Mythology in 1860-1880

Between 1860 and 1880, roughly speaking, English people interested in

early myths and religions found the mythological theories of Professor

Max Muller in possession of the field. These brilliant and attractive

theories, taking them in the widest sense, were not, of course, peculiar

to the Right Hon. Professor. In France, in Germany, in America, in

Italy, many scholars agreed in his opinion that the science of language

is the most potent spell for opening the secret chamber of mythology. But

while these scholars worked on the same general principle as Mr. Max

Muller, while they subjected the names of mythical beings--Zeus, Helen,

Achilles, Athene--to philological analysis, and then explained the

stories of gods and heroes by their interpretations of the meanings of

their names, they arrived at all sorts of discordant results. Where Mr.

Max Muller found a myth of the Sun or of the Dawn, these scholars were

apt to see a myth of the wind, of the lightning, of the thunder-cloud, of

the crepuscule, of the upper air, of what each of them pleased. But

these ideas--the ideas of Kuhn, Welcker, Curtius (when he appeared in the

discussion), of Schwartz, of Lauer, of Breal, of many others--were very

little known--if known at all--to the English public. Captivated by the

graces of Mr. Max Muller's manner, and by a style so pellucid that it

accredited a logic perhaps not so clear, the public hardly knew of the

divisions in the philological camp. They were unaware that, as Mannhardt

says, the philological school had won 'few sure gains,' and had

discredited their method by a 'muster-roll of variegated' and discrepant

'hypotheses.'

Now, in all sciences there are differences of opinion about details. In

comparative mythology there was, with rare exceptions, no agreement at

all about results beyond this point; Greek and Sanskrit, German and

Slavonic myths were, in the immense majority of instances, to be regarded

as mirror-pictures on earth, of celestial and meteorological phenomena.

Thus even the story of the Earth Goddess, the Harvest Goddess, Demeter,

was usually explained as a reflection in myth of one or another celestial

phenomenon--dawn, storm-cloud, or something else according to taste.

Again, Greek or German myths were usually to be interpreted by comparison

with myths in the Rig Veda. Their origin was to be ascertained by

discovering the Aryan root and original significance of the names of gods

and heroes, such as Saranyu--Erinnys, Daphne--Dahana, Athene--Ahana. The

etymology and meaning of such names being ascertained, the origin and

sense of the myths in which the names occur should be clear.

Clear it was not. There were, in most cases, as many opinions as to the

etymology and meaning of each name and myth, as there were philologists

engaged in the study. Mannhardt, who began, in 1858, as a member of the

philological school, in his last public utterance (1877) described the

method and results, including his own work of 1858, as 'mainly failures.'

But, long ere that, the English cultivated public had, most naturally,

accepted Mr. Max Muller as the representative of the school which then

held the field in comparative mythology. His German and other foreign

brethren, with their discrepant results, were only known to the general,

in England (I am not speaking of English scholars), by the references to

them in the Oxford professor's own works. His theories were made part of

the education of children, and found their way into a kind of popular

primers.

For these reasons, anyone in England who was daring enough to doubt, or

to deny, the validity of the philological system of mythology in general

was obliged to choose Mr. Max Muller as his adversary. He must strike,

as it were, the shield of no Hospitaler of unsteady seat, but that of the

Templar himself. And this is the cause of what seems to puzzle Mr. Max

Muller, namely the attacks on _his_ system and _his_ results in

particular. An English critic, writing for English readers, had to do

with the scholar who chiefly represented the philological school of

mythology in the eyes of England.

Modern Mythology · 第 5 / 171 题