_Lafitte: the Pirate of the Gulf. By the author of the South-West. New
York: Harper and Brothers._
The “author of the _South-West_” is Professor Ingraham. We had
occasion to speak favorably of that work in our Messenger for January
last. “_Lafitte_,” the book now before us, may be called an historical
novel. It is based, in a great degree, upon a sketch in Mr. Flint's
“_Valley of the Mississippi_,” of the great Baratarian outlaw; and
many of the leading incidents narrated may be found in the
“_Louisiana_” of Marboi, and the “_Memoirs_” of Latour. We are not,
however, to decide upon the merits of the story—which runs nearly
thus—by any reference to historical truth.
An expatriated Frenchman resides upon the banks of the Kennebeck. He
has two sons—twins—their mother having died in their infancy. Their
names are Achille and Henri—the former proud, impetuous and
ambitious—the latter of a more gentle nature. We are introduced to
this little family when the boys are in their fifteenth year. At this
epoch a jealousy of his brother, never felt before, and founded on the
obvious preference of the father for Henri, arises in the bosom of
Achille. Gertrude, now, a niece and ward of the old gentleman, becomes
an inmate of the house. She is beautiful, is beloved by both the sons,
but returns only the affection of Henri. Jealousy thus deepens into
hatred on the part of Achille. This hatred is still farther embittered
by an accident. Henri saves the life of his mistress, and, in so
doing, rejects the proffered assistance of Achille. The lovers meet
too by moonlight, and are overheard by the discarded brother, who in a
moment of phrensy, plunges a knife in the bosom of Henri, hurries to
the sea-coast, and, seizing the boat of a fisherman, pushes out
immediately to sea. Upon the eve of being lost, he is picked up by a
merchant vessel, and proceeds with her on a voyage to the
Mediterranean. The vessel is captured by the Algerines—our hero is
imprisoned—escapes by the aid of a Moorish maiden, whom he dishonors
and abandons—is recaptured—escapes again in an open boat for Ceuti—is
again captured by Algerines—unites with them, and subsequently
commands them—is taken by the Turks—is promoted in their navy—turns
Mussulman—becomes the chief of an armed horde—combats in the Egyptian
ranks—becomes again a pirate—is taken by the Spaniards—is liberated
and becomes a corsair again, and again. His adventures so far,
however, from the period of his attack upon Henri—adventures occupying
a period of fifteen years—are related by the novelist in language very
little more diffuse than our own. We are now introduced, at full
length to Achille, in the character of Lafitte. The scene is Jamaica,
and we find the freebooter planning a descent upon the house of a
{594} wealthy Mexican exile, Velasquez. He has a daughter, Constanza,
very beautiful, and a nephew, very much of a rascal. The nephew is in
league with the robbers, and admits them to the house for the sake of
sharing the booty. The adventure ends in the death of the traitor by a
pistol-shot from the hands of Velasquez—the death of the old man
himself through agitation—and the carrying off of the maiden, and much
booty, by Lafitte. The lady however, is treated with great deference
by that noble-spirited and fine-looking young man the cut-throat, who
wears a grey cloak with a velvet collar, folds his arms, gnashes his
teeth, and has, we must admit it, a more handsomely furnished cabin
than even the Red Rover himself. We are assured that his only object
in carrying the damsel off at all, was to shield his person by means
of her own, from the shots of his pursuers. Accordingly, a
merchantman, bound for Kingston, heaving in sight, Constanza is set at
liberty and put on board of it, with an old negro wench Juana (all
lips) and a young pirate boy Theodore, (all sentiment) to attend upon
her orders and convoy her safely into port. We now have a storm (in
the usual manner) a wreck, and a capture. The dismasted vessel is
taken by one of the galleys of Lafitte, and the lady again falls into
the clutches of the buccaneers, who carry her to one of their
rendezvous, a very romantic cavern, at the head of the bay of
Gonzales, in the island of St. Domingo.
In the meantime the lover of the fair Constanza, one Count D'Oyley,
commander of the French frigate, Le Sultan, going to visit his
mistress at her paternal residence, is made aware of her disaster,
follows immediately with his frigate's tender in pursuit of Lafitte,
and fails in meeting him, but has the satisfaction of being taken
prisoner by one of the freebooter's small vessels, and carried to the
identical rendezvous in which lies the object of his search. The
lovers repose in different caverns, and are totally unsuspicious of
the so near presence of each other. But the maiden, of course, sings a
song, made on purpose improviso, and all about love and the moon, and
the lover, hearing every word of it, breaks through the wall (also of
course) and—clasps her in his arms! But we are growing scurrilous.
Lafitte arrives, and promises the two captives their freedom and a
passage to Port-au-Prince in the morning. Count D'Oyley, however,
having dreamed in succession four very ugly dreams, thinks it better
to put no faith in the freebooter, and getting up in the middle of the
night, makes his escape from the rendezvous with his mistress and
Juana. In so doing he has only to dress his mistress as a man, and
himself as a woman, to descend a precipice, to make a sentinel at the
mouth of the cave drunk, and so walk over him—make another drunk in
Lafitte's schooner, and so walk over him—walk over some forty or fifty
of the crew on deck—and finally to walk off with the long-boat. These
things are trifles with a man of genius—and an author should never let
slip an opportunity of displaying his invention. D'Oyley's frigate
happens just precisely at the right moment to be in the offing, and
has no difficulty whatever in picking up all hands.
We are now brought to Barataria—and some scenes follow of historical
interest. An offer on the part of the British is made to Lafitte. He
demands time for reflection, and proceeds to lay the pacquet of
proposals before the Governor of Louisiana, demanding a free pardon
for himself and associates as the reward of his information, and the
price of his adherence to the States. After some trouble he succeeds
in his application. He is present, and fights valiantly, at the battle
of New Orleans. In the heat of the contest he is attacked pointedly
and with vehemence by an individual in the uniform of a British naval
officer—is wounded, and carried to the hospital. Here he discovers, as
a nun, his cousin Gertrude, who after the attack by Achille upon
Henri, has taken the veil, by way of atonement for her share in the
disaster. Henri, she informs Lafitte, is not killed, but gone to
France with his father. Our hero now, having recovered of his wound,
vows to devote to penitence, among the monks of St. Bernard, the
remainder of his life. His first object, however, being to restore, as
far as possible, his ill-gotten wealth to the proper owners, he finds
it necessary to purchase a vessel with the view of collecting his
treasures. He does so, and proceeds to accomplish his purpose.
The naval officer who attacked him so fiercely on the ramparts at
Orleans is now discovered to be D'Oyley, although it does seem a
little singular that Lafitte, who knew D'Oyley well, should not have
discovered this matter before. The Frenchman, it appears, having
rescued his mistress from the cavern, as before shown, and having
reached his frigate in safety, can think of no more commendable course
than that of returning for the purpose of dispersing the pirates, and
hanging the preserver of his own life, and of the life and honor of
his mistress. With this laudable design, he drops anchor at the mouth
of the cavern. In the night time, however, the poor tossed-about lady
is carried off thro' a port-hole, by Cudjo, an old negro, for some
wise purposes of his own. Upon learning this occurrence the Count is
very angry, and just then perceiving a schooner making her way out of
the harbor, jumps at once to the conclusion that his lady is on board,
and that Lafitte is the person who put her there. It is really
distressing to see what a passion the Count is in upon this occasion.
“Lafitte,” says he, “thou seared and branded outlaw!—cursed of God and
loathed of men!—fit compeer of hell's dark spirits!—blaster of human
happiness!—destroyer of innocence! Guilty thyself, thou would'st make
all like thee! Scorner of purity, thou would'st unmake and make it
guilt! Like Satan, thou sowest tares of sorrow among the seeds of
peace!—thou seekest good to make it evil! Renegade of mankind!—thou
art a blot among thy race—the living presence of that moral pestilence
which men and holy writ term _sin!_” The beauty and vigor of all this
are not at all diminished by the fact that the “scorner of purity” and
“renegade of mankind” was necessarily deprived of the pleasure of
hearing a word of it, being otherwise busily engaged in the State of
Louisiana.
The Count, having overtaken the schooner, and found out his mistake,
goes to Barataria, and thence, proceeding to New Orleans, arrives on
the day of the battle. Lafitte is there discovered upon the ramparts,
and the combat ensues as heretofore described. D'Oyley imagines that
Lafitte is mortally wounded. In a few days, however, the
newly-purchased vessel of the corsair, with the corsair on board, is
pointed out to him as it is leaving the harbor, and he again starts
with his frigate in pursuit. Lafitte meanwhile has proceeded to the
{595} rendezvous at which we left Constanza in the clutches of Cudjo,
rescues her, and placing her safely in his vessel, determines to put
her forthwith in the hands of her lover. He is met, unfortunately, by
the frigate of the enraged D'Oyley. The vessels are thrown together,
and the Count springs with his boarders on the deck of the
schooner—turning a deaf ear to explanation. The corsair is mortally
wounded by the Count. The cap of the latter falling off in the tumult,
he is discovered to be Henri—the brother of Achille, or Lafitte. An
old man on board, called Lafon, is at the same moment opportunely
discovered to be the father. Explanations ensue. Lafitte dies—the
lovers are happy—and the story terminates.
It must not be supposed that the absurdities we have here pointed out,
are as obtrusive in the novel of Professor Ingraham as they appear in
our naked digest. Still they are sufficiently so. “_Lafitte_,” like
the “Elkswatawa” of Mr. French, is most successful, we think, in its
historical details. Commodore Patterson and General Andrew Jackson are
among the personages who form a portion of the story. The portrait of
the President seems to us forcibly sketched. But our author is more
happy in any respect than in delineations of character. Some
descriptive pieces are well-drawn, and admirably colored. We may
instance the several haunts of the pirates, the residence of
Velasquez, the house of the council at New Orleans, and the private
cabin allotted by the corsair to Constanza. The whole book possesses
vigor, and a certain species of interest—and there can be little doubt
of its attaining popularity. The chronological mannerism noticed in
“Elkswatawa” is also observable in “Lafitte.” Some other mannerisms
referrible to the same sin of imitation are also to be observed. As a
general rule it may be safely assumed, that the most simple, is the
best, method of narration. Our author cannot be induced to think so,
and is at unnecessary pains to bring about artificialities of
construction—not so much in regard to particular sentences, as to the
introduction of his incidents. To these he always approaches with the
gait of a crab. We have, for example, been keeping company with the
buccaneers for a few pages—but now they are to make an attack upon
some old family mansion. In an instant the buccaneers are dropped for
the mansion, and the definite for the indefinite article. In place of
_the_ robbers proceeding in the course wherein we have been bearing
them company, and advancing in proper order to the dwelling, they are
suddenly abandoned for _a_ house. _A_ family mansion is depicted. _A_
man is sitting within it. _A_ maiden is sitting by his side, and _a_
quantity of ingots are reposing in the cellar. We are then, and not
till then, informed, that the family mansion, the man, the maiden and
the ingots, are the identical mansion, man, maiden and ingots, of
which we have already heard the buccaneers planning the attack.—Thus,
at the conclusion of book the 4th, Count D'Oyley has rescued his
mistress from the cavern, and arrived with her, in safety, upon the
deck of his frigate. He has, moreover, decided upon returning with the
frigate to the cavern for the laudable purpose, as aforesaid, of
hanging his deliverer. We naturally expect still to keep company with
_the_ ship in this adventure; and turn over the page with a certainty
of finding ourselves upon her decks. But not so. She is now merely _a_
frigate which we behold at a distance—_a_ stately ship arrayed in the
apparel of war, and which “sails with majestic motion into the bay of
Gonzales.” Of course we are strongly tempted to throw the book, ship
and all, out of the window.
The novelist is too minutely, and by far too frequently _descriptive_.
We are surfeited with unnecessary detail. Every little figure in the
picture is invested with all the dignities of light and shadow, and
chiaro 'scuro. Of mere outlines there are none. Not a dog yelps,
unsung. Not a shovel-footed negro waddles across the stage, whether to
any ostensible purpose or not, without eliciting from the author a
_vos plaudite_, with an extended explanation of the character of his
personal appearance—of his length, depth, and breadth,—and, more
particularly, of the length, depth, and breadth of his shirt-collar,
shoe-buckles and hat-band.
The English of Professor Ingraham is generally good. It possesses
vigor and is very copious. Sometimes, however, we meet with a sentence
without end, involving a nominative without a verb. For example,
“As the men plied their oars, and moved swiftly down the bayou, the
Indian, who was the last of his name and race, with whom would expire
the proud appellation, centuries before recognized among other tribes,
as the synonyme for intelligence, civilization, and courage—THE
NATCHEZ!—the injured, persecuted, slaughtered and unavenged
Natchez—the Grecians of the aboriginal nations of North America!” See
p. 125. Vol. 2.
Many odd words, too, and expressions, such as “revenge you,” in place
of “avenge you”—“Praxitiles,” instead of “Praxiteles”—“assayed” in
lieu of “essayed,” and “denouément” for “dénouement”—together with
such things as “frissieur,” “closelier,” “self-powered,” “folden,” and
“rhodomantine” are here to be found, and, perhaps, may as well be
placed at once to the account of typographical errors.
Our principal objection is to the tendency of the tale. The
pirate-captain, from the author's own showing, is a weak, a
vaccillating villain, a fratricide, a cowardly cut-throat, who strikes
an unoffending boy under his protection, and makes nothing of hurling
a man over a precipice for merely falling asleep, or shooting him down
without any imaginable reason whatsoever. Yet he is never mentioned
but with evident respect, or in some such sentence as the following.
“I could hardly believe I was looking upon the celebrated Lafitte,
when I gazed upon his elegant, even noble person and fine features, in
which, in spite of their resolute expression, there is an air of
frankness which assures me that _he would never be guilty of a mean
action_,” &c. &c. &c. In this manner, and by these means, the total
result of his portraiture as depicted, leaves upon the mind of the
reader no proper degree of abhorrence. The epithet “impulsive,”
applied so very frequently to the character of this scoundrel, as to
induce a smile at every repetition of the word, seems to be regarded
by the author as an all-sufficient excuse for the unnumbered legion of
his iniquities. We object too—decidedly—to such expressions on the
lips of a hero, as “If I cannot be the last in Heaven, I will be the
first in Hell”—“Now favor me, Hell or Heaven, and I will have my
revenge!”—“Back hounds, or, by the holy God, I will send one of you to
breakfast in Hell,” &c. &c. &c.—expressions with which the volumes
before us are too plentifully besprinkled. {596} Upon the whole, we
could wish that men possessing the weight of talents and character
belonging to Professor Ingraham, would either think it necessary to
bestow a somewhat greater degree of labor and attention upon the
composition of their novels, or otherwise, would _not_ think it
necessary to compose them at all.