EIGHT

Now this non-employment of time-approved devices seems even the more

remarkable when you consider how intensely Joseph Hergesheimer realizes

the sensuous world of his characters and, in particular, the optic

world. He is the most insistently superficial of all writers known to

me, in his emphasis upon shapes and textures and pigments.

His people are rendered from complexion to coat-tail buttons, and

the reader is given precisely the creasing of each forehead and the

pleating of their under-linen. Mr. Hergesheimer’s books contain whole

warehousefuls of the most carefully finished furniture in literature;

and at quaint bric-à-brac he has no English equal. It is all visioned,

moreover, very minutely. Joseph Hergesheimer makes you observe his

chairs and panelings and wall-papers and window-curtains with an

abnormal scrutiny. The scenery and the weather, too, are “done” quite

as painstakingly, but these are indigenous to ordinary novels.

Now of course, like virtually every other practise of “realism,” this

is untrue to life: nobody does in living regard adjacent objects as

attentively as the reader of a Hergesheimer story is compelled to note

them. For one, I cannot quite ignore this fact, even when I read with

most delight: and I sometimes wonder if Mr. Hergesheimer premeditatedly

sits down to study an andiron or a fan for literary use, or whether his

personal existence is actually given over to this concentration upon

externals and inanimate things. But he was once a painter; and large

residuals of the put-by art survive.

All this results, of course, in a “style” to which the reader is never

quite oblivious. The Hergesheimer dramas—dramas wherein each of the

players has a slight touch of fever—are enacted, with a refining hint

of remoteness, behind the pellucid crystal of this “style,” which

sharpens outlines, and makes colors more telling than they appear to

everyday observation, and brings out unsuspected details (seen now for

the first time by the reader, with a pleasurable shock of delight), and

just noticeably glazes all.

The Hergesheimerian panorama is, if I may plagiarize, a little truer

than truth: and to turn from actual life to Joseph Hergesheimer’s pages

arouses a sensation somewhat akin to that sustained by a myopic person

when he puts on spectacles...

And thus is a quite inoffensive tropic town foredoomed to be a

perennial source of disappointment to all tourists who have previously

read _San Cristóbal de la Habana_,—that multi-colored sorcerous

volume, with which we have here no immediate concern,—and who, being

magic-haunted, will over-rashly bring to bear upon a duly incorporated

city, thriftily engaged in the tobacco and liquor-business, their eyes

unre-enforced.

Joseph Hergesheimer, an essay in interpretation · 第 12 / 15 题