THE CRIME 1920.

On a bleak wet stormy afternoon at the outset of last year’s Spring, I

was in a cottage, all alone, and knowing that I must be all alone till

evening. It was a remote cottage, in a remote county, and had been ‘let

furnished’ by its owner. My spirits are easily affected by weather, and

I hate solitude. And I dislike to be master of things that are not mine.

‘Be careful not to break us,’ say the glass and china. ‘You’d better

not spill ink on me,’ growls the carpet. ‘None of your dog’s-earing,

thumb-marking, back-breaking tricks here!’ snarl the books.

The books in this cottage looked particularly disagreeable--horrid

little upstarts of this and that scarlet or cerulean ‘series’ of

‘standard’ authors. Having gloomily surveyed them, I turned my back on

them, and watched the rain streaming down the latticed window, whose

panes seemed likely to be shattered at any moment by the wind. I have

known men who constantly visit the Central Criminal Court, visit also

the scenes where famous crimes were committed, form their own theories

of those crimes, collect souvenirs of those crimes, and call themselves

Criminologists. As for me, my interest in crime is, alas, merely morbid.

I did not know, as those others would doubtless have known, that

the situation in which I found myself was precisely of the kind most

conducive to the darkest deeds. I did but bemoan it, and think of Lear

in the hovel on the heath. The wind howled in the chimney, and the rain

had begun to sputter right down it, so that the fire was beginning to

hiss in a very sinister manner. Suppose the fire went out! It looked as

if it meant to. I snatched the pair of bellows that hung beside it. I

plied them vigorously. ‘Now mind!--not too vigorously. We aren’t yours!’

they wheezed. I handled them more gently. But I did not release them

till they had secured me a steady blaze.

I sat down before that blaze. Despair had been warded off. Gloom,

however, remained; and gloom grew. I felt that I should prefer any one’s

thoughts to mine. I rose, I returned to the books. A dozen or so of

those which were on the lowest of the three shelves were full-sized,

were octavo, looked as though they had been bought to be read. I would

exercise my undoubted right to read one of them. Which of them? I

gradually decided on a novel by a well-known writer whose works, though

I had several times had the honour of meeting her, were known to me only

by repute.

I knew nothing of them that was not good. The lady’s ‘output’ had not

been at all huge, and it was agreed that her ‘level’ was high. I had

always gathered that the chief characteristic of her work was its great

‘vitality.’ The book in my hand was a third edition of her latest novel,

and at the end of it were numerous press-notices, at which I glanced

for confirmation. ‘Immense vitality,’ yes, said one critic. ‘Full,’

said another, ‘of an intense vitality.’ ‘A book that will live,’ said

a third. How on earth did he know that? I was, however, very willing

to believe in the vitality of this writer for all present purposes.

Vitality was a thing in which she herself, her talk, her glance, her

gestures, abounded. She and they had been, I remembered, rather too much

for me. The first time I met her, she said something that I lightly and

mildly disputed. On no future occasion did I stem any opinion of hers.

Not that she had been rude. Far from it. She had but in a sisterly,

brotherly way, and yet in a way that was filially eager too, asked me

to explain my point. I did my best. She was all attention. But I was

conscious that my best, under her eye, was not good. She was quick to

help me: she said for me just what I had tried to say, and proceeded to

show me just why it was wrong. I smiled the gallant smile of a man who

regards women as all the more adorable because logic is not their strong

point, bless them! She asked--not aggressively, but strenuously, as one

who dearly loves a joke--what I was smiling at. Altogether, a chastening

encounter; and my memory of it was tinged with a feeble resentment. How

she had scored! No man likes to be worsted in argument by a woman. And

I fancy that to be vanquished by a feminine writer is the kind of defeat

least of all agreeable to a man who writes. A ‘sex war,’ we are often

told is to be one of the features of the world’s future--women

demanding the right to do men’s work, and men refusing, resisting,

counter-attacking. It seems likely enough. One can believe anything

of the world’s future. Yet one conceives that not all men, if this

particular evil come to pass, will stand packed shoulder to shoulder

against all women. One does not feel that the dockers will be very

bitter against such women as want to be miners, or the plumbers frown

much upon the would-be steeple-jills. I myself have never had my sense

of fitness jarred, nor a spark of animosity roused in me, by a woman

practising any of the fine arts--except the art of writing. That she

should write a few little poems or pensées, or some impressions of a

trip in a dahabieh as far as (say) Biskra, or even a short story or

two, seems to me not wholly amiss, even though she do such things for

publication. But that she should be an habitual, professional author,

with a passion for her art, and a fountain-pen and an agent, and sums

down in advance of royalties on sales in Canada and Australia, and a

profound knowledge of human character, and an essentially sane outlook,

is somehow incongruous with my notions--my mistaken notions, if you

will--of what she ought to be.

‘Has a profound knowledge of human character, and an essentially sane

outlook’ said one of the critics quoted at the end of the book that I

had chosen. The wind and the rain in the chimney had not abated, but

the fire was bearing up bravely. So would I. I would read cheerfully and

without prejudice. I poked the fire and, pushing my chair slightly back,

lest the heat should warp the book’s covers, began Chapter I. A

woman sat writing in a summer-house at the end of a small garden

that overlooked a great valley in Surrey. The description of her was

calculated to make her very admirable--a thorough woman, not strictly

beautiful, but likely to be thought beautiful by those who knew her

well; not dressed as though she gave much heed to her clothes, but

dressed in a fashion that exactly harmonised with her special type. Her

pen ‘travelled’ rapidly across the foolscap, and while it did so she was

described in more and more detail. But at length she came to a ‘knotty

point’ in what she was writing. She paused, she pushed back the hair

from her temples, she looked forth at the valley; and now the landscape

was described, but not at all exhaustively, it, for the writer soon

overcame her difficulty, and her pen travelled faster than ever, till

suddenly there was a cry of ‘Mammy!’ and in rushed a seven-year-old

child, in conjunction with whom she was more than ever admirable; after

which the narrative skipped back across eight years, and the woman

became a girl, giving as yet no token of future eminence in literature

but--I had an impulse which I obeyed almost before I was, conscious of

it.

Nobody could have been more surprised than I was at what I had

done--done so neatly, so quietly and gently. The book stood closed,

upright, with its back to me, just as on a book-shelf, behind the bars

of the grate. There it was. And it gave forth, as the flames crept

up the blue cloth sides of it, a pleasant though acrid smell. My

astonishment had passed, giving place to an exquisite satisfaction.

How pottering and fumbling a thing was even the best kind of written

criticism! I understood the contempt felt by the man of action for the

man of words. But what pleased me most was that at last, actually, I, at

my age, I of all people, had committed a crime--was guilty of a crime.

I had power to revoke it. I might write to my bookseller for an

unburnt copy, and place it on the shelf where this one had stood--this

gloriously glowing one. I would do nothing of the sort. What I had done

I had done. I would wear forever on my conscience the white rose of

theft and the red rose of arson. If hereafter the owner of this cottage

happened to miss that volume--let him! If he were fool enough to write

to me about it, would I share my grand secret with him? No. Gently,

with his poker, I prodded that volume further among the coals.

The all-but-consumed binding shot forth little tongues of bright

colour--flamelets of sapphire, amethyst, emerald. Charming! Could even

the author herself not admire them? Perhaps. Poor woman!--I had scored

now, scored so perfectly that I felt myself to be almost a brute while

I poked off the loosened black outer pages and led the fire on to pages

that were but pale brown.

These were quickly devoured. But it seemed to me that whenever I left

the fire to forage for itself it made little headway. I pushed the book

over on its side. The flames closed on it, but presently, licking their

lips, fell back, as though they had had enough. I took the tongs and put

the book upright again, and raked it fore and aft. It seemed almost

as thick as ever. With poker and tongs I carved it into two, three

sections--the inner pages flashing white as when they were sent to

the binders. Strange! Aforetime, a book was burnt now and again in the

market-place by the common hangman. Was he, I wondered, paid by the

hour? I had always supposed the thing quite easy for him--a bright

little, brisk little conflagration, and so home. Perhaps other books

were less resistant than this one? I began to feel that the critics were

more right than they knew. Here was a book that had indeed an intense

vitality, and an immense vitality. It was a book that would live--do

what one might. I vowed it should not. I subdivided it, spread it,

redistributed it. Ever and anon my eye would be caught by some sentence

or fragment of a sentence in the midst of a charred page before the

flames crept over it. Always loathed you, but, I remember; and think

Tolstoi was right. Who had always loathed whom? And what, what, had

Tolstoi been right about? I had an absurd but genuine desire to know.

Too late! Confound the woman!--she was scoring again. I furiously drove

her pages into the yawning crimson jaws of the coals. Those jaws had

lately been golden. Soon, to my horror, they seemed to be growing grey.

They seemed to be closing--on nothing. Flakes of black paper, full-sized

layers of paper brown and white, began to hide them from me altogether.

I sprinkled a boxful of wax matches. I resumed the bellows. I lunged

with the poker. I held a newspaper over the whole grate. I did all that

inspiration could suggest, or skill accomplish. Vainly. The fire went

out--darkly, dismally, gradually, quite out.

How she had scored again! But she did not know it. I felt no bitterness

against her as I lay back in my chair, inert, listening to the storm

that was still raging. I blamed only myself. I had done wrong. The small

room became very cold. Whose fault was that but my own? I had done wrong

hastily, but had done it and been glad of it. I had not remembered the

words a wise king wrote long ago, that the lamp of the wicked shall be

put out, and that the way of trangressors is hard.

And Even Now · 第 26 / 30 题