VI

The five plays, that are but one play, have, when played one after

another, something extravagant and superhuman, something almost

mythological. Those nobles with their indifference to death and their

immense energy seem at times no nearer the common stature of men than do

the Gods and the heroes of Greek plays. Had there been no Renaissance and

no Italian influence to bring in the stories of other lands English

history would, it may be, have become as important to the English

imagination as the Greek Myths to the Greek imagination; and many plays by

many poets would have woven it into a single story whose contours, vast as

those of Greek myth, would have made living men and women seem like

swallows building their nests under the architrave of some Temple of the

Giants. English literature, because it would have grown out of itself,

might have had the simplicity and unity of Greek literature, for I can

never get out of my head that no man, even though he be Shakespeare, can

write perfectly when his web is woven of threads that have been spun in

many lands. And yet, could those foreign tales have come in if the great

famine, the sinking down of popular imagination, the dying out of

traditional phantasy, the ebbing out of the energy of race, had not made

them necessary? The metaphors and language of Euphuism, compounded of the

natural history and mythology of the classics, were doubtless a necessity

also, that something might be poured into the emptiness. Yet how they

injured the simplicity and unity of the speech! Shakespeare wrote at a

time when solitary great men were gathering to themselves the fire that

had once flowed hither and thither among all men, when individualism in

work and thought and emotion was breaking up the old rhythms of life, when

the common people, no longer uplifted by the myths of Christianity and of

still older faiths, were sinking into the earth.

The people of Stratford-on-Avon have remembered little about him, and

invented no legend to his glory. They have remembered a drinking-bout of

his, and invented some bad verses for him, and that is about all. Had he

been some hard-drinking, hard-living, hard-riding, loud-blaspheming Squire

they would have enlarged his fame by a legend of his dealings with the

devil; but in his day the glory of a Poet, like that of all other

imaginative powers, had ceased, or almost ceased outside a narrow class.

The poor Gaelic rhymer leaves a nobler memory among his neighbours, who

will talk of Angels standing like flames about his death-bed, and of

voices speaking out of bramble-bushes that he may have the wisdom of the

world. The Puritanism that drove the theatres into Surrey was but part of

an inexplicable movement that was trampling out the minds of all but some

few thousands born to cultivated ease.

May 1901.

Ideas of Good and Evil · 第 47 / 73 题