Book III. Ode XIII. 171

THE POEMS OF BEATTIE.

[Illustration: J. Beattie.]

THE

POETICAL WORKS

OF

JAMES BEATTIE.

WITH A

MEMOIR OF THE AUTHOR,

BY REV. ALEXANDER DYCE.

BOSTON:

LITTLE, BROWN AND COMPANY.

NEW YORK:

EVANS AND DICKERSON.

PHILADELPHIA:

LIPPINCOTT, GRAMBO AND COMPANY.

M.DCCC.LIV.

RIVERSIDE, CAMBRIDGE:

PRINTED BY H. O. HOUGHTON AND COMPANY.

STEREOTYPED BY STONE AND SMART.

CONTENTS.

Page

Memoir of Beattie, by the Rev. Alexander Dyce vii

The Minstrel; or, the Progress of Genius, Book I 7

The Minstrel; or, the Progress of Genius, Book II 35

Retirement 61

Elegy written in the year 1758 64

Ode to Hope 67

Ode on Lord Hay's Birthday 72

The Battle of the Pigmies and Cranes, from the

Pygmæogeranomachia of Addison 76

The Hares, a Fable 88

Epitaph; being part of an Inscription designed for a

Monument erected by a Gentleman to the Memory of his Lady 92

The Hermit 92

PIECES REJECTED BY THE AUTHOR FROM THE LATER EDITIONS OF HIS POEMS.

The Judgment of Paris 97

Ode to Peace 120

The Triumph of Melancholy 126

Elegy 136

Elegy 138

The Wolf and Shepherds 141

On the Report of a Monument to be erected in Westminster

Abbey, to the Memory of a late Author 145

Song, in Imitation of Shakspeare's 'Blow, Blow, thou

winter wind' 153

Epitaph on two young Men of the name of Leitch, who

were drowned in crossing the River Southesk, 1757 154

Epitaph intended for himself 155

Verses written by Mr. Blacklock, on a blank leaf of his

Poems, sent to the Author 156

An Epistle to the Rev. Mr. Thomas Blacklock 157

To the Rt. Hon. Lady Charlotte Gordon, dressed in a

Tartan Scotch Bonnet, with Plumes 166

Anacreon, Ode XXII. 167

The beginning of the First Book of Lucretius 167

Horace, Book II. Ode X. 170

Book III. Ode XIII. 171

Virgil, Pastoral I. 178

II. 179

III. 184

IV. 194

V. 198

VI. 205

VII. 210

VIII. 216

IX. 223

X. 229

Epitaph for a Sheriff's Messenger, written and published at

the particular desire of the Person for whom it is intended 234

To Mr. Alexander Ross, at Lochlee, Author of 'The Fortunate

Shepherdess,' and other Poems in the broad Scotch Dialect 235

MEMOIR OF BEATTIE,

BY THE REV. ALEXANDER DYCE.

"Heard you that Hermit's strain from Scotia borne,

'For virtue lost, and ruin'd man I mourn?'

Who may forget thee, Beattie? who supply

The tale half-told of Edwin's minstrelsy?"

_The Pursuits of Literature._

The subject of this memoir was born on the 25th of October, 1735, at

Laurencekirk, in the county of Kincardine, Scotland. His father, James

Beattie, who kept a small shop in the village at the same time that he

rented a little farm in the neighbourhood, was a man of considerable

talents and acquirements:[A] his mother, too, was distinguished for her

abilities. Our author, James, was the youngest of the six children of

this respectable pair.

After his father's decease, which happened when he was only seven years

old, his mother, by means of the emoluments derived from the shop and

the farm, was enabled to bring up her family in comfort. In the

management of her affairs she was assisted by her eldest son, David, a

youth of eighteen, who generously and affectionately relinquished all

other pursuits for that of promoting her welfare and happiness, and who

appears to have fostered his brothers and sisters with an almost

parental care. James was placed at the parish school of Laurencekirk,

which was then in some repute, and of which, about forty years before,

Ruddiman, the famous grammarian, had been the master. At this time he

had access to few books, except those which the minister of the village

(the Rev. Mr. Thomson) kindly lent him, and which he read with avidity.

It was then that he first became acquainted with English versification

in Ogilby's Virgil. Even then he was known among his schoolfellows by

the name of _the poet_; and sometimes he would rise from bed, during the

night, that he might commit to writing any poetical idea that his fancy

had happened to suggest.

In 1749 he began his academical career, at the Marischal College,

Aberdeen:[B] and as his circumstances were straitened, he became a

competitor--and with success--for one of those bursaries or exhibitions,

which are annually bestowed on students who are unable to support the

entire expenses of a university education. He attended the Greek class

taught by Dr. Blackwell. This scholar, whose writings on classical

subjects,[C] though now fallen into disrepute, once enjoyed considerable

popularity, soon discovered that his pupil was no ordinary young man,

and distinguished him by several encouraging marks of approbation. The

kindness of the Professor made a deep impression on the mind of Beattie,

and he used to declare, in after life, that Blackwell was the first

person who gave him reason to believe that he was possessed of any

genius. During the four years of his attendance at the Marischal College

he also studied philosophy and divinity. The last mentioned branch of

knowledge he pursued doubtless with a view to the ministry, the church

being then the chief resource of the well educated sons of the poorer

classes in Scotland: he, however, soon abandoned all thoughts of the

clerical profession.

Having taken the degree of M. A., he was elected, on the 1st of August,

1753, schoolmaster of Fordoun, a small hamlet at the foot of the

Grampian hills, about six miles distant from his birthplace: here also

he officiated as præcentor, or parish-clerk.

Many an hour was now spent by Beattie in perfect solitude; the family of

Mr. Forbes, the minister, being almost the only society, save the

surrounding peasantry, which his situation allowed him to enjoy. But his

days went happily by. When not occupied by his public duties, he appears

to have devoted a portion of his time to the study of the classics;[D]

and occasionally he amused himself by composing little poems, a few of

which were printed in the Scots Magazine. His fondness for music had

ever been decided; and in his present retirement he cultivated it with

uncommon success.[E] In the grand and beautiful scenery of the

neighbourhood he found a never-failing source of pleasure. Not far from

the place where he dwelt, a large and well wooded glen communicates with

the mountains. In it he loved to wander; in it some of his earliest

verses were written; and his recollections of its wild and romantic

charms may be traced in several vivid descriptions of nature in his

poetical works. Sometimes he would pass the whole night among the

fields, gazing on the sky, and observing the various aspects it assumed

till the return of day; and the exhilarating song of "the lyric lark"

in the mornings of summer used to fill him with delight. In 1755, his

loneliness was cheered by the arrival of his brother David, who came to

settle himself at the village of Fordoun.

The celebrated and eccentric Francis Garden, Esq., (afterwards one of

the judges of the supreme courts of civil and criminal law in Scotland,

by the title of Lord Gardenstone,) who was then sheriff of the county of

Kincardine, and occasionally resided in the neighbourhood of Fordoun,

was the earliest patron of our author. They accidentally became

acquainted with each Other. Mr. Garden having one day discovered Beattie

busily writing with a pencil in his favourite glen, and learning that he

was engaged in the composition of a poem,[F] from that period took him

under his protection.

At this time too he became known to another more celebrated and more

eccentric character, Lord Monboddo, whose family estate is in the parish

of Fordoun; and though their opinions on some important points by no

means coincided, they ever after lived on friendly terms.

In 1757, the place of usher in the grammar-school of Aberdeen being

vacant, Beattie, by the advice of Mr. Forbes, the minister of Fordoun,

became a candidate for it, but without success. So conspicuously,

however, had his abilities manifested themselves during his examination

on that occasion, that the same place becoming again vacant about a year

after, and two candidates having appeared, both of whom were declared

unqualified for it, he was requested by the magistrates to fill it

without further trial. He was accordingly elected to the office on the

20th June, 1758.

This was an important event in Beattie's life. From a secluded hamlet,

where there was the greatest difficulty in obtaining either society or

books, he was transplanted to a populous and flourishing town, where he

might associate with those whose tastes were congenial with his own, and

carry on his literary pursuits by means of public libraries. The friend

of his earlier years, Professor Blackwell, had sunk into the grave; but

he had soon the good fortune to become intimately acquainted with

several persons of acknowledged talents and learning, connected with the

Marischal and King's Colleges, as also with various well educated

gentlemen, inhabitants of the town.

In 1760, a chair in the Marischal College becoming vacant, it was

suggested to Beattie by his friend, Mr. Arbuthnot,[G] that he should

endeavour to procure the appointment for himself. Our author, who had

never dreamed of aspiring to so dignified a situation, heard the

proposal with astonishment. Mr. Arbuthnot, however, "willing to try what

could be done," induced the Earl of Erroll, with whom he was on intimate

terms, to solicit, by means of Lord Milton, the powerful interest of the

Duke of Argyll in behalf of the humble usher. The application proved

successful; and on the 8th October, 1760, Beattie was installed

Professor of Moral Philosophy and Logic in the Marischal College.

His first lectures were delivered during the winter session of 1760, and

1761; and for the long space of more than thirty years he continued to

discharge most conscientiously the duties of the important station to

which he had been so unexpectedly raised.

A literary and convivial club (to which the vulgar gave the nickname of

the _Wise Club_) had been established for some years at Aberdeen, the

members consisting of the Professors of the Marischal and King's

Colleges, and of gentlemen of the town, who had a taste for literature

and conversation. Into this society Beattie was now enrolled. They used

to meet at a tavern, once a fortnight, at five o'clock in the

afternoon, (for in those days the common dinner-hour was early) when,

the president taking the chair, an essay was read, composed by one of

the members in his turn, and a literary or philosophical subject

discussed; at half past eight a slight meal was served up, and at ten

they retired to their homes. To this club Dr. Reid, Dr. Campbell, Dr.

Gerrard, and Dr. Gregory, belonged; and from it several admired works of

philosophy and criticism may be said to have originated.

In 1761 Beattie made his first appearance in print, in his own

character, by publishing a small volume, dedicated to the Earl of

Erroll, entitled _Original Poems and Translations_. It consisted partly

of some of the verses which he had formerly sent to the Scots Magazine,

and partly of pieces which he had recently composed. "This collection,"

says his good-natured and not very tasteful biographer, Sir William

Forbes, "was very favourably received, and stamped Dr. Beattie with the

character of a poet of great and original genius." It was certainly

"favourably received," the chief critical journals of the day being

unanimous in its praise; but that it "stamped the author with the

character of a poet of great and original genius," I cannot allow. The

truth is, it does not contain a single poem which rises much above

mediocrity; and if Beattie had never touched the lyre with a more

powerful hand, a memoir of his life would not have been required for

the Aldine Poets. So lightly, indeed, did he himself afterwards think of

the collection in question, that he used to destroy all the copies of it

which he could procure, and would only suffer four pieces from it (and

these much altered and improved) to stand in the same volume with _The

Minstrel_.

During the summer of 1763, Beattie for the first time visited London,

among the inhabitants of which, Millar, his publisher, was almost his

only acquaintance. While residing there, he made a pilgrimage to Pope's

villa at Twickenham.

_The Judgment of Paris_, printed in 4to, in 1765, was the least

successful of our author's poetical works. Several passages of

considerable beauty could not prevent this elaborate, cold, and

metaphysical production from being utterly neglected by the public.

That his _Verses on the death of Churchill_ (which appeared anonymously

very soon after _The Judgment of Paris_) were read with more attention,

is to be attributed rather to the subject of the piece than to its

intrinsic merit.[H] No one can peruse it without regretting that the

amiable Beattie should have been betrayed by political feelings into

such virulent abuse of a man of genius, who had just been gathered to

the poets of other days. He is said to have written it at the

solicitation of certain friends in Scotland, where the name of Churchill

was held in detestation; and on these injudicious instigators let a

portion of the odium rest.

In the autumn of 1765, Gray, who was then regarded as the first of

living bards, paid a visit to the Earl of Strathmore, at Glammis castle.

No sooner did Beattie hear of his arrival than he addressed to him the

following letter:

Marischal College of Aberdeen, 30th August, 1765.

"If I thought it necessary to offer an apology for venturing to

address you in this abrupt manner, I should be very much at a loss

how to begin. I might plead my admiration of your genius, and my

attachment to your character; but who is he that could not, with

truth, urge the same excuse for intruding upon your retirement? I

might plead my earnest desire to be personally acquainted with a man

whom I have so long and so passionately admired in his writings; but

thousands of greater consequence than I, are ambitious of the same

honour. I, indeed, must either flatter myself that no apology is

necessary, or otherwise I must despair of obtaining what has long

been the object of my most ardent wishes; I must forever forfeit

all hopes of seeing you, and conversing with you.

"It was yesterday I received the agreeable news of your being in

Scotland, and of your intending to visit some parts of it. Will you

permit us to hope, that we shall have an opportunity, at Aberdeen,

of thanking you in person, for the honour you have done to Britain,

and to the poetic art, by your inestimable compositions, and of

offering you all that we have that deserves your acceptance, namely,

hearts full of esteem, respect, and affection? If you cannot come so

far northward, let me at least be acquainted with the place of your

residence, and permitted to wait on you. Forgive, sir, this request;

forgive me if I urge it with earnestness, for indeed it concerns me

nearly; and do me the justice to believe, that I am, with the most

sincere attachment, and most respectful esteem, &c. &c. &c.

"P. S. Dr. Carlysle of Musselburgh, and Dr. Wight of Glasgow,

acquainted me of your being in Scotland. It was from them I learned

that my name was not wholly unknown to you."

In consequence of this letter, Beattie received an invitation to Glammis

castle; and a friendship and correspondence commenced between the two

poets, which terminated only with the death of Gray. The impression

which their first meeting made on our author he thus describes in a

letter to Sir William Forbes:--"I am sorry you did not see Mr. Gray on

his return; you would have been much pleased with him. Setting aside his

merit as a poet, which, however, in my opinion, is greater than any of

his contemporaries can boast, in this or in any other nation, I found

him possessed of the most exact taste, the soundest judgment, and the

most extensive learning. He is happy in a singular facility of

expression. His conversation abounds in original observations, delivered

with no appearance of sententious formality, and seeming to arise

spontaneously without study or premeditation. I passed two very

agreeable days with him in Glammis, and found him as easy in his

manners, and as communicative and frank, as I could have wished."

A new edition of our author's Poems came forth in 1766. From it a large

portion of the pieces published in the former collection was rejected;

while _The Judgment of Paris_, the _Lines on the Death of Churchill_,

and one or two copies of verses never before printed, supplied the

deficiency. The translation of Addison's _Pygmæogeranomachia_, which

concludes the volume, is remarkable for its spirited and graceful

versification.

In a letter to Dr. Blacklock, dated 22d September in the same year,

Beattie thus alludes to his great work, _The Minstrel_:--

"Not long ago I began a poem in the style and stanza of Spenser, in

which I propose to give full scope to my inclination, and be either

droll or pathetic, descriptive or sentimental, tender or satirical, as

the humour strikes me; for, if I mistake not, the manner which I have

adopted admits equally of all these kinds of composition. I have written

one hundred and fifty lines, and am surprised to find the structure of

that complicated stanza so little troublesome. I was always fond of it,

for I think it the most harmonious that ever was contrived. It admits of

more variety of pauses than either the couplet or the alternate rhyme;

and it concludes with a pomp and majesty of sound, which, to my ear, is

wonderfully delightful. It seems also very well adapted to the genius of

our language, which, from its irregularity of inflexion and number of

monosyllables, abounds in diversified terminations, and consequently

renders our poetry susceptible of an endless variety of legitimate

rhymes. But I am so far from intending this performance for the press,

that I am morally certain it never will be finished. I shall add a

stanza now and then, when I am at leisure, and when I have no humour for

any other amusement; but I am resolved to write no more poetry with a

view to publication, till I see some dawnings of a poetical taste among

the generality of readers, of which, however, there is not at present

any thing like an appearance."

Writing to Sir William Forbes, 8th January, 1767, our author gives an

account of the cause of his composing _The Hermit_, the most perfect of

his minor poems:--

"The favourable reception you gave to my little poem, demands my

acknowledgments. I aimed at simplicity in the expression, and something

like uncommonness in the thought; and I own I am not ill pleased with it

upon the whole; though I am sensible it does not answer the purpose for

which I made it. I wrote it at the desire of a young lady of this

country, who has a taste both for poetry and music, and wanted me to

make words for a Scots tune called 'Pentland Hills,' of which she is

very fond. The verses correspond well enough with the measure and

subject of the tune, but are extremely unsuitable for the purpose of a

song."[I]

To Dr. Blacklock he again writes concerning _The Minstrel_:

"Aberdeen, 20th May, 1767.

"MY performance in Spenser's stanza has not advanced a single line

these many months. It is called 'The Minstrel.' The subject was

suggested by a dissertation on the old minstrels, which is prefixed

to a collection of Ballads lately published by Dodsley, in three

volumes. I propose to give an account of the birth, education, and

adventures of one of those bards; in which I shall have full scope

for description, sentiment, satire, and even a certain species of

humour and of pathos, which, in the opinion of my great master are

by no means inconsistent, as is evident from his works. My hero is

to be born in the south of Scotland; which you know was the native

land of the English minstrels; I mean of those minstrels who

travelled into England, and supported themselves there by singing

their ballads to the harp. His father is a shepherd. The son will

have a natural taste for music and the beauties of nature; which,

however, languishes for want of culture, till in due time he meets

with a hermit, who gives him some instruction; but endeavours to

check his genius for poetry and adventures, by representing the

happiness of obscurity and solitude, and the bad reception which

poetry has met with in almost every age. The poor swain acquiesces

in this advice, and resolves to follow his father's employment;

when, on a sudden, the country is invaded by the Danes, or English

borderers, (I know not which,) and he is stript of all his little

fortune, and obliged by necessity to commence minstrel. This is all

that I have as yet concerted of the plan. I have written one hundred

and fifty lines, but my hero is not yet born, though now in a fair

way of being so, for his parents are described and married. I know

not whether I shall ever proceed any farther: however, I am not

dissatisfied with what I have written."

On the 28th June, 1767, Beattie was married at Aberdeen to Miss Mary

Dun, only daughter of the rector of the Grammar-school in that city; a

mutual attachment having for some time existed between them. She was a

few years younger than our author: her person was pleasing, her manners

were lively; and she possessed a moderate share of accomplishments. This

union, which seemed to promise nothing but happiness to Beattie, threw

the blight of misery over his later years, and undoubtedly contributed

to shorten his career. The woman whom he had selected as a partner for

life, inherited from her mother the most dreadful of human

maladies,--insanity; which, a few years after marriage, displayed itself

in strange follies and caprices,[J] and at last broke forth with such

violence, as to render her separation from her family absolutely

necessary. By this lady he had two sons, of whom particular mention

will be made hereafter.

Beattie now employed himself on the composition of his _Essay on Truth_,

a work, which was to be honoured with such marks of public approbation,

as the most sanguine author in his wildest dreams of success could

hardly have anticipated. In a letter to Sir William Forbes, dated 17th

January, 1768, he says:--

"I have, for a time, laid aside my favourite studies, that I might have

leisure to prosecute a philosophical inquiry, less amusing indeed than

poetry and criticism, but not less important. The extraordinary success

of the sceptical philosophy has long filled me with regret. I wish I

could undeceive mankind in regard to this matter. Perhaps this wish is

vain: but it can do no harm to make the trial. The point I am now

labouring to prove, is the universality and immutability of moral

sentiment,--a point which has been brought into dispute, both by the

friends and by the enemies of virtue. In an age less licentious in its

principles, it would not, perhaps, be necessary to insist much on this

point. At present it is very necessary. Philosophers have ascribed all

religion to human policy. Nobody knows how soon they may ascribe all

morality to the same origin; and then the foundations of human society,

as well as of human happiness, will be effectually undermined. To

accomplish this end, Hobbes, Hume, Mandeville, and even Locke, have

laboured; and, I am sorry to say, from my knowledge of mankind, that

their labour has not been altogether in vain. Not that the works of

these philosophers are generally read, or even understood by the few who

read them. It is not the mode, now-a-days, for a man to think for

himself; but they greedily adopt the conclusions, without any concern

about the arguments or principles whence they proceed; and they justify

their own credulity by general declamations upon the transcendent merit

of their favourite authors, and the universal deference that is paid to

their genius and learning. If I can prove those authors guilty of gross

misrepresentations of matters of fact, unacquainted with the human

heart, ignorant even of their own principles, the dupes of verbal

ambiguities, and the votaries of frivolous, though dangerous philosophy,

I shall do some little service to the cause of truth; and all this I

will undertake to prove in many instances of high importance."

During this year, a poem in broad Scotch, entitled _The Fortunate

Shepherdess_, by Alexander Ross, schoolmaster, of Lochlee, was printed

by subscription at Aberdeen; and in order to excite some curiosity about

the volume, Beattie good-naturedly wrote a copy of verses in the same

dialect, addressed to the author, which appeared in the Aberdeen

Journal.[K]

He thus communicates to Dr. Blacklock his motives for attempting the

laborious prose work, with which he was still occupied:--

"Aberdeen, 9th January, 1769.

"It was very kind in you to read over my 'Essay on the Immutability

of Moral Sentiment' with so much attention. I wish it deserved any

part of the high encomium you bestowed on it. I flatter myself it

will receive considerable improvements from a second transcribing,

which I intend to begin as soon as I can. Some parts of it will be

enlarged, and others (perhaps) shortened: the examples from history,

and authorities from ancient authors, will be more numerous; it will

be regularly distributed into chapters and sections, and the

language will be corrected throughout. The first part, which treats

of the permanency of truth in general, is now in great forwardness;

ninety pages in quarto are finished, and materials provided for as

many more. The design of the whole you will guess from the part you

have seen. It is to overthrow scepticism, and establish conviction

in its place; a conviction not in the least favourable to bigotry or

prejudice, far less to a persecuting spirit; but such a conviction

as produces firmness of mind, and stability of principle, in a

consistence with moderation, candour, and liberal inquiry. If I

understand my own design, it is certainly this; whether I shall

accomplish this design or not, the event only will determine.

Meantime I go on with cheerfulness in this intricate and fatiguing

study, because I would fain hope that it may do some good; harm I

think it cannot possibly do any.

"Perhaps you are anxious to know what first induced me to write on

the subject; I will tell you as briefly as I can. In my younger days

I read chiefly for the sake of amusement, and I found myself best

amused with the classics, and what we call the _belles lettres_.

Metaphysics I disliked; mathematics pleased me better; but I found

my mind neither improved nor gratified by that study. When

Providence allotted me my present station, it became incumbent on me

to read what had been written on the subject of morals and human

nature; the works of Locke, Berkeley, and Hume, were celebrated as

masterpieces in this way; to them, therefore, I had recourse. But,

as I begin to study them with great prejudices in their favour, you

will readily conceive how strangely I was surprised to find them, as

I thought, replete with absurdities. I pondered these absurdities: I

weighed the arguments, with which I was sometimes not a little

confounded; and the result was, that I began at last to suspect my

own understanding, and to think that I had not capacity for such a

study. For I could not conceive it possible, that the absurdities of

these authors were so great as they seemed to me to be; otherwise,

thought I, the world would never admire them so much. About this

time some excellent antisceptical works made their appearance,

particularly Reid's 'Inquiry into the Human Mind.' Then it was that

I began to have a little more confidence in my own judgment, when I

found it confirmed by those of whose abilities I did not entertain

the least distrust. I reviewed my authors again, with a very

different temper of mind. A very little truth will sometimes

enlighten a vast extent of science. I found that the sceptical

philosophy was not what the world imagined it to be, nor what I,

following the opinion of the world, had hitherto imagined it to be,

but a frivolous, though dangerous, system of verbal subtilty, which

it required neither genius, nor learning, nor taste, nor knowledge

of mankind, to be able to put together; but only a captious temper,

an irreligious spirit, a moderate command of words, and an

extraordinary degree of vanity and presumption. You will easily

perceive that I am speaking of this philosophy only in its most

extravagant state, that is, as it appears in the works of Mr. Hume.

The more I study it, the more am I confirmed in this opinion. But

while I applauded and admired the sagacity of those who led me into,

or at least encouraged me to proceed in, this train of thinking, I

was not altogether satisfied with them in another respect. I could

not approve that extraordinary adulation which some of them paid to

their arch-adversary. I could not conceive the propriety of paying

compliments to a man's _heart_, at the very time one is proving that

his aim is to subvert the principles of truth, virtue, and religion;

nor to his _understanding_, when we are charging him with publishing

the grossest and most contemptible nonsense. I thought I then

foresaw, what I have since found to happen, that this controversy

will be looked upon rather as a trial of skill between two

logicians, than as a disquisition in which the best interests of

mankind were concerned; and that the world, especially the

fashionable part of it, would still be disposed to pay the greatest

deference to the opinions of him who, even by the acknowledgment of

his antagonists, was confessed to be the best philosopher and the

soundest reasoner. All this has happened, and more. Some, to my

certain knowledge, have said, that Mr. Hume and his adversaries did

really act in concert, in order mutually to promote the sale of one

another's works; as a proof of which, they mention, not only the

extravagant compliments that pass between them, but also the

circumstance of Dr. R.[L] and Dr. C.[M] sending their manuscripts to

be perused and corrected by Mr. Hume before they gave them to the

press. I, who know both the men, am very sensible of the gross

falsehood of these reports. As to the affair of the manuscripts, it

was, I am convinced, candour and modesty that induced them to it.

But the world knows no such thing; and, therefore, may be excused

for mistaking the meaning of actions that have really an equivocal

appearance. I know likewise that they are sincere, not only in the

detestation they express for Mr. Hume's irreligious tenets, but also

in the compliments they have paid to his talents; for they both look

upon him as an extraordinary genius; a point in which I cannot agree

with them. But while I thus vindicate them from imputations, which

the world, from its ignorance of circumstances, has laid to their

charge, I cannot approve them in every thing; I wish they had

carried their researches a little farther, and expressed themselves

with a little more firmness and spirit. For well I know, that their

works, for want of this, will never produce that effect which (if

all mankind were cool metaphysical reasoners) might be expected from

them. There is another thing in which my judgment differs

considerably from that of the gentlemen just mentioned. They have

great metaphysical abilities, and they love the metaphysical

sciences. I do not. I am convinced that this metaphysical spirit is

the bane of true learning, true taste, and true science; that to it

we owe all this modern scepticism and atheism; that it has a bad

effect upon the human faculties, and tends not a little to sour the

temper, to subvert good principles, and to disqualify men for the

business of life. You will now see wherein my views differ from

those of the other answerers of Mr. Hume. I want to show the world,

that the sceptical philosophy is contradictory to itself, and

destructive of genuine philosophy, as well as of religion and

virtue; that it is in its own nature so paltry a thing (however it

may have been celebrated by some,) that to be despised it needs only

to be known; that no degree of genius is necessary to qualify a man

for making a figure in this pretended science; but rather a certain

minuteness and suspiciousness of mind, and want of sensibility, the

very reverse of true intellectual excellence; that metaphysics

cannot possibly do any good, but may do, and actually have done,

much harm; that sceptical philosophers, whatever they may pretend,

are the corrupters of science, the pests of society, and the enemies

of mankind. I want to show, that the same method of reasoning, which

these people have adopted in their books, if transferred into common

life, would show them to be destitute of common sense; that true

philosophers follow a different method of reasoning: and that,

without following a different method, no truth can be discovered. I

want to lay before the public, in as strong a light as possible, the

following dilemma: our sceptics either believe the doctrines they

publish, or they do not believe them: if they believe them, they are

fools--if not, they are a thousand times worse. I want also to

fortify the mind against the sceptical poison, and to propose

certain criteria of moral truth, by which some of the most dangerous

sceptical errors may be detected and guarded against.

"You are sensible, that, in order to attain these ends, it is

absolutely necessary for me to use great plainness of speech. My

expressions must not be so tame as to seem to imply either a

diffidence in my principles, or a coldness towards the cause I have

undertaken to defend. And where is the man who can blame me for

speaking from the heart, and therefore speaking with warmth, when I

appear in the cause of truth, religion, virtue, and mankind? I am

sure my dear friend Dr. Blacklock will not; he, who has set before

me so many examples of this laudable ardour; he, whose style I

should be proud to take for my model, if I were not aware of the

difficulty, I may say, the insuperable difficulty, of imitating it

with success. You need not fear, however, that I expose myself by an

excess of passion or petulance. I hope I shall be animated, without

losing my temper, and keen, without injury to good manners. In a

word, I will be as soft and delicate as the subject and my

conscience will allow. One gentleman, a friend of yours,[N] I shall

have occasion to treat with much freedom. I have heard of his

virtues. I know he has many virtues; God forbid I should ever seek

to lessen them, or wish them to be found insincere. I hope they are

sincere, and that they will increase in number and merit every day.

To his virtues I shall do justice; but I must also do justice to his

faults, at least to those faults which are public, and which, for

the sake of truth and of mankind, ought not to be concealed or

disguised. Personal reflections will be carefully avoided; I hope I

am in no danger of falling into them, for I bear no personal

animosity against any man whatsoever: sometimes I may perhaps be

keen; but I trust I shall never depart from the Christian and

philosophic character.

"A scheme like this of mine cannot be popular, far less can it be

lucrative. It will raise me enemies; it will expose me to the

scrutiny of the most rigid criticism; it will make me be considered

by many as a sullen and illiberal bigot. I trust, however, in

Providence, and in the goodness of my cause, that my attempts in

behalf of truth shall not be altogether ineffectual, and that my

labours shall be attended with some utility to my fellow-creatures.

This, in my estimation, will do much more than counterbalance all

the inconveniences I have any reason to apprehend. I have already

fallen on evil tongues (as Milton says) on account of this intended

publication. It has been reported, that I had written a most

scurrilous paper against Mr. Hume, and was preparing to publish it

when a friend of mine interposed, and, with very great difficulty,

prevailed on me to suppress it, because he knew it would hurt or

ruin my character. Such is the treatment I have to expect from one

set of people. I was so provoked when I first heard this calumny

that I deliberated whether I should not throw my papers into the

fire, with a _Si populus vult decipi, decipiatur_: but I rejected

that thought; for so many persons have told me, that it was my

_duty_ to publish these papers, that I almost began to think so

myself. Many have urged me to publish them; none ever dissuaded me.

The gentleman, named in the report, read the essay, and returned it

with the highest commendations; but I do not recollect that he ever

spoke a syllable about publishing or suppressing it. But I have

certainly tired you with so long a detail, about so trifling a

matter as my works. However, I thought it necessary to say something

by way of apology for them, for I find that your good opinion is of

too much consequence to my peace, to suffer me to neglect any

opportunity of cultivating it."

The _Essay on Truth_ being now finished, our author was desirous of

selling the MS. to some bookseller, in order that he might avoid all

risk to himself in the publication, and intrusted the care of this

matter to Sir William Forbes and Mr. Arbuthnot. His two friends,

however, having applied to the bookseller, whom they imagined the most

proper person to publish the work, were vexed by his positive refusal to

purchase it, although he had no objection to print it on Beattie's

account. In this difficulty they generously resolved to become

themselves the purchasers of the first edition. "I therefore," says Sir

William Forbes, "wrote to him [Beattie] (nothing surely but the truth,

although, I confess, not the whole truth,) that the manuscript was sold

for fifty guineas, which I remitted to him by a bank bill; and I added,

that we had stipulated with the bookseller who was to print the book,

that we should be partners in the publication."

At length in May, 1770, the _Essay on Truth_ was given to the world. As

it had been seen in manuscript by several eminent literary characters,

and as it was understood to be a direct attack on the philosophy of Hume

(who was then in the height of his popularity,) its appearance excited

immediate notice. It has been said, that on its publication, Hume spoke

of Beattie with great bitterness, complaining (and I am forced to allow

that there was some cause for the complaint) that he had not used him

like a gentleman: it has even been asserted that he could not endure the

name of our author to be mentioned in his presence. I suspect that in

all this there is great exaggeration. The placid temper of Hume was not

likely to be much ruffled by any thing that might be written against his

system; his friends and admirers were probably more disturbed by the

attack than the philosopher himself. In less than four years five large

editions of the _Essay_ were circulated, and translations of it were

made into French and other foreign languages.

From the rugged paths of philosophy Beattie turned once more into the

flowery walks of poesy. In 1771, the First Book of _The Minstrel_ was

published without the author's name. Its success was complete. The voice

of every critic was loud in its praise; and before the Second Book

appeared (in 1774), four editions of the First had been dispersed

throughout the kingdom. The following elegant and touching encomium was

passed upon the poem by Lord Lyttelton, in a letter to Mrs. Montagu, who

had put the First Book into the hands of that virtuous nobleman:

"Hill Street, 8th March, 1771.

"I read your 'Minstrel' last night, with as much rapture as poetry,

in her noblest, sweetest charms, ever raised in my soul. It seemed

to me that my once most beloved minstrel, Thomson, was come down

from heaven, refined by the converse of purer spirits than those he

lived with here, to let me hear him sing again the beauties of

nature, and the finest feelings of virtue, not with human, but with

angelic strains! I beg you to express my gratitude to the poet for

the pleasure he has given me."

Of the same date with the preceding letter, Beattie received one from

Gray, containing many minute remarks on his poem. As it consists almost

entirely of verbal criticism, it scarcely admits of quotation: a single

short extract may however be given from it:

"St. 11. _O, how canst thou renounce_,[O] &c. But this, of all others,

is my favourite stanza. It is true poetry; it is inspiration; only (to

show it is mortal) there is one blemish; the word _garniture_ suggesting

an idea of dress, and, what is worse, of French dress."

When the poem was reprinted, one or two slight alterations were made in

deference to the opinion of Gray.

In a letter to the Dowager Lady Forbes, 12th October, 1772, our author

confesses that in the character of Edwin he meant to paint himself:

"From the questions your Ladyship is pleased to propose in the

conclusion of your letter, as well as from some things I have had the

honour to hear you advance in conversation, I find you are willing to

suppose that, in Edwin, I have given only a picture of myself, as I was

in my younger days. I confess the supposition is not groundless. I have

made him take pleasure in the scenes in which I took pleasure, and

entertain sentiments similar to those of which, even in my early youth,

I had repeated experience. The scenery of a mountainous country, the

ocean, the sky, thoughtfulness and retirement, and sometimes melancholy

objects and ideas, had charms in my eyes, even when I was a schoolboy:

and at a time when I was so far from being able to express, that I did

not understand my own feelings, or perceive the tendency of such

pursuits and amusements; and as to poetry and music, before I was ten

years old I could play a little on the violin, and was as much master of

Homer and Virgil as Pope's and Dryden's translations could make me."

The intense thought which Beattie had devoted to the composition of the

_Essay on Truth_ having materially injured his health, he was advised by

his physicians to try the remedy of change of scene. He accordingly set

out on a journey to London, and arrived there in the beginning of

autumn, 1771. He was no longer the obscure individual who had visited it

in 1763;[P] he was now the triumphant adversary of scepticism, and the

author of the admired _Minstrel_; a man whom the most distinguished

characters in the literary and fashionable world were prepared to treat

with attention and respect. Among several letters of introduction, which

he carried with him, was one from Dr. Gregory, of Edinburgh, to Mrs.

Montagu. At the splendid and hospitable mansion of this celebrated lady,

Beattie became acquainted with various persons, both male and female,

who were then the chief ornaments of London society; and he used to

dwell with delight on the recollections of her more private parties,

made up of Lord Lyttelton, Mrs. Carter, and a few others, who spent

their evenings in the most unreserved conversation on literary, moral,

or religious subjects. From this time, Mrs. Montagu continued to be one

of his firmest friends; and their epistolary correspondence closed only

with her life. The politeness and kindness of Hawkesworth, Armstrong,

Garrick, and Johnson, also contributed much to render pleasant his visit

to the metropolis. Concerning the last illustrious man he writes thus:

"Johnson has been greatly misrepresented. I have passed several entire

days with him, and found him extremely agreeable. The compliments he

pays to my writings are so high that I have not the face to mention

them." In December Beattie had returned to Aberdeen.

In 1772, his mother died, at the advanced age of fourscore, at the house

of her affectionate son David, in the neighbourhood of Laurencekirk.

Towards the end of April, 1773, Beattie, accompanied by his wife, set

out again for London. This journey was undertaken partly for the sake of

his health and partly with a view to another object--the bettering of

his circumstances. The emolument which he had derived from his writings

bore unfortunately no proportion to the fame he had acquired; and the

small income arising from his professorship afforded him the only means

for supporting his family. During his former visit to the capital, in

1771, his English friends had been very desirous to procure for him some

permanent provision; and it was well known that his Majesty had

expressed approbation of his writings, and had even declared his

intention of conferring some reward on the man who had laboured so

successfully to advance the interests of religion. With several

important letters of introduction--one addressed to the Earl of

Dartmouth--he now arrived in London, and was cordially welcomed by Mrs.

Montagu, and his other friends. His reception by Lord Dartmouth was kind

and courteous: soon after which, being summoned to wait on Lord North,

he was told by that minister that an early opportunity should be taken

to inform his Majesty of his arrival.

By some of his friends it had been suggested that Beattie should take

orders, and enter the English church; but this mode of improving his

fortunes he very properly rejected.[Q] At last, by the advice of the

Archbishop of York, a memorial was drawn up "expressing his services,

his wants, and his wishes;" which, having been transmitted to Lord

Dartmouth, was by him laid before the King, who, on that occasion, spoke

of Beattie and his writings with high approbation, and signified a

desire to see him.

Meantime the number of our author's acquaintances in the metropolis

increased daily, and his society was eagerly courted by a long list of

illustrious names. He now became personally known to a distinguished

churchman, with whom, during the preceding year he had held some

correspondence by letter--Dr. Porteus, then Rector of Lambeth, and

finally Bishop of London; and the friendship which took place between

them was sincere and lasting.

At the first levee, Beattie was presented by Lord Dartmouth to his

Majesty, who for several minutes talked to him concerning his _Essay on

Truth_ in the most condescending and affable manner.

Soon after this, the University of Oxford, at the installation of Lord

North as its Chancellor, conferred on our author a very flattering mark

of distinction, an honorary degree of Doctor of Laws.

At length the object of his wishes was attained. On the 20th of August,

he received an official letter from the secretary of Lord North,

informing him that the king had been pleased to allow him a pension of

two hundred pounds a year. Of the private interview, with which, a few

days after he was honoured by their majesties, he has left the following

account in his Diary:

"Tuesday, 24th August, set out for Dr. Majendie's at Kew-Green. The

Doctor told me that he had not seen the King yesterday, but had left a

note in writing, to intimate that I was to be at his house to-day; and

that one of the King's pages had come to him this morning, to say 'that

his Majesty would see me a little after twelve.' At twelve, the Doctor

and I went to the King's house, at Kew. We had been only a few minutes

in the hall, when the King and Queen came in from an airing; and, as

they passed through the hall, the King called to me by name, and asked

how long it was since I came from town. I answered, about an hour. 'I

shall see you,' says he, 'in a little.' The Doctor and I waited a

considerable time (for the King was busy), and then we were called into

a large room, furnished as a library, where the King was walking about,

and the Queen sitting in a chair. We were received in the most gracious

manner possible by both their Majesties. I had the honour of a

conversation with them (nobody else being present but Dr. Majendie) for

upwards of an hour, on a great variety of topics; in which both the King

and Queen joined, with a degree of cheerfulness, affability, and ease,

that was to me surprising, and soon dissipated the embarrassment which I

felt at the beginning of the conference. They both complimented me, in

the highest terms, on my 'Essay,' which, they said, was a book they

always kept by them; and the King said he had one copy of it at Kew, and

another in town, and immediately went and took it down from a shelf. I

found it was the second edition. 'I never stole a book but one,' said

his Majesty, 'and that was yours (speaking to me); I stole it from the

Queen, to give it to Lord Hertford to read.' He had heard that the sale

of Hume's 'Essays' had failed, since my book was published; and I told

him what Mr. Strahan had told me, in regard to that matter. He had even

heard of my being in Edinburgh last summer, and how Mr. Hume was

offended on the score of my book. He asked many questions about the

second part of the 'Essay,' and when it would be ready for the press. I

gave him, in a short speech, an account of the plan of it; and said, my

health was so precarious, I could not tell when it might be ready, as I

had many books to consult before I could finish it; but, that if my

health were good, I thought I might bring it to a conclusion in two or

three years. He asked, how long I had been in composing my Essay?

praised the caution with which it was written; and said, he did not

wonder that it had employed me five or six years. He asked about my

poems. I said, there was only one poem of my own on which I set any

value (meaning the 'Minstrel,') and that it was first published about

the same time with the 'Essay.' My other poems, I said, were incorrect,

being but juvenile pieces, and of little consequence, even in my own

opinion. We had much conversation on moral subjects; from which both

their Majesties let it appear that they were warm friends to

Christianity; and so little inclined to infidelity, that they could

hardly believe that any thinking man could really be an atheist, unless

he could bring himself to believe that he made himself; a thought which

pleased the King exceedingly; and he repeated it several times to the

Queen. He asked, whether any thing had been written against me. I spoke

of the late pamphlet, of which I gave an account, telling him, that I

never had met with any man who had read it, except one Quaker. This

brought on some discourse about the Quakers, whose moderation and mild

behaviour the King and Queen commended. I was asked many questions about

the Scots universities; the revenues of the Scots clergy; their mode of

praying and preaching; the medical college of Edinburgh; Dr. Gregory

(of whom I gave a particular character), and Dr. Cullen; the length of

our vacation at Aberdeen, and the closeness of our attendance during the

winter; the number of students that attend my lectures; my mode of

lecturing, whether from notes, or completely written lectures; about Mr.

Hume, and Dr. Robertson, and Lord Kinnoull, and the Archbishop of York,

&c. &c. &c. His Majesty asked what I thought of my new acquaintance,

Lord Dartmouth? I said there was something in his air and manner which I

thought not only agreeable, but enchanting, and that he seemed to me to

be one of the best of men; a sentiment in which both their Majesties

heartily joined. 'They say that Lord Dartmouth is an enthusiast,' said

the King, 'but surely he says nothing on the subject of religion, but

what every Christian may, and ought to say.' He asked, whether I did not

think the English language on the decline at present? I answered in the

affirmative; and the King agreed, and named the 'Spectator' as one of

the best standards of the language. When I told him that the Scots

clergy sometimes prayed a quarter, or even half an hour at a time, he

asked whether that did not lead them into repetitions? I said, it often

did. 'That,' said he, 'I don't like in prayers; and excellent as our

liturgy is, I think it somewhat faulty in that respect.' 'Your majesty

knows,' said I, 'that three services are joined in one in the ordinary

church service, which is one cause of those repetitions.' 'True,' he

replied, 'and that circumstance also makes the service too long.' From

this he took occasion to speak of the composition of the church liturgy;

on which he very justly bestowed the highest commendation. 'Observe,'

his Majesty said, 'how flat those occasional prayers are, that are now

composed, in comparison with the old ones.' When I mentioned the

smallness of the church livings in Scotland, he said, 'he wondered how

men of liberal education would choose to become clergymen there;' and

asked, 'whether in the remote parts of the country, the clergy, in

general were not very ignorant?' I answered, 'No, for that education was

very cheap in Scotland, and that the clergy, in general, were men of

good sense, and competent learning.' He asked whether we had any good

preachers at Aberdeen? I said, yes, and named Campbell and Gerard, with

whose names, however, I did not find that he was acquainted. Dr.

Majendie mentioned Dr. Oswald's 'Appeal' with commendation; I praised it

too and the queen took down the name, with a view to send for it. I was

asked, whether I knew Dr. Oswald? I answered, I did not; and said, that

my book was published before I read his; that Dr. O. was well known to

Lord Kinnoull, who had often proposed to make us acquainted. We

discussed a great many other topics; for the conversation, as before

observed, lasted for upwards of an hour, without any intermission. The

Queen bore a large share in it. Both the King and her Majesty showed a

great deal of good sense, acuteness, and knowledge, as well as of good

nature and affability. At last the king took out his watch (for it was

now almost three o'clock, his hour of dinner), which Dr. Majendie and I

took as a signal to withdraw. We accordingly bowed to their Majesties,

and I addressed the King in these words: 'I hope, Sir, your Majesty will

pardon me, if I take this opportunity to return you my humble and most

grateful acknowledgments, for the honour you have been pleased to confer

upon me.' He immediately answered, 'I think I could do no less for a man

who has done so much service to the cause of Christianity. I shall

always be glad of an opportunity to show the good opinion I have of

you.' The Queen sate all the while, and the King stood, sometimes

walking about a little. Her Majesty speaks the English language with

surprising elegance, and little or nothing of a foreign accent. There is

something wonderfully captivating in her manner; so that if she were

only of the rank of a private gentlewoman, one could not help taking

notice of her, as one of the most agreeable women in the world. Her face

is much more pleasing than any of her pictures; and in the expression of

her eyes, and in her smile, there is something peculiarly engaging.

When the Doctor and I came out, 'Pray,' said I, 'how did I behave? Tell

me honestly, for I am not accustomed to conversations of this kind.'

'Why, perfectly well,' answered he, 'and just as you ought to do.' 'Are

you sure of that?' said I. 'As sure,' he replied, 'as of my own

existence: and you may be assured of it too, when I tell you, that if

there had been any thing in your manner or conversation which was not

perfectly agreeable, your conference would have been at an end in eight

or ten minutes at most.' The Doctor afterwards told me, that it was a

most uncommon thing for a private man, and a commoner, to be honoured

with so long an audience. I dined with Dr. and Mrs. Majendie, and their

family, and returned to town in the evening, very much pleased with the

occurrences of the day."

At this time, Sir Joshua Reynolds, having requested Beattie to sit for

his picture, produced a likeness of him, which is generally regarded as

one of the finest works of that admirable artist. He is represented in

his Oxford gown of Doctor of Laws, with his famous Essay under his arm;

while beside him is Truth, habited as an Angel, holding in one hand a

pair of scales, and with the other thrusting down three frightful

figures, emblematic of Prejudice, Scepticism, and Folly.[R] Of this

picture Sir Joshua made a present to Beattie, who set a due value on so

noble a composition, and preserved it with the utmost care.

After an absence of a little more than five months, he returned to

Aberdeen.

A striking proof how highly the character and talents of Beattie were

appreciated, even by those to whom he was personally unknown, occurred

in October of this year (1773), when the chair of Moral Philosophy in

the University of Edinburgh was offered to him by the electors, the

magistrates of the city. He, however, declined accepting it, "Though my

fortune" (he writes to Sir William Forbes, on the subject) "were as

narrow now as it lately was, I should still incline rather to remain in

quiet where I am, than, by becoming a member of the University of

Edinburgh, to place myself within the reach of those (few as they are)

who have been pleased to let the world know that they do not wish me

well." He alludes to the enemies whom his _Essay on Truth_ had raised

up.

The Second Book of _The Minstrel_, together with a new and corrected

edition of the First, appeared in 1774, the author's name being now

added. The poem, thus enlarged, suffered no diminution of its

popularity.

The following year, Beattie and his wife spent several weeks in London,

residing during the chief part of the time with Dr. Porteus, one of his

kindest and most zealous friends. On this occasion, having shown himself

at court, he was immediately recognized by the King, who spoke to him

very graciously, and made several inquiries concerning his studies.

To a new and improved edition in quarto, of the _Essay on Truth_,

printed by subscription,[S] in 1776, our author appended three other

Essays: _On Poetry and Music, as they affect the Mind_, _On Laughter and

Ludicrous Composition_, and _On the Utility of Classical Learning_. In

1777,[T] he gave to the press a new edition of _The Minstrel_, to which

he added a few of his minor poems: this volume (he says in the preface)

contains "all the verses of which I am willing to be considered as the

author." In 1778,[U] he printed for private circulation a _Letter to Dr.

Blair, on the improvement of Psalmody in Scotland_. In 1779, he

published, for the use of the young men who attended his Lectures, a

_List of Scotticisms_, to the amount of about two hundred. And in 1780,

he contributed some thoughts _On Dreaming_ to the well known periodical

paper, _The Mirror_.

The following portion of a letter from Dr. Johnson to Beattie shows how

sincerely our author was esteemed by the great moralist:

"Bolt Court, Fleet Street, 21st August, 1780.

"More years than I have any delight to reckon have past since you

and I saw one another. Of this, however, there is no reason for

making any reprehensory complaint, _sic fata ferunt_: but, methinks,

there might pass some small interchange of regard between us. If you

say that I ought to have written, I now write; and I write to tell

you, that I have much kindness for you and Mrs. Beattie, and that I

wish your health better, and your life long. Try change of air, and

come a few degrees southward; a softer climate may do you both good.

Winter is coming on, and London will be warmer, and gayer, and

busier, and more fertile of amusement than Aberdeen."

In 1781, Beattie made another journey to London, taking with him his

eldest son, James Hay Beattie.[V] While there, we find him writing thus

to Sir William Forbes:

"1st June.

"I have been visiting all my friends again and again, and found them

as affectionate and attentive as ever. Death has indeed deprived me

of some since I was last here, of Garrick, and Armstrong, and poor

Harry Smith; but I have still many left."... "Johnson grows in grace

as he grows in years. He not only has better health and a fresher

complexion than ever he had before (at least since I knew him), but

he has contracted a gentleness of manners which pleases every body."

"28th June.

"I thought it my duty to appear at the levee before I left London;

and accordingly the week before last I went to court. The king had

not seen me for six years, and yet, to my surprise, knew me at first

sight. He spoke to me with his wonted condescension and affability;

and paid me a very polite compliment on the subject of my writings."

His _Dissertations, Moral and Critical_, were published in 1783.

A passage from a letter of the poet Cowper to the Rev. William Unwin,

5th April, 1784,[W] must not be omitted here:

"If you have not his poem, called the 'The Minstrel,' and cannot borrow

it, I must beg you to buy it for me; for, though I cannot afford to

deal largely in so expensive a commodity as books, I must afford to

purchase at least the poetical works of Beattie."

His health impaired, and his peace of mind destroyed, by the melancholy

condition of his wife (who, labouring under confirmed insanity, was now

removed from her family), we need not wonder that Beattie should

endeavour to forget his domestic griefs in the society of his English

friends, to whom he was ever welcome. During the year 1784, after

passing some time in London, he spent a month with Dr. Porteus (who had

now attained the rank of Bishop of Chester), at the beautiful parsonage

of Hunton, near Maidstone, which he characterizes as "the mansion of

peace, piety, and cheerfulness." He also visited Mrs. Montagu, at her

seat, called Sandleford, in Berks.

In 1786, his _Evidences of the Christian Religion_, were published. A

remark which he makes in a letter, while engaged in the composition of

this judicious summary, is worth quoting: "Whether this work shall ever

be of use to others, I know not; but this I know, that it has been of

considerable benefit to myself. For though, when I entered upon it, I

understood my subject well enough to entertain no doubt of the goodness

of my cause, yet I find, as I advance, new light continually breaking in

upon me."

The receipt of the following letter could hardly fail to gratify our

author:

"Philadelphia, 1st August, 1786.

"The American revolution, which divided the British empire, made no

breach in the republic of letters. As a proof of this, a stranger to

your person, and a citizen of a country lately hostile to yours, has

expressed his obligations to you for the knowledge and pleasure he

has derived from your excellent writings by procuring your admission

into the American Philosophical Society; a certificate of which,

subscribed by our illustrious president, Dr. Franklin, and the other

officers of the society, you will receive by the next vessel that

sails to any port in North Britain from this city.

"The stranger alluded to finished his studies in medicine in

Edinburgh in the year 1769, and has ever since taught chemistry and

medicine in the college of Philadelphia. His name (with the greatest

respect for yours) is,

"BENJAMIN RUSH."

The next year, with his eldest son for his companion, he repaired again

to London. While there, he writes thus to his niece, Miss Valentine, now

Mrs. Glennie:

"London, 20th July, 1787.

"I am just returned from Windsor, where I passed three days. I went

thither, partly to see some friends, but chiefly that I might pay my

respects to the King and Queen. They both received me in the most

gracious manner. I saw the King first on the terrace, where he knew

me at first sight, and did me the honour to converse with me a

considerable time. Next morning I saw him again at prayers in his

chapel, where he was pleased to introduce me to the Queen, who

inquired very kindly after my health; observed, that many years had

passed since she saw me last; regretted the bad weather which I had

met with at Windsor (for it rained incessantly,) which, said she,

has made your friends see less of you than they wished; and, after

some other conversation, her Majesty and the Princess Elizabeth,

who attended her, made a slight courtesy, and stepped into the

carriage that waited for them at the chapel door. The King remained

with us for some time longer, and talked of various matters."

Our author then proceeded to visit Dr. Porteus at Hunton, and Mrs.

Montagu at Sandleford, but was obliged to quit the latter place sooner

than he had intended, on account of the illness of his son, who shewed

symptoms of that consumptive complaint to which he afterwards fell a

victim. For the sake of medical advice Beattie carried him back to the

metropolis, and from thence, by very easy stages, to Aberdeen. Soon

after his return to Scotland, the invalid improved so much in health

that he was able to take upon him part of the management of the class of

Moral Philosophy in the Marischal College, having been appointed in June

of this year (when he was not quite nineteen) assistant professor to his

father.

In 1790, Beattie put forth the first volume of his _Elements of Moral

Science_; and superintended an edition of Addison's Periodical Papers,

adding a few notes to Tickell's Life of that author, and to Johnson's

Remarks on his Prose Writings. The second volume of the _Transactions of

the Royal Society of Edinburgh_, published during this year, contains

'Remarks on some Passages of the Sixth Book of the Æneid,' from

Beattie's pen.

He had now to suffer the dire bereavement which he had long foreseen,

the loss of his eldest son, the object of his fondest affection. He thus

informs the Duchess of Gordon of the melancholy event:

"Aberdeen, 1st December, 1790.

"Knowing with what kindness and condescension your grace takes an

interest in every thing that concerns me and my little family, I

take the liberty to inform you, that my son James is dead; that the

last duties to him are now paid; and that I am endeavouring to

return, with the little ability that is left me, and with entire

submission to the will of Providence, to the ordinary business of

life. I have lost one who was always a pleasing companion; but who,

for the last five or six years, was one of the most entertaining and

instructive companions that ever man was blest with: for his mind

comprehended almost every science; he was a most attentive observer

of life and manners; a master of classical learning; and he

possessed an exuberance of wit and humour, a force of understanding,

and a correctness and delicacy of taste, beyond any other person of

his age I have ever known.

"He was taken ill in the night of the 30th of November, 1789; and

from that time his decline commenced. It was long what physicians

call a nervous atrophy; but towards the end of June, symptoms began

to appear of the lungs being affected. Goats' milk, and afterwards

asses' milk, were procured for him in abundance; and such exercise

as he could bear, he regularly took; these means lengthened his days

no doubt, and alleviated his sufferings, which indeed were not often

severe: but, in spite of all that could be done, he grew weaker and

weaker, and died the 19th of November, 1790, without complaint or

pain, without even a groan or a sigh; retaining to the last moment

the use of his rational faculties; indeed, from first to last, not

one delirious word ever escaped him. He lived twenty-two years and

thirteen days. Many weeks before it came, he saw death approaching,

and he met it with such composure and pious resignation, as may no

doubt be equalled, but cannot be surpassed.

"He has left many things in writing, serious and humorous,

scientific and miscellaneous, prose and verse, Latin and English;

but it will be a long time before I shall be able to harden my heart

so far as to revise them."

In April of the following year, Beattie again travelled southwards,

accompanied by Montagu,[X] his second son and only surviving child.

They remained some weeks in Edinburgh, and then journeyed slowly to

London, which after a short stay they quitted for the summer residence

of Dr. Porteus, who was now elevated to the see of the metropolis. The

tranquillity of Fulham Palace, and the kind attentions of its

inhabitants, contributed greatly to amend the health and raise the

spirits of our author; and he seems to have enjoyed the company of the

distinguished persons with whom he had an opportunity of associating.

"Last week," he writes to Sir William Forbes, 30th June, 1791, "I made a

morning visit to Mr. Pitt. I had heard him spoken of as a grave and

reserved man; but saw nothing of it. He gave me a very frank, and indeed

affectionate reception; and was so cheerful, and in his conversation so

easy, that I almost thought myself in the company rather of an old

acquaintance than of a great statesman. He was pleased to pay me some

very obliging compliments, asked about my health, and how I meant to

pass the summer; spoke of the Duchess of Gordon, the improvements of

Edinburgh, and various other matters: and when I told him, I knew not

what apology to make for intruding upon him, said, that no apology was

necessary, for that he was very glad to see me, and desired to see me

again." Before returning to Scotland, the travellers went to Bath, and

from thence to Sandleford, the seat of Mrs. Montagu.

The second volume of the _Elements of Moral Science_ appeared in 1793.

During the same year the sudden death of his favourite sister, Mrs.

Valentine, increased the domestic sorrows of Beattie. His health was at

this period so greatly impaired, that being unable to attend to his

duties of Professor in the Marischal College, he engaged his old pupil,

Mr. Glennie, as an assistant: occasionally, however, he continued to

lecture to his class till the commencement of the winter session of

1797.

For some time past he had occupied himself in the melancholy yet

pleasing task of editing a volume of the compositions of his eldest son.

From a pardonable partiality for the writings of a beloved child, and

from his not very accurate attainments in classical scholarship, he

admitted into the collection several pieces, both English and Latin,

which fall considerably below mediocrity. A few copies of the work were

privately printed in 1794, under the title of _Essays and Fragments in

Prose and Verse, by James Hay Beattie_, and were "offered as presents to

those friends with whom the author was particularly acquainted or

connected."[Y] Though it undoubtedly shows that the deceased was a

young man of uncommon quickness of talent, and the most indefatigable

application, it exhibits nothing which has a claim to be considered as

the offspring of genius.[Z] The most interesting portion of the volume

is the biographical sketch prefixed to it by the afflicted father, a

memoir of exquisite simplicity and pathos. The account given by Beattie

of the method which he adopted in imparting to his son the first idea

of a Supreme Being is too striking to be omitted here:

"The doctrines of religion I wished to impress on his mind, as soon as

it might be prepared to receive them; but I did not see the propriety of

making him commit to memory theological sentences, or any sentences

which it was not possible for him to understand. And I was desirous to

make a trial how far his own reason could go in tracing out, with a

little direction, the great and first principle of all religion, the

being of God. The following fact is mentioned, not as a proof of

superior sagacity in him (for I have no doubt that most children would

in like circumstances think as he did), but merely as a moral or logical

experiment: He had reached his fifth (or sixth) year, knew the alphabet,

and could read a little; but had received no particular information with

respect to the Author of his being; because I thought he could not yet

understand such information; and because I had learned, from my own

experience, that to be made to repeat words not understood is extremely

detrimental to the faculties of a young mind. In a corner of a little

garden, without informing any person of the circumstance, I wrote in the

mould, with my finger, the three initial letters of his name; and sowing

garden-cresses in the furrows, covered up the seed, and smoothed the

ground. Ten days after, he came running to me, and with astonishment in

his countenance, told me that his name was growing in the garden. I

smiled at the report, and seemed inclined to disregard it; but he

insisted on my going to see what had happened. Yes, said I carelessly,

on coming to the place, I see it is so; but there is nothing in this

worth notice; it is mere chance; and I went away. He followed me and

taking hold of my coat, said, with some earnestness, It could not be

mere chance; for that somebody must have contrived matters so as to

produce it.--I pretend not to give his words, or my own, for I have

forgotten both; but I give the substance of what passed between us in

such language as we both understood.--So you think, I said, that what

appears so regular as the letters of your name, cannot be by chance.

Yes, said he, with firmness, I think so. Look at yourself, I replied,

and consider your hands and fingers, your legs and feet, and other

limbs; are not they regular in their appearance, and useful to you? He

said, they were. Came you then hither, said I, by chance? No, he

answered, that cannot be; something must have made me. And who is that

something? I asked. He said he did not know. (I took particular notice,

that he did not say, as Rousseau fancies a child in like circumstances

would say, that his parents made him.) I had now gained the point I

aimed at, and saw that his reason taught him (though he could not so

express it) that what begins to be must have a cause, and that what is

formed with regularity must have an intelligent cause. I therefore told

him the name of the Great Being who made him and all the world;

concerning whose adorable nature I gave him such information as I

thought he could in some measure comprehend. The lesson affected him

greatly, and he never forgot either it, or the circumstance that

introduced it."

After the loss of this highly-gifted youth, the only tie which bound

Beattie to the world was his second son, who, though far inferior to the

deceased in learning, was endowed with no ordinary talents.[AA] Just as

our author was anxiously forming plans for his future establishment in

life, Montagu was unexpectedly carried off by a fever of only a few

days' continuance, in the eighteenth year of his age. Beattie thus

communicates to Sir William Forbes the intelligence of his death:

"Aberdeen, 14th March, 1796.

"Our plans relating to Montagu are all at an end. I am sorry to give

you the pain of being informed, that he died this morning at five.

His disorder was a fever, from which at first we had little

apprehension; but it cut him off in five days. He himself thought

from the beginning that it would be fatal; and, before the delirium

came on, spoke with great composure and Christian piety of his

approaching dissolution: he even gave some directions about his

funeral. The delirium was very violent, and continued till within a

few minutes of his death, when he was heard to repeat in a whisper

the Lord's prayer, and began an unfinished sentence, of which

nothing could be heard but the words _incorruptible glory_. Pious

sentiments prevailed in his mind through life, and did not leave him

till death; nor then, I trust, did they leave him. Notwithstanding

the extreme violence of his fever, he seemed to suffer little pain,

either in body or in mind, and as his end drew near, a smile settled

upon his countenance. I need not tell you that he had every

attention that skilful and affectionate physicians could bestow.

I give you the trouble to notify this event to Mr. Arbuthnot.

I would have written to him, but have many things to mind, and

but indifferent health. However, I heartily acquiesce in the

dispensations of Providence, which are all good and wise. God bless

you and your family.

"He will be much regretted; for wherever he went he was a very

popular character."

Such an effect had this fresh calamity on the intellectual powers of

Beattie, that a few days after Montagu's death, he experienced a

temporary hut almost utter loss of memory respecting him. Having

searched every room in the house, he would say to his niece, Mrs.

Glennie, "You may think it strange, but I must ask you if I have a son,

and where he is?" She then felt herself under the painful necessity of

calling to his recollection the sufferings of Montagu, the mention of

which never failed to restore him to reason. Often with tears he would

declare himself thankful that his children were in the grave,

exclaiming, in allusion to their mother's malady, "How could I have

borne to see their elegant minds mangled with madness!" On viewing the

dead body of Montagu for the last time, he said, "I have now done with

the world."

The following passages from two of his letters, written about this

period, are deeply affecting. He tells the Rev. Dr. Laing, 10th April,

1796:

"I hope I am resigned, as my duty requires, and as I wish to be; but I

have passed many a bitter hour, though on those occasions nobody sees

me. I fear my reason is a little disordered, for I have sometimes

thought of late, especially in a morning, that Montagu is not dead,

though I seem to have a remembrance of a dream that he is. This you will

say, what I myself believe, is a symptom not uncommon in cases similar

to mine, and that I ought by all means to go from home as soon as I can.

I will do so when the weather becomes tolerable."

To Sir William Forbes he says, 17th of the same month:

"I have been these many days resolving to write to you and Mr.

Arbuthnot, to thank you for your very kind and sympathetic letters, but

various things have come in my way to prevent it. I need not pretend a

hurry of business, for every-body knows I am not capable of any. A deep

gloom hangs upon me, and disables all my faculties; and thoughts so

strange sometimes occur to me as to make me 'fear that I am not,' as

Lear says, 'in my perfect mind.' But I thank God I am entirely resigned

to the divine will; and, though I am now childless, I have friends

whose goodness to me, and other virtues, I find great comfort in

recollecting. The physicians not only advise, but entreat, and indeed

command me to go from home, and that without further delay; and I do

seriously resolve to set out for Edinburgh to-morrow."

Though Beattie never from henceforth engaged in any kind of study, he

still found some enjoyment in books, and still derived some pleasure

from the society of a very few of his oldest friends. He almost entirely

ceased to correspond, even with those whom he most valued; yet when he

happened to receive a letter from any of them, his spirits were always

excited for the rest of the day. Music, in which he had once delighted,

had become disagreeable to him since the loss of his eldest son.[AB] A

few months, however, before Montagu's death, he had occasionally played

an accompaniment while Montagu sung; but now, when prevailed on to

resume his favourite violoncello, he was always dissatisfied with his

own performance. "My fingers," he writes to the Rev. Dr. Laing, 5th

June, 1798, "have not strength to press down the strings."

In this state he continued till the beginning of April, 1799, when he

was struck with palsy, which, for eight days, rendered him nearly

incapable of utterance. At different times the disease repeated its

attacks, the last of which, on the 5th of October, 1802, deprived him

entirely of the power of motion. On the morning of the 18th of August,

1803, he expired without a struggle, in the sixty-eighth year of his

age.

His remains were laid, according to his own desire, beside those of his

children, in the church-yard of St. Nicholas, at Aberdeen; and a Latin

inscription, from the pen of the late Dr. James Gregory, of Edinburgh,

marks the spot of his interment.

In person he was of the middle size, of a broad, square make, which

seemed to indicate a more robust constitution than he really possessed.

In his gait there was something of a slouch. During his later years he

grew corpulent and unwieldy; but a few months before his death his hulk

was greatly diminished. His features were very regular; his complexion

somewhat dark. His eyes were black, brilliant, full of a tender and

melancholy expression, and, in the course of conversation with his

friends, became extremely animated.

Though I am of opinion with Gilbert Wakefield, that the maxim _De

mortuis nil nisi_ VERUM is better than _De mortuis nil nisi_ BONUM, it

is with pain that I touch on the reported failing of so truly good a man

as Beattie. It has been asserted that towards the close of life he

indulged to excess in the use of wine. In a letter to Mr. Arbuthnot, he

says, "With the present pressure upon my mind, I should not be able to

sleep, if I did not use wine as an opiate; it is less hurtful than

laudanum, but not so effectual." He may, perhaps, have had too frequent

recourse to so palatable a medicine, in the hope of banishing for a

while the recollection of his sorrows; and if, under any circumstances,

such a fault is to be regarded as venial, it may be excused in one who

was a more than widowed husband and a childless father.

The prose writings of Beattie appear of late years to have fallen into

disrepute; and the once celebrated _Essay on Truth_ is at present as

much undervalued as it was formerly overrated.

His fame now rests upon _The Minstrel_ alone. Since its first

publication, many poems of a far loftier and more original character

have been produced in England; yet still does it maintain its

popularity; and still in Edwin, that happy personification of the poetic

temperament, do young and enthusiastic readers delight to recognize a

picture of themselves. Though we cannot fail to regret that Beattie

should have left it incomplete, yet we do not long for the concluding

books from any interest which we take in the story, such as is excited

by some other unfinished works of genius, the tale of _Cambuscan_, for

instance, or the legend of _Christabel_. In _The Minstrel_, indeed,

there is but little invention; it is a poem of sentiment and

description, conveying to us lessons of true philosophy in language of

surpassing beauty, and displaying pictures of nature, in her romantic

solitudes, painted by a master's hand. "On my once asking Dr. Beattie,"

says Sir William Forbes, "in what manner he had intended to employ his

Minstrel, had he completed his original design of extending the poem to

a third canto, he said, he proposed to have introduced a foreign enemy

as invading his country, in consequence of which the Minstrel was to

employ himself in rousing his countrymen to arms."[AC] But surely such a

conclusion would have formed too violent a contrast to the repose of the

earlier books; and the charm which attaches us to the meditative Edwin,

while a wanderer among the lonely hills and groves, would have been

broken, or at least weakened, by placing him amid the throng of warriors

and the din of arms.

With the exception of _The Hermit_ and the following exquisite

stanza[AD] of _Retirement_, there is little worthy of particular notice

in the minor poems of Beattie.

FOOTNOTES:

[A] "At his leisure hours he cultivated the muses. A journal kept by

him, as well as some specimens of his poetry, are still in the

possession of his descendants. This last circumstance is the more worthy

of being noticed, as it proves that Dr. Beattie derived his poetical

turn from his father."--Bower's _Life of Beattie_, 1804, p. 2.

[B] According to Bower, Beattie was supported at college by the

generosity of his brother David, who accompanied him to Aberdeen, when

he first quitted Laurencekirk to commence his course at the University.

"The peculiar mode of their conveyance to Aberdeen is a matter of very

trifling moment. It may not be unacceptable to some, however, to be

informed, that they rode on one horse; and at a season of the year not

the most agreeable for undertaking a journey (when good roads were

unknown in Scotland) of thirty English miles."--_Life of Beattie_, 1804,

p. 17.

[C] _Life of Homer_, _Court of Augustus_, &c.

[D] Bower's _Life of Beattie_, 1804, p. 89.

[E] _Ibid._ p. 100.

[F] Lord Gardenstone was himself a votary of the muses, though his

verses are now forgotten. As a satirical poet he is far from

contemptible.

[G] Robert Arbuthnot, Esq., Secretary to the Board of Trustees for

Fisheries, Manufactures, and improvements in Scotland, who resided

chiefly at Peterhead, where he carried on business as a merchant; a

person of considerable taste and learning. He was nearly related to the

famous Dr. Arbuthnot, the friend of Pope and Swift.

[H] Sir William Forbes says it "had a rapid sale." Mr. A. Chalmers,

however (_Poets_, vol. xviii. p. 519), doubts if it was ever published

for sale, except in Beattie's _Poems_, 1766, in the Advertisement to

which we are told that it "appeared in a separate pamphlet in the

beginning of the year 1765." I have been unable to meet with the

original edition.

[I] I have been told that the poem consisted originally of only four

stanzas, and that the two beautiful ones with which it now concludes

were added, a considerable time after the others were written, at the

request of Mrs. Carnegie, of Charlton, near Montrose. This lady, whose

maiden name was Scott, was authoress of a poem called _Dunotter Castle_,

printed in the second edition of Colman and Thornton's _Poems by Eminent

Ladies_.

'Pentland Hills', for which Beattie wrote _The Hermit_, was an air

composed by Mr. Tytler, of Woodhouselee, in imitation of the old

Scottish melodies.

[J] On one occasion, I have been informed, she took some China jars from

the chimney-piece, and carefully arranged them on the top of the parlour

door, in order that when Beattie opened it, they might fall upon his

head.

[K] Beattie's Verses were printed in the Aberdeen Journal, together with

an introductory letter in prose also by him, signed "Oliver Oldstile."

The writer of the Life of Ross, in that pleasing compilation, _Lives of

Scottish Poets_, 3 vols. 1822, says: "The author of both productions was

generally understood to be Dr. Beattie; and they have remained so long

ascribed to him without contradiction, that there can be little doubt of

their being from his pen." _Part_ iii. p. 107. There is no doubt about

the matter; Beattie owns them in a letter to Blacklock.--Forbes's _Life

of Beattie_, vol. i. p. 153. ed. 1807. _The Fortunate Shepherdess_ is a

poem of great merit: to the second edition of it (and I believe to all

subsequent editions) Beattie's verses are prefixed.

[L] Dr. Reid.

[M] Dr. Campbell.

[N] Mr. Hume, who at an early period had been the patron of Blacklock.

Long before the date of this letter they had ceased to have any

intercourse.

[O]

"O how canst thou renounce the boundless store

Of charms which Nature to her votary yields!

The warbling woodland, the resounding shore,

The pomp of groves, and garniture of fields;

All that the genial ray of morning gilds,

And all that echoes to the song of even,

All that the mountain's sheltering bosom shields,

And all the dread magnificence of heaven,

O, how canst thou renounce, and hope to be forgiven!"

"I have often wished," says Beattie, in a note on Gray's letter, "to

alter this same word [_garniture_], but have not yet been able to hit

upon a better."

[P] See p. xv.

[Q] At a subsequent period, after the king had granted him a pension, he

received two offers of church preferment in England--the one from Mr.

Pitt, of Dorsetshire, of a living in that county worth £150 per annum,

the other from Dr. Thomas, Bishop of Winchester, of a living in Hants,

valued at £500 a year--neither of which he would accept. In the letter

wherein he declines the second noble offer, he thus expresses himself:

"I wrote the 'Essays on Truth' with the certain prospect of raising many

enemies, with very faint hopes of attracting the public attention, and

without any views of advancing my fortune. I published it, however,

because I thought it might probably do a little good, by bringing to

nought, or, at least, lessening the reputation of that wretched system

of sceptical philosophy, which had made a most alarming progress, and

done incredible mischief to this country. My enemies have been at great

pains to represent my views, in that publication, as very different: and

that my principal, or only motive was to make a book, and, if possible,

to raise myself higher in the world. So that, if I were now to accept

preferment in the church, I should be apprehensive that I might

strengthen the hands of the gainsayer, and give the world some ground to

believe that my love of truth was not quite so ardent, or so pure, as I

had pretended.

"Besides, might it not have the appearance of levity and insincerity,

and, by some, be construed into a want of principle, if I were, at these

years (for I am now thirty-eight), to make such an important change in

my way of life, and to quit, with no other _apparent_ motive than that

of bettering my circumstances, that church of which I have hitherto been

a member? If my book has any tendency to do good, as I flatter myself it

has, I would not, for the wealth of the Indies, do any thing to

counteract that tendency; and I am afraid that tendency might, in some

measure be counteracted (at least in this country) if I were to give the

adversary the least ground to charge me with inconsistency. It is true,

that the force of my reasonings cannot be _really_ affected by my

character; truth is truth, whoever be the speaker; but even truth itself

becomes less respectable, when spoken, or supposed to be spoken, by

insincere lips.

"It has also been hinted to me, by several persons of very sound

judgment, that what I have written, or may hereafter write in favour of

religion, has a chance of being more attended to, if I continue a

layman, than if I were to become a clergyman. Nor am I without

apprehensions (though some of my friends think them ill founded) that,

from entering so late in life, and from so remote a province, into the

Church of England, some degree of ungracefulness, particularly in

pronunciation, might adhere to my performances in public, sufficient to

render them less pleasing, and consequently less useful."

[R] So Beattie names the figures in one of his letters; but Sir William

Forbes tells us they are supposed to mean Sophistry, Scepticism, and

Infidelity. The worthy Baronet proceeds to observe:

"Because one of these was a lean figure and the [an] other a fat one,

people of lively imaginations pleased themselves with finding in them

the portraits of Voltaire and Mr. Hume. But Sir Joshua, I have reason to

believe, had no such thought when he painted those figures."

Surely Sir William had never read all the letters which he printed in

his _Life of Beattie_, for in vol. ii. p. 42, octavo ed., we find the

great painter writing to our poet as follows, in February, 1774:

"Mr. Hume has heard from somebody that he is introduced in the picture,

not much to his credit; there is only a figure, covering his face with

his hands, which they may call Hume or any body else; _it is true it has

a tolerable broad back. As for Voltaire, I intended he should be one of

the group._"

This fine picture is now at Aberdeen, in the possession of Beattie's

niece, Mrs. Glennie.

[S] When Beattie was in London, in 1773, and when it was doubtful

whether government would ever make any provision for him, his friends

there set on foot a subscription for this work. "It was a thing," says

he, in a letter to Lady Mayne, January, 1774, "of a private nature

entirely; projected not by me, but by some of my friends, who had

condescended to charge themselves with the whole trouble of it: it was

never meant to be made public, nor put into the hands of booksellers,

nor carried on by solicitation, but was to be considered as a

_voluntary_ mark of the approbation of some persons of rank and fortune,

who wished it to be known that they patronized me on account of what I

had written in defence of truth," &c. Prefixed to the volume is a list

of nearly five hundred subscribers, among whom are many distinguished

characters in church and state.

[T] A spurious edition of his Juvenile Poems, with some which he never

wrote, from Dodsley's _Collection_, was put forth in 1780. This volume

he disowned in a public advertisement.

[U] Perhaps it was not printed till the beginning of the following year.

In a letter to Beattie, dated Feb. 1st, 1779, Mrs. Montagu says, "I was

much pleased with your pamphlet on Psalmody."

[V] He was born in 1768, and was named after James Hay, Earl of Errol,

our author's early patron.

[W] Writing from Edinburgh, 28th May, 1784, to his niece, Miss Valentine

(now Mrs. Glennie), Beattie describes the sensation caused in that city

by the performances of Mrs. Siddons. He says that he met her at the

house of Lord Buchan; that he played to her many Scotch airs on the

violoncello, with which she was much gratified; and that "she sung

'Queen Mary's Complaint' to admiration, and I had the honour to

accompany her on the bass."--Forbes's _Life of Beattie_, vol. ii. p.

324, octavo ed.

I am informed, by the incomparable actress in question, that the

quotation just given contains an utter falsehood, which, when Forbes's

Life of our author first appeared, in 1806, she read with astonishment.

She remembers perfectly having been introduced to Beattie at Lord

Buchan's, but she is quite certain she did _not_ sing either Queen

Mary's Complaint or any other song; and she observes, that if she _had_

sung to his accompaniment, the circumstance would have been so striking

that it could not possibly have escaped her recollection.

Qy. Has Beattie's letter been mutilated, the person who transcribed it

for the press having by mistake omitted some lines? and do the words

"she sung," in the concluding sentence, refer to some other more musical

lady, and not to Mrs. Siddons?

[X] He was so named after Mrs. Montagu. From one of Beattie's letters,

dated 1789, it appears that she had made a handsome present of money to

her godson.

[Y] I possess a copy of it which bears the following inscription:

"To William Hayley, Esq.,

in testimony of the utmost respect,

esteem, and gratitude, from J. Beattie.

1st January, 1796."

On one of its fly-leaves the ever-ready pen of Hayley has written the

subjoined sonnet:

TO DOCTOR BEATTIE, IN GRATEFUL ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HIS VERY INTERESTING

PRESENT.

"Bard of the North! I thank thee with my tears

For this fond work of thy paternal hand:

It bids the buried youth before me stand

In nature's softest light, which love endears.

Parents like thee, whose grief the world reveres,

Faithful to pure affection's proud command,

For a lost child have lasting honours plann'd,

To give in fame what fate denied in years.

The filial form of Icarus was wrought

By his afflicted sire, the sire of art!

And Tullia's fane engross'd her father's heart:

That fane rose only in perturbed thought;

But sweet perfection crowns, as truth begun,

This Christian image of thy happier son."

[Z] It was afterwards published for sale in 1799. I extract from it a

jeu d'esprit--one of those pieces which Beattie printed, in opposition

to the advice of Sir William Forbes and some other grave friends.

THE MODERN TIPPLING PHILOSOPHERS.

FATHER HODGE[1] had his pipe and his dram,

And at night, his cloy'd thirst to awaken,

He was served with a rasher of ham,

Which procured him the surname of _Bacon_.

He has shown that, though logical science

And dry theory oft prove unhandy,

Honest Truth will ne'er set at defiance

Experiment, aided by brandy.

Des Cartes bore a musket, they tell us,

Ere he wished, or was able, to write,

And was noted among the brave fellows,

Who are bolder to tipple than fight.

Of his system the cause and design

We no more can be pos'd to explain:--

The _materia subtilis_ was wine,

And the _vortices_ whirl'd in his brain.

Old Hobbes, as his name plainly shows,

At a _hob-nob_ was frequently tried:

That all virtue from selfishness rose

He believ'd, and all laughter from pride.[2]

The truth of his creed he would brag on,

Smoke his pipe, murder Homer,[3] and quaff,

Then staring, as drunk as a dragon,

In the pride of his heart he would laugh.

Sir Isaac discover'd, it seems,

The nature of colors and light,

In remarking the tremulous beams

That swom on his wandering sight.

Ever sapient, sober though seldom,

From experience _attraction_ he found,

By observing, when no one upheld him,

That his wise head fell souse on the ground.

As to Berkley's philosophy--he has

Left his poor pupils nought to inherit,

But a swarm of deceitful ideas

Kept like other monsters, in spirit.[4]

Tar-drinkers can't think what's the matter,

That their health does not mend, but decline:

Why, they take but some wine to their water,

He took but some water to wine.

One Mandeville once, or Man-devil,

(Either name you may give as you please)

By a brain ever brooding on evil,

Hatch'd a monster call'd _Fable of Bees_,

Vice, said he, aggrandizes a people;[5]

By this light let my conduct be view'd;

I swagger, swear, guzzle, and tipple:

And d---- ye, 'tis all for your good.

David Hume ate a swinging great dinner,

And grew every day fatter and fatter;

And yet the huge hulk of a sinner

Said there was neither spirit nor matter.

Now there's no sober man in the nation,

Who such nonsense could write, speak, or think:

It follows, by fair demonstration,

That he philosophiz'd in his drink.

As a smuggler, even Priestley could sin;

Who, in hopes the poor gauger of frightening,

While he fill'd the case-bottles with gin,

Swore he fill'd them with thunder and lightning.[6]

In his cups, (when Locke's laid on the shelf),

Could he speak, he would frankly confess t' ye,

That unable to manage himself,

He puts his whole trust in Necessity.

If the young in rash folly engage,

How closely continues the evil!

Old Franklin retains, as a sage,

The thirst he acquired when a devil.[7]

That charging drives fire from a phial,

It was natural for him to think,

After finding, from many a trial,

That drought may be kindled by drink.

A certain high priest could explain,[8]

How the soul is but nerve at the most;

And how Milton had glands in his brain,

That secreted the Paradise Lost.

And sure it is what they deserve,

Of such theories if I aver it,

They are not even dictates of nerve,

But mere muddy suggestions of claret.

Our Holland Philosophers say, Gin

Is the true philosophical drink,

As it made Doctor Hartley imagine

That to _shake_ is the same as to _think_.[9]

For, while drunkenness throbb'd in his brain,

The sturdy materialist chose (O fye!)

To believe its vibrations not pain,

But wisdom, and downright philosophy.

Ye sages, who shine in my verse,

On my labours with gratitude think,

Which condemn not the faults they rehearse,

But impute all your sin to your drink.

In drink, poets, philosophers, mob, err;

Then excuse if my satire e'er nips ye:

When I praise, think me prudent and sober,

If I blame, be assur'd I am tipsy.

[1] Roger Bacon, the father of experimental philosophy. He

flourished in the thirteenth century.

[2] See _The Spectator_, No. 47.

[3] Hobbes was a great smoker, and wrote what some have been

pleased to call a Translation of Homer.

[4] He taught that the external universe has no existence,

but an ideal one, in the mind (or _spirit_) that perceives

it; and he thought tar-water a universal remedy.

[5] Private vices public benefits.

[6] Electrical batteries.

[7] Bred a printer. This was written long before Dr.

Franklin's death.

[8] Dr. L., Bp. of C., is probably the person here alluded

to. He was a zealous materialist.

[9] He resolved Perception and Thinking into _vibrations_,

and (what he called) _vibratiuncles_ of the brain.

[AA] "I have been assured by those who were intimately acquainted with

both, that of the two brothers, Montagu was in many respects the

superior."

Bower's _Life of Beattie_, 1804, p. 210.

[AB] James Hay Beattie had a scientific knowledge of music, and, with the

assistance of the Rev. Dr. Laing, had superintended the building an

organ for himself. In one of our author's letters, 8th June, 1791, is

the following passage:

"The organ of Durham cathedral was too much for my feelings; for it

brought too powerfully to my remembrance another organ, much smaller,

indeed, but more interesting, which I can never hear any more."

[AC] See, too, Beattie's letter to Blacklock, p. xv. of this memoir.

[AD]

Thy shades, thy silence now be mine,

Thy charms my only theme;

My haunt the hollow cliff, whose pine

Waves o'er the gloomy stream:

_Whence the scar'd owl on pinions gray

Breaks from the rustling boughs,

And down the lone vale sails away

To more profound repose._

ADVERTISEMENT.

January, 1777.

Having lately seen in print some poems ascribed to me which I never

wrote, and some of my own inaccurately copied, I thought it would not be

improper to publish, in this little volume, all the verses of which I am

willing to be considered as the author. Many others I did indeed write

in the early part of my life; but they were in general so incorrect,

that I would not rescue them from oblivion, even if a wish could do it.

Some of the few now offered to the Public would perhaps have been

suppressed, if in making this collection I had implicitly followed my

own judgment. But in so small a matter, who would refuse to submit his

opinion to that of a friend?

It is of no consequence to the reader to know the date of any of these

little poems. But some private reasons determined the author to add,

that most of them were written many years age, and that the greatest

part of the MINSTREL, which is his latest attempt in this way, was

composed in the year one thousand seven hundred and sixty-eight.

PREFACE TO THE MINSTREL.

The design was to trace the progress of a Poetical Genius, born in a

rude age, from the first dawning of fancy and reason, till that period

at which he may be supposed capable of appearing in the world as a

Minstrel, that is, as an itinerant Poet and Musician;--a character

which, according to the notions of our forefathers, was not only

respectable, but sacred.

I have endeavoured to imitate Spenser in the measure of his verse, and

in the harmony, simplicity, and variety of his composition. Antique

expressions I have avoided; admitting, however, some old words, where

they seemed to suit the subject; but I hope none will be found that are

now obsolete, or in any degree not intelligible to a reader of English

poetry.

To those who may be disposed to ask, what could induce me to write in so

difficult a measure, I can only answer that it pleases my ear, and

seems, from its Gothic structure and original, to bear some relation to

the subject and spirit of the Poem. It admits both simplicity and

magnificence of sound and of language beyond any other stanza that I am

acquainted with. It allows the sententiousness of the couplet, as well

as the more complex modulation of blank verse. What some critics have

remarked, of its uniformity growing at last tiresome to the ear, will be

found to hold true, only when the poetry is faulty in other respects.

THE MINSTREL.