By John D. Shortridge

_The making of harpsichords flourished in Italy throughout the 16th and

17th centuries. The Italian instruments were of simpler construction

than those built by the North Europeans, and they lacked the familiar

second manual and array of stops._

_In this paper, typical examples of Italian harpsichords from the Hugo

Worch Collection in the United States National Museum are described in

detail and illustrated. Also, the author offers an explanation for

certain puzzling variations in keyboard ranges and vibrating lengths of

strings of the Italian harpsichords._

THE AUTHOR: _John D. Shortridge is associate curator of cultural history

in the United States National Museum, Smithsonian Institution._

Perhaps the modern tendency to idealize progress has been responsible

for the neglect of Italian harpsichords and virginals during the present

day revival of interest in old musical instruments. Whatever laudable

traits the Italian builders may have had, they cannot be considered to

have been progressive. Their instruments of the mid-16th century hardly

can be distinguished from those made around 1700. During this 150 years

the pioneering Flemish makers added the four-foot register, a second

keyboard, and lute and buff stops to their instruments. However, the

very fact that the Italian builders were unwilling to change their

models suggests that their instruments were good enough to demand no

further improvements. Anyone who has heard a properly restored Italian

harpsichord or an accurately made reproduction will agree that the tone

of such instruments is of exceptional beauty.

This paper consists of a description of the structural features of two

typical Italian instruments and a general discussion of the stringing

and tuning of Italian harpsichords and virginals that is based on

certain measurements of 33 instruments housed in various museums in the

United States. To the curators and other staff members of these

institutions I express my sincere gratitude for making it possible for

me to measure valuable instruments entrusted to their care or for

supplying similar information by mail.

The first type of instrument described below usually has been designated

in modern books about musical instruments and in catalogs of instrument

collections as a spinet, the term virginal being applied to the

rectangular instruments having the keyboard along the long side. Since

both of these types have basically the same arrangement of keyboard,

wrest plank, hitch pins, strings and jacks, and since both types were

known as virginals in 17th-century England, it is logical to reserve the

term spinet for another kind of instrument, namely the one with the

wrest plank and tuning pins in front over the keyboard, and with the

strings stretched diagonally. Such instruments were popular in England

in the late 17th and early 18th centuries and were known in English as

spinets during the period of their popularity. By using the term

polygonal virginal we can distinguish, when necessary, the five-sided

Italian model from the rectangular instruments usually produced in

northern Europe. Some rectangular virginals were made in Italy; one

Flemish polygonal virginal, made by the elder Hans Ruckers in 1591,

survives. Long instruments, resembling the grand piano in shape, are

called harpsichords. Of course it is understood that both types of

virginals as well as the spinet and the harpsichord were keyed

chordophones employing the plucking action of jacks and plectra.

[Illustration: Figure 2.--POLYGONAL VIRGINAL IN OUTER CASE.]

Throughout this paper the different octaves are indicated according to

the following system:

[Illustration: Music]

[Illustration: Figure 3.--POLYGONAL VIRGINAL REMOVED FROM OUTER CASE.]

Italian Harpsichord-Building in the 16th and 17th Centuries · 第 2 / 12 题