BY EMILY DICKEY BEERY.

"The Tempest" is a little enchanted world where play all the forces that

are manifested in the larger creation from the lowest animalism to the

highest manhood, harmonious with his invisible environment. This world

in miniature--true to the laws of the macrocosm--begins in chaos, storm,

and stress, but finds completion in supernal air and divine peace. We

shall find by consecutive study of the dramas that the poet, in his

creative work, has ever risen from lower manifestations to higher as his

own soul soared on higher and higher wing. Prospero was his last,

greatest, and divinest thought of man in his unfolding godward.

Nature in her evolution takes no vast strides, and her supreme poet

follows her divine current of growth from the animal man to the grand

manifestation of his ideal. He understood that in man's unfolding not a

round could be missed of the "Jacob's Ladder" resting upon the earth,

but reaching into the heavens.

In this ideal world of "The Tempest," Caliban stands upon the earth

groping to attain the first step, while Prospero stands upon the summit

with his face heavenward. This typical man comes upon the stage on a

high plane of development. Long previously he had left the rank and file

of humanity to tread the ever lonely path to higher achievement,

therefore we must look below him to find, among the creations of the

poet, the incarnation which was the chrysalis for this last ideal. Here

our intuitive perception immediately descries Hamlet, that wonderful

human mystery who was the first of Shakspere's sons to enter the

precincts of the inner life and catch a glimpse of the godlike

potentialities of the human soul.

In Hamlet was the struggle of birth; in Prospero, the glory of

achievement, the fulfilment to some extent of the poet's ideal man, and

the first to realize that the power of thought is the supreme force in

the universe. Hamlet caught the first glimpse of this truth when he

said, "There's nothing good or bad but thinking makes it so." He is the

hero of spiritual birth and growth in man from the dawning of the

soul-life, through its fierce struggles to dominate the lower self and

rise into realms of clearer light and truth. The "godlike reason which

was not left in him to rust unused," in its aspiration became

illuminated by intuition and revealed to his awe-inspired gaze new

worlds not dreamed of by the Horatios of his time.

Hamlet was lost in wonder at himself. The lower forces of his nature

along the old inherited lines of thought, coming in contact with the

higher thought-currents, newly created, caused the blended stream to

"turn awry and lose the name of action," termed by the unseeing world

lack of courage and will-power. Even he could not understand but that in

some inexplicable way he _must_ be a coward, because he could not

perceive the _why_ of his delaying vengeance. Yet he knew he was brave

to the core of his being. When his military friends, "distilled almost

to jelly with the act of fear," would have restrained him from following

the spirit of his father, he cries out:

Why, what should be the fear? I do not set my life at a pin's fee;

and for my soul, what can it do to that, being a thing immortal as

itself? ... My fate cries out, and makes each petty artery in this

body as hardy as the Nemean lion's nerve.

He was strong of will and resolute of purpose, but had reached the plane

of development where his higher nature would not permit him to commit

murder. Yet the strong current of popular opinion, as well as all

hereditary and sub-conscious influences in himself, were ever impelling

him to do the deed. In his soul-growth, Hamlet had passed the plane of

revenge as a passion, but had not reached the divine heights of

forgiveness. To avenge the murder of his father was to him a sacred

command and duty coming in conflict with another equally sacred duty

voiced by his higher self, and the mighty meeting of these two

soul-forces always resulted in inaction. This moral battleground is the

pivotal point of the drama, indirectly putting in motion all the forces

which terminate in the final catastrophe.

In his thoughtful moods his disposition was ever shaken with "thoughts

beyond the reaches of our souls," saying, "Why is this? wherefore? what

should we do?" It was the unlaid ghost of his higher self that

propounded these queries to the apparition. The birth-throes of thought

were giving him entrance into a new world where he began to see "What a

piece of work is man! how _infinite_ in faculty! in action how like an

angel! in apprehension how like a God!"

The thoughts that Hamlet voices had passed through Shakspere's brain,

and the wonderful powers manifested by Prospero had been apprehended by

his own prophetic vision. Hamlet might have moved along on the lower

plane successfully, but the law of spiritual growth, the divine force

upheaving and uplifting his soul against the barriers of his

sub-conscious mentality and his environment, finally ended in the sad

tragedy. Yet in the defeat was a victory, for it was merely the turn of

the spiral downward for a higher rise in evolution.

Prospero is first revealed to us at about the age of Hamlet when the

curtain falls and hides him from our tear-dimmed eyes. Shakspere loved

Hamlet. He was dearest to his heart of all his children, and he felt

that he must not die, but must come into the full fruition of the

immortals. The soul so nobly struggling from its swaddling clothes

_must_ become a freed spirit of godlike power. Therefore he presents to

us an ideal world where Hamlet sits upon the throne as Prospero,

"transported and rapt in secret studies," "neglecting worldly ends, all

dedicated to closeness and the bettering of his mind with that which

o'erprized all popular rate." Prospero was born a higher type, therefore

the divine in him had freer action. His soul opened to the over-soul

like a flower to the sunlight.

The divine force in man is his will--his true will--and this force in

its perfect exercise has no human limitation. It is only the _seeming_

will that is limited. This power, _manifested in thought_, is

represented by Ariel.

The statement of Prospero that his studies bettered his mind to such

high degree is proof that they were those not of the magician, but of

the philosopher and true psychologist, for the study of magic darkens

the soul and degrades the intellect. Prospero's power was not magical,

and Shakspere used the word magician only to bring the drama within

touch of his audience, knowing full well that the wise would understand,

for "wisdom is justified of her children."

In the manifestation of soul-power we first perceive the true greatness

of Prospero and the heights to which Shakspere's own soul had risen, for

"the stream cannot rise higher than its source." The greatness of Julius

Caesar is "weighed in the balance and found wanting," for every truly

great nature must be the rounded out and harmonious development of the

intellectual, moral, and spiritual. This is the measure of Prospero, and

in his unfolding, unseen realms and previously unknown powers had

opened, according to eternal law, to his demanding soul.

"The Tempest" is philosophical, psychological, and occult--philosophical

because thought is the motor power. Le Conte says: "That deepest of all

questions--the nature and origin of natural forces--is a question for

philosophy and not for science." Thought is a natural force; yes, a

dynamic force of the most intense power. It may be a search-light of the

universe, a thunderbolt of destruction, or a messenger of light and love

with healing in its wings. The mantle of Prospero is simply an emblem of

power, and the word is so understood among the Orientals. In Scripture,

when Elijah ascended in his fiery chariot, his mantle fell upon Elisha,

who immediately caused the waters to retreat from its stroke and

continued clothed with his master's power. So Prospero, robing himself

in his mantle or laying it aside, means his exercise or non-exercise of

what are termed supernatural powers.

Victor Hugo says that Shakspere "did not question the invisible world,

he rehabilitated it. He did not deny man's supernatural power, he

consecrated it." There is no reason why man in his higher estate should

not have free intercourse with a world invisible to him in his lower

conditions. Can the grub have the same companionship as the butterfly?

Victor Hugo also says that the "'Midsummer Night's Dream' depicts the

action of the invisible world on man, but 'The Tempest' symbolizes the

action of man on the invisible world. In the poet's youth, man obeys the

spirits. In the poet's ripe age, the _spirits obey man_." This shows a

fine apprehension of the interior revealings of the supreme poetic

genius. Every great and true poet is also a prophet and seer. Then why

should not Shakspere--the supremest in all the "tide of time"--not have

the widest and most far-reaching vision of the wonderful attainments

and powers of the perfected man. He undoubtedly saw and felt the

grandeur of the ages to come, and knew, with divine prescience, that

only the hem of the garment of knowledge had been as yet touched. There

is but one power in the universe, and as Emerson says, "Every man is an

inlet to the whole." Then where is his limitation?

Did not nature obey the Nazarene, and the winds and mountainous waves

lie gently down at His bidding? And did He not say that His disciples

should do greater works than He had done? Then why should not Prospero,

as a typical man, have control over all the forces of nature?

It is interesting to note that Shakspere has given to him almost the

identical powers of the Man of Nazareth! This is not strange, as it is

an absolute truth that when man rises to the royalty of spirit every

element will be his obedient servant. Thought will be the agent of his

ministries; which the poet has so marvellously portrayed in its

personification as Ariel. Ariel says: "Thy thoughts I cleave to;" and

Prospero, in calling him, "Come with a thought." It is now claimed by

the most advanced and best psychologists, that a forceful, living

thought does become a real embodiment which may be perceived by the

finer senses. Ariel was what the mind of his master made him, sometimes

a sprite, sometimes a sea-nymph, again a harpy, anything and everything

the master directed.

Sycorax symbolized ignorance, and thought had been long imprisoned in

the holds of nature by this creature of darkness, but ever painfully

struggling to reach the light. Ignorance imprisoned thought, but could

not free it. Prospero, as wisdom, gave it freedom and directed its

action until he could send it forth in still more glorious freedom.

Freedom of thought is a dominant strain in the drama, and is even sung

by the "reeling ripe" Stephano. Caliban represents the child of

ignorance, closely allied to nature and partaking of its poetry and

grandeur. He is man in his first estate, just emerging from the animal.

Yet, in this crude, forbidding aspect how superior in dignity compared

with Stephano and Trinculo in their vile abasement through the vices of

civilization.

Shakspere's knowledge of the power of thought over the body is shown in

his saying that Sycorax, "through age and envy, had grown into a hoop;"

and of Caliban that, "As with age his body uglier grows, so his mind

cankers." It is not strange that Shakspere perceived the new psychology,

for Milton sang--

Oft Converse with heavenly habitants

Begins to cast a beam on the outward shape,

The unpolluted temple of the mind,

And turns it by degrees to the soul's essence,

Till all be made immortal.

The poet Spenser most beautifully expresses this truth in saying:

So every spirit, as it is more pure,

And hath in it the more of heavenly light,

So it the fairer body doth procure

To habit in....

For of the soul the body form doth take,

For soul is form, and doth the body make.

This is the teaching also of St. Paul, that the body must be transformed

by the renewing of the mind.

Here we perceive the source of the heavenly beauty and grace of Miranda.

"The pure in heart shall see God." Her thought and vision wrought out

for her a bodily expression that made her seem celestial to the

beholder, and held him in doubt whether she were goddess or mortal.

In esoteric thought the perfected being must be an equal blending of the

masculine and feminine, which Balzac has so gloriously interpreted in

his "Seraphita." This quality we see in Prospero, the gentle, refined

element of motherhood, blended with sublime dignity and strength. His

child was to him "a cherubim infusing him with fortitude from heaven,"

and he gave to her the richest dower of inheritance--knowledge, with

purity of heart and purpose. With the gentle patience of love he

instructed her in the laws of nature and her being, with divine purity

of thought. For all nature is pure as God himself. Thus Miranda became

the peerless young Eve of blended wisdom and innocence.

After a display of his power, he states, in his address to Ferdinand,

the most abstruse problems of the ideal philosophy.

These ... were all spirits, and

Are melted into air, into thin air;

And, like the baseless fabric of this vision,

The cloud-capp'd towers, the gorgeous palaces,

The solemn temples, the great globe itself,

Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve

And, like this insubstantial pageant faded,

Leave not a rack behind. We are such stuff

As dreams are made on, and our little life

Is rounded with a sleep.

This sublime inspiration was almost the last outburst of the mighty

genius of Shakspere, and is a fitting crown of glory.

Prospero was fully conscious of his superiority, and with simple but

grandest dignity he claims that practically it was his own power that

worked all the wonders. Most sublimely he expresses this when he calls

before him his invisible helpers:

Ye elves of hills, brooks, standing lakes and groves,

And ye that on the sands with printless foot

Do chase the ebbing Neptune and do fly him

When he comes back; ... by whose aid,

Weak masters though ye be, I have bedimm'd

The noontide sun, call'd forth the mutinous winds,

And 'twixt the green sea and the azured vault

Set roaring war; to the dread rattling thunder

Have I given fire, and rifted Jove's stout oak

With his own bolt; the strong-based promontory

Have I made shake, and by the spurs plucked up

The pine and cedar; graves at my command

Have waked their sleepers, oped, and let them forth

By my so potent art.

Passing from his power over nature to the manifestation of his higher

self with men, we see the spiritual plane he had reached. In coming

again in contact with the world of humanity his first action is the

recognition of the good and the forgiving the evil:

--O good Gonzalo,

My true preserver, and a loyal sir

To him thou follow'st, I will pay thy graces

Home both in word and deed.

His divine forgiveness of those who had so cruelly wronged him shows the

height of his spiritual attainment:

Though with their high wrongs I am struck to the quick,

Yet with my nobler reason 'gainst my fury

Do I take part; the rarer action is

In virtue than in vengeance: they being penitent,

The sole drift of my purpose doth extend

Not a frown further.

In the very remarkable events of his life he recognizes a higher power

in all his guidance. "Was Milan thrust from Milan, that his issue should

become kings of Naples?"

There's a divinity that shapes our ends,

Roughhew them how we will.

In no drama has the poet risen to such supreme types of character.

Prospero was the highest expression of Shakspere's latest thought, but

only the shadowing forth of a supremer ideal. We can portray what is

beneath us far more vividly and truly than what is above us. Shakspere

had _lived_ Hamlet, and that is why he so vitally touches every human

soul. In Prospero it was the vision by the great poetic soul of a

promised land he had only viewed from a mountain top. He had seen the

wonderfully luscious grasps of Eschol, but had not yet tasted them. This

is why we feel the vast yet subtle difference between "Hamlet" and "The

Tempest."

If the immortal poet had lived the years allotted to man, with ever

increasing openness of vision, his own soul would have attained that

lofty height where, from the "pattern on the mount," he would have

portrayed the splendor of divine manhood in godlike majesty, the soul

irradiating the body like the shining face of Moses in its halo of

awe-inspiring divinity. The people required a veil; they would require

one still.

Although Shakspere left us before he had lived in the radiance of the

truly spiritual realm, we may well crown his Prospero with his words of

another:

He sits 'mongst men like a descended God:

He hath a kind of honor sets him off,

More than a mortal seeming.

The Arena, Volume 18, No. 93, August, 1897 · 第 49 / 66 题