=Amaziah's Wars.= In the division of the two kingdoms, Edom and the

South Country fell to Judah. Shishak so completely weakened Judah that

it appears to have early lost control of the Edomites. Amaziah, the

father of Uzziah, was the first who succeeded in winning a decisive

victory over these southern foes of the Hebrews. The battle was

fought, as in the days of David, in the Valley of Salt, southwest of

the Dead Sea. The narrative adds that he took Sela (the Rock) by

storm. It is not clear whether this was a border fortress or, as many

hold, Petra, the marvellous capital city of the Edomites, which lies

in a narrow gorge, cut out of the heart of the many-colored limestone

mountains that rise between the Ghôr and the Arabian desert.^{(50)}

Elated by this victory, Amaziah foolishly challenged the king of

Northern Israel to battle. The decisive engagement was fought at

Beth-shemesh, the prosperous town that lay on the southern side of the

Valley of Sorek. It was almost due west of Jerusalem and in the heart

of the lowlands along which the northern army probably approached.

Following up the victory, the Northern Israelites tore down two

hundred yards of the northwestern wall of Jerusalem at the point where

the city mounted the northern plateau and was, therefore, most

exposed. They also looted the temple and royal palace, thus completing

the humiliation of the southern kingdom. The conspiracy which resulted

in the flight and execution of Amaziah at Lachish, the southwestern

outpost of Judah, was probably the fruit of his folly.

=Uzziah's Strong Reign.= Uzziah, who succeeded his father, rebuilt the

walls of Jerusalem and strengthened them by towers that guarded the

northwestern and southwestern gates of the city. He also extended the

influence of Judah in the south, building the important port of Elath.

In a campaign against the Philistines he captured Gath, whose power

had already been broken by the Arameans, Jabneh, west of Gezer, and

Ashdod farther south. The death of this strong king, therefore, marked

a crisis in the life of Judah, for his successors were inefficient and

at this time Assyrian armies began to invade Palestine.

=Isaiah of Jerusalem.= It was in the year that Uzziah died that

Judah's great prophet, Isaiah, entered upon his work. His intense

loyalty to his nation and his conception of the transcendent majesty

of the Divine King who ruled over Israel, reveal his southern birth

and training. His familiarity with king, court, and the problems of

the nation leave little doubt that he was a citizen of Jerusalem and

possibly a scion of one of its noble families. At first, like Amos, he

devoted himself to denouncing the crimes of the ruling class and the

inevitable result of their cruelty, greed, and disregard of public

responsibility.

=His Advice to Ahaz in the Crisis of 734 B.C.= When, in 735, Northern

Israel and Damascus united and endeavored to force Judah to combine

with them in a coalition against the invader, Tiglath-pileser IV,

Isaiah entered upon his work as a statesman. In person he went to

advise Ahaz, as the king was probably investigating the defences of

Jerusalem, in view of the possibilities of an impending siege. The

place of meeting was evidently south of the city, where the valley of

the Tyropœon joined that of the Hinnom near the pool where, in earlier

days, Adonijah had rallied his followers.^{(107)} Isaiah's advice,

however, to make no alliances, but to simply trust Jehovah for

deliverance, was rejected by king and people. Ahaz became a vassal of

Assyria, and not only turned over the silver and gold of the temple

and palace to the invader, but went in person to Damascus to pay

homage to Tiglath-pileser.

=The Great Rebellion of 703 B.C.= The great crisis that called forth

the majority of Isaiah's recorded sermons came thirty years later,

when Judah was again tempted to enter into an alliance with the other

states of Palestine in an endeavor to break free from the rule of

Assyria. In common with the other little states of Palestine, it was a

victim of its intermediate position between the great world-powers,

Assyria and Egypt. Under a new Ethiopian dynasty, Egypt's ambitions

were again beginning to stir and Assyria was the chief barrier to

their realization. Therefore, Egypt by promises of help encouraged the

states of Palestine to revolt against Assyria. In 711 B.C. the

Philistine towns of Ashdod and Gath did actually rebel. It was only by

going about in the garb of the captive, proclaiming in this objective

way what would be the consequence if Judah rebelled against Assyria,

that Isaiah was able to arrest the attention of the nation and save it

from fatally compromising itself. When the great Assyrian king,

Sargon, died in 705 B.C. the temptations to rebel were too strong to

be resisted. Merodach-baladan, of the ancient Babylonian royal line,

at once instigated a successful revolt in the lower Tigris-Euphrates

valley and sent emissaries to Palestine to stir up the vassal states

in a general uprising against Assyria. Tyre, Edom, Moab, Ammon the

Philistine cities, and certain of the neighboring Bedouin tribes

united in raising the standard of revolt against their common foe.

Egypt again promised assistance, and, although Isaiah protested with

all his powers, Judah was drawn into the coalition. Hezekiah was made

the southern leader of the rebellion.

=Home of the Prophet Micah.= Sennacherib, the successor of Sargon,

after putting down the rebellion in southern Babylonia, advanced with

a large army to the reconquest of the eastern Mediterranean states. It

was probably while the Assyrian king was advancing from the north that

Isaiah's contemporary, Micah, uttered his warning against the venal

and greedy nobles of Judah. The home of the prophet was

Moresheth-gath. Eusebius and Jerome describe it as a small village a

little east of the modern Beit-Jibrin, which commands the entrance to

the Valley of Zephathah, through which ran the highway from Jerusalem

to Gaza. Another important road ran from Hebron past the mound which

represents without reasonable doubt the ancient Gath, and thence along

the coast plains to the north. It was the centre of a prosperous

agricultural life and at the same time shared the peculiar

characteristics of these frontier towns. From his home among the

foot-hills^{(108)} Micah was able to watch the movement of Assyrian

armies and to keep in close touch with the world-politics of his day.

Like Amos, he was inspired by the sense of approaching danger to turn

his attention to conditions within the nation and to endeavor with all

his prophetic power to prepare it for the coming crisis. The note of

alarm sounds through all his early utterances. In imagination he

pictures the effects of the coming invasions and in the sound of the

names of the villages about his home he finds suggestions of the

calamity about to overtake them. His eyes fall first on Gath, which

lay to the northwest on the highway along which the Assyrian army

would naturally approach. His vision sweeps southward, including

Shaphir, the modern Suafir, five miles southeast of Ashdod on the

Philistine Plain, Zaanan and Lachish to the southwest, and other small

villages on the western borders of Judah. His eye rests last of all

upon Mareshah, which has recently been identified beyond doubt with

the large Tell es-Sandahannah, one mile south of Beit-Jibrin. The

latter was the most important city near Micah's home, for it guarded

the pass and stood near the junction of the great highways that

radiate from this point.

=Judah's Fate in 701 B.C.= Judah experienced in 701 B.C. the

calamities that Isaiah and Micah had predicted. The annals of

Sennacherib state that the Assyrian king conquered forty-six of the

cities of Judah, together with innumerable fortresses and small towns

in their neighborhood; over two hundred thousand captives, and horses,

mules, asses, camels, oxen, and sheep without number were carried away

as spoils. In the picturesque language of the conqueror, "Hezekiah was

shut up like a bird in a cage in the midst of Jerusalem" until he was

forced to surrender and to pay a huge tribute of gold and silver.

=Isaiah's Counsel in a Later Crisis.= In this great crisis the wisdom

of Isaiah's counsel was vindicated beyond question and his authority

became so strong with king and people that an attempt was made to

remove certain of the surviving heathen symbols from the popular

worship. In the later crisis of 690 B.C., when Sennacherib advanced to

the conquest of Egypt, the prophet by his advice was able to save

Jerusalem. While engaged in the siege of Lachish, the imposing

fortress on the Philistine Plain on the southern side of the Wady

el-Hesy, Sennacherib sent messengers demanding the unconditional

surrender of Judah's capital. From the point of view of the Assyrian

king it was dangerous to leave in his rear a strong fortress like

Jerusalem, which had already proved a centre of rebellion. His demand,

however, was unreasonable, for there is no evidence that Jerusalem, at

this later time, was guilty of sedition. In the light of these changed

conditions, instead of predicting calamity as a penalty for rebellion,

Isaiah advised Hezekiah to refuse to surrender his city to

destruction. The calm, unflinching faith of the prophet overcame the

fears of the king and thus preserved Jerusalem for another century.

Without waiting to carry out his threats against Jerusalem,

Sennacherib advanced against Egypt. From the variant traditions it

appears that in the marshy land on the eastern side of the Nile delta

his army was overtaken by a plague and he was forced ignominiously to

retreat.

=The Reactionary Reign of Manasseh.= Assyria continued, during the

reign of Hezekiah's successor, Manasseh, to maintain its control of

Palestine. Assyrian and Babylonian customs and religious institutions

pervaded the land as never before. Two legal contracts, drawn up in

the usual Assyrian form and dating from the years 651 and 648 B.C. in

the reign of Manasseh, have been discovered in the mound of Gezer. The

one records the sale of a field and the other of an estate with the

house and land. The owner of the land was a Hebrew (Nethaniah) but the

joint owners of the estate and the twelve witnesses were nearly all

Assyrians, indicating how strong was this foreign influence at the

time. The weak Manasseh was a leader in a wide-spread reaction against

the exalted religious and ethical teachings of the prophets. The old

Canaanite cults were largely revived and the worship of Babylonian and

Assyrian deities was introduced even into the temple at Jerusalem.

Silenced by persecution, the faithful prophets and priests devoted

themselves to putting the principles proclaimed by Amos, Hosea, and

Isaiah into definite laws that would shape the daily life of the

people. The results of their work are preserved in the book of

Deuteronomy, which became the basis of the later reformation of

Josiah.

=Two Prophetic Reformers.= The two leaders in the great reform

movement were Jeremiah of Anathoth and Zephaniah, who seems to have

had great influence over his kinsman, the young Josiah. Zephaniah was

apparently a native of Jerusalem. Most of his prophecy is devoted to

denouncing the different forms of apostasy and the crimes of

oppression then prevalent in the capital. While Jeremiah was not a

citizen of Jerusalem, he came from a neighboring village and was also

in close touch with the political, social, and religious life of the

capital.

=Situation of Anathoth.= The little town of Anathoth,^{(109)} his

home, lay to the northeast of Jerusalem, just over the Mount of

Olives, at the point where the hills began to descend to the barren

wilderness to the east. It stood on a low, rounded hill. The limestone

rocks crop out at many points, imparting a rugged appearance to the

landscape. A thriving fig orchard on the western side of the modern

town recalls the forceful figure by which Jeremiah contrasted the Jews

left in Palestine with the exiles in Babylonia. The low stone and mud

buildings of the present town are crowded close together and the dirty

streets and people remind the traveller of the men of ancient Anathoth

who persecuted their illustrious townsman. On the south the view is

shut off by the rising hills, but toward the northeast lies Gibeon and

Ramah and to the north Michmash, with its inspiring memories. The

chief view from Anathoth, like that from Tekoa, is toward the Jordan

valley and the Dead Sea. The gray, barren hills let themselves down in

gradual terraces to the depths below. To the northeast are the

tree-clad hills of Gilead, while across the Dead Sea rise the rounded,

rocky cliffs of the Moabite plateau. Like the homes of most of the

great Hebrew prophets, it is a place of broad outlook. The general

impression of Anathoth is grim, stern, and sombre, although here the

harsh, barren landscape of the south merges into the more fertile and

pleasing hill country of the north. Even so in the character of

Jeremiah were blended the sternest, most exalted sense of justice and

a love for his nation and his countrymen so tender and strong that he

was ready to give his life, if need be, to save them from the evils

which he saw impending. Through all his sermons these two motives

struggle, sometimes the one and sometimes the other breaking forth

into expression.

=Josiah's Reign.= In Josiah the reformers found an energetic leader.

It was during his reign that the Scythian hordes poured down from

southeastern Europe. Some of these wild barbarians swept down the

eastern coast of the Mediterranean, giving Zephaniah and Jeremiah the

texts of their earlier sermons. Others, turning to the east, flung

themselves against the Assyrian empire and ultimately, in union with

the Babylonians, succeeded in conquering Nineveh itself. The impending

fall of Assyria favored the work of the reformers, so that in 621 B.C.

the prophetic law-book was brought from the temple and publicly

adopted by Josiah in behalf of the people. The record of the

institution of this new law indicates that Josiah's authority extended

beyond the old bounds of Judah. After the withdrawal of the Assyrian

governors it was natural that the surviving tribes of the north should

again look to Jerusalem for political and religious leadership. This

fact explains why Josiah's last fatal battle was fought against the

Egyptian king, Necho, in the vicinity of the old Canaanite fortress of

Megiddo.

=The Brief Rule of Egypt.= Necho, the son of Psamtik I, a Libyan who

had succeeded in conquering Egypt, was inspired by the oft-recurring

ambition to recover the Asiatic possessions once held by the empire.

The approaching fall of Assyria gave him a favorable opportunity. With

the aid of the Greek mercenaries in his service, he succeeded in

conquering the Philistine cities. The defeat of Josiah at Megiddo in

608 B.C. gave him practical possession of Palestine. In the same way

the different states of Syria fell before him, so that between 608 and

605 B.C. he was master of the eastern Mediterranean. This brief

Egyptian rule, however, was overthrown by the new Chaldean kingdom,

which arose in lower Babylonia and, after the fall of Nineveh, quickly

fell heir to the southern and western part of the Assyrian empire. The

decisive battle between the Egyptians and Chaldeans was fought at

Carchemish, by the Euphrates, in 605 B.C. and resulted in the complete

defeat of Necho's army. The Egyptians were speedily driven from Syria

and Palestine and the Chaldean authority established in their stead.

=Jehoiakim's Reign.= By the death of Josiah the cause of the patriotic

prophetic party in Judah suffered severely. The younger son of the

dead king, who was first put on the throne, was soon deposed by Necho

and the selfish Jehoiakim was established as a vassal of Egypt. His

sympathies were with the party of reaction and he proved another

Manasseh. When the Chaldeans appeared in Palestine their rule was

readily accepted, but after a reign of ten years Jehoiakim listened to

the seductive promises of Egypt and rebelled against his Chaldean

master. It was during the reign of Jehoiakim that Jeremiah delivered

the greater part of his sermons. By direct address and object-lesson

he denounced the follies and crimes of the king and people and tried

to save them from the calamity which he saw impending. When the spirit

of rebellion was rife he used all his influence to keep his countrymen

loyal to the Chaldeans, but in vain. While Judah was being overrun by

the Chaldean armies, Jehoiakim died and was succeeded by his young

son, Jehoiachin.

=The First Captivity.= In 597 B.C. Jerusalem itself fell before the

army of Nebuchadrezzar. The king, his nobles, and between eight and

ten thousand of the prominent men and artisans, representing in all

between thirty and forty thousand souls, were transported to

Babylonia. The object of Nebuchadrezzar was to strip the land of its

leaders and all who might assist in carrying through another

rebellion. Over the Judeans who were left behind was placed Zedekiah,

a son of Josiah. The new king was inclined to listen to the voice of

Jeremiah and to rule for the best interests of his subjects, but he

was helpless in the hands of his headstrong nobles. For nearly a

decade Judah submitted to the strong and, on the whole, benign rule of

Nebuchadrezzar; but by 593 B.C. the kings of Edom, Moab, Ammon, Tyre,

and Sidon encouraged, as of old, by Egypt were again plotting

rebellion. Jeremiah did all in his power to save Judah from these

fatal entanglements, but false prophets undermined his influence and

encouraged the people to hope that Jehovah would perform a miracle in

their behalf.

=The Second Captivity.= In 588 B.C. Zedekiah rebelled against the

Chaldeans. Syria and Palestine proved themselves again, as throughout

all their long history, a land incapable of united action.

Nebuchadrezzar established his head-quarters at Riblah, on the upper

Euphrates, beside the great northern highway. From this strategic

point, from which history had already demonstrated that the Hebrew

coastlands could best be ruled, he directed the campaign against the

rebellious states. Most of them surrendered at once. Tyre and

Jerusalem alone held out against a protracted siege. The Egyptian army

which came to relieve Jerusalem was defeated on the borders of

Palestine. It was only the fear of the judgment that would be visited

upon them that inspired the followers of Zedekiah to resist as long as

they did. Even at the risk of imprisonment and death at the hands of

the unprincipled nobles, Jeremiah asserted that the only hope lay in

surrender. At last Zedekiah in desperation, after the northern walls

of the city had already been broken down by the besiegers, fled by

night through the southeastern gate of the city, down through the

gorge of the Kidron to Jericho. Here he was captured by the Chaldeans

and carried to Riblah on the Orontes. While his life was spared, the

nobles and religious leaders who had been active in the rebellion were

put to death. About five thousand of the prominent men of Jerusalem

were carried with Zedekiah to Babylon. The city and temple were

stripped of their wealth and the walls were thrown down, leaving

Judah's capital "a ruin and a heap." Israel's feasts were transformed

into fasts and her songs into lamentations.^{(110)}

=The End of the Southern Kingdom.= Not wishing to leave the territory

of Judah in utter desolation, Nebuchadrezzar appointed Gedaliah, a

grandson of Josiah's counsellor, Shaphan, governor over the Jews

remaining in Jerusalem. The new ruler selected as the centre of his

government Mizpah,^{(20, 21)} the most commanding point in northern

Judah, four and a half miles northwest of Jerusalem. This was one of

the two border cities which had been fortified by Asa, in his war

against Northern Israel. The northern position of his capital

suggests that his authority, like that of Josiah, extended over a part

of southern Samaria. This inference is supported by the fact that

Israelites from Shechem, Shiloh, and Samaria came, under the

protection of his rule, to present offerings at the ruined temple at

Jerusalem. Many Jewish refugees soon returned from Moab, Ammon, and

Edom to put themselves under the protection of Gedaliah's just and

kindly rule. The bright promise of an early restoration of Judah's

fortunes was destroyed by the treachery of a certain Ishmael, of the

Judean royal line, who, at the instigation of the king of Ammon, went

to Mizpah and treacherously slew Gedaliah. Contrary to Jeremiah's

advice, the Judahites who survived fled to Egypt, taking him with

them. Thus Judah was overtaken with an even more overwhelming fate

than that of the northern kingdom. Yet in the hour of its deepest

humiliation two brave souls, Jeremiah in Palestine and Ezekiel in

distant Babylon, proclaimed in clearest terms that Judah would again

be inhabited and that a noble destiny yet awaited their nation. Above

all, Jeremiah declared that inasmuch as the old covenant between

Jehovah and the nation had been broken by the crimes of the rulers and

people, a new and more spiritual covenant would be established between

Jehovah and each individual.

XX

THE BABYLONIAN AND PERSIAN PERIODS

=Jewish Refugees in Egypt.= After the destruction of Jerusalem in 586

B.C. the Jews were to be found in three great centres--Egypt,

Babylonia, and Palestine. Egypt, because of its friendly attitude

toward the Jews and its nearness to southern Palestine, was the refuge

to which most of the Jewish fugitives fled. Inasmuch as the approach

of the Chaldean armies was from the north, the main highway running

south from Hebron through the solitary desert was the most natural

line of escape. The result was that a very large proportion of the

Jewish race were to be found from this time on in the land of the

Nile. Even before the final destruction of Jerusalem, both Jeremiah

and Ezekiel addressed the Jewish refugees in Egypt. They were found in

four important towns. The two nearest to Palestine were Migdol and

Tahpanhes. Migdol means tower or fortress, and the reference is

evidently to one of the frontier towns that guarded the eastern

boundary of Egypt. It was probably the Migdolos mentioned in the

_Itinerarium Antonini_, and was situated midway between Pelusium on

the Mediterranean coast and Sele, a little west of the Crocodile Lake,

the present Lake Timsah. This would identify it with the ruins known

as the Tell es-Semut, twelve miles southwest of Pelusium, beside the

ancient caravan route that ran from Palestine to Egypt.

[Illustration: BABYLONIAN EMPIRE

PERSIAN EMPIRE

ALEXANDER'S EMPIRE

THE M.-N. CO.

]

=Situation of Tahpanhes.= Tahpanhes, the biblical name of the

Græco-Egyptian city, Daphne, is represented by the modern Tell

Defenneh. It lay on the right bank of the Pelusiac branch of the

Nile and close to the caravan route from Palestine. On the north was

the marshy Lake Menzaleh. It was, however, close to the fertile lands

of the Nile Delta and from the days of Psamtik I an important military

and commercial town. Here were settled Greek and Phœnician colonists,

and here the Jews who fled with Jeremiah after the murder of Gedaliah

found refuge. Here and at Migdol the refugees were in closest touch

with their kinsmen who had remained behind in Palestine and were in a

position to return thither whenever conditions were favorable. They

were also in the midst of a cosmopolitan life that offered them ample

opportunity to engage in trade, which must have been the chief

occupation of these semi-desert towns.

=Memphis.= A third home of Jewish colonists in Egypt was Noph, which

was the biblical designation of the sacred city of Memphis. This great

city lay ten miles south of Cairo, at the southern end of the Nile

Delta. It was a large metropolitan city, with an exceedingly diverse

population. Herodotus found in the vicinity of the Egyptian temple of

Ptah a Tyrian colony with a temple dedicated to the "foreign

Aphrodite." Here were probably settled the Jews who had decided to

make permanent homes in Egypt, and who may have reared here a temple

to Jehovah.

Biblical Geography and History · 第 16 / 25 段