LESSON V.

Justice, as a general term, means all moral duty. One of its rules is,

that we should “love our neighbours as ourselves.” Some men have

construed this to include each individual of the human family. Such

construction we deem to be error. The word “neighbour,” as here used,

includes those virtues which render one good man acceptable to another

and to God. “And who is my neighbour?” “And Jesus answered and said, A

certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves,

which stripped him, and departed, leaving him half dead. And by chance

there came down a certain priest that way, and when he saw him, he

passed by on the other side. And likewise a Levite, when he was at the

place, came and looked on him, and passed by on the other side. But a

certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was: and when he saw

him, he had compassion on him, and went to him and bound up his wounds,

pouring in oil and wine, and set him on his own beast, and brought him

to an inn, and took care of him. And on the morrow, when he departed, he

took out two pence, and gave them to the host, and said unto him, Take

care of him, and whatsoever thou spendest more, when I come again I will

repay thee.” _Luke_ x. 30–36.

Who has given a better definition of the word neighbour? And how shall

we esteem him, who, instead of loving such an one as himself, shall

treat him with ingratitude, fraud, and cruelty? “God is angry with the

wicked every day.” _Ps._ vii. 2. If to “love our neighbour as ourselves”

implies that we should love all men equally alike, it also necessarily

will imply a subversion of order, and consequently lead to acts of

injustice, because all men are not equal. “For if any provide not for

his own, and especially for those of his own house, he hath denied the

faith, and is worse than an infidel.” 1 _Tim._ v. 8.

It would be ungrateful and unjust to not save a parent from death in

preference to a stranger—the life of him on whom the life and happiness

of thousands depended, in preference to an obscure individual.

One man may be of more value to me, and to the public, than another,

because he is further removed from being a mere animal. He has more

knowledge, more power, and does dispense more happiness to his

fellow-man.

A very evil man and a good one may be in the vicinity or elsewhere; but

to regard them equally alike is a contradiction of Christian duty. When

we love our neighbour as ourselves, we love the man, his acts, his

character; but when we are taught to love our enemies, the mind reaches

him as a creature of God, our erring fellow-mortal, our brother steeped

in sin—and we look upon him with pity, forgiveness; and yet hate his

qualities and conduct. The cases are quite dissimilar. “Love not the

world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the

world, the love of the Father is not in him.” 1 _John_ ii. 15.

------------------

Studies on Slavery, in Easy Lessons · 第 136 / 254 题