'As often as I read Demosthenes, the balanced clauses, the rhythmic

movement and cadence, make me forget that this is not my beloved

poetry; for Homer too abounds in contrast and parallel, in figures

startling or simple. It is a provision of nature, I suppose, that each

faculty should have its proper equipment attached to it. How should I

scorn your Muse? I know her powers too well.

'None the less, I consider my task of a Homeric encomium twice as

difficult as your praise of Demosthenes; not because it must be in

verse, but from the nature of the material; _I_ cannot lay down a

foundation of fact to build the edifice of praise upon; there is

nothing but the poems themselves. Everything else is uncertain--his

country, his family, his time. If there had been any uncertainty about

them,

Debate and strife had not divided men;

but as it is, they give him for a country Ios or Colophon or Cumae,

Chios, Smyrna, or Egyptian Thebes, or half a hundred other places; his

father may be Maeon the Lydian, or he may be a river; his mother is now

Melanope, and now in default of satisfactory human descent a dryad; his

time is the Heroic Age, or else perhaps it is the Ionic. There is no

knowing for certain whether he was before or after Hesiod, even; and no

wonder, considering that some object to his very name, and will have

him Melesigenes instead. So too with his poverty, and his blindness.

However, all these questions are best left alone. So you see the arena

open to my panegyric is extremely limited; my theme is a poet and not a

man of action; I can infer and collect his wisdom only from his verses.

'_Your_ work, now, can be reeled smoothly off out of hand; you have

your definite known facts; the butcher's meat is there, only needing to

be garnished with the sauce of your words. History supplies you with

the greatness and distinction of Demosthenes; it is all known; his

country was Athens, the splendid, the famous, the bulwark of Hellas.

Now if _I_ could have laid hands on Athens, I might have used the

poet's right to introduce the loves and judgements and sojourns there

of the Gods, the gifts they lavished on it, the tale of Eleusis. As

for its laws and courts and festivals, its Piraeus and its colonies,

the memorials set up in it of victory by land and sea, Demosthenes

himself is the authority for saying that no words could do justice to

them. My material would have been inexhaustible; and I could not have

been accused of hanging up my true theme; the formula of panegyric

includes the arraying of the man in the splendours of his country. So

too Isocrates ekes out his _Helen_ by introducing Theseus. It is true

that poets have their privileges; and perhaps _you_ have to be more

careful about your proportions; there must not be _too_ much sack to

the proverbial halfpennyworth of bread.

'Well then, let Athens go; but your discourse at once finds another

support in his father's wealth--that "golden base" which Pindar

likes--; for to be responsible for providing a war-ship was to be

among the richest Athenians in those days. And though he died while

Demosthenes was quite a child, we are not to count his orphan state a

disaster; it led to the distinction that brought his splendid gifts

into notice.

'Tradition gives us no hint of how Homer was educated or developed his

powers; the panegyrist must plunge straight into his works, and can

find nothing to talk about in his breeding and training and pupilage;

he has not even the resource of that Hesiodic sprig of bay which could

make a facile poet out of a shepherd. But think of _your_ abundance

in this branch of the subject. There is Callistratus and all the

mighty roll of orators, Alcidamas, Isocrates, Isaeus, Eubulides. Then

again, at Athens even those who were subject to paternal control had

countless temptations to indulgence, youth is the susceptible time, a

neglected ward could have lived as irregular a life as he chose, and

yet the objects that Demosthenes set up for himself were philosophy and

patriotism, and the doors they took him to not Phryne's, but those of

Aristotle and Theophrastus, Xenocrates and Plato.

'And so, my dear sir, your way is open to a disquisition upon the two

kinds of human love, the one sprung of a desire that is like the sea,

outrageous, fierce, stormily rocking the soul; it is a true sea wave,

which the earthly Aphrodite sets rolling with the tempestuous passions

of youth; but the other is the steady drawing of a golden cord from

heaven; it does not scorch and pierce and leave festering wounds; it

impels towards the pure and unsullied ideal of absolute beauty, and is

a sane madness in those souls which "yet hold of Zeus and nurse the

spark divine."

'Love will find out the way, though that way involve a shaven head,

a cavern dwelling, a discouraging mirror and punitive sword, a

disciplining of the tongue, a belated apprenticeship to the actor's

art, a straining of the memory, a conquest over clamour, and a

borrowing of night hours to lengthen toilsome days.[19] All this your

Demosthenes endured, and who knows not what an orator it made of

him? his speech packed with thought and terse of language, himself

convincing in his knowledge of human nature, as splendid in the

elevation as mighty in the force of his sentiments, the master and not

the slave of his words and his ideas, ever fresh with the graces of

his art. He is the one orator whose speech has, in the bold phrase of

Leosthenes, at once the breath of life and the strength of wrought iron.

'Callisthenes remarked of Aeschylus that he wrote his tragedies in

wine, which lent vigour and warmth to his work. With Demosthenes it was

otherwise; he composed not on wine but on water; whence the witticism

of Demades, that most men's tongues are regulated by water,[20] but

Demosthenes's pen was subject to the same influence. And Pytheas

detected the smell of the midnight oil in the very perfection of the

speeches. Well, there is much in common between your subject and mine,

so far as this branch of them is concerned; on Homer's _poems_ I was no

worse off than you are.

'But when you come to your hero's acts of humanity, his pecuniary

sacrifices, his grand political achievements' (and he was going on

in full swing to the rest of the catalogue, when I interrupted, with

a laugh: 'Must I be dowsed with the remainder of your canful, good

bath-man?' 'Most certainly,' he retorted, and went straight on),

'the public entertainments he gave, the public burdens he assumed,

the ships, the wall, the trench he contributed to, the prisoners he

ransomed, the girls he portioned, his admirable policy, the embassies

he served on, the laws he got passed, the mighty issues he was

concerned in--why, then I cannot but laugh to see your contracted

brows; as if a recital of the exploits of Demosthenes _could_ lack

matter!'

'I believe you think, my good man,' I protested, 'that I have never had

the deeds of Demosthenes drummed into me; I should be singular among

rhetoricians, then.' 'It was on the assumption,' he said, 'implied by

you, that we want assistance. But perhaps your case is a very different

one; is the light so bright that you cannot manage to fix your eyes on

the dazzling glory of Demosthenes? Well, I was rather like that about

Homer at first. Indeed, I came very near turning mine away, thinking I

could not possibly face my subject. However, I got over it somehow or

other; became gradually inured, as it were, superior to the weakness of

vision that would have condemned me for a bastard eagle and no true son

of Homer.

'But now here is another great advantage that I consider you have over

me. The poetic faculty has a single aim; from which it follows that

Homer's glory must be laid hold of at once and as a whole. You on the

other hand, if you were to attempt dealing with the whole Demosthenes

all at once, would never know what to say; you would waver and not be

able to set your thoughts to work. You would be like the _gourmand_

at a Sicilian banquet, or the aesthete who has a thousand delightful

sights and sounds presented to him at once; they do not know which

way to turn for their conflicting desires. I suspect that you too are

distracted and find concentration impossible; all round you are the

varied attractions--his magnanimity, his fire, his orderly life, his

oratorical force and practical courage, the endless opportunities of

gain that he scorned, his justice, humanity, honour, spirit, sagacity,

and each of all his great services to his country. It may well be that,

when you behold on this side decrees, ambassadors, speeches, laws, on

the other, fleets, Euboea, Boeotia, Chios, Rhodes, the Hellespont,

Byzantium, you are pulled to and fro among these too numerous

invitations, and cannot tell which to accept.

'Pindar once found himself in a similar difficulty with an

over-abundant theme:

Ismenus? Melia's distaff golden-bright?

Cadmus? the race from dragon's teeth that came?

Thebe's dark circlet? the all-daring might

Of Heracles? great Bacchus' merry fame?

White-armed Harmonia's bridal?--Ay, but which?

My Muse, we're poor in that we are too rich.

You, I dare say, are in the same quandary. Logic and life, rhetoric and

philosophy, popularity and death--ay, but which?

'The maze is quite easy to escape from, though; you have only to take

hold of one single clue, no matter which--his oratory, if you will, so

that it is taken by itself--, and stick to that one throughout your

present discourse. You will have ample material; his oratory is not of

the Periclean type. Pericles could lighten and thunder, and he could

hit the right nail on the head; so much tradition tells us; but we

have nothing to judge for ourselves by, no doubt because, beyond the

momentary impression produced, there was in his performances no element

of permanence, nothing that could stand the searching test of time. But

with Demosthenes's work--well, that it will be your province to deal

with, if your choice goes that way.

'Or if you prefer his character, or his policy, it will be well to

isolate some particular detail--if you are greedy you may pick out two

or three--which will give you quite enough to go upon; so great was he

at every point. And for such specializing we have Homer's example; the

compliments he pays his heroes are attached to parts of them, their

feet, their heads, their hair, even their shields or something they

have on; and the Gods seem to have had no objection to poets' basing

their praises merely on a distaff, a bow, or the aegis; a limb or a

quality must pass still more easily; and as for good actions, it is

impossible to give an exhaustive list of them. Demosthenes accordingly

will not blame you for confining your eulogy to _one_ of his merits,

especially as to celebrate the whole of them worthily would be beyond

even _his_ powers.'

When Thersagoras had finished this harangue, I remarked: 'Your

intention is plain; I am to be convinced that you are more than a good

poet; so you have constructed your prose Demosthenes as a pendant to

your verse Homer.' 'No, no,' he said; 'what made me run on so long was

the idea that, if I could ease your mind by showing how light your

task was, I should have secured my listener.' 'Then let me tell you

that _your_ object has not been furthered, and _my_ case has only been

aggravated.' 'A fine doctor I seem to be!' he said. 'Not knowing where

the difficulty lies,' I continued, 'you are a doctor who mistakes his

patient's ailment and treats him for another.' 'How so?'

'You have been prescribing for the troubles that would attend a first

attempt; unfortunately it is years and years since I got through that

stage, and your remedies are quite out of date.' 'Why, then,' he

exclaimed, 'the cure is complete; nobody is nervous about a road of

which he knows every inch.'

'Ah, but then I have set my heart upon reversing the feat that

Anniceris of Cyrene exhibited to Plato and his friends. To show what

a fine driver he was, he drove round the Academy time after time

exactly in his own track, which looked after it as if it had only been

traversed once. Now my endeavour is just the opposite, to _avoid_ my

old tracks; and it is by no means so easy to keep out of the ruts.'

'Pauson's is the trick for you,' he said. 'What is that? I never heard

of it.'

'Pauson the painter was commissioned to do a horse rolling. He painted

one galloping in a cloud of dust. As he was at work upon it, his

patron came in, and complained that this was not what he had ordered.

Pauson just turned the picture upside down and told his man to hold

it so for inspection; there was the horse rolling on its back.' 'You

dear innocent!' I said; 'do you suppose I have kept my picture turned

the same way all these years? It has been shifted and tilted at every

conceivable angle, till I begin to have apprehensions of ending like

Proteus.' 'And how was that?' 'Oh, I mean the issue of his attempts to

evade human observation; when he had exhausted all shapes of animals

and plants and elements, finding no metamorphosis left him, he had to

be Proteus again.'

'You have more shifts than ever Proteus had,' he said, 'to get off

hearing my poem.'

'Oh, do not say that,' said I; 'off goes my burden of care, and I am

at your service. Perhaps when you have got over your own pains of

child-birth you will show more feeling for my delicate state.'

He liked the offer, we settled down on a convenient stone step, and

I listened to some excellent poetry. In the middle of reading he was

seized with an idea, did up his tablets, and said: 'You shall have your

hearer's fee, as well deserved as an Athenian's after a day in court or

assembly. Thank me, please.' 'I do, before I know what for. But what

may it be?' 'It was in the Macedonian royal archives that I came across

the book; I was delighted with it at the time, and took considerable

trouble to secure it; it has just come into my head that I have it

at home. It contains, among details of Antipater's management of the

household, facts about Demosthenes that I think you will find worth

your best attention.' 'You shall have payment on the spot,' I said,

'in the shape of an audience for the rest of your verses; and moreover

I shall not part with you till your promise is fulfilled. You have

given me a luscious Homer birthday dinner; and it seems you are to be

at the charges of the Demosthenes one too.'

He read to the end, we stayed long enough for me to give the poem its

meed of praise, and then adjourned to his house, where after some

search the book was found. I took it away with me, and on further

acquaintance was so much impressed by it that I shall do no editing,

but read it you _totidem verbis_. Asclepius is not less honoured if his

worshippers, in default of original compositions, have the hymns of

Isodemus or Sophocles performed before him; there is a failure nowadays

in the supply of new plays for Dionysus; but those who produce the

works of old masters at the proper season have the credit all the same

of honouring the God.

This book, then (the part of the state records that concerns us is the

conversation I shall give you)--the book informs us that Archias's

name was announced to Antipater. In case any of my younger hearers

should not know the fact already, this Archias had been charged with

the arrest of all exiles. In particular, he was to get Demosthenes from

Calauria into Antipater's presence, but rather by persuasion than by

force. Antipater was excited about it, hoping that Demosthenes might

arrive any day. So, hearing that Archias was come from Calauria, he

gave orders for his instant admittance.

When he entered--but you shall have the conversation as it stands.

_Archias. Antipater_

_Ar._ Is it well with you, Antipater?

_Ant._ It is well, if you have brought Demosthenes.

_Ar._ I have brought him as I might. I have the urn that holds his

remains.

_Ant._ Ha? my hopes are dashed. What avail ashes and urns, if I have

not Demosthenes?

_Ar._ The soul, O King, may not be prisoned in a man's own despite.

_Ant._ Why took you him not alive?

_Ar._ We took him.

_Ant._ And he has died on the way?

_Ar._ He died where he was, in Calauria.

_Ant._ Your neglect is to blame; you took not due care of him.

_Ar._ Nay, it lies not at our door.

_Ant._ What mean you? These are riddles, Archias; you took him alive,

and you have him not?

_Ar._ Was it not your charge that we should use no force at first? Yet

indeed we should have fared no better if we had; we did intend it.

_Ant._ You did not well, even in the intention; it may be your violence

killed him.

_Ar._ No, we killed him not; but if we could not persuade him, there

was nothing for it but force. But, O King, how had you been the better

off, if he had come alive? you could have done no more than kill him.

_Ant._ Peace, Archias! methinks you comprehend neither the nature of

Demosthenes, nor my mind. You think there is no more in the finding of

Demosthenes than in the hunting down such scoundrels as Himeraeus or

Aristonicus or Eucrates; these are like swollen torrents--mean fellows

in themselves, to whom a passing storm gives brief importance; they

make a brave show while the disturbance lasts; but they are as sure to

vanish soon as the wind to fall at evening. The recreant Hyperides is

another--a selfish demagogue, who took no shame to curry favour with

the mob by libelling Demosthenes, and make himself its instrument for

ends that his dupes soon wished they had never attained; for the libels

had not long borne their fruit before the libelled was reinstated

with more honour than Alcibiades himself. But what recked Hyperides?

he scrupled not to use against what had once been dearest to him the

tongue that he deserved, even by that iniquity, to lose.

_Ar._ How? was Demosthenes not our enemy of enemies?

_Ant._ Not in the eyes of one who cares for an honourable nature, and

loves a sincere consistent character. The noble is noble, though it be

in an enemy; and virtue has no country. Am I meaner than Xerxes? he

could admire Bulis and Sperchis the Spartans, and release them when

they were in his power. No man that ever lived do I admire more than

Demosthenes; twice I was in his company at Athens (in hurried times, it

is true), and I have heard much from others, and there is his work to

judge by. And what moves me is not his skill in speech. You might well

suppose so; Python was nothing, matched with him, and the Attic orators

but babes in comparison with his finish and intensity, the music of

his words, the clearness of his thoughts, his chains of proof, his

cumulative blows. We found our mistake when we listened to Python and

his promises; we had gathered the Greeks to Athens to see the Athenians

confuted; it was Demosthenes who confuted _us._ But no words of mine

can describe the power of his eloquence.

Yet to that I give but a secondary place, as a tool the man used. It

was the man himself I marvelled at, his spirit and his wisdom, and

the steadiness of soul that steered a straight course through all the

tempests of fortune with never a craven impulse. And Philip was of

my mind about him; when a speech of his before the Athenian assembly

against Philip was reported, Parmenio was angry, and made some bitter

jest upon him. But Philip said: _Ah, Parmenio, he has a right to say

what he pleases; he is the only popular orator in all Greece whose name

is missing in my secret service accounts, though I would far rather

have put myself in his hands than in those of clerks and third-rate

actors. All the tribe of them are down for gold, timber, rents, cattle,

land, in Boeotia if not in Macedonia[21]; but the walls of Byzantium

are not more proof against the battering-ram than Demosthenes against

gold_.

_This is the way I look at it, Parmenio. An Athenian who speaking in

Athens prefers me to his country shall have of my money, but not of

my friendship; as for one who hates me for his country's sake, I will

assault him as I would a citadel, a wall, a dock, a trench, but I have

only admiration for his virtue, and congratulations for the State that

possesses him. The other kind I should like to crush as soon as they

have served my purpose; but him I would sooner have here with us than

the Illyrian and Triballian horse and all my mercenaries; arguments

that carry conviction, weight of intellect, I do not put below force of

arms._

That was to Parmenio; and he said much the same to me. At the time of

the Athenian expedition under Diopithes, I was very anxious, but Philip

laughed at me heartily, and said: _Are you afraid of these town-bred

generals and their men? Their fleet, their Piraeus, their docks, I snap

my fingers at them. What is to be looked for from people whose worship

is of Dionysus, whose life is in feasting and dancing? If Demosthenes,

and not a man besides, had been subtracted from Athens, we should have

had it with less trouble than Thebes or Thessaly; deceit and force,

energy and corruption, would soon have done the thing. But he is ever

awake; he misses no occasion; he makes move for move and counters every

stroke. Not a trick of ours, not an attempt begun or only thought of,

but he has intelligence of it; in a word he is the obstacle that stands

between us and the swift attainment of our ends. It was little fault of

his that we took Amphipolis, that we won Olynthus, Phocis, Thermopylae,

that we are masters of the Hellespont._

_He rouses his reluctant countrymen out of their opiate sleep, applies

to their indolence the knife and cautery of frank statement, and little

he cares whether they like it or not. He transfers the revenues from

state theatre to state armament, re-creates with his navy bill a fleet

disorganized to the verge of extinction, restores patriotism to the

place from which it had long been ousted by the passion for legal fees,

uplifts the eyes of a degenerate race to the deeds of their fathers and

emulation of Marathon and Salamis, and fits them for Hellenic leagues

and combinations. You cannot escape his vigilance, he is not to be

wheedled, you can no more buy him than the Persian King could buy the

great Aristides._

_This is the direction your fears should take, Antipater; never mind

all the war-ships and all the fleets. What Themistocles and Pericles

were to the Athens of old, that is Demosthenes to Athens to-day, as

shrewd as Themistocles, as high of soul as Pericles. He it was that

gained them the control of Euboea and Megara, the Hellespont and

Boeotia. It is well indeed that they give the command to such as Chares

or Diopithes or Proxenus, and keep Demosthenes to the platform at home.

If they had given into his hands their arms and ships and troops, their

strategy and their money, I doubt he would have put me on my mettle to

keep Macedonia; even now that he has no weapon but his decrees, he is

with us at every turn, his hand is upon us; the ways and means are of

his finding, the force of his gathering; it is he that sends armadas

afar, he that joins power to power, he that meets our every change of

plan._

This was his tone about Demosthenes on many other occasions too; he

put it down as one of his debts to fortune that armies were never led

by the man whose mere words were so many battering-rams and catapults

worked from Athens to the shattering and confounding of his plans. As

to Chaeronea, even the victory made no difference; he continued to

impress upon us how precarious a position this one man had contrived

for us. _Things went unexpectedly well; their generals were cowards

and their troops undisciplined, and the caprice of fortune, which has

so often served us well, brought us out victorious; but he had reduced

me to hazarding my kingdom and my life on that single throw; he had

brought the most powerful cities into line, he had united Greece,

he had forced Athens and Thebes and all Boeotia, Corinth, Euboea,

Megara--the might of Greece, in short--to play the game out to its end,

and had arrested me before I reached Attic soil._

He never ceased to speak thus about Demosthenes. If any one told him

the Athenian democracy was a formidable rival, 'Demosthenes,' he would

say, 'is my only rival; Athens without him is no better than Aenianes

or Thessalians.' Whenever Philip sent embassies to the various states,

if Athens had sent any one else to argue against his men, he always

gained his point with ease; but when it was Demosthenes, he would tell

us the embassy had come to naught: there was not much setting up of

trophies over speeches of Demosthenes.

The Works of Lucian of Samosata — Volume 04 · 第 11 / 17 段