TEN

It is through distrust of this beguiling sympathy that I have spoken

throughout with self-restraint, and have hedged so often with “I

think” and “I believe” and “it seems to me,” and have niggled

over Hergesheimerian faults that are certainly tiny and possibly

non-existent: because of my private suspicion that all my private

notions about Joseph Hergesheimer are probably incorrect. To me, I

confess, he appears a phenomenon a little too soul-satisfying to be

entirely credible.

Pure reason does not brevet it as humanly possible that the

Hergesheimer I privately find in the pages of the Hergesheimer books

should flourish in any land wherein the self-respecting author is

usually restricted to choose between becoming the butt or the buttress

of mediocrity: so that I cautiously refrain from quite believing

in this Joseph Hergesheimer as a physical manifestation in actual

trousers.... Indeed, his corporeal existence cannot well be conceded

except upon the hypothesis that America has produced, and is even

nourishing, a literary artist who may endure in the first rank. Which

is absurd, of course, and a contention not to be supported this side of

Bedlam, and, none the less, is my firm private belief to-day.

None the less, also, must I to-day speak with very self-conscious

self-restraint, because for the judicious any more thoroughgoing

dicta are checked by the probability, and the ardent hope, that Mr.

Hergesheimer’s work is barely begun. Nobody born of a generation which

has witnessed the beginnings and the æsthetic endings of Mr. Hewlett

and Mr. Le Gallienne would be so rash as to predict the upshot of

any author’s career with no ampler data to “go on” than the initial

chapters, however fine. Rather must it perforce content me to believe

that the Joseph Hergesheimer who has made head against the fourteen

years of neglect and apparent failure, without ever arranging any very

serious compromise with human dunderheadedness and self-complacency,

is now in train to weather unarithmeticable decades of public success

by virtue of the same wholesome egoism. And I can see besetting him

just one lean danger,—a feline peril that hunts subtly, with sheathed

claws and amicable purrings,—in the circumstance that the well-meaning

Philistia which yesterday was Mr. Hergesheimer’s adversary, so far as

it noted him at all, will be henceforward affording him quite sensible

and friendly and sincere advice.

Well, the results should, at the worst, be interesting.

Joseph Hergesheimer, an essay in interpretation · 第 14 / 15 题