dukes became kings

of Poland, and in 1569 the two countries were united. When Poland was

divided between Russia and Prussia, part of Lituania fell to the

former, part to the latter. There are still about one million and a

half of people who speak Lituanian in Russia and Prussia, while

Lettish is spoken by about one million in Curland and Livonia.

The Lituanian language even as it is now spoken by the common people,

contains some extremely primitive grammatical forms--in some cases

almost identical with Sanskrit. These forms are all the more curious,

because they are but few in number, and the rest of the language has

suffered much from the wear and tear of centuries.

Now in that remote Lituanian language we find that our old friend

Par_g_anya has taken refuge. There he lives to the present day, while

even in India he is almost forgotten, at least in the spoken

languages; and there, in Lituania, not many centuries back might be

heard among a Christianized or nearly Christianized people, prayers

for rain, not very different from that which I translated to you from

the Rig-Veda. In Lituanian the god of thunder was called

_Perkunas_,[247] and the same word is still used in the sense of

thunder. In Old Prussian, thunder was _percunos_, and in Lettish to

the present day _perkons_ is thunder, god of thunder.[248]

It was, I believe, Grimm who for the first time identified the Vedic

Par_g_anya with the Old Slavonic Perun, the Polish Piorun, the

Bohemian Peraun. These words had formerly been derived by Dobrovsky

and others from the root peru, I strike. Grimm ("Teutonic Mythology,"

Engl. transl., p. 171) showed that the fuller forms Perkunas,

Pehrkons, and Perkunos existed in Lituanian, Lettish, Old Prussian,

and that even the Mordvinians had adopted the name Porguini as that of

their thunder-god.

Simon Grunau, who finished his chronicle in 1521, speaks of three

gods, as worshipped by the Old Prussians, Patollo, Patrimpo, and

Perkuno, and he states that Perkuno was invoked "for storm's sake,

that they might have rain and fair weather at the proper time, and

thunder and lightning should not injure them."[249]

The following Lituanian prayer has been preserved to us by

Lasitzki:[250]

"Check thyself, O Percuna, and do not send misfortune on my

field! and I shall give thee this flitch."

Among the neighbors of the Lets, the Esthonians, who, though un-Aryan

in language, have evidently learned much from their Aryan neighbors,

the following prayer was heard,[251] addressed by an old peasant to

their god _Picker_ or _Picken_, the god of thunder and rain, as late

as the seventeenth century.[252]

"Dear Thunder (woda Picker), we offer to thee an ox that has

two horns and four cloven hoofs; we would pray thee for our

ploughing and sowing, that our straw be copper-red, our

grain golden-yellow. Push elsewhere all the thick black

clouds, over great fens, high forests, and wildernesses. But

unto us, ploughers and sowers, give a fruitful season and

sweet rain. Holy Thunder (poeha Picken), guard our

seed-field, that it bear good straw below, good ears above,

and good grain within."[253]

Now, I say again, I do not wish you to admire this primitive poetry,

primitive, whether it is repeated in the Esthonian fens in the

seventeenth century of our era, or sung in the valley of the Indus in

the seventeenth century before our era. Let aesthetic critics say what

they like about these uncouth poems. I only ask you, Is it not worth a

great many poems, to have established this fact, that the same god

Par_g_anya, the god of clouds and thunder and lightning and rain, who

was invoked in India a thousand years before India was discovered by

Alexander, should have been remembered and believed in by Lituanian

peasants on the frontier between East Prussia and Russia, not more

than two hundred years ago, and should have retained its old name

Par_g_anya, which in Sanskrit meant "showering," under the form of

_Perkuna_, which in Lituanian is a name and a name only, without any

etymological meaning at all; nay, should live on, as some scholars

assure us, in an abbreviated form in most Slavonic dialects, namely,

in Old Slavonic as _Perun_, in Polish as _Piorun_, in Bohemian as

_Peraun_, all meaning thunder or thunderstorm?[254]

Such facts strike me as if we saw the blood suddenly beginning to flow

again through the veins of old mummies; or as if the Egyptian statues

of black granite were suddenly to begin to speak again. Touched by the

rays of modern science the old words--call them mummies or

statues--begin indeed to live again, the old names of gods and heroes

begin indeed to speak again.

All that is old becomes new, all that is new becomes old, and that one

word, Par_g_anya, seems, like a charm, to open before our eyes the

cave or cottage in which the fathers of the Aryan race, our own

fathers--whether we live on the Baltic or on the Indian Ocean--are

seen gathered together, taking refuge from the buckets of Par_g_anya,

and saying, "Stop now, Par_g_anya; thou hast sent rain; thou hast made

the deserts passable, and hast made the plants to grow; and thou hast

obtained praise from man."

* * * * *

We have still to consider the third class of gods, in addition to the

gods of the earth and the sky, namely the gods of the highest heaven,

more serene in their character than the active and fighting gods of

the air and the clouds, and more remote from the eyes of man, and

therefore more mysterious in the exercise of their power than the gods

of the earth or the air.

The principal deity is here no doubt the bright sky itself, the old

_Dyaus_, worshipped as we know by the Aryans before they broke up into

separate people and languages, and surviving in Greece as Zeus, in

Italy as Jupiter, Heaven-father, and among the Teutonic tribes as

_Tyr_ and _Tiu_. In the Veda we saw him chiefly invoked in

connection with the earth, as Dyava-p_ri_thivi, Heaven and Earth. He

is invoked by himself also, but he is a vanishing god, and his place

is taken in most of the Vedic poems by the younger and more active

god, _Indra_.

India: What can it teach us? A Course of Lectures Delivered before the University Of Cambridge · 第 14 / 21 段