CHAPTER VIII.

GLASS.

It is interesting to remark that the Saracens, while they had to begin

with no art of their own, and learned all their aesthetic training from

their foreign subjects, yet contrived to introduce some element of

distinctive originality into almost every branch of artistic work. Thus

the carved panels of the Cairo pulpits are a genus by themselves; only

in Cairo can such work be seen. The metal-work of Mesopotamia, Damascus,

and Cairo, is wholly unlike any other metal-work in the world, except

that which was avowedly an imitation of it. It is not merely that the

designs are varied, or new shapes introduced; the whole character of the

work is distinct from any other style. The chased inlay of silver in the

metal-work, and the self-contained arabesques and geometrical panelling

of doors, ceilings, and stone-work, are features which we may seek in

vain to match in Europe.

So is it with their glass; it is absolutely unique in character. Without

prejudging the question whether some of the mosque lamps were imitated

in Italy or not, at least no one will dispute that they form a distinct

class by themselves, and that no other glass resembles them in the

shape, the general style, or the details of the ornament. Nor do the

stained glass windows of the mosques and houses of Cairo offer any

analogy to the windows of our cathedrals, or any other windows at all.

In glass, as in most other artistic industries, the differentiating

genius of the Saracen artist displays itself in a special character

persistently maintained through many centuries.

The oldest glass in the world belongs to Egypt. The dull green and

opaque blue glass of the Pharaohs is well known, and there can be little

doubt that the art was not suffered to die out under the Greek and Roman

governors, though examples of these periods are not numerous. The Arab

and other Mohammadan rulers of this province of the Muslim empire

encouraged the manufacture of glass, at least in the insignificant form

of small weights for testing the accuracy of coins. The British Museum

possesses a large collection of these glass weights, bearing

inscriptions which assign them to definite dates. Some have the names of

the early Egyptian governors under the Damascus and Baghdād Khalifs, of

the eighth and ninth centuries, but most of them present the names of

the Fātimy Khalifs of the tenth and especially of the eleventh century,

more rarely the twelfth. These coin weights prove at least that the

making of glass had not become a lost art in Egypt. We read in the life

of St. Odilo, bishop of Fulda, of a _vas pretiosissimum vitreum

Alexandrini generis_, which was on the table of the Emperor Henry in the

first half of the eleventh century. There is a vase in the treasury of

St. Mark’s, at Venice, of nearly opaque turquoise paste, inscribed with

Arabic characters, which may probably be of the tenth century. “The bowl

is five-sided, and on each side is the rude figure of a hare. These

figures, as well as the inscription, are in low relief, and were

probably cut with the wheel. The setting is in filigree, with stones and

ornaments of cloissonné enamels.”[75] Cups of rock crystal of the same

century are in existence and are frequently mentioned by the Arab

historians, who even describe thrones and other large objects made of

this mineral, which offers some analogy to glass in the process of

cutting on the wheel, and which must have induced imitations in the

cheaper substance.

Most of the existing glass-work of Egypt, however, belongs to the

fourteenth century, and consists of lamps intended to be suspended in

the mosques of Cairo. “All show that the makers were tolerably expert

glass-blowers, and could produce vessels of considerable size; but the

glass is of bad colour and full of bubbles and imperfections. The makers

had learnt, probably from the Byzantines, the art of gilding and

enamelling glass, and made much use of it. Inscriptions in large

characters are favourite ornaments; figures of birds, animals, sphinxes,

and other monsters, are found. The outlines are generally put on in red

enamel, the spaces between being often gilt. The enamels are used

sometimes as grounds and sometimes for the ornaments; the usual colours

are blue, green, yellow, red, pale red, and white.”[76]

There is every reason to believe that these mosque lamps were made at

Cairo, or at all events that the best and oldest specimens were made

there,[77] though the coarser and more modern sort has been attributed

to imitators at Murano (Venice), who are believed to have worked for the

Mamlūk Sultans. It is true that Damascus and Tyre had a greater name for

glass-working; Nāsir-i-Khusrau, remarks that Tyre exported glass vessels

worked on the wheel; William of Tyre writes to the same effect; and

Benjamin of Tudela, in the twelfth century, speaks of ten glass-

manufacturers at Antioch, and four hundred Jews at Tyre (Sūr)

“shipowners and manufacturers of the celebrated Tyrian glass.” In the

Royal Inventories of France are notices of several glass vessels, among

the possessions of Charles V., in 1380, described as “of the Damascus

style,” among others _une lampe de voirre outrée en façon de Damas sans

aucun garnison_. It was, however, the custom among our mediaeval

chroniclers to regard Damascus as the centre of Saracenic art, and to

call everything Oriental _à la façon de Damas_, and the term must not be

pressed too far. Some lamps may, indeed, be the product of the glass-

workers of Tyre or Damascus; and one in the South Kensington Museum is

stated to have come from a mosque which seems to be near Damascus, and

another believed to be from Damascus is in the British Museum. Most of

the Cairo lamps, however, were doubtless made in the city where they

were destined to hang, or at the not far distant Mansūra, famous for its

glass-works. It must always be remembered that the probability of

fragile objects, such as glass and pottery, being made in the immediate

neighbourhood of their destination is very strong, in the absence of

distinct evidence of importation. We know that there were glass-works at

Cairo. Nāsir-i-Khusrau[78] states that a transparent glass of great

purity was, in his time, made at Misr, by which he means Fustāt, or Old

Cairo; and if he had not said this, the numerous fragments which are

constantly picked up on the mounds of rubbish which lie between Cairo

and the site of Fustāt would be proof enough. It is curious, however,

that lamps should be almost the only objects of glass that seem to have

been made at Cairo. It is recorded that the Mamlūks used glass drinking-

vessels, and so much might be inferred from the representation of cups

on their metal-work, which are plainly intended for glass or horn

vessels. Nevertheless, there is a complete absence of mediaeval glass

cups, or other vessels of undoubted Egyptian manufacture; and the only

glass objects besides the lamps are a few bottles, decorated with enamel

like the lamps, but in more delicate lines, chiefly of red and gold; and

the coin weights, to which we have already referred.

Of the enamelled glass mosque lamps there are five examples of the

finest kind at the British Museum, three equally superb specimens belong

to the South Kensington Museum, besides four others exhibited there on

loan by the Khedive. A few are to be found in private collections, of

which that of M. Charles Schefer, at Paris, is among the most

remarkable; Mr. Magniac has a lamp of Sultan Hasan, and Linant Pasha had

others of the Amīrs Sheykhū and Almās. So few now come into the market

that the price of such examples as are offered for sale is absurd. Very

few of these lamps are now seen hanging in their proper places in the

sanctuary of the mosques; I only noticed two or three in all the mosques

of Cairo in 1883. This is partly due to the risk of their being carried

off by enterprising collectors, to whom the guardians of the mosques,

who have long known the market value of their treasures, are not

indisposed to sell them for an adequate bribe; and partly to the

circumstance that the Commission for the Preservation of the Monuments

of Cairo, alive to the dangers to which these magnificent objects were

exposed, by the cupidity of travellers and the venality of natives,

instituted a rigorous search and removed all the lamps they could find

to the safety of the Museum of Arab Art. Here, when I examined the

collection in 1883, were about eighty glass lamps, chiefly derived from

the mosques of Sultan Hasan, Barkūk, and Kāït Bey. As there were several

lamps which were precise duplicates of others in the collection, I

suggested to the Khedive that four of these duplicates should be sent on

loan to South Kensington, and his Highness readily gave the necessary

authorisation.[79] The following description of these four lamps will

show the general character of this branch of Saracenic glass-work.

The first lamp (Arab Museum, No. 24) bears the name and titles of Sultan

Hasan, who reigned from 1347 to 1361, with brief intervals of

deposition. It is ornamented with Arabic inscriptions, medallions, and

other decorations, in enamelled colours, and had six loops for

suspension, one of which is broken off, leaving a small hole. The

colours of the enamel are chiefly cobalt and red, with a touch here and

there of pale green and white. The glass is thick and muddy, with

numerous striae, as is the case with all Saracenic lamps. The decoration

is arranged in a series of five bands, the position of which is

indicated in the accompanying skeleton outline:—

[Illustration: FIG. 92.

DIAGRAM OF GLASS LAMP.]

_A_, on the neck, interrupted by three medallions, _a, a, a_; _B_, at

the junction of the neck and body of the lamp; _C_, surrounding the body

and containing the main inscription, interrupted by the glass loops for

attaching the silver chains that attached the lamp to the beams or

ceiling of the mosque; _D_, on the lower curve of the body; and _E_, on

the foot. This division is common to most of the lamps with which I am

acquainted, but the ornament of course varies greatly in different

examples.

The inscriptions on the five bands are as follows:—

_A_. الله نور السموات والارض (_a_) مثل نوره كمشكاة فيها (_a_) مصباح

المصباح (_a_)

“God is the Light of the heavens and the earth; His light is as a niche

in which is a lamp, the lamp:” here the inscription breaks off, it

should continue فى زجاجة الزجاجة كأنها كوكب درّى “in a glass, the glass

as it were a glittering star.”—_Korān_, xxiv. 35. The Arabic letters are

in cobalt, the shading lines and ornaments, which are very delicately

traced, are in red.

_a, a, a._ Three medallions, each bearing, on a fess indicated in

outline by thin red lines, the inscription thrice repeated: عز لمولانا

السلطان الملك “Glory to our lord the Sultan the king,” written in thin

red lines.

_B._ Six fleurs-de-lis, in green and red, with red line ornament

between.

_C._ عز لمولانا (_loop_) السلطان (_l._) الملك ا (_l._) لناصر ناصر ا

(_l._) لدنيا والدين (_l._) حسن بن محمد عز نصره (_l._)

“Glory to our lord the Sultan the king, the helper [En Nāsir], Aid of

the state and church, Hasan son of Mohammad: be his triumph magnified!”

These words are formed by the glass being left plain in the midst of a

ground of cobalt enamel. In earlier examples the plain portions would

have been gilt.

_D._ Three medallions similar to _a, a, a,_ but the inscriptions

slightly imperfect, divided by floral ornaments in red, green, and blue.

_E._ Ornament in fine red outline, within blue border.

The second lamp (Arab Museum, No. 40) is similar to this in the

inscriptions, the arrangement, and the colours, and differs only in

substituting for the fleurs-de-lis of band _B_, six ornaments in blue,

divided by red outline tracings.

The third lamp (Arab Museum, No. 47), which has lost its foot, has much

less inscriptional ornament, and more floral decoration. Band _A_ has,

instead of the Arabic inscription, arabesque scroll-work in blue,

divided by medallions similar to those (_a, a, a_) of the first lamp,

and bearing the same inscription. _B_ is decorated with three red and

three green circular splashes, arranged alternately: these daubs are

very common on lamps of this period. _C_ has no inscription, but a

conventional floral design repeated six times with slight variations,

and divided by the six loops for suspension. _D_ has three medallions

like _a, a, a,_ with the same inscription, divided by red outline

ornamentation enclosed in blue border within outer border of red. _E_ is

broken off. The inscriptions, it will be observed, do not give the name

of any Sultan, but the lamp is stated to have been taken, like the other

two, from the mosque of Hasan.

The fourth of the Khedive’s lamps (Arab Museum, No. 11) belonged to the

mosque of Sultan Barkūk, (in the Coppersmiths’ Market at Cairo,) who

ruled in the last two decades of the fourteenth century. The

inscriptions and ornament are arranged in much the same manner as on the

first lamp of Sultan Hasan. Band _A_ presents the same inscription as

that lamp, but perfect to the words كوكب درّى, “glittering star.” The

medallions _a, a, a,_ however, contain the following inscription thus

arranged, written in fine red lines within a blue border, outside which

is another border of fine red line ornamentation:—

الظاهر the Illustrious

-----------------

عز لمولانا السلطان Glory to our lord the Sultan

-----------------

الملك the King

_B_ is decorated with six splashes of pale green and red alternately, as

on the third lamp.

_C_ has the inscription—

عز لمولانا (_loop_) السلطان (_l._) الملك (_l._) الظا (_l._) هر ابو سعيد

(_l._) انصره الله (_l._)

“Glory to our lord the Sultan, the king, the Illustrious [Edh-Dhāhir]

Abu-Sa‘īd, whom God assist.” The letters are in plain glass, defined by

the blue ground, as on the first lamp.

_D._ Three fleurs-de-lis and three double fleurs-de-lis arranged

alternately in blue borders; the single fleur-de-lis also enclosed in

outer red border as on the first lamp. On the foot, _E_, are coarse

flowers in red and greenish white in blue scroll borders.

These are good examples of the most ordinary type of Saracenic glass

lamp, with the usual mode of decoration. The three other lamps in the

South Kensington Museum, purchased in 1860, 1869, and 1875, are all

rather exceptional in their inscriptions and ornament, though these are

arranged in the same manner as in the Khedive’s lamps. They are more

choice, and the small one, of Kāfūr Es-Sālihy, from its unusually small

size, and from its probably early date, is the gem of the collection.

_Glass lamp[80] of Kāfūr Es-Sālihy_, probably of the thirteenth century,

enamelled in colours and gilt, the latter unusually well-preserved.

Height, 10¼ in. [S. K. M., 6820.-1860.]

“The ornament appears to have been traced in fine lines of red enamel,

and the spaces between the lines filled in some cases with coloured

enamels, in others with gilding. The whole work is carelessly executed,

but very effective.” On the neck is a broad band on which is an

inscription in blue divided into three parts by three medallions, the

centres of which are occupied by a white sixfoil flower on a red ground.

This inscription (_A_) reads—

مما عمل برسم الجناب ‏◯‏ العالى اﻟ ‏◯‏ ﻤولوى البكى

“Of what was made by order of his Highness the exalted, the Lord, the

Bey.”

On the body of the lamp (_C_), divided by three loops for suspension, is

the following inscription, originally gilt on a blue ground, in

continuation of _A_:—

كافور الرومى الحر (_l._) بدر الملكى اﻟ (_l._) لصالحى عز انصاره (_l._)

“Kāfūr Er-Rūmy, El-Harīdy, [liegeman] of El-Melik Es-Sālih: be his

triumphs magnified!”

On the under-side of the body the devices in medallions are repeated,

separated by floral ornament, chiefly gilt on a blue ground; on the foot

are three twelve-foiled medallions in blue, in which are arabesques in

blue, white, yellow, green, and red, on a gilt ground.

_Glass lamp of the Mamlūk Amīr Ākbughā_, fourteenth century, enamelled

with circular disks and medallions in white, red, and blue, with three

suspending chains of silver. Height, 13 in. [S. K. M., 1056.-1869.] Fig.

93.

“This very fine specimen resembles the preceding very closely as regards

the character both of the glass and of the ornamentation.” On the neck,

three medallions divide an inscription in blue enamel:—

_A._ فى بيوت اذن الله ان ترفع ويذكر فيها اسمه يبّح له فيها بالغدوّ

“In the houses which God hath permitted to be raised for His name to be

commemorated therein, men celebrate his praises morning” [and

evening].—_Korān_, xxiv. 36.

In the centre of the medallions is a device: on a fess gules, a lozenge

argent; the ground of the medallion is also white.

“On the upper part of the body are eleven sixfoil medallions formed by a

blue line, the grounds within which were probably gilt. On these are

lines very carelessly sketched in red, some of which show some

resemblance to the outlines of birds.” There were six loops for

suspension, one of which is broken, dividing the inscription _C_, which

is in blue characters with red edges on a gilt ground:—

_C._ مما عمل برسم الجناب (_l._) العالى المولوى (_l._) الاميرى الكبيرى

(_l._) سيف الدين . . . (_l._) اقبغا عبد الواحد (_l._) الملكى الناصرى

(_l._)

“Of what was made by order of his Highness, exalted, Lord, the Great

Amīr, Seyf-ed-dīn Alfy, ‘Abd-El-Wāhid Ākbughā, [liegeman] of El-Melik

En-Nāsir.”

[Illustration: FIG. 93.—GLASS LAMP OF AKBUGHA.

Fourteenth Century. (_South Kensington Museum._)]

On the under part of the body the medallions with devices are repeated;

between them are spaces filled with arabesque ornament in white, red,

green, yellow, and blue, on a gilt ground.

Ākbughā was a well-known Mamlūk of the great Sultan En-Nāsir Mohammad

ibn Kalaūn. He died in 1343.

_Glass lamp of Kahlīs_, a Mamlūk of El-Melik En-Nāsir, fourteenth

century; described, but probably erroneously, as having been brought

from the mosque “Devi Saidenaya” at Cairo, which is not known, though a

convent of a similar name exists near Damascus. Height, 11⅜ in. [S. K.

M., 580.-1875.]

This is rather better and more carefully made than the others, and the

enamel is in excellent preservation. The inscription on the neck, in

gold on a blue ground, is divided by three medallions; the centre of

each shows on a red ground a gold fess, on which is a scimitar in black

with white mountings.

_A._ انّما يعمر مساجد الله ‏◯‏ من آمن بالله واليوم اﻟ ‏◯‏ ﺂخر

واقام الصلاة ‏◯

“He only shall visit the mosques of God who believeth in God and the

Last Day, and is instant in prayer.”—_Korān_, ix. 18.

On the body are six loops for suspension, dividing an inscription in

blue on a gold ground:—

_C._ هذا ما اوقفه (_loop_) العبد الفقير (_l._) الى الله تعالى الر (_l._)

اجى غفور اله الكر (_l._) يم قحليس الملكى (_l._) الناصرى (_l._)

“This is what was dedicated by the humble servant of God Almighty,

hoping for the forgiveness of God the generous, Kahlīs, [liegeman] of

El-Melik En-Nāsir.”

On the lower part of the body the medallions are repeated, the spaces

between are filled with arabesque ornament, showing blue enamel on a

gold ground, lines of red on gold, and three small ornaments in white,

blue, red, and green enamel.

Of the lamps in the British Museum, the following are the most

interesting:—

_Glass lamp of Sheykhū_, a Mamlūk of El-Melik En-Nāsir, fourteenth

century. The inscriptions run round the neck (_A_) and the body (_C_),

and (as usual) are formed of blue enamel on a plain glass ground in

(_A_), and in plain glass (outlined in red) on a blue enamel ground in

(_C_): the plain glass was probably gilt when new. The neck inscription

contains the ordinary _Korān_ verse, “God is the light of the heavens

(_s_) and the earth: his light is as (_s_) a niche in which is a lamp

(_s_)”: here it breaks off.

At the points marked (_s_) is an armorial medallion: per fess, gules and

sable, on a fess or, a cup gules; within a belt of delicate red tracery.

The body inscription (_C_), divided by six loops, runs:—

برسم المقر الا (_l._) شرف العالى (_l._) المولوى (_l._) المخدومى (_l._)

السيفى سيجو (_l._) الناصرى عز الله نصره (_l._)

“By order of his excellency, the most noble, the exalted, the lord, the

master, Seyf-ed-dīn Sheykhū, [the liegeman] of En-Nāsir, God magnify his

triumph!”

On the lower curve of the body (_D_) are three armorial medallions, as

on (_A_), but divided by three medallions of arabesques, drawn in

delicate red outline on a blue enamel ground, within a belt of red

tracery.

_Glass lamp of Tukuzdemir_, Councillor of En-Nāsir, fourteenth century.

On _A_, the same inscription as on the preceding lamp, breaking off at

the same point; but divided by three shields, pear-shaped: gules, in

chief an eagle displayed or, in base a cup of the last.

On _C_: مما عمل برسم المولوى الاميرى السيفى طقزدمر امير مجلس الملكى

الناصرى الباى

“Of what was made by order of the lord, the Amīr, Seyf-ed-dīn

Tukuzdemir, Sitting Councillor of El-Melik En-Nāsir, the Bey.”

On _D_, three shields as on _A_, alternating with beautiful arabesques

in red, white, blue, and yellow.

On _E_, العالم “the wise,” repeated all round.

The border ornament consists chiefly of fine red tracery.

As before, the upper inscription is blue on gold, the lower gold

(outlined with red) on blue: but in this lamp the gold is exceptionally

well-preserved. The “Sitting Councillor,” _Amīr Meglis_, had control

over the doctors and surgeons of the Court (see p. 31); and this

Tukuzdemir is mentioned by the contemporary traveller, Ibn-Batūta, as

one of the chief nobles of the day.

A third lamp of exceptional interest, in the British Museum, must be

referred to here, although it is believed to be of Damascus manufacture.

It is quite different in style from the ordinary Cairo lamps: neither

medallions nor shields appear upon it, nor the name of any Sultan or

lord. The neck inscription (_A_) contains the beginning of the formula

“God is the light,” &c., down to الزجاجة, and the body inscription (_C_)

continues it to الامثال; the whole reads:—

(_A_). “God is the light of the heavens and the earth; his light is as a

niche in which is a lamp, and the lamp in a glass; the glass | (_C_) as

it were a glittering star; it is lit from a blessed tree, an olive

neither of the east nor of the west, the oil thereof would well-nigh

shine though no fire touched it—light upon light: God guideth to his

light whom He pleaseth; and God strikes out parables [for mankind, and

God is mighty over all.]” As before the neck inscription is blue on a

gold ground, and the body inscription gold upon blue: the gold is

unusually well preserved. Fine red tracery forms the borders. On the

three loops for suspension the following inscription is distributed:—

مما عمل برسم ‏|‏ المسجد بالترية ‏|‏ الصاحبة التقونة

“Of what was made for the mosque at the grave of the lady Et-Takūna.”

The meaning as well as the position of this curious inscription is

unique: and the mosque and the lady Takūna, or Takwīya, or whatever her

name may be, has not yet been identified. Over the word المسجد are signs

which look like ١٩٨, and may be a date reversed, 891 (A.D. 1486).

A lamp exhibited by Mr. J. Dixon at the Burlington Fine Arts Club, in

the summer of 1885, bore the inscription round the neck

المقر الكريم العالى ا _m_ المولو[ى] الاميرى الكبيرى _m_ المالكى المخدومى

_m_

continued round the body,

التقى على الله تعالى يلبغا الناصرى امير حاجب بالابواب الشريفة

“His excellency the generous, exalted, lord, great amīr, royal, master,

| trusting in God most High, Yelbughā, the retainer of En-Nāsir, lord

chamberlain of the royal gates.”

At the points _m_ are medallions bearing a coat of arms: on a fess a

scimitar azure, with brown mountings, chief gules, base brown.

Yelbughā is mentioned by El-Makrīzy (in the _Khitat_) as a “wezīr” and

“ustāddār,” and “one of the chief mamlūks of El-Melik Edh-Dhāhir

Barkūk,” in reference to his restoration of the mosque El-Akmar in 1397.

The lamp may have come from this very mosque; but it must have been made

after the death of Barkūk, since Yelbughā styles himself, not Edh-

Dhāhiry, but En-Nāsiry, _i.e._ mamlūk of En-Nāsir Farag, Barkūk’s son

and successor. This will give the lamp a date of about 1405-10.

No two lamps are really alike; the designs are infinite, and only in the

inscriptions do we find any trace of monotony. The appropriateness of

the passage from the Korān about “the light of the heavens and the

earth,” seems to have made it very popular with the glass-workers, and

it recurs with almost the persistency of the still more celebrated

“Throne Verse,” which meets the eye in nearly every mosque and tomb in

Cairo. Besides variety in ornament, the lamps sometimes differ widely in

substance. The transparent glass, covered with inscriptions and designs

in blue and red enamel, is certainly the ordinary material, but some

lamps are of plain glass with no enamel at all; such is the lamp of the

church of Abu-Sarga, engraved in Mr. Butler’s _Coptic Churches_, which

has the form of the lamps already described, but is perfectly plain, and

has only three loops for suspension. A similar lamp is preserved in the

Coptic church of Sitt Maryam hard by. Some of the lamps in the Arab

Museum at Cairo are of pale green or blue glass, and semi-opaque, and I

have seen one, of a rich deep blue, still hanging in a mosque. Lamps of

the same shape and purpose were also made of pottery, but not, so far as

we know, in Egypt. The earthenware lamps are chiefly of Damascus and

Rhodian ware, and belong to the sixteenth century; some of them reach

very large sizes, and not a few are open to suspicion of owing their

existence to the modern forger’s desire to satisfy the passion of the

collector. The Saracenic glass lamps do not appear to have been made

much later than the fourteenth century, nor do we hear much of Eastern

glass from travellers after this period. Venice had then taken up the

_rôle_ of glassmaking.

[Illustration: FIG. 94.—VASE OF SULTAN BEYBARS II.]

The mode in which the lamps were used was this: they were suspended by

chains of silver or brass to the wooden beams that generally run across

the span of the smaller arches in a mosque, or else to the ceiling, or

to the gallows brackets that stand out from the walls, as at Sultan

Hasan. A small glass vessel containing oil was hung inside the lamp by

means of wires hitched on to the rim, and a wick was soaked in the oil

and lighted. The effect of the yellow light shining through the gold and

the blue and red enamel, and showing off the inscriptions and ornament,

must have been magnificent: the true Oriental delight in softened light,

which we notice in the shady _meshrebīyas_, the subdued tones of the

windows, the dull red and blue of the ceilings, is exhibited in this

manner of introducing light into the mosques.

Besides the mosque lamps, the most prominent use of glass in Cairo was

for the windows of both mosques and houses. Over the niche of a mosque,

and over the lattice wood-work of a _meshrebīya_ in a house, one

generally sees examples of the characteristic stained glass windows of

Cairo. In houses they are generally set in a row, in slight wooden

frames, over the lattice, to the number of eight or more. The Cairo room

in the South Kensington Museum (no. 1193-1883), has eleven of these

stained windows, which are called in Arabic _kamarīyas_ or _shemsīyas_,

“moonlike” or “sunlike.” They consist of a rectangular frame of wood,

about two inches broad by one thick, and forming an oblong about thirty

inches high by twenty broad. The frame is filled with an arabesque,

floral, architectural, or inscriptional design in open stucco-work, the

perforations being filled with stained glass. The mode of making these

windows is the simplest. A bed of plaster is poured into the frame and

suffered to set, and the design is then cut out with a gouge or other

tool, after which the stained glass is fixed with more plaster on the

outside of the window, which is then put up in its place, flush with the

inside of the wall, and set in a slight wooden frame with a flat

architrave round it forming a margin which conceals the joints between

the several windows. A couple of buttons keep the window from falling

inwards, while the architrave secures it on the outside. It will be seen

that no special skill is required for most of this work. The plaster is

easily cut—as any one may prove who cares to make the experiment of

carving a _kamarīya_ out of plaster of Paris—and the glass requires no

fitting, for its superfluous edges are concealed by the plaster. The

material is fragile, no doubt, as those who have tried to bring it to

England know, but moderate care on the part of the workman would ensure

the safety of the _kamarīya_ between its cutting and its placing in the

window. Where the art comes in is in the shaping of the perforations

which form the design. The shape and slant of these holes are skilfully

regulated according to the height they are to be raised above the

spectator; and the thick plaster setting of the bright little facets of

glass gives the light that comes through the latter a shaded appearance

which is singularly charming. It is difficult to give in words any clear

idea of the exquisite effect which is obtained by a skilful management

of the plaster rims; and, unfortunately, in our climate one cannot

reckon on seeing the sun’s rays streaming through the stained glass of

those _kamarīyas_ which are exhibited in the South Kensington Museum.

[Illustration: FIG. 95.

FIG. 96.

STAINED GLASS WINDOWS.

(_South Kensington Museum._)]

[Illustration: FIG. 97.

FIG. 98.

STAINED GLASS WINDOWS.

(_South Kensington Museum._)]

With all the ingenuity of moulding that is noticeable in the plaster

designs of these _kamarīyas_, it must be admitted that the designs

themselves are somewhat monotonous. Certain well-known types recur again

and again, and it seems as if the artist had satisfied himself that no

other design could be so successful and suited to the character of the

light that was strained through. The South Kensington Museum contains

thirty-seven of these windows, including the eleven belonging to the

Cairo room, and the following is an analysis of the designs presented by

this series:—

Pinks and other flowers growing from a vase—ten examples, varied of

course in colours and slight details, but actually of the same design,

which is the commonest of all. (Fig. 98.)

Cypress entwined with flower-stem—six examples. The spirals of the

flower-stem are made to twist in opposite directions in a pair of

these designs.

Cypress alone, one; or within a quatrefoil, surrounded by flowers,

two. Two cypresses under an arch, one; or beneath a palm, one example.

(Fig. 97.)

Kiosk between two cypresses or two buds (fig. 95.), or alone, six

examples.

Scroll or sprig of flowers and leaves, three examples. (Fig. 96.)

Thus thirty of the thirty-seven windows are accounted for by five

designs. The remainder consist of two Solomon’s Seals, one rosette, and

four portions of Arabic inscriptions, of which two or three form parts

of Christian formulas. Examples of the kiosk, the palm spreading over

two cypresses, the flowers growing out of a vase, and the scroll or

sprig of flowers, are given in the illustrations (figs. 95-98).

The position of the row of _kamarīyas_ over a _meshrebīya_ is almost

always just beneath the eave of the window, above the lattice-work; but

there is one exception in the South Kensington Museum. The Cairo room

there has its eleven _kamarīyas_ in an intermediate position, with a

panel of lattice-work above as well as below the glass. This is so

unusual, that competent authorities have asserted that the _meshrebīya_

has been wrongly put together; but apart from the fact that the sketch I

made of the window before it was taken down in Cairo shows the same

arrangement, the joints of the wood-work prove that the window is in its

original position, and could not have been set up in any other way.

The art of the Saracens in Egypt · 第 8 / 12 章