I would reply that I am not engaged in a study of the _Cult_ of Cronos,
but of the revolting element in his _Myth_: his swallowing of his
children, taking a stone emetic by mistake, and disgorging the swallowed
children alive; the stone being on view at Delphi long after the
Christian era. Now, such stories of divine feats of swallowing and
disgorging are very common, I show, in savage myth and popular Marchen.
The bushmen have Kwai Hemm, who swallows the sacred Mantis insect. He is
killed, and all the creatures whom he has swallowed return to light. Such
stories occur among Australians, Kaffirs, Red Men, in Guiana, in
Greenland, and so on. In some cases, among savages. Night (conceived as
a person), or one star which obscures another star, is said to 'swallow'
it. Therefore, I say, 'natural phenomena, explained on savage
principles, might give the data of the swallowing myth, of Cronos'
{37}--that is, the myth of Cronos may be, probably is, originally a
nature-myth. 'On this principle Cronos would be (ad hoc) the Night.'
Professor Tiele does not allude to this effort at interpretation. But I
come round to something like the view of Kuhn. Cronos (ad hoc) is the
midnight [sky], which Professor Tiele also regards as one of his several
aspects. It is not impossible, I think, that if the swallowing myth was
originally a nature-myth, it was suggested by Night. But the question I
tried to answer was, 'Why did the Greeks, of all people, tell such a
disgusting story?' And I replied, with Professor Tiele's approval, that
they inherited it from an age to which such follies were natural, an age
when the ancestors of the Greeks were on (or under) the Maori stage of
culture. Now, the Maoris, a noble race, with poems of great beauty and
speculative power, were cannibals, like Cronos. To my mind, 'scientific
exactitude' is rather shown in confessing ignorance than in adding to the
list of guesses.