CHAPTER I

_OLD GLASS

AND

HOW TO COLLECT IT_

[Illustration]

_The Standard Book on the Subject._

A HISTORY OF ENGLISH STAINED

GLASS WINDOWS.

By MAURICE DRAKE. Fully Illustrated in Colour

and Half-tone. Foolscap folio. £2, 2s. net.

“One of the most beautiful, nay, most sumptuous, books

produced in recent years, and from that point of view the Author

and the publisher, the artist and the printer, and, indeed, also

the binder, are to be heartily congratulated. But it is also an

interesting book to read, although the subject is not everyone’s

subject, for it is written, not merely with knowledge, which one

can find anywhere on most subjects, but with knowledge touched

with humanity, which is the kind of knowledge that we want in

a book.”--_Daily Chronicle._

FIRST STEPS IN COLLECTING.

By Mrs GRACE VALLOIS, Author of “Antiques

and Curios in our Homes.” 64 Illustrations.

Picture Cover. 6s. net.

In this book G. M. Vallois has grappled successfully with the

problem of how to give the amateur a slight general knowledge

of a wide subject, without deluging him with technical details.

ANTIQUES AND CURIOS IN OUR HOMES.

By G. M. VALLOIS. 61 Illustrations. 6s. net.

In addition to being interesting to those who possess old furniture,

etc., it should appeal to young persons making a home, as, even though

they may not be able to buy Antique Furniture, it is of educational

value to them, inasmuch as it teaches in a most fascinating manner the

difference between Sheraton and Chippendale, between Wedgwood and Willow

Pattern, etc.

[Illustration: A fine specimen of Early Bristol Glass, with landscape

painted by Edkin.]

OLD GLASS AND HOW

TO COLLECT IT

BY

J. SYDNEY LEWIS

ILLUSTRATED

LONDON

T. WERNER LAURIE LTD.

30 NEW BRIDGE STREET, E.C.4

The Author desires to express his best thanks to Miss Whitmore Jones, Mr

Cole of Law, Foulsham & Cole, Mr A. Edwards of Messrs Edwards Limited,

for their kind permission to include examples of old English and Irish

glass from their Collections, and to Messrs Sotheby, Wilkinson & Hodge

for allowing him to include the list of prices fetched by various

specimens at their Sales.

He is also desirous of acknowledging the assistance he has received from

the Authorities of the British and Dublin Museums, and also to the late

Mr J. Herbert Bailey, to whom and to “The Connoisseur” he is indebted

for several of the illustrations.

His indebtedness to the great work of Mr A. Hartshorne is one which he

shares with every writer who takes as his subject “Old English Glass.”

CONTENTS

CHAPTER PAGE

I. INTRODUCTORY 1

II. EARLY ENGLISH GLASS 27

III. EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY GLASS 55

IV. MEMORIAL GLASSES 95

V. BRISTOL AND NAILSEA GLASS 115

VI. IRISH GLASS 128

VII. CURIOUS AND FREAK GLASSES 154

VIII. FRAUDS AND IMITATIONS 166

IX. SOME HINTS TO COLLECTORS 182

CATALOGUE OF PRICES OF PRINCIPAL PIECES OF

GLASS 191

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

Early Bristol Glass; landscape painted by Edkin....._Frontispiece_

FIG.

1. Elizabethan Glass (Brit. Mus. Coll.) }

} _To face page_ 42

2. Posset Cup (Charles II.) }

3. Feeding Cup (William III.) }

} ” 48

4. Glass Panel (Charles II.) }

5. Glass Tankard with Coin blown in Base }

} ” 50

6. Coin blown in Base of Tankard }

7. Air-twisted Stem Glasses.....” 62

8. Air-twisted Button and Baluster Stem Glasses.....” 66

9. Opaque-twisted Stem and Rose Glasses.....” 68

10. Double Ogee Bowls.....” 72

11. Ale Glasses and Sweetmeat Glasses.....” 74

12. Eighteenth-century Drinking Glasses.....” 76

13. Rummers and Baluster Stem Glasses.....” 84

14. Decanters and Salt-cellars (Eighteenth Cent.).....” 90

15. Candlesticks and Tapersticks.....” 92

16. Jacobean Rushlight Holder and Wine Glasses.....” 94

17. Jacobite Toasting Glasses.....” 96

18. Jacobite Goblets.....” 100

19. Jacobite Glass.....” 102

20. Memorial Toasting Glasses.....” 106

21. Memorial Glasses (Various).....” 108

22. A Nelson Glass and George IV. Coronation Glass.....” 110

23. Commemoration Glasses.....” 112

24. Tankards and Grog Glasses.....” 114

25. Old Bristol Glass Decanter and Mug.....” 120

26. Bristol Glass Vases and Candlesticks.....” 122

27. Bristol Glass Vases and Castors.....” 124

28. Early Nailsea Jugs.....” 126

29. Nailsea Jug and Mug.....” 128

30. Early Irish Glass.....” 130

31. Old Irish Salad Bowls and Celery Glasses.....” 132

32. Old Waterford Centrepiece, with Collar.....” 134

33. Old Waterford Preserve Jars and Bowls.....” 136

34. (1) Old Cork Decanters; (2) Old Waterford Decanters.....” 138

35. Old Cut Irish Decanters and Finger-basins.....” 140

36. Early Irish Fruit Dishes.....” 150

37. Masonic, Toasting, and Freak Glasses; an Early

Cambridge Yard Ale Glass _Page_ 160

38. Saxon Glass.....” 30

39. Various Styles of Cutting.....” 7

40. Examples of Baluster Stems and Tear Glasses.....” 57

41. Tear Glasses.....” 61

42. Old English Glasses.....” 65

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTORY

The origin of glass is lost in antiquity. Pliny, indeed, ascribes its

discovery to certain Phœnician mariners who, being shipwrecked upon a

sandy shore, used a block of the natron which formed their cargo to

support a pot which they were putting over an improvised fire. The heat

fused the sand with the natron, and lo! the glass was discovered in the

ashes.

Since, however, Pliny’s authority was Rumour, and since, also, such a

phenomenon is a physical impossibility--for no bonfire could produce a

temperature at which sand would fuse--it is possible that Rumour in

Pliny’s day had a no greater reputation for reliability than in the

twentieth century. But the story, if not true, is at least well invented

and serves to show at how early an age in the world’s history glass was

known.

It is more than probable that the place of its origin was Ancient Egypt,

and that the Phœnicians, who were undoubtedly acquainted with its use,

drew their knowledge from the workers on the banks of old Nile. At any

rate articles of glass have been discovered in tombs of the fifth and

sixth dynasties--some 3300 years before Christ. This, the earliest known

glass, is generally opaque, and is chiefly used to form small articles

of ornament, such as beads for necklaces, etc. The “aggry” beads, found

in Anglo-Saxon barrows and made in our own time by the Ashantis and

neighbouring tribes, are of similar type. Some admirable specimens of

ancient Egyptian glass are to be found in the British Museum. Among them

is a turquoise-blue opaque glass jar of Thothmes III.--the greatest of

all the kings of Egypt--dating from about 1550 B.C.

At a later date glass was extensively made in Alexandria, the sand in

the vicinity being of exceptional purity and so, suitable for its

manufacture. The city speedily became celebrated for the beauty of its

output, and articles of Alexandrian glass were largely exported to

Greece and to Rome, where also, in the space of a few years,

glass-houses were established; and to Constantinople, which was, in

time, to become famous for the manufacture of coloured glass and of the

Mosaics so dear to the Oriental taste.

The Greeks do not appear to have developed the art of glass-making at a

very early age, but specimens of glass have been found in Grecian tombs,

and, in the Golden Age of Ancient Greece, when art and literature

reached their zenith under Pericles, glass was certainly employed for

purposes of architectural decoration.

In Rome, however, the art of glass manufacture found a congenial home

and was developed to a high pitch of excellence. So widespread was its

use that it is a truism to say that in Rome of two thousand years ago

glass was employed for a greater number of purposes--domestic,

architectural, and ornamental--than it is to-day, even though the

glazing of windows was in its infancy and the use of the material for

optical purposes was scarcely known. In effect, coloured and ornamental

glass held much the same place in the Roman household that china and

earthenware do among us to-day. Glass was used for pavements and for

the external covering of walls. The Roman glass-workers were

particularly happy in their combination of colours, both by fusing

together threads of various colours, or by fusing masses, so as to

imitate onyx, porphyry, serpentine, and other ornamental stones.

The most interesting of all was the famous cameo glass. A bubble of

opaque white glass was blown, and this was coated with blue and a

further layer of opaque white superimposed. The outer coat of blue was

removed from the portion which was to display the design, leaving the

white to be carved into whatever figures the artist’s fancy dictated.

The finest example extant of this kind of ware is the famous Portland

vase in the British Museum.

The art, thus brought to such perfection in Rome, naturally spread

throughout Italy and the Roman colonies in France, Spain, Germany, and

Britain. Probably workmen from the Italian cities also established the

first furnaces among the lagoons of Venice, and so laid the foundation

of what were to be the finest glass manufactories in the world. At the

end of the thirteenth century a guild of glass-workers was formed.

These sequestered their craft upon the island of Murano, and there

cultivated it with an increasing skill that in a brief space made

Venetian glass the marvel of the civilised world. The peculiar merits of

the Venetian product were grace of form and lightness of execution. Many

of the vessels are surpassingly thin. The quality of the metal, however,

leaves something to be desired. It is dull, frequently tinged with

yellow--due to the presence of iron--or purple--the effect of too great

a proportion of manganese. The workmen became so skilful that, carried

away by the _joie d’exécuter_, they produced not only the artistic

forms for which Venetian glass is famous, but all sorts of

extravagances--ships, animals, birds, fishes, and so on--whose only

merit was to testify to the excellence of a technique which could so

triumph over the difficulties of form and material.

Meanwhile, other European nations had taken their cue from Venice, and

glass-houses sprang up in various parts of the Continent, particularly

in France and in Bohemia; the latter, indeed, speedily became the great

rival of Venice.

In England, as we shall see, glass was made during the Roman

occupation. Under the Saxons, glass-workers were imported from the

Continent, but to judge from the number and variety of the specimens

found in Anglo-Saxon tombs, it is probable that it was also manufactured

to an equal extent at home. During the Middle Ages the art appears to

have fallen into abeyance, save in a few isolated instances to be noted

later, but in the sixteenth century the custom of using glass vessels

was introduced from France and the Low Countries, most of the pieces

being imported from Venice. To prevent the money thus expended from

leaving the country, efforts were made about the middle of the century

to establish the art by the aid of workmen from Murano, and the history

of glass manufactured in England may be said to have fairly begun. It

was undoubtedly stimulated by the religious persecutions on the

Continent, particularly the Spanish Terror in the Netherlands, for the

Low Countries were seriously endeavouring to rival Murano in the art,

and the craftsmen who fled for refuge to England undoubtedly did much to

develop their trade in the country of their adoption, as did the

Huguenot refugees at a later period.

[Illustration:

_Strawberry

Cutting_

_Hob-nail

Cutting_

_Diamond

Cutting_

_Fleur-de-lis

Cutting_

_Fan Cutting_

_Herring-bone

Cutting_

FIG. 39.]

In the seventeenth century the whole process was revolutionised by the

introduction of a large proportion of oxide of lead, making what is

technically known as “flint” glass--a glass much more brilliant than any

other, a quality due partly to its transparency and partly to its

increased refractive power, which renders it specially fitted for

“cutting”--a process which enhances its beauty by increasing the number

of ways in which the light rays falling on the glass are dispersed. The

discovery has given English glass a well-deserved pre-eminence for

beauty of metal--a pre-eminence which the glass-cutters of the

eighteenth century admirably sustained by the excellence of their work.

All this time the art of glass-making on the Continent had been

developing. In particular, the Venetian workers at Murano had perfected

the art of colouring and enamelling glass--a result which was later to

have its influence upon English artists. An admirable example of what

they achieved in this direction is an old spinet in the South Kensington

Museum, which once belonged to Queen Elizabeth of Bohemia, the daughter

of James I. Whatever its merits as a musical instrument, its once

gorgeous gilt crimson leather case hides an interior of the utmost

interest to students of glass, for the interior of the lid is panelled

into eighteen divisions, each representing some classical

subject--Narcissus, Daphne, Andromeda, Argus, etc.--admirably done in

coloured glass. The front of the keyboard, the stretcher bar and the

keys themselves are also elaborately decorated in similar fashion with

coloured glass, silver or enamel. The keys are covered with ornaments in

coloured glass, the accidentals being faced with blue and white striped

glass and the naturals being fronted with the same.

Although it is no part of the purpose of this book to deal in detail

with the technical side of the manufacture of glass, yet some few words

as to the nature of the material with which we are dealing are not only

desirable but essential to the proper understanding of its various

qualities and kinds and the different stages of its manufacture.

The scientist will tell us that glass is a double silicate, being

compounded of a silicate of sodium (or potassium) and a silicate of

lime. For the benefit of non-scientific readers, we may remark that a

silicate is a chemical compound formed when silica combines with an

alkaline substance like lime, soda, or potash. Silica is probably the

most widely distributed substance in nature. Silicate of alumina is, for

example, the basis of all clayey soils, and silica, in the pure form of

quartz, is the chief constituent of the sand of the sea and of all those

rocks which are known as sandstones. Rock-crystal, amethyst, agate,

onyx, jasper, flint, etc., are all varieties of silica. Crystalline

silica is hard enough to scratch glass--a fact utilised, as we shall

see, in the sand-blast which is used for the purpose of engraving

patterns on glass. Silica is fusible only at a very high temperature,

but readily combines with alkaline substances to form soluble silicates,

which are known in commerce as soluble glass, or water-glass, because it

dissolves readily in hot water. Water-glass is used in making artificial

stone, in coating stone surfaces, _e.g._ walls of buildings, etc., to

preserve the stone from decay under the weathering influence of the

atmosphere, and in the manufacture of cement.

Ordinary glass has many valuable properties which make it of great

importance in the arts and manufactures. Among these may be mentioned

the fact that it can be made to take any shape with ease. It resists the

action of all ordinary acids, and hence is of the utmost value to the

chemist and the chemical manufacturer. Hydrofluoric acid alone attacks

it, by combining readily with its silica and so dissolving it. For this

reason, hydrofluoric acid is used in etching on glass. Again, glass is

cheap, being literally made from the dust of the earth; it is

transparent, and so can be used in buildings, transmitting light whilst

protecting from the inclemency of the weather. Its transparency, too,

combined with its high refractive power, make it of inestimable value

in the manufacture of optical instruments. It is this high refractive

power, too, which gives to cut glass its beautiful lustre and sparkle,

and one aim of the glass-founder is to increase this refractive power

and so enhance the brilliancy of his product. If glass could be made

which would refract light to the same extent as the diamond does, it

would exhibit the same “fire” as the king of gems. It is hard and close

in texture, and so is capable of taking a high polish. Its great

drawback is its brittleness, but this can be reduced to a great extent

by immersing it, whilst red-hot, in a hot bath of paraffin oil, wax, or

resin. A tumbler of glass so “tempered” may be dropped on the floor

without breaking.

It may be added, as a matter of common interest, that this brittleness

is largely a result of the fact that glass is an extremely bad conductor

of heat. Because of this, a mass of molten glass, when cooling, becomes

set on its outside surface long before the interior has become

solidified; hence the solid exterior prevents the molecules of the

interior portion from contracting. As a result, a condition of strain is

established, the interior molecules tending to contract, while the

exterior tends in the opposite direction; consequently a very slight

blow is enough to cause a fracture.

_Varieties of Glass._--As we shall frequently find it necessary to refer

to the various kinds of glass, it may be as well at the outset to

attempt to give a clear idea of their differences and of the meanings of

the various terms employed in describing them.

As regards quality, the chief kinds are crown glass, flint glass, plate

glass, bottle glass, and crystal glass, and the differences in

composition may be conveniently expressed in the form of a table:--

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+

| | | | | | |Oxide of|Oxide of|

| |Silica. |Potash. |Soda. |Lime. |Alumina.| Lead. | Iron. |

|--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------|

|Crown. | 67 | 21 | -- | 10 | 2 | -- | -- |

|--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------|

|Flint. | 44 | 12 | -- | -- | 1 | 43 | -- |

|--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------|

|Plate. | 78 | 2 | 13 | 5 | 2 | -- | -- |

|--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------|

|Bottle. | 59 | 3 | -- | 25 | 6 | -- | 7 |

|--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------|

|Crystal.| 56 | 9 | -- | 3 | -- | 32 | -- |

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+

Cheapest of all glass is bottle glass, where the base is mainly lime.

The metal used for medicine bottles contains more potash and is purer

and clearer. The use of potash and soda makes the glass more easily

fusible; alumina has the opposite effect; lime makes a harder glass;

lead gives lustre, increases fusibility, and heightens the refractive

power. Hence in glass which is to be cut and polished the employment of

lead in sufficient quantity is a factor of the highest importance. This

is a point to be specially noted in connection with English glass.

Lead--chiefly the oxides known as litharge and minium--in small

quantities has long been employed, the introduction of the metal serving

as a flux, but lead glass was generally avoided as being too brittle.

Merret, writing in 1662, remarks that could this glass be made as tough

as crystalline, “it would far surpass it in the glory and beauty of its

colours.” It will be noted that the two kinds of glass in which lead is

used in quantity are flint glass and crystal. The larger the amount of

lead the greater the beauty and brilliancy of the product, a result due,

as previously intimated, to the increase in refractive power that is

brought about by its addition.

Flint glass derives its name from the fact that in England the

silica, which is the main constituent of all glass, was procured

from flints which were calcined and pulverised. Being highly

refractive it is extensively employed in the manufacture of optical

instruments--telescopes, microscopes, etc. Quartz and fine sand are now

used in the place of flints. The glass is soft, and hence easily

scratched and dulled. It is essential that only the purest materials be

employed, and special furnaces and pots are needed. Flint glass was

known in quite early times. It was probably discovered by accident that

certain stones were fusible, for fossil glass is found in many places

where great fires have been. Volcanic glass--obsidian--is a well-known

substance, while there exist in Scotland ancient forts, the stones of

which have been fused together by the action of heat. The Venetians used

quartz in preference to sand, since the latter was liable to contain

impurities, and the Venetian craftsmen who settled in England were

accustomed to ensure the purity of their silica by calcining flints.

Crown glass is the finest sort of ordinary window glass. Plate glass is

the superior kind of thick glass used for mirrors, shop windows, etc. It

will be noted that it is the only kind of glass which contains soda.

The process of glass manufacture comprises three stages, mixing,

melting, and blowing. The various ingredients are first finely ground

and then thoroughly mixed by the aid of a mixer, forming what is known

as the “batch.” This is placed in melting pots. These are crucibles of

fire-clay, _i.e._ clay capable of withstanding the action of heat. The

clay must be of the finest quality, and be carefully freed from

extraneous matters which might affect the quality of the glass. Hence

the manufacture of the “pots” is itself an industry of some importance,

and as each costs some £10, they form an important item in the expense

of manufacture, especially as the pots are short-lived, some eight to

ten weeks being the average life of one of them.

The ordinary pot is an inverted section of a cone, the apex being

closed. For flint glass a covered pot is essential, the form ordinarily

adopted being a bell-jar closed at the bottom and with an arched

opening at the top. Each pot holds from ten to fifteen cwt. of the

“batch.” When full, the pots are placed in specially constructed

furnaces, holding from five to fifteen pots, and capable of producing a

temperature of from 10,000° to 12,000° F. The details of the firing are

intricate and interesting but have no direct bearing on our purpose;

their object is to produce complete fusion, to allow for the removal of

all impurities, and to ensure the homogeneity of the product.

The final stage with which we are concerned is that of blowing, since

all table glass, worthy of being called table glass, is blown. In other

words, every decanter, vase, tumbler, and wine glass of the better sort

begins its existence as a bubble of molten glass at the end of an iron

tube--the glass-blower’s tube--and owes its form to the delicate touches

of simple tools held in a skilful hand and guided by a trained eye. It

is this fact which gives glass its individuality. There is no

hard-and-fast rigour of line, no mechanical uniformity of shape, such as

is associated with machine-made goods; even the simplest wine glass is

an individual thing, which the taste of the craftsman has endowed with

artistic distinction whilst retaining its simplicity of form.

It is a matter for regret that the glass-blower’s art is seriously

threatened in these latter days of hurry and competition. The demand for

cheap glass has led to the introduction of blowing machines, in which

the bubble of molten glass is taken up by one of many blowing tubes, and

placed inside a mould, air being driven by machinery through the other

end of the tube and inflating the bubble until it touches the sides of

its mould. The budding craftsman thus loses the practice of blowing

these simpler forms, and as he is now forbidden to work at the furnaces

until he is over fourteen, he often fails to acquire that lightness and

dexterity of hand which are the mark of the first-rate craftsman, and

which can be most readily gained in early life. There is, of course, no

reason why common vessels should not be produced in this way, and

tumblers, decanters, and lamp glasses are so manufactured in large

numbers.

Needless to say, moulded or pressed glass has little value, either

intrinsic or artistic, in the collector’s eye, unless it has acquired

distinction on account of its age; for moulded or pressed glass has been

known from early times, and it is of the greater interest, since only

English glass, _i.e._ flint glass, or glass of similar characteristics,

can profitably be so dealt with. It will be readily understood that only

glass of a low melting point, which does not quickly solidify, and which

at the moment of solidification expands and fills out the interstices of

the mould, can be successfully treated in this way. One bar to the

extensive use of this form of glass was the cost of the essential lead

and potash. These are often now replaced by baryta and lime, with the

result that a very suitable glass is produced, which contains no

appreciable quantity of either lead or potash.

The art of glass-cutting in Europe dates back to the middle of the

sixteenth century, when it was extensively practised on the Continent,

particularly in Bohemia. The earliest examples were probably imitated

from the rock-crystal cups of ancient Greece and Rome. There is no doubt

that in both these countries the art was practised for the

ornamentation of the famous crystallinum, whilst some vessels were

undoubtedly cut out of the solid block.

The discovery of flint glass revolutionised the art of glass

ornamentation. The strong refractive powers of the new glass made it

specially suitable for cutting, which brought out a wonderful fire and

sparkle that even the finest art of Bohemia and Venice had not been able

to attain. At first, of course, the English craftsmen were far inferior

in artistic merit--both as regards design and execution--to those of

Bohemia; but the superior brilliancy of the metal atoned to a great

extent for the deficiencies of the workmen, and Early English cut wine

glasses and punch glasses are by no means to be despised. “L’article

Anglais solide et confortable, mais sans élégance,” spread the fame and

fashion of English glass throughout the Continent and, incidentally,

over the world.

The earliest examples of English cut glass are perhaps the

thistle-shaped glasses, originally fashioned in Bohemia but adopted by

Scotland as representing the national emblem. Apart from these, the

ogee-shape was most commonly selected as being more amenable to artistic

treatment than the bell.

The stem is usually knopped and cut into facets, and is invariably

hexagonal in shape. The cutting is continued beyond the top of the stem

on to the lower part of the bowl, so as to give a kind of finish.

Sometimes, indeed, the cutting is made to include the bowl in a scheme

of decoration, and the rim is engraved with conventional designs,

wreaths of flowers, etc. Towards the end of the eighteenth century the

facets became long flutes.

The process technically known as glass-cutting is essentially one of

grinding and polishing. The grinding is done by a wheel, made of

cast-iron, and made to rotate rapidly by a continuous band passing over

a revolving shaft. Above the wheel is a receptacle containing sand and

water, which can be fed on to the wheel as desired. Smoothing is done by

a sandstone wheel, similarly mounted, and polishing by a wooden one fed

with putty powder. The craftsman holds his piece in the hand, pressing

it against the rotating wheel.

Engraving is really very fine grinding, done usually with a copper

wheel or, rather, disk, whilst etching is done by coating the glass with

wax, or some similar protective substance, scratching the pattern

through the wax and then subjecting the piece to the action of

hydrofluoric acid.

It need hardly be said that only the best kinds of glass are cut by a

method which makes such demands on the time and skill of the workman;

the cheaper kinds of glass are all moulded or “pressed.” Pressed glass

is also essentially English, no other kind, save flint glass, being

suitable for treatment in this way. It is, in the first place, essential

to obtain a metal which has a low melting point, and one which does not

shrink in solidifying, as that would draw it away from the sides of the

mould, and so effectively spoil the design. The low melting point of the

metal enables the product to be “fire polished.” In this process it is

reheated to a point sufficient to melt a thin surface layer, and so

remove any roughness due to the process of moulding, and leave a smooth

bright surface. The art of pressing glass has been brought to a high

degree of perfection, elaborate decorations being produced with ease.

The cost of the process, too, has in recent years been lessened by the

use of baryta and lime, in the place of lead and potash, and in this way

the output has been greatly cheapened, while baryta glass, if inferior

in sparkle to lead glass, is yet far more brilliant than ordinary glass.

The problem how to distinguish real old glass from modern imitations is

one that besets the collector at every stage of his progress. A few

specimens supply their own testimony in the shape of a date, but it is

by no means impossible to engrave a date on a piece of specious-looking

real antiquity, and so give it a fictitious value, by making it appear

“the thing which it is not.”

As to the character of the glasses themselves, shape alone is no

criterion of age. Apart from the possibility of deliberate imitation, it

does not follow that because a piece is ponderous, clumsy in appearance

and, to a modern eye, unduly capacious, that it is necessarily an early

piece. Right from the beginning of glass manufacture in England, two

qualities, at least, were undoubtedly manufactured; the better to

ornament the tables of the great, and the poorer for service in kitchen

and tavern. Whereas articles of the former were as dainty and artistic

as the skill of the craftsman would allow, the latter were roughly made

and deliberately ponderous to bear the rougher usage to which they were

subjected. As the same practice continues up to the present day, it

follows that there is in existence a considerable quantity of common

glass with all the attributes, as far as shape and clumsiness of form

are concerned, of that of an earlier period.

Possibly the appearance of the metal and the style of workmanship are as

reliable guides as any others. The metal of the earliest glasses was by

no means perfect. Instead of the beautiful clarity and perfect

transparency we are accustomed to associate with glass, there is often a

streakiness or cloudiness visible in the material, together with

numerous bubbles and flaws. If the striations are horizontal, the glass

is of an earlier type than if they are perpendicular. The sides of the

bowl are often irregular, and the stems are often clumsy, uneven, badly

balanced, and altogether disproportionate in point of size to an eye

accustomed to the slenderer style of modern glassware. An important

point is the junction between the bowl and the stem. For some

extraordinary reason, the welding of the two seems to have given the

ancient glass-blowers considerable trouble, and the join is often too

clearly perceptible. Hence the collector who comes across an apparently

ancient piece bearing evident signs of clumsy joining should give it

more than casual attention. Sometimes, to obviate the difficulty, the

base of the bowl was made into a kind of knop, and at other times the

junction was hidden by an irregular band--the prototype of the collar

which so often appeared in glasses of a somewhat later period.

The bubble which appears in many stems was probably the outcome of

accident and possibly of an attempt to imitate the hollow stems of

Venetian glass. It is worthy of note that whilst the bubble is almost

invariably present in the baser forms of early eighteenth-century glass,

it is frequently absent from the finer varieties. Another point of

difference is that the better specimens rarely have the folded foot,

which is invariably present in the coarser makes, the turning under of

the rim, whilst plastic, to make a kind of welt, being an obvious

precaution against the rougher usage to which they were inevitably

subjected. Sometimes the feet were domed, but these were difficult to

make and the numbers were restricted. In some specimens ridges or ribs

are formed on the upper and lower sides of the foot.

The earliest glasses were devoid of any attempt at decorative engraving,

and these plain glasses may also be roughly classified by noting whether

the glass rests on the flat of the foot or on the rim only. The former

are of the earlier type.

Among the tests which the collector might apply are the following:--

Note whether the glass rings clear and sweet in tone. In twisted stems,

note whether the stem twists to the left or the right. The genuine

glasses have almost invariably stems twisted to the left. In

opaque-twisted stems, note particularly the colour of the spiral. In the

forgeries the opacity is less definite, the twist often having a kind of

translucent look.

Genuine old glass often has a cloudy tinge with frequently a tone of

steely blue. Forgeries may show a greenish tint.

In old glass the centre of the base, where the piece was, after being

finished, knocked off the pontil, is generally left rough; in the

imitations it is generally ground smooth.

The foot of a genuine old glass is never quite flat, there is always a

slope--sometimes a very pronounced one--from the centre to the edge. The

modern imitation, usually made abroad, often has a perfectly flat foot.

The edge of the bowl in a genuine old glass is always rounded, never

left hard and sharp.

Old Glass and How to Collect it · 第 1 / 9 章