THE PROPOSED REMEDY.

It may be that there is no remedy, but that will not prevent us from

trying to find one. During the last ten years we have experimented. We

have tried Democratic rule and Republican rule; the "McKinley bill" and

the "Wilson bill"; "tariff for protection" and "tariff for revenue

only"; a Treasury "surplus" and a Treasury "deficit"; yet none of these

things have sensibly affected the squeezing process. We have lost our

faith in the tariff and in tariff-tinkering, as well as in the leaders

who recommend it. We have dismissed our old political leaders and chosen

new ones; and as your "gold-standard" squeezing policy is the only

rational cause "in sight" for the origin and continuance of our

condition--to use an expressive Western phrase--we are "going for it."

We are willing that you should own and control the property which was

ours, and in which your money was invested, but when you attempt to

force upon us your financial policy, your politics, and your religion,

we object. You may own and control the property, but not us; here we

draw the line. This is what Marsh Murdock had in his mental view when he

said at the St. Louis Convention, "You want to own the country and run

it too." But the veteran editor of the _Eagle_ has changed his mind and

consented to being "run."

You have bought the leading papers, caused our editors to "change their

minds," flooded the country with a trashy literature that is an insult

to our intelligence, and provided funds to pay third-rate preachers for

preaching to us a religion which we do not want. We are not rich, yet we

are able to pay for our education and our religion--if it is a kind that

will be of any use to us.

We do not fear the result of our experiment. If we fail, the same old

squeeze will continue; if we succeed, there is a prospect of relief.

Without variation, there is not even a prospect of bettering our

condition. If we should succeed in creating that financial paradox, a

fifty-three-cent dollar, we are such political heretics as to prefer

that kind of a dollar to none, or to "confidence." We have unbounded

confidence in the dollars which jingle in our pockets, but very little

in those which exist only in the imagination, and are represented by

stocks, bonds, checks, drafts, clearing-house certificates, and other

devices, which always fail to perform the function of money in the last

extremity, when money is most needed.

Do not allow yourselves to be terrified at the ghost of a silver dollar,

for the ghost of it is all that will ever trouble you. In the event of

free coinage, the trains going East will not be loaded with silver

dollars to pay off old mortgages. I have seen a statement in Eastern

papers to the effect that we wanted cheap money with which to pay our

debts. It is a base slander; every intelligent Western man knows that,

whatever happens short of the miraculous, only a small share of our

mortgage debts will be paid.

All the holdings you now have in the West, new and old taken together,

are not worth fifty-three cents on the dollar; and you cannot now in any

way realize that much from them; and if your present policy is

indefinitely continued you have no prospect of ever realizing

fifty-three per cent on your investments. If, then, you should be paid

in silver dollars, or if a larger share of the loans should be paid

under the new conditions, you would be a gainer and not a loser by the

change. It seems to me that an increase in the volume of money and

rising prices are the opportunity for you to realize from your holdings,

for without some favorable change you will hardly realize twenty-five

per cent.

You can test the truth of these statements. Take twenty holdings, not

selected, and try to convert them into cash. Or offer them to some

capitalist who has travelled extensively in the West during the last

five years. Time will convince you, if nothing else will; but the

knowledge may come a little too late for practical purposes. You ought

to be with us in this free-silver movement, and you would be if you knew

what we know. We are not fools, although we may appear so to you; we

know what we want, and we are trying to get it.

You threaten "to draw in your money from the West." If you have any

money in the West which you _can_ "draw in," the sooner you do it the

better; it will be an heroic remedy instead of misery long drawn out. A

"panic" will return like a boomerang upon yourselves, and make _your_

property still less valuable. You can cause a panic, break our business

men, make more idle men and tramps, and, in short, concentrate three or

four years of squeezing into a few weeks or months; but what benefit can

_you_ hope to derive from it?

Whatever adds to _our_ prosperity will increase the actual value of

_your_ holdings; our interests are identical, then why should _you_

desire the continuance of present conditions? Have the present

conditions done anything for you, as far as Western investments are

concerned? Is not your increase of capital simply an increase "on paper"

which you can never realize? We cordially invite you to join us in our

effort to bring on an era of prosperity; forsake your political leaders,

as we have forsaken ours, and use at least as much common sense in

politics as you do in business.

Save this article; it will be good reading after the election is over.

It is not politics, it is business; it is the naked truth. The writer

does not want to borrow any money; he seeks no office, is not a

politician, has no axe to grind, and expects no reward, except to share

in the general prosperity, as he has shared in the general adversity, in

the capacity of a humble citizen.

The Arena, Volume 18, No. 93, August, 1897 · 第 24 / 66 题