I know nothing of General Buell's intended operations, never having

received any information in regard to the general plan of campaign. If

it be intended that his column shall move on Bowling Green while another

moves from Cairo or Paducah on Columbus or Camp Beauregard, it will be a

repetition of the same strategic error which produced the disaster of Bull

Run. To operate on exterior lines against an enemy occupying a central

position will fail, as it always has failed, in ninety-nine cases out of a

hundred. It is condemned by every military authority I have ever read.

General Buell's army and the forces at Paducah occupy precisely the same

position in relation to each other and to the enemy as did the armies of

McDowell and Patterson before the battle of Bull Run.

Very respectfully, your obedient servant,

H. W. HALLECK, Major-General

[Indorsement]

The within is a copy of a letter just received from General Halleck. It is

exceedingly discouraging. As everywhere else, nothing can be done.

A. LINCOLN.

TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR ANDREW.

WASHINGTON, D. C., January 11, 1862

GOVERNOR JOHN A. ANDREW, Boston:

I will be greatly obliged if you will arrange; somehow with General Butler

to officer his two un-officered regiments.

A. LINCOLN

TO GENERAL D. C. BUELL.

EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 13, 1861

BRIGADIER-GENERAL BUELL.

MY DEAR SIR--Your despatch of yesterday is received, in which you say, "I

received your letter and General McClellan's, and will at once devote my

efforts to your views and his." In the midst of my many cares I have not

seen, nor asked to see, General McClellan's letter to you. For my own

views, I have not offered and do not now offer them as orders; and while I

am glad to have them respectfully considered, I would blame you to follow

them contrary to your own clear judgment, unless I should put them in the

form of orders. As to General McClellan's views, you understand your duty

in regard to them better than I do.

With this preliminary I state my general idea of this war to be, that

we have the greater numbers and the enemy has the greater facility of

concentrating forces upon points of collision; that we must fail unless we

can find some way of making our advantage an overmatch for his; and that

this can only be done by menacing him with superior forces at different

points at the same time, so that we can safely attack one or both if he

makes no change; and if he weakens one to strengthen the other, forbear to

attack the strengthened one, but seize and hold the weakened one, gaining

so much.

To illustrate: Suppose last summer, when Winchester ran away to reinforce

Manassas, we had forborne to attack Manassas, but had seized and held

Winchester. I mention this to illustrate and not to criticise. I did not

lose confidence in McDowell, and I think less harshly of Patterson than

some others seem to.... Applying the principle to your case, my idea is

that Halleck shall menace Columbus and "down river" generally, while you

menace Bowling Green and East Tennessee. If the enemy shall concentrate

at Bowling Green, do not retire from his front, yet do not fight him there

either, but seize Columbus and East Tennessee, one or both, left exposed

by the concentration at Bowling Green. It is a matter of no small anxiety

to me, and which I am sure you will not overlook, that the East Tennessee

line is so long and over so bad a road.

Yours very truly,

A. LINCOLN.

(Indorsement.)

Having to-day written General Buell a letter, it occurs to me to send

General Halleck a copy of it.

A. LINCOLN.

TO GENERAL H. W. HALLECK.

EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 1, 1862.

MAJOR-GENERAL HALLECK.

MY DEAR SIR:--The Germans are true and patriotic and so far as they have

got cross in Missouri it is upon mistake and misunderstanding. Without a

knowledge of its contents, Governor Koerner, of Illinois, will hand you

this letter. He is an educated and talented German gentleman, as true a

man as lives. With his assistance you can set everything right with

the Germans.... My clear judgment is that, with reference to the German

element in your command, you should have Governor Koerner with you; and if

agreeable to you and him, I will make him a brigadier-general, so that

he can afford to give his time. He does not wish to command in the field,

though he has more military knowledge than some who do. If he goes

into the place, he will simply be an efficient, zealous, and unselfish

assistant to you. I say all this upon intimate personal acquaintance with

Governor Koerner.

Yours very truly,

A. LINCOLN

MESSAGE TO CONGRESS.

WASHINGTON, January 17, 1862

TO THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:

I transmit to Congress a translation of an instruction to the minister of

his Majesty the King of Prussia accredited to this government, and a copy

of a note to that minister from the Secretary of State relating to the

capture and detention of certain citizens of the United States, passengers

on board the British steamer Trent, by order of Captain Wilkes of the

United States Navy.

A. LINCOLN

TO GENERAL McCLELLAN.

DEPARTMENT OF STATE, WASHINGTON.

January 20, 1862.

MAJOR-GENERAL GEORGE B. McCLELLAN,

Commanding Armies of the United States:

You or any officer you may designate will in your discretion suspend the

writ of habeas corpus so far as may relate to Major Chase, lately of the

Engineer Corps of the Army of the United States, now alleged to be guilty

of treasonable practices against this government.

A. LINCOLN.

By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD.

PRESIDENT'S GENERAL WAR ORDER NO. 1

EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 27, 1862.

Ordered, That the 22d day of February, 1862, be the day for a general

movement of the land and the naval forces of the United States against the

insurgent forces.

That especially the army at and about Fortress Monroe, the Army of

the Potomac, the Army of Western Virginia, the army near Munfordville,

Kentucky, the army and flotilla at Cairo, and a naval force in the Gulf of

Mexico, be ready for a movement on that day.

That all other forces, both land and naval, with their respective

commanders, obey existing orders for the time, and be ready to obey

additional orders when duly given.

That the heads of departments, and especially the Secretaries of War and

of the Navy, with all their subordinates, and the General-in-chief, with

all other commanders and subordinates of land and naval forces, will

severally be held to their strict and full responsibilities for the prompt

execution of this order.

A. LINCOLN.

TO SECRETARY STANTON,

EXECUTIVE MANSION WASHINGTON, January 31, 1862

HON. SECRETARY OF WAR.

MY DEAR SIR:--It is my wish that the expedition commonly called the

"Lane Expedition" shall be, as much as has been promised at the

adjutant-general's office, under the supervision of General McClellan, and

not any more. I have not intended, and do not now intend, that it shall be

a great, exhausting affair, but a snug, sober column of 10,000 or 15,000.

General Lane has been told by me many times that he is under the command

of General Hunter, and assented to it as often as told. It was the

distinct agreement between him and me, when I appointed him, that he was

to be under Hunter.

Yours truly,

A. LINCOLN.

PRESIDENT'S SPECIAL WAR ORDER NO. 1.

EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 31, 1862.

Ordered, That all the disposable force of the Army of the Potomac,

after providing safely for the defence of Washington, be formed into an

expedition for the immediate object of seizing and occupying a point upon

the railroad southwestward of what is known as Manassas Junction, all

details to be in the discretion of the commander-in-chief, and the

expedition to move before or on the 22d day of February next.

A. LINCOLN.

OPPOSITION TO McCLELLAN'S PLANS

TO GENERAL G. B. McCLELLAN,

EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, February 3, 1862.

MAJOR-GENERAL MCCLELLAN.

DEAR SIR--You and I have distinct and different plans for a movement

of the Army of the Potomac--yours to be down the Chesapeake, up the

Rappahannock to Urbana, and across land to the terminus of the railroad on

the York River; mine to move directly to a point on the railroad southwest

of Manassas.

If you will give me satisfactory answers to the following questions, I

shall gladly yield my plan to yours.

First. Does not your plan involve a greatly larger expenditure of time and

money than mine?

Second. Wherein is a victory more certain by your plan than mine?

Third. Wherein is a victory more valuable by your plan than mine?

Fourth. In fact, would it not be less valuable in this, that it would

break no great line of the enemy's communications, while mine would?

Fifth. In case of disaster, would not a retreat be more difficult by your

plan than mine?

Yours truly,

A. LINCOLN.

Memorandum accompanying Letter of President Lincoln to General McClellan,

dated February 3,1862.

First. Suppose the enemy should attack us in force before we reach the

Occoquan, what?

Second. Suppose the enemy in force shall dispute the crossing of the

Occoquan, what? In view of this, might it not be safest for us to cross

the Occoquan at Coichester, rather than at the village of Occoquan? This

would cost the enemy two miles of travel to meet us, but would, on the

contrary, leave us two miles farther from our ultimate destination.

Third. Suppose we reach Maple Valley without an attack, will we not be

attacked there in force by the enemy marching by the several roads from

Manassas; and if so, what?

TO WM. H. HERNDON.

EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, February 3, 1862.

DEAR WILLIAM:--Yours of January 30th just received. Do just as you say

about the money matter.

As you well know, I have not time to write a letter of respectable length.

God bless you, says

Your friend,

A. LINCOLN.

RESPITE FOR NATHANIEL GORDON

February 4, 1862

A. LINCOLN, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

To all to whom these Presents shall come, Greeting:

Whereas it appears that at a term of the Circuit Court of the United

States of America for the Southern District of New York held in the month

of November, A.D. 1861, Nathaniel Gordon was indicted and convicted for

being engaged in the slave trade, and was by the said court sentenced to

be put to death by hanging by the neck, on Friday the 7th day of February,

AD. 1862:

And whereas a large number of respectable citizens have earnestly besought

me to commute the said sentence of the said Nathaniel Gordon to a term of

imprisonment for life, which application I have felt it to be my duty to

refuse:

And whereas it has seemed to me probable that the unsuccessful application

made for the commutation of his sentence may have prevented the said

Nathaniel Gordon from making the necessary preparation for the awful

change which awaits him;

Now, therefore, be it known, that I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the

United States of America, have granted and do hereby grant unto him, the

said Nathaniel Gordon, a respite of the above recited sentence, until

Friday the twenty-first day of February, A.D. 1862, between the hours of

twelve o'clock at noon and three o'clock in the afternoon of the said day,

when the said sentence shall be executed.

In granting this respite, it becomes my painful duty to admonish the

prisoner that, relinquishing all expectation of pardon by human authority,

he refer himself alone to the mercy of the common God and Father of all

men.

In testimony whereof I have hereunto signed my name and caused the seal of

the United States to be affixed.

Done at the City of Washington, this fourth day of February, A.D. 1862,

and of the independence of the United States the eighty-sixth.

A. LINCOLN.

By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.

MESSAGE TO THE SENATE.

WASHINGTON CITY, February 4. 1862

To THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES:

The third section of the "Act further to promote the efficiency of the

Navy," approved December 21, 1862, provides:

"That the President of the United States, by and with the advice and

consent of the Senate, shall have the authority to detail from the retired

list of the navy for the command of squadrons and single ships such

officers as he may believe that the good of the service requires to be

thus placed in command; and such officers may, if upon the recommendation

of the President of the United States they shall receive a vote of thanks

of Congress for their services and gallantry in action against an enemy,

be restored to the active list, and not otherwise."

In conformity with this law, Captain Samuel F. Du Pont, of the navy, was

nominated to the Senate for continuance as the flag-officer in command of

the squadron which recently rendered such important service to the Union

in the expedition to the coast of South Carolina.

Believing that no occasion could arise which would more fully correspond

with the intention of the law, or be more pregnant with happy influence as

an example, I cordially recommend that Captain Samuel F. Du Pont receive a

vote of thanks of Congress for his services and gallantry displayed in the

capture of Forts Walker and Beauregard, commanding the entrance of Port

Royal Harbor, on the 7th of November, 1861.

A. LINCOLN.

TO GENERALS D. HUNTER AND J. H. LANE.

EXECUTIVE MANSION WASHINGTON, FEBRUARY 4, 1862.

MAJOR-GENERAL HUNTER AND BRIGADIER-GENERAL LANE, Leavenworth, Kansas:

My wish has been and is to avail the government of the services of both

General Hunter and General Lane, and, so far as possible, to personally

oblige both. General Hunter is the senior officer, and must command when

they serve together; though in so far as he can consistently with the

public service and his own honor oblige General Lane, he will also oblige

me. If they cannot come to an amicable understanding, General Lane must

report to General Hunter for duty, according to the rules, or decline the

service.

A. LINCOLN.

EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 1, RELATING TO POLITICAL PRISONERS.

WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, February 14,1862.

The breaking out of a formidable insurrection based on a conflict of

political ideas, being an event without precedent in the United States,

was necessarily attended by great confusion and perplexity of the public

mind. Disloyalty before unsuspected suddenly became bold, and treason

astonished the world by bringing at once into the field military forces

superior in number to the standing army of the United States.

Every department of the government was paralyzed by treason. Defection

appeared in the Senate, in the House of Representatives, in the Cabinet,

in the Federal courts; ministers and consuls returned from foreign

countries to enter the insurrectionary councils of land or naval forces;

commanding and other officers of the army and in the navy betrayed our

councils or deserted their posts for commands in the insurgent forces.

Treason was flagrant in the revenue and in the post-office service, as

well as in the Territorial governments and in the Indian reserves.

Not only governors, judges, legislators, and ministerial officers in

the States, but even whole States rushed one after another with apparent

unanimity into rebellion. The capital was besieged and its connection with

all the States cut off. Even in the portions of the country which were

most loyal, political combinations and secret societies were formed

furthering the work of disunion, while, from motives of disloyalty or

cupidity or from excited passions or perverted sympathies, individuals

were found furnishing men, money, and materials of war and supplies to the

insurgents' military and naval forces. Armies, ships, fortifications,

navy yards, arsenals, military posts, and garrisons one after another were

betrayed or abandoned to the insurgents.

Congress had not anticipated, and so had not provided for, the emergency.

The municipal authorities were powerless and inactive. The judicial

machinery seemed as if it had been designed, not to sustain the

government, but to embarrass and betray it.

Foreign intervention, openly invited and industriously instigated by the

abettors of the insurrection, became imminent, and has only been prevented

by the practice of strict and impartial justice, with the most perfect

moderation, in our intercourse with nations.

The public mind was alarmed and apprehensive, though fortunately not

distracted or disheartened. It seemed to be doubtful whether the Federal

Government, which one year before had been thought a model worthy of

universal acceptance, had indeed the ability to defend and maintain

itself.

Some reverses, which, perhaps, were unavoidable, suffered by newly levied

and inefficient forces, discouraged the loyal and gave new hopes to the

insurgents. Voluntary enlistments seemed about to cease and desertions

commenced. Parties speculated upon the question whether conscription had

not become necessary to fill up the armies of the United States.

In this emergency the President felt it his duty to employ with energy the

extraordinary powers which the Constitution confides to him in cases of

insurrection. He called into the field such military and naval forces,

unauthorized by the existing laws, as seemed necessary. He directed

measures to prevent the use of the post-office for treasonable

correspondence. He subjected passengers to and from foreign countries to

new passport regulations, and he instituted a blockade, suspended the

writ of habeas corpus in various places, and caused persons who were

represented to him as being or about to engage in disloyal and treasonable

practices to be arrested by special civil as well as military agencies

and detained in military custody when necessary to prevent them and deter

others from such practices. Examinations of such cases were instituted,

and some of the persons so arrested have been discharged from time to time

under circumstances or upon conditions compatible, as was thought, with

the public safety.

Meantime a favorable change of public opinion has occurred. The line

between loyalty and disloyalty is plainly defined. The whole structure

of the government is firm and stable. Apprehension of public danger and

facilities for treasonable practices have diminished with the passions

which prompted heedless persons to adopt them. The insurrection is

believed to have culminated and to be declining.

The President, in view of these facts, and anxious to favor a return to

the normal course of the administration as far as regard for the public

welfare will allow, directs that all political prisoners or state

prisoners now held in military custody be released on their subscribing

to a parole engaging them to render no aid or comfort to the enemies in

hostility to the United States.

The Secretary of War will, however, in his discretion, except from the

effect of this order any persons detained as spies in the service of the

insurgents, or others whose release at the present moment may be deemed

incompatible with the public safety.

To all persons who shall be so released, and who shall keep their parole,

the President grants an amnesty for any past offences of treason or

disloyalty which they may have comminuted.

Extraordinary arrests will hereafter be made under the direction of the

military authorities alone.

By order of the President EDWIN M. STANTON, Secretary of War.

MESSAGE TO CONGRESS. WASHINGTON CITY, February 15, 1862

TO THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UNITED STATES:

The third section of the "Act further to promote the efficiency of the

Navy," approved December 21, 1861, provides

"That the President of the United States, by and with the advice and

consent of the Senate, shall have the authority to detail from the retired

list of the navy for the command of squadrons and single ships such

officers as he may believe that the good of the service requires to be

thus placed in command; and such officers may, if upon the recommendation

of the President of the United States they shall receive a vote of thanks

of Congress for their services and gallantry in action against an enemy,

be restored to the active list, and not otherwise."

In conformity with this law, Captain Louis M. Goldsborough, of the navy,

was nominated to the Senate for continuance as the flag-officer in command

of the North Atlantic Blockading Squadron, which recently rendered such

important service to the Union in the expedition to the coast of North

Carolina.

Believing that no occasion could arise which would more fully correspond

with the intention of the law or be more pregnant with happy influence

as an example, I cordially recommend that Captain Louis M. Goldsborough

receive a vote of thanks of Congress for his services and gallantry

displayed in the combined attack of the forces commanded by him and

Brigadier-General Burnside in the capture of Roanoke Island and the

destruction of rebel gunboats On the 7th, 8th, and 10th of February, 1862.

A. LINCOLN.

FIRST WRITTEN NOTICE OF GRANT

TO GENERAL H. W. HALLECK.

EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON,

February 16, 1862.

MAJOR-GENERAL HALLECK, St. Louis, Missouri:

You have Fort Donelson safe, unless Grant shall be overwhelmed from

outside; to prevent which latter will, I think, require all the vigilance,

energy, and skill of yourself and Buell, acting in full co-operation.

Columbus will not get at Grant, but the force from Bowling Green will.

They hold the railroad from Bowling Green to within a few miles of Fort

Donelson, with the bridge at Clarksville undisturbed. It is unsafe to

rely that they will not dare to expose Nashville to Buell. A small part of

their force can retire slowly toward Nashville, breaking up the railroad

as they go, and keep Buell out of that city twenty days. Meanwhile

Nashville will be abundantly defended by forces from all South and perhaps

from hers at Manassas. Could not a cavalry force from General Thomas on

the upper Cumberland dash across, almost unresisted, and cut the railroad

at or near Knoxville, Tennessee? In the midst of a bombardment at Fort

Donelson, why could not a gunboat run up and destroy the bridge at

Clarksville? Our success or failure at Fort Donelson is vastly important,

and I beg you to put your soul in the effort. I send a copy of this to

Buell.

A. LINCOLN.

EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 2.--IN RELATION TO STATE PRISONERS.

WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON CITY, FEBRUARY 27, 1862

It is ordered:

First. That a special commission of two persons, one of military rank and

the other in civil life, be appointed to examine the cases of the state

prisoners remaining in the military custody of the United States, and to

determine whether in view of the public Safety and the existing rebellion

they should be discharged, or remain in military custody, or be remitted

to the civil tribunals for trial.

Second. That Major-General John A. Dix, commanding in Baltimore, and the

HON. Edwards Pierrepont, of New York, be, and they are hereby, appointed

commissioners for the purpose above mentioned; and they are authorized to

examine, hear, and determine the cases aforesaid ex parte and in a summary

manner, at such times and places as in their discretion they may appoint,

and make full report to the War Department.

By order of the President EDWIN M. STANTON, Secretary of War.

ORDER RELATING TO COMMERCIAL INTERCOURSE.

Considering that the existing circumstances of the country allow a partial

restoration of commercial intercourse between the inhabitants of those

parts of the United States heretofore declared to be in insurrection

and the citizens of the loyal States of the Union, and exercising the

authority and discretion confided to me by the act of Congress, approved

July 13, 1861, entitled "An act further to provide for the collection of

duties on imports, and for other purposes," I hereby license and permit

such commercial intercourse in all cases within the rules and regulations

which have been or may be prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury for

conducting and carrying on the same on the inland waters and ways of the

United States.

WASHINGTON, February 28, 1862.

A. LINCOLN.

SPEECH TO THE PERUVIAN MINISTER,

WASHINGTON, D. C., MARCH 4, 1862

The Papers and Writings of Abraham Lincoln — Volume 5: 1858-1862 · 第 25 / 27 段