STONES CRYING OUT

'For the priests which bare the ark stood in the midst of Jordan, until

every thing was finished that the Lord commanded Joshua to speak unto

the people, according to all that Moses commanded Joshua: and the

people hasted and passed over. 11. And it came to pass, when all the

people were clean passed over, that the ark of the Lord passed over,

and the priests, in the presence of the people. 12. And the children of

Reuben, and the children of Gad, and half the tribe of Manasseh, passed

over armed before the children of Israel, as Moses spake unto them: 13.

About forty thousand prepared for war passed over before the Lord unto

battle, to the plains of Jericho. 14. On that day the Lord magnified

Joshua in the sight of all Israel; and they feared him, as they feared

Moses, all the days of his life. 15. And the Lord spake unto Joshua,

saying, 16. Command the priests that bare the ark of the testimony,

that they come up out of Jordan. 17. Joshua therefore commanded the

priests, saying, Come ye up out of Jordan. 18. And it came to pass,

when the priests that bare the ark of the covenant of the Lord were

come up out of the midst of Jordan, and the soles of the priests' feet

were lifted up unto the dry land, that the waters of Jordan returned

unto their place, and flowed over all his banks, as they did before.

19. And the people came up out of Jordan on the tenth day of the first

month, and encamped in Gilgal, in the east border of Jericho. 80. And

those twelve stones, which they took out of Jordan, did Joshua pitch in

Gilgal. 21. And he spake unto the children of Israel, saying, When your

children shall ask their fathers in time to come, saying, What mean

these stones? 22. Then ye shall let your children know, saying, Israel

came over this Jordan on dry land. 23. For the Lord your God dried up

the waters of Jordan from before you, until ye were passed over, as the

Lord your God did to the Red sea, which He dried up from before us,

until we were gone over: 24. That all the people of the earth might

know the hand of the Lord, that it is mighty: that ye might fear the

Lord your God for ever.'--JOSHUA iv. 10-24.

This chapter is divided into two sections. The first (from verses 1 to

14) has as its main subject the bringing up of the twelve memorial

stones from the bed of Jordan; the second (verse 15 to the end) gives

the conclusion of the whole incident. The plan of arrangement, already

pointed out in a former chapter, is very plain in this. Each section

has God's commands to Joshua, Joshua's to the people, and the execution

of these. To each is appended a summary, which anticipates the more

detailed particulars that follow. Our text begins in the middle of the

first section, but we must glance at the preceding verses. These tell

how, when the people were all across, Joshua, who had apparently

remained on the eastern bank with the twelve representatives of the

tribes, received God's command to tell these the purpose for which they

had been chosen, and to set them to execute it. This additional

instruction is the explanation of the apparent discrepancy between

Joshua iii. 12 and iv. 2. Verses 4-8 tell Joshua's communication of the

instructions to the men; verse 8 narrates the execution of them by each

man's wrenching up from the river's bed a great stone, with which he

toiled through the muddy ooze to the western shore, and thence over the

hot plain to Gilgal, where the host camped; verse 9 tells that twelve

other stones were set up where the priests had stood, and were visible

at some time after date, when it was written; but when that was, or

whether the verse is part of the original or a later note, we cannot

say. At any rate, there were two memorials, one on the bank, one in the

stream--'a grand jury of great stones,' as Thomas Fuller calls them.

There is no difficulty in supposing that the monument in the river was

firm enough to resist its current, and high enough to be visible either

above the surface or beneath the ordinarily shallow water.

I. The first picture here brought before us is that of the motionless

ark in the midst of what had been Jordan. There is an obvious intention

to contrast the stillness of the priests, bearing it on their

shoulders, and standing rooted in that strange place all these long

hours, with the hurry around. 'The priests stood ... and the people

hasted.' However broad the front and swift the march, the crossing must

have taken many hours. The haste was not from fear, but eagerness. It

was 'an industrious speed and mannerly quickness, as not willing to

make God wait upon them, in continuing a miracle longer than necessity

did require.' When all were over, then came the twelve and Joshua, who

would spend some time in gathering the stones and rearing the memorial

in the river-bed. Through all the stir the ark was still. Over all the

march it watched. So long as one Israelite was in the channel it

remained, a silent presence, to ensure his safety. It let their rate of

speed determine the length of its standing there. It waited for the

slowest foot and the weariest laggard. God makes His 'very present

help' of the same length as our necessities, and lets us beat the time

to which He conforms. Not till the last loiterer has struggled to the

farther shore does He cease by His presence to keep His people safe on

the strange road which by His presence He has opened for them.

The silent presence of the ark is enough to dam up the stream. There is

vehement action around, but the cause of it all is in absolute repose.

God moves all things, Himself unmoved. He 'worketh hitherto,' and no

intensity of energy breaks the depth of His perfect rest. His activity

implies no effort, and is followed by no exhaustion. The ark is still,

while it holds back a swollen river for hours. The centre of the

swiftest revolution is a point of rest.

The form of the miracle was a condescension to weak faith, to which

help was ministered by giving sense something to grasp. It was easier

to believe that the torrent would not rush down on them when they could

look at the priests standing there motionless, with the visible symbol

of God's presence on their shoulders. The ark was no more the cause of

the miracle than were its carriers; but, just as Jesus helped one blind

man by laying moistened earth on his eyes, and another by sending him

to Siloam to wash, so God did here. Children learn best when they have

something to look at. Sight is sometimes the servant of faith.

We need not dwell on the summary, beginning with verse 11, which

anticipates the subject of the next section, and adds that the fighting

men of the tribes who had already received their inheritance on the

east bank of Jordan, loyally kept their promise, and marched with their

brethren to the campaign.

II. Verses 15-18 finish the story with the return of the waters to

their bed. The triple division appears again. First God commands

Joshua, who then transmits the command to the people, who, in turn,

then obey. And thus at each stage the divine causality, Joshua's

delegated but absolute authority, and the people's prompt obedience,

are signalised; and the whole incident, in all its parts, is set forth

as on the one hand a conspicuous instance of God's interposition, and,

on the other, of Israel's willing service.

We can fancy how the people who had reached the western shore lined the

bank, gazing on the group in the channel, who still stood waiting God's

command to relieve them at their post. The word comes at last, and is

immediately obeyed. May we not learn the lesson to stand fixed and

patient wherever God sets us, as long as He does not call us thence?

God's priests should be like the legionary on guard in Pompeii, who

stuck to his post while the ashes were falling thick, and was smothered

by them, rather than leave his charge without his commander's orders.

One graphic word pictures the priests lifting, or, as it might be

translated, 'plucking,' the soles of their feet from the slimy bottom

into which they had settled down by reason of long standing still. They

reach the bank, marching as steadily with their sacred burden as might

be over so rough and slippery a road. The first to enter were the last

to leave the river's bed. God's ark 'goes before us,' and 'is our

rearward.' He besets us behind and before, and all dangerous service is

safe if begun and ended in Him. The one point made prominent is the

instantaneous rush back of the impatient torrent as soon as the curb

was taken off. Like some horse rejoicing to be free, the tawny flood

pours down, and soon everything looks 'as aforetime,' except for the

new rock, piled by human hands, round which the waters chafed. The

dullest would understand what had wrought the miracle when they saw the

immediate consequence of the ark's leaving its place. Cause and effect

seldom come thus close together in God's dealings; but sometimes He

lets us see them as near each other as the lightning and the thunder,

that we may learn to trace them in faith, when centuries part them. How

the people would gaze as the hurrying stream covered up their path, and

would look across to the further shore, almost doubting if they had

really stood there that morning I They were indeed 'Hebrews'--men from

the other side-now, and would set themselves to the dangerous task

before them with courage. 'Well begun is half done'; and God would not

divide the river for them to thrust them into a tiger's den, where they

would be torn to pieces. Retreat was impossible now. A new page in

their history was turned. The desert was as unreachable as Egypt, The

passage of the Jordan rounded off the epoch which the passage of the

Bed Sea introduced, and began a new era.

That parallelism of the two crossings is suggested by the notice of

date in verse 19. 'The tenth day of the first month' was just forty

years to a day since the first Paschal lamb had been chosen, and four

days short of the Passover, which was solemnised at Gilgal (Joshua v.

10) where they encamped that night. It was a short march from the point

of crossing, and a still shorter from Jericho. It would have been easy

to fall upon the invaders as they straggled across the river, but no

attempt was made to dispute the passage, though, no doubt, many a keen

pair of eyes watched it from the neighbouring hills. In the beginning

of the next chapter we are told why there was this singular supineness.

'Their heart melted, neither was there spirit in them any more,' or, in

more modern language, panic laid hold of the enemy, and they could not

pluck up courage to oppose the advance of Israel. If we add this result

to those mentioned in chapter in., we find sufficient motive for the

miracle to take it out of the class of purposeless, legendary wonders.

Given the importance of Israel as the depositaries of revelation, there

is nothing unreasonable in a miracle which so powerfully contributed to

their conquest of Canaan, and we have yet to learn that there is

anything unreasonable in the belief that they were the depositaries of

revelation. The fundamental postulate of the Old Testament is a

supernatural revelation, and that opens the door for any miracle

needful for its accomplishment. It is folly to seek to conciliate by

minimising the miraculous element. However much may be thrown out to

the wolves, they will not cease to pursue and show their teeth. We

should be very slow to pronounce on what is worthy of God; but any man

who believes in a divine revelation, given to the world through Israel,

may well believe in such a miracle as this at such a moment of their

history.

III. The memorial stones (verses 20-24). Gilgal, the first encampment,

lay defenceless in the open plain, and the first thing to be done would

be to throw up some earthwork round the camp. It seems to have been the

resting-place of the ark and probably of the non-combatants, during the

conquest, and to have derived thence a sacredness which long clung to

it, and finally led, singularly enough, to its becoming a centre of

idolatrous worship. The rude circle of unhewn stones without

inscription was, no doubt, exactly like the many prehistoric monuments

found all over the world, which forgotten races have raised to keep in

everlasting remembrance forgotten fights and heroes. It was a

comparatively small thing; for each stone was but a load for one man,

and it would seem mean enough by the side of Stonehenge or Carnac, just

as Israel's history is on a small scale, as compared with the

world-embracing empires of old. Size is not greatness; and Joshua's

little circle told a more wonderful story than its taller kindred, or

Egyptian obelisks or colossi.

These grey stones preached at once the duty of remembering, and the

danger of forgetting, the past mercies of God. When they were reared,

they would seem needless; but the deepest impressions get filled up by

degrees, as the river of time deposits its sands on them. We do not

forget pain so quickly as joy, and most men have a longer and keener

remembrance of their injurers than of their benefactors, human or

divine. The stones were set up because Israel remembered, but also lest

Israel should forget. We often think of the Jews as monsters of

ingratitude; but we should more truly learn the lesson of their

history, if we regarded them as fair, average men, and asked ourselves

whether our recollection of God's goodness to us is much more vivid

than theirs. Unless we make distinct and frequent efforts to recall, we

shall certainly forget 'all His benefits.' The cultivation of thankful

remembrance is a very large part of practical religion; and it is not

by accident that the Psalmist puts it in the middle, between hope and

obedience, when he says 'that they might set their hope in God, and not

forget the works of God, but keep His commandments' (Psalm lxxviii.7).

The memorial stones further proclaimed the duty of parental instruction

in God's mercies. They speak of a time when tradition was the vehicle

of history; when books were rare, and monuments were relied upon to

awaken curiosity which a father's words would satisfy. Notwithstanding

all differences in means of obtaining knowledge, the old law remains in

full force, that the parent is the natural and most powerful instructor

in the ways of God. The Jewish father was not to send his child to some

Levite or other to get his question answered, but was to answer it

himself. I am afraid that a good many English parents, who call

themselves Christians, are too apt to say, 'Ask your Sunday-school

teacher,' when such questions are put to them. The decay of parental

religious teaching is working enormous mischief in Christian

households; and the happiest results would follow if Joshua's homely

advice were attended to, '_Ye_ shall let your children know.'

The same principle which led to the erection of this simple monument

reaches its highest and sacredest instance in the institution of the

Lord's Supper, in which Jesus, with wonderful lowliness, condescends to

avail Himself of material symbols in order to secure a firmer place in

treacherous memories. He might well have expected that such stupendous

love could never be forgotten; but He 'knoweth our frame,' and trusts

some share in keeping His death vividly in the hearts of His people to

the humble ministry of bread and wine, Strange that we should need to

be reminded of the death which it is life to remember! Blessed that,

needing it, we have the need so tenderly met, and that He does not

disdain to accept loving memories which slumber till stirred by such

poor reminders of His unspeakable love!

Expositions of Holy Scripture Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges, Ruth, and First Book of Samuel, Second Samuel, First Kings, and Second Kings chapters I to VII · 第 59 / 226 题