THE SECOND SIGHT

The Gillie and the fire-raising. Survival of belief in second

sight. Belief in ancient Greece and elsewhere. Examples in

Lapland. Early evidence as to Scotch second sight. Witches burned

for this gift. Examples among the Covenanting Ministers. Early

investigations by English authors: Pepys, Aubrey, Boyle, Dicky

Steele, De Foe, Martin, Kirk, Frazer, Dr. Johnson. Theory of

visions as caused by Fairies. Modern example of Miss H. Theory of

Frazer of Tiree (1700). 'Revived impressions of sense.' Examples.

Agency of Angels. Martin. Modern cases. Bodily condition of the

seer. Not epileptic. The second-sighted Minister. The visionary

Beadle. Transference of vision by touch. Conclusion.

Some years ago, the author was fishing in a river of Inverness-

shire. He drove to the stream, picked up an old gillie named

Campbell, and then went on towards the spot where he meant to begin

angling. A sheep that lay on the road jumped up suddenly, almost

under the horse's feet, the horse shied, and knocked the dogcart

against a wall. On the homeward way we observed a house burning,

opposite the place where the horse shied, and found that a farmer

had been evicted, and his cottage set on fire. This unhappy person,

it seems, was in debt to all his tradesmen, not to his landlord

only. The fire-raising, however, was an excessively barbaric method

of getting him to leave the parish, and the view justified the

indignation of the gillie. The old gillie, much excited, declared

that the horse had foreseen this event in the morning, and had,

consequently, shied. In a more sceptical spirit the author reminded

Campbell of the sheep which started up. 'That sheep was the devil,'

Campbell explained, nor could this rational belief of his be shaken.

The affair led to a conversation on the second sight, and Campbell

said, 'he had it not,' 'but his sister (or sister-in-law) had it'.

Campbell was a very agreeable companion, interested in old events,

and a sympathiser, as he said, in spite of his name, with the great

Montrose. His remarks led the author to infer that, contrary to

what some inquirers wrote in the last, and Graham Dalyell in the

present century, the belief in the second sight is still quite

common in the Highlands. As will be shown later, this inference was

correct.

We must not, from this survival only, draw the conclusion that the

Highlanders are more superstitious than many educated people south

of the Highland line. Second sight is only a Scotch name which

covers many cases called telepathy and clairvoyance by psychical

students, and casual or morbid hallucinations by other people. In

second sight the percipient beholds events occurring at a distance,

sees people whom he never saw with the bodily eye, and who

afterwards arrive in his neighbourhood; or foresees events

approaching but still remote in time. The chief peculiarity of

second sight is, that the visions often, though not always, are of a

_symbolical_ character. A shroud is observed around the living man

who is doomed; boding animals, mostly black dogs, vex the seer;

funerals are witnessed before they occur, and 'corpse-candles' (some

sort of light) are watched flitting above the road whereby a burial

procession is to take its way. {228} Though we most frequently hear

the term 'second sight' applied as a phrase of Scotch superstition,

the belief in this kind of ominous illusion is obviously universal.

Theoclymenus, in the Odyssey, a prophet by descent, and of the same

clan as the soothsayer Melampus, beholds the bodies and faces of the

doomed wooers, 'shrouded in night'. The Pythia at Delphi announced

a similar symbolic vision of blood-dripping walls to the Athenians,

during the Persian War. Again, symbolic visions, especially of

blood-dripping walls, are so common in the Icelandic sagas that the

reader need only be referred to the prodigies before the burning of

Njal, in the Saga of Burnt Njal. Second sight was as popular a

belief among the Vikings as among the Highlanders who retain a large

share of their blood. It may be argued by students who believe in

the borrowing rather than in the independent evolution of ideas,

that the Gaelic second sight is a direct inheritance from the

Northmen, who have left so many Scandinavian local names in the

isles and along the coasts.

However this may be, the Highland second sight is different, in many

points, from the clairvoyance and magic of the Lapps, those famous

sorcerers. On this matter the History of Lapland, by Scheffer,

Professor of Law in Upsala, is generally cited (Oxford, 1674).

'When the devil takes a liking to any person in his infancy,' says

Scheffer, 'he presently seizes on him by a disease, in which he

haunts him with several apparitions.' This answers, in magical

education, to Smalls, or Little Go.

Some Lapps advance to a kind of mystic Moderations, and the great

sorcerers attain to Final Schools, and are Bachelors in Black Arts.

'They become so knowing that, _without_ the drum they can see things

at the greatest distances; and are so possessed by the devil that

they see things even against their will.' The 'drum' is a piece of

hollow wood covered with a skin, on which rude pictures are drawn.

An index is laid on the skin, the drum is tapped, and omens are

taken from the picture on which the index happens to rest. But this

practice has nothing to do with clairvoyance. In Scheffer's account

of Lapp seers we recognise the usual hysterical or epileptic lads,

who, in various societies become saints, mediums, warlocks, or

conjurers. But Scheffer shows that the Lapp experts try,

voluntarily, to see sights, whereas, except when wrapped in a bull's

hide of old, or cowering in a boiler at the present day, the

Highland second-sighted man lets his visions come to him

spontaneously and uninvoked. Scheffer wished to take a magical drum

from a Lapp, who confessed with tears, that, drum or no drum, he

would still see visions, as he proved by giving Scheffer a minute

relation 'of whatever particulars had happened to me in my journey

to Lapland. And he further complained, that he knew not how to make

use of his eyes, since things altogether distant were presented to

them.' When a wizard is consulted he dances round till he falls,

lies on the ground as if dead, and, finally, rises and declares the

result of his clairvoyance. His body is guarded by his friends, and

no living thing is allowed to touch it. Tornaeus was told many

details of his journey by a Lapp, 'which, although it was true,

Tornaeus dissembled to him, lest he might glory too much in his

devilish practices'. Olaus Magnus gives a similar account. The

whole performance, except that the seer is not bound, resembles the

Eskimo 'sleep of the shadow,' more than ordinary Highland second

sight. The soul of the seer is understood to be wandering away,

released from his body.

The belief in clairvoyance, in the power of seeing what is distant,

and foreseeing what is in the future, obviously and undeniably

occurs everywhere, in ancient Israel, as in Mexico before the

Spanish Conquest, and among the Red Indian tribes as among the

Zulus. It is more probable that similar hallucinatory experiences,

morbid, or feigned, or natural, have produced the same beliefs

everywhere, than that the beliefs were evolved only by 'Aryans,'--

Greeks or Scandinavians--and by them diffused all over the world, to

Zulus, Lapps, Indians of Guiana, Maoris.

One of the earliest references to Scotch second sight is quoted by

Graham Dalyell from Higden's Polychronicon (i. lxiv.). {231a}

'There oft by daye tyme, men of that islonde seen men that bey dede

to fore honde, byheded' (like Argyll, in 1661), 'or hole, and what

dethe they deyde. Alyens setten theyr feet upon feet of the men of

that londe, for to see such syghtes as the men of that londe doon.'

This method of communicating the hallucination by touch is described

in the later books, such as Kirk's Secret Commonwealth (1691), and

Mr. Napier, in his Folklore, mentions the practice as surviving in

the present century. From some records of the Orkneys, Mr. Dalyell

produces a trial for witchcraft on Oct. 2, 1616. {231b} This case

included second sight. The husband of Jonka Dyneis being in a

fishing-boat at Walls, six miles from her residence at Aith, and in

peril, she was 'fund and sein standing at hir awin hous wall, in ane

trans, that same hour he was in danger; and being trappit, she could

not give answer, bot stude as bereft of hir senssis: and quhen she

was speirit at quhy she wes so movit, she answerit, "Gif our boit be

not tynt, she is in great hazard,"--and wes tryit so to be'.

Elspeth Reoch, in 1616, was tried as a witch for a simple piece of

clairvoyance, or of charlatanism, as we may choose to believe. The

offence is styled 'secund sicht' in the official report. Again,

Issobell Sinclair, in 1633, was accused, almost in modern

spiritualistic phrase, of 'bein _controlled_ with the phairie, and

that be thame, shoe hath the second sight'. {232a} Here, then, we

find it officially recorded that the second-sighted person is

entranced, and more or less unconscious of the outer world, at the

moment of the vision. Something like le petit mal, in epilepsy,

seems to be intended, the patient 'stude as bereft of hir senssis'.

{232b} Again, we have the official explanation of the second sight,

and that is the spiritualistic explanation. The seer has a fairy

'control'. This mode of accounting for what 'gentle King Jamie'

calls 'a sooth dreame, since they see it walking,' inspires the

whole theory of Kirk (1691), but he sees no harm either in 'the

phairie,' or in the persons whom the fairies control. In Kirk's own

time we shall find another minister, Frazer of Tiree, explaining the

visions as 'revived impressions of sense' (1705), and rejecting

various superstitious hypotheses.

The detestable cruelty of the ministers who urged magistrates to

burn second-sighted people, and the discomfort and horror of the

hallucinations themselves, combined to make patients try to free

themselves from the involuntary experience. As a correspondent of

Aubrey's says, towards the end of the sixteenth century: 'It is a

thing very troublesome to them that have it, and would gladly be rid

of it . . . they are seen to sweat and tremble, and shreek at the

apparition'. {232c} 'They are troubled for having it judging it a

sin,' and they used to apply to the presbytery for public prayers

and sermons. Others protested that it was a harmless accident,

tried to teach it, and endeavoured to communicate the visions by

touch.

As usual among the Presbyterians a minister might have abnormal

accomplishments, work miracles of healing, see and converse with the

devil, shine in a refulgence of 'odic' light, or be second-sighted.

But, if a layman encroached on these privileges, he was in danger of

the tar-barrel, and was prosecuted. On the day of the battle of

Bothwell Brig, Mr. Cameron, minister of Lochend, in remote Kintyre,

had a clairvoyant view of the fight. 'I see them (the Whigs) flying

as clearly as I see the wall,' and, as near as could be calculated,

the Covenanters ran at that very moment. {233a} How Mr. Cameron

came to be thought a saint, while Jonka Dyneis was burned as a

sinner, for precisely similar experiences, is a question hard to

answer. But Joan of Arc, the saviour of France, was burned for

hearing voices, while St. Joseph of Cupertino, in spite of his

flights in the air, was canonised. Minister or medium, saint or

sorcerer, it was all a question of the point of view. As to

Cameron's and Jonka's visions of distant contemporary events, they

correspond to what is told of Apollonius of Tyana, that, at Ephesus,

he saw and applauded the murder of Domitian at Rome; that one

Cornelius, in Padua, saw Caesar triumph at Pharsalia; that a maniac

in Gascony beheld Coligny murdered in Paris. {233b} In the whole

belief there is nothing peculiarly Scotch or Celtic, and Wodrow

gives examples among the Dutch.

Second Sight, in the days of James VI. had been a burning matter.

After the Restoration, a habit of jesting at everything of the kind

came in, on one hand; on the other, a desire to investigate and

probe the stories of Scotch clairvoyance. Many fellows of the Royal

Society, and learned men, like Robert Boyle, Henry More, Glanvill,

Pepys, Aubrey, and others, wrote eagerly to correspondents in the

Highlands, while Sacheverell and Waldron discussed the topic as

regarded the Isle of Man. Then came special writers on the theme,

as Aubrey, Kirk, Frazer, Martin, De Foe (who compiled a catch-penny

treatise on Duncan Campbell, a Highland fortune-teller in London),

Theophilus Insulanus (who was urged to his task by Sir Richard

Steele), Wodrow, a great ghost-hunter: and so we reach Dr. Johnson,

who was 'willing to be convinced,' but was not under conviction. In

answer to queries circulated for Aubrey, he learned that 'the godly'

have not the faculty, but 'the virtuous' may have it. But Wodrow's

saint who saw Bothwell Brig, and another very savoury Christian who

saw Dundee slain at Killiecrankie, may surely be counted among 'the

godly'. There was difference of opinion as to the hereditary

character of the complaint. A correspondent of Aubrey's vouches for

a second-sighted man who babbled too much 'about the phairie,' and

'was suddenly removed to the farther end of the house, and was there

almost strangled'. {234} This implies that spirits or 'Phairies'

lifted him, as they did to a seer spoken of by Kirk, and do to the

tribal medicine-men of the Australians, and of course, to 'mediums'.

Contemporary with Aubrey was the Rev. Robert Kirk of Aberfoyle, a

Celtic scholar who translated the Bible into Gaelic. In 1691 he

finished his Secret Commonwealth of Elves, Faunes and Fairies,

whereof only a fragment has reached us. It has been maintained that

the book was printed in 1691, but no mortal eye has seen a copy. In

1815 Sir Walter Scott printed a hundred copies from a manuscript in

the Advocates' Library in Edinburgh. He did not put his name on the

book, but Charles Kirkpatrick Sharpe, in a note on his own copy,

affirms that Sir Walter was the editor. {235} Another edition was

edited, for Mr. Nutt, by the present writer, in 1893. In the year

following the completion of his book Mr. Kirk died, or, as local

tradition avers, was carried away to fairyland.

Mr. Kirk has none of the Presbyterian abhorrence of fairies and

fauns, though, like the accusers of the Orkney witches, he believes

that 'phairie control' inspires the second-sighted men, who see them

eat at funerals. The seers were wont to observe doubles of living

people, and these doubles are explained as 'co-walkers' from the

fairy world. This 'co-walker' 'wes also often seen of old to enter

a hous, by which the people knew that the person of that liknes wes

to visite them within a few days'.

Now this belief is probably founded on actual hallucinatory

experience, of which we may give a modern example. In the early

spring of 1890, a lady, known to the author, saw the 'copy, echo, or

living picture,' of a stranger, who intended (unknown to her) to

visit her house, but who did not carry out his intention. The

author can vouch for her perfect integrity, and freedom both from

superstition, and from illusions, except in this case. Miss H.

lives in Edinburgh, and takes in young men as boarders. At the time

of this event, she had four such inmates. Two, as she believed,

were in their study on the second floor; two were in the drawing-

room on the first floor, where she herself was sitting. The hour

was seven o'clock in the evening, and the lamp on the stair was lit.

Miss H. left the drawing-room, and went into a cupboard on the

landing, immediately above the lamp. She saw a young gentleman, of

fair complexion, in a suit of dark blue, coming down the staircase

from the second floor. Supposing him to be a friend of her boarders

whose study was on that floor, she came out of the cupboard, closed

the door to let him pass, and made him a slight bow. She did not

hear him go out, nor did the maid who was standing near the street

door. She did not see her two friends of the upstairs study till

nine o'clock: they had been at a lecture. When they met, she said:

'Did you take your friend with you?'

'What friend?'

'The fair young man who left your rooms at seven.'

'We were out before seven, we don't know whom you mean.'

The mystery of the young man, who could not have entered the house

without ringing, was unsolved. Next day a lady living exactly

opposite Miss H.'s house, asked that lady if she could give

hospitality to a young man who was coming to Edinburgh from the

country. Miss H. assented, and prepared a room, but the visitor,

she was informed, went to stay with a relation of his own. Two days

later Miss H. was looking out of her dining-room window after

luncheon.

'Why, there's my ghost!' she exclaimed, and her friends, running to

the window, allowed that he answered to the description. The

'ghost' went into the house of Miss H.'s friend on the other side of

the street, and Miss H., with natural curiosity, sallied out, and

asked who he was. He was the young man for whom she had prepared a

room. During his absence in the country, his 'co-walker' had

visited the house at which he intended to stay!

Coincidences of this kind, then, gave rise to the belief in this

branch of second sight.

Though fairies are the 'phantasmogenetic agencies' in second sight,

a man may acquire the art by magic. A hair rope which has bound a

corpse to a bier is wound about him, and then he looks backward

'through his legs' till he sees a funeral. The vision of a seer can

be communicated to any one who puts his left foot under the wizard's

right foot.

This is still practised in some parts of the Highlands, as we shall

see, but, near Inverness, the custom only survives in the memory of

some old people. {237} Mr. Kirk's wizards defended the lawfulness

of their clairvoyance by the example of Elisha seeing Gehazi at a

distance. {238} The second sight was hereditary in some families:

this is no longer thought to be the case. Kirk gives some examples

of clairvoyance, and prescience: he then quotes and criticises Lord

Tarbatt's letters to Robert Boyle. Second sight 'is a trouble to

most of them, and they would be rid of it at any rate, if they

could'. One of our own informants says that the modern seers are

anxious when they feel the vision beginning: they do not, however,

regard the power as unholy or disreputable. Another informant

mentions a belief that children born between midnight and one

o'clock will be second-sighted. People attempt to hasten or delay

the birth, so as to avoid the witching hour; clearly then they

regard the second sight as an unenviable accomplishment. 'It is

certane' says Kirk, 'he sie more fatall and fearfull things, than he

do gladsome.' For the physical condition of the seer, Kirk

describes it as 'a rapture, transport, and sort of death'. Our

contemporary informants deny that, in their experience, any kind of

convulsion or fit accompanies the visions, as in Scott's account of

Allan Macaulay, in the Legend of Montrose.

Strangely unlike Mr. Kirk, in style and mode of thought, is his

contemporary, the Rev. Mr. Frazer of Tiree and Coll; Dean of the

Isles. We cannot call a clergyman superstitious because, 200 years

ago, he believed in good and bad angels. Save for this element in

his creed, Mr. Frazer may be called strictly and unexpectedly

scientific. He was born in Mull in 1647, being the son of the Rev.

Farquhard Frazer, a cadet of the house of Lovat. The father was one

of the first Masters of Arts who ever held the living of Coll and

Tiree: in his time only three landed gentlemen of the McLeans could

read and write. The son, John, was educated at Glasgow University,

and succeeded to his father's charge, converting the lairds and

others 'to the true Protestant faith' (1680). At the Revolution, or

later, being an Episcopalian and Jacobite, he was deprived of his

stipend, but was not superseded and continued the exercise of his

ministry till his death in 1702. Being in Edinburgh in 1700, he met

Andrew Symson, a relation of his wife: they fell into discourse on

the second sight, and he sent his little manuscript to Symson who

published it in 1707. There is an Edinburgh reprint, by Webster, in

1820. The work is dedicated to Lord Cromartie, the Lord Tarbatt of

Kirk's book, and the correspondent of Pepys. Symson adds a preface,

apologising for Mr. Frazer's lack of books and learned society, and

giving an example of transference of second sight: the seer placed

his foot on that of the person interested, who then saw a ship

labouring in a storm. The tale was not at first hand.

Mr. Frazer, in his tractate, first deals with the question of fact,

of the hallucinations called second sight: 'That such

representations are made to the eyes of men and women, is to me out

of all doubt, and that affects follow answerable thereto, as little

questionable'. But many doubt as to the question of fact,

'wherefore so little has been written about it'. Four or five

instances, he thinks, will suffice, 1. A servant of his left a barn

where he slept, 'because nightly he had seen a dead corps in his

winding sheet, straighted beside him'. In about half a year a young

man died _and was buried_ in the barn. 2. Mr. Frazer went to stay

in Mull with Sir William Sacheverell, who wrote on second sight in

the Isle of Man, and was then engaged in trying to recover treasures

from the vessel of the Armada sunk in Tobermory Bay. The Duke of

Argyll has a cannon taken from Francis I. at Pavia, which was raised

from this vessel, and, lately, the fluke of a ship's anchor brought

up a doubloon. But the treasure still lies in Tobermory Bay. Mr.

Frazer's tale merely is that a woman told a sailor to bid him leave

a certain boy behind. The sailor did not give the message, the boy

died, and the woman said that she had seen the lad 'walking with me

in his winding sheets, sewed up from top to toe,' that this portent

never deceived her. 3. A funeral was seen by Duncan Campbell, in

Kintyre, he soon found himself at the real funeral.

4. John Macdonald saw a sea-captain all wet, who was drowned,

'about a year thereafter'. The seer 'was none of the strictest

life'. 5. A man in Eigg foretold an invasion and calamities. The

vision was fulfilled by a landing of English forces in 1689, when

Mr. Frazer himself was a prisoner of Captain Pottinger's, in Eigg.

He next mentions an old woman who, in a syncope or catalepsy,

believed she had been in heaven. She had a charm of barbarous

words, whereby she could see the answers to questions 'in live

images before her eyes, or upon the wall, but the images were not

tractable (tangible), which she found by putting to her hand, but

could find nothing'. In place of burning this poor crone, Mr.

Frazer reasoned with her, 'taught her the danger and vanity of her

practice,' and saw her die peacefully in extreme old age.

Seeking for an explanation Mr. Frazer gives a thoroughly modern

doctrine of visual and auditory hallucinations, as revived

impressions of sense. The impressions, 'laid up in the brain, will

be reversed back to the retiform coat and crystalline humour,' hence

'a lively seeing, as if, de novo, the object had been placed before

the eye'. He illustrates this by experiments in after-images. He

will not deny, however, that angels, good or bad, may intentionally

cause the revival of impressions, and so, for their own purposes,

produce the hallucinations from within. The coincidence of the

hallucination with future events may arise from the fore-knowledge

of the said angels, who, if evil, are deceptive, like Ahab's false

prophets. The angel then, who, through one channel or another,

fore-knows, or anticipates an event, 'has no more to do than to

reverse the species of these things from a man's brain to the organ

of the eye'. Substitute telepathy, the effect produced by a distant

mind, for angels, and we have here the very theory of some modern

inquirers. Mr. Frazer thinks it unlikely that _bad_ angels delude

'several men that I have known to be of considerable sense, and

pious and good conversation'. He will not hear of angels making

bodies of 'compressed air' (an old mystic idea), which they place

before men's eyes. His own hypothesis is more economical of marvel.

He has not observed second sight to be hereditary. If asked why it

is confined to ignorant islanders, he denies the fact. It is as

common elsewhere, but is concealed, for fear of ridicule and odium.

He admits that credulity and ignorance give opportunities to evil

spirits 'to juggle more frequently than otherwise they would have

done'. So he 'humbly submits himself to the judgment of his

betters'. Setting aside the hypothesis of angels, Mr. Frazer makes

only one mistake, he does not give instantiae contradictoriae, where

the hallucination existed without the fulfilment. He shows a good

deal of reading, and a liking for Sir Thomas Browne. The difference

between him and his contemporary, Mr. Kirk, is as great as that

between Herodotus and Thucydides.

Contemporary with Frazer is Martin Martin, whose Description of the

Western Isles (1703, second edition 1716) was a favourite book of

Dr. Johnson's, and the cause of his voyage to the Hebrides. Martin

took his M.A. degree at Edinburgh University in 1681. He was a

curious observer, political and social, and an antiquarian. He

offers no theory of the second sight, and merely recounts the

current beliefs in the islands. The habit is not, in his opinion,

hereditary, nor does he think that the vision can be communicated by

touch, except by one to another seer. Where several seers are

present, all do not necessarily see the vision. 'At the sight of a

vision, the eyelids of the person are erected, and the eyes continue

staring until the object vanish,' as Martin knew by observing seers

at the moment of the experience. Sometimes it was necessary to draw

down the eyelids with the fingers. Sickness and swooning

occasionally accompanied the hallucination. The visions were

usually symbolical, shrouds, coffins, funerals. Visitors were seen

before their arrival. 'I have been seen thus myself by seers of

both sexes at some 100 miles distance; some that saw me in this

manner had never seen me personally, and it happened according to

their visions, without any previous design of mine to go to those

places, my coming there being purely accidental.' Children are

subject to the vision, the horse of a seer, or the cow a second-

sighted woman is milking, receives the infection, at the moment of a

vision, sweats and trembles. Horses are very nervous animals, cows

not so much so.

As to objections, the people are very temperate, and madness is

unknown, hence they are not usually visionary. That the learned

'are not able to oblige the world with a satisfying account of those

visions,' is no argument against the fact of their occurrence. The

seers are not malevolent impostors, and there are cases of second-

sighted folk of birth and education, 'nor can a reasonable man

believe that children, horses, and cows could be pre-engaged in a

combination to persuade the world of the reality of the second

sight'. The gift is not confined to the Western Islands, and Martin

gives a Dutch example, with others from the Isle of Man. His

instances are of the usual sort, the fulfilment was sometimes long

deferred. He mentions a case, but not that given by Mr. Frazer, in

the Isle of Eigg. The natives had been at Killiecrankie, and one of

them murdered an English soldier in Skye, hence the English invasion

of 1689, in which a pretty girl (as had been prophesied by a seer)

was brutally ill-treated. The most interesting cases are those in

which strangers are seen, and peculiarities in their dress observed

before their arrival. In the Pirate Scott shows how Norna of the

Fitful Head managed to utter such predictions by aid of early

information; and so, as Cleveland said, 'prophesied on velvet'.

There are a few cases of a brownie being seen, once by a second-

sighted butler, who observed brownie directing a man's game at

chess. Martin's book was certainly not calculated to convince Dr.

Johnson; his personal evidence only proves that a kind of

hallucinatory trance existed, or was feigned.

Later than Martin we have the long work of Theophilus Insulanus,

which contains many 'cases,' of more or less interest or absurdity.

But Theophilus is of no service to the framer of philosophical or

physiological theories of the second sight. The Presbyterian clergy

generally made war on the belief, but one of them, as Mrs. Grant

reports in her Essays, {244} had an experience of his own. This

good old pastor's 'daidling bit,' or lounge, was his churchyard. In

an October twilight, he saw two small lights rise from a spot

unmarked by any stone or memorial. These 'corpse-candles' crossed

the river, stopped at a hamlet, and returned, attended by a larger

light. All three sank into the earth on the spot whence the two

lights had risen. The minister threw a few stones on the spot, and

next day asked the sexton who lay there. The man remembered having

buried there two children of a blacksmith who lived at the hamlet on

the opposite side of the water. The blacksmith died next day! This

did more for second sight, probably, than all the minister's sermons

could do against the belief.

As we began by stating, it is a popular superstition among the

learned that the belief in second sight has died out among the

Highlanders. Fifty years ago, Dr. McCulloch, in his Description of

the Western Islands, wrote thus: 'Second sight has undergone the

fate of witchcraft; ceasing to be believed, it has ceased to exist'.

{245} Now, as to whether second sight exists or not, we may think

as we please, but the belief in second sight is still vivacious in

the Highlands, and has not altered in a single feature. A well-

known Highland minister has been kind enough to answer a few

questions on the belief as it is in his parish He first met a

second-sighted man in his own beadle, 'a most respectable person of

entirely blameless life'. After citing a few examples of the

beadle's successful hits, our informant says: 'He told me that he

felt the thing coming on, and that it was always preceded by a sense

of discomfort and anxiety. . . . There was no epilepsy, and no

convulsion of any kind. He felt a sense of great relief when the

vision had passed away, and he assured me repeatedly that the gift

was an annoyance rather than a pleasure to him,' as the Lapp also

confessed to Scheffer. 'Others who had the same gift have told me

the same thing.' Out of seven or eight people liable to this

malady, or whatever we are to call it, only one, we learn, was other

than robust, healthy, and steady. In two instances the seers were

examined by a physician of experience, and got clean bills of mental

and bodily health. An instance is mentioned in which the beadle,

alone in a boat with a friend, on a salt-water loch, at night, saw a

vision of a man drowning in a certain pool of a certain river. A

shepherd's plaid lay on the bank. The beadle told his companion

what he saw, and set his foot on his friend's, who then shared his

experience. This proves the continuity of the belief that the

hallucination can be communicated by contact. {246} As a matter of

evidence, it would have been better if the beadle had not first told

his friend what he saw. Both men told our informant next day, and

the vision was fulfilled 'scarcely a week afterwards'. This vision,

granting the honesty of the seers, was a case of 'clairvoyance,' but

'symbolical hallucinations' frequently occur. In our informant's

experience the gift is not hereditary.

On the whole subject Dr. Stewart, of Nether Lochaber, wrote several

articles in the Inverness Courier, during the autumn of 1893. The

Highland clergy have, doubtless, some difficulty in dealing with the

belief among their parishioners. But, as the possession of the

accomplishment is no longer regarded as criminal, and as the old

theories of diabolical possession, or fairy inspiration, are not

entertained, at least by the educated, the seers are probably to be

regarded as merely harmless visionaries. At most we may say, with

the poet:--

Lo, the sublime telepathist is here.

The belief in witchcraft is also as lively in the Highlands, as in

Devonshire, but, while the law takes no cognisance of it, no great

harm is done. The witchcraft mainly relies on 'sympathetic magic,'

on perforating a clay image of an enemy with needles and so forth.

There is a very recent specimen in the Pitt Rivers collection, at

the museum in Oxford. It was presented, in a scientific spirit, by

the victim, who was 'not a penny the worse,' unlike Sir George

Maxwell of Pollok, two centuries ago.

Though second sight is so firmly rooted in Celtic opinion, the

tourist or angler who 'has no Gaelic' is not likely to hear much of

it. But, when trout refuse to rise, and time hangs heavy in a boat

on a loch, it is a good plan to tell the boatman some ghostly

Sassenach tales. Then, perhaps, he will cap them from his own

store, but point-blank questions from an inquiring southron are of

very little use. Nobody likes to be cross-examined on such matters.

Unluckily the evidence, for facts not for folklore, is worthless

till it has stood the severest cross-examination.