Conclusion as to our Method

All this discussion of fetishes arose out of our author's selection of

the subject as an example of the viciousness of our method. He would not

permit us 'simply to place side by side' savage and Greek myths and

customs, because it did harm (i. 195); and the harm done was proved by

the Nemesis of De Brosses. Now, first, a method may be a good method,

yet may be badly applied. Secondly, I have shown that the Nemesis does

not attach to all of us modern anthropologists. Thirdly, I have proved

(unless I am under some misapprehension, which I vainly attempt to

detect, and for which, if it exists, I apologise humbly) that Mr. Max

Muller, on p. 15, accepts the doctrine which he denounces on p. 197.

{126} Again, I am entirely at one with Mr. Max Muller when he says (p.

210) 'we have as yet really no scientific treatment of Shamanism.' This

is a pressing need, but probably a physician alone could do the work--a

physician double with a psychologist. See, however, the excellent pages

in Dr. Tylor's Primitive Culture, and in Mr. William James's Principles

of Psychology, on 'Mediumship.'

Modern Mythology · 第 119 / 171 题