Russia Ruble of 100 copecks, silver .66.9

Ruble, ¼, and ½ rouble.

Sandwich Islands Dollar, gold 1.00.

Spain Peseta of 100 centimes gold and silver .19.3

5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 pesetas.

Sweden Crown, gold .26.8

Switzerland Franc, gold and silver .19.3

5, 10, and 20 francs.

Tripoli Mahbub. 20 piasters, silver .74.3

Turkey Piaster, gold .04.4

25, 50, 100, 250, and 500 piasters.

United States Peso, silver .83.6

of Colombia

THE SOUTH AND PROTECTIVE TARIFF.

JONESBORO, Ark.

How is the South, and, particularly, how are Southern farmers,

benefited by the tariff?

S. W. MOREHEAD.

_Answer._—Just as other American farmers are. First, by escaping

direct taxation for the support of the General Government, a form

of taxation that always bears on farmers and the other industrial

classes heavily, as illustrated in direct taxation for State and

county purposes. The Southern politicians who framed the Constitution

of the Southern Confederacy, a majority of them, ignored the

protectionist policy of Washington, Madison, Clay, Lowndes, Bell,

and other Southern statesmen of different political parties, and, as

Jefferson Davis puts it, in his “Rise and Fall of the Confederacy,”

“protective duties for the benefit of special branches of industry

were altogether prohibited.” A tariff for revenue only, export

duties, and direct taxation were relied on to supply the exchequer of

the Confederacy. What does Mr. Davis say of the result as regards the

last of these sources? On page 495 of Volume I. he writes: “Within

six months after the passage of the war tax of Aug. 19, 1861, the

popular aversion to internal taxation by the General Government

had so influenced the legislation of the several States that only

in South Carolina, Mississippi, and Texas were the taxes actually

collected from the people. The quotas of the remaining States had

been raised by the issue of bonds and State Treasury notes. The

public debt of the country was thus actually increased instead of

being diminished by the taxation imposed by Congress.” Where did

most of the money come from that was raised by the Confederacy? Off

the agricultural products of the South. As to the foreign loan,

Davis says: “Each bond, at the option of the holder, was convertible

at its nominal amount into cotton at the rate of sixpence sterling

for each pound of cotton—say 4,000 pounds of cotton for each bond

of a hundred pounds sterling.” The farmer was paid for the cotton

in Confederate currency or bonds, as a rule, and any other cotton

exported from the country was compelled to pay an export duty to

help pay the interest on the foreign bonds. But not only does the

policy of American protection tend to keep the amount raised by

direct taxation down to a minimum (as now, when, except the internal

revenue tax on whisky and tobacco, nearly the entire revenue of the

Federal Government is collected off of imports), but it levies the

tariff mainly on such articles as can be produced in this country,

so compelling consumers of Southern cotton, sugar, rice, tobacco,

etc., to pay better prices for these articles, or foreign competitors

to reduce their profits when selling to American consumers; while

it admits, coffee, tea, and other home necessities that we cannot

produce, free of duty. It lays a duty on iron and other ores, and so

encourages the Tennessee, Georgia, and Alabama miner to delve for the

wealth beneath his feet. It taxes cotton goods, and so holds out an

extra inducement over all that nature has done to encourage the South

to erect cotton factories. The same is true in a thousand other lines

of manufacture. In general, it attracts capital into the South to

engage in mining and manufacturing; it keeps money at home; it builds

up home markets; it develops natural resources; it quickens the

inventive genius of the nation, and it diversifies industries, and

so provides occupations adapted to the various talents of different

persons. This last is what the South needs more, in proportion,

than any other section of the Union. Diversity of occupation, like

diversity of crops, is essential to the realization of the best

results. In many cases the most expert mechanics would make inferior

farmers. The girl who “loves dearly to attend cotton-looms” (as a

female operative in the weaving department of the Southern Exposition

at Louisville lately exclaimed) would not stay on a farm. Diversity

of industry affords opportunity for every worker to make the most

of his abilities. It is the safety-valve of labor, which prevents

any one occupation from being overgorged with laborers. It is the

great equalizer of wages. The South is only beginning to realize the

importance of home manufactures. Georgia is alive to this matter; so

are some portions of Kentucky. Other Southern States are awakening to

it. If it be true that in some parts of the North the manufacturers

are strong enough to stand without protection, it is not yet true of

the same industries in the South, and the latter should demand that

the tariff be maintained until she has acquired like strength. She

has the cotton, iron, sugar, cheaper labor, and on account of the

climate it costs the laborers less to live there than in the North.

Why should she not rival France, of similar climate, in manufactures?

Capitalists are asking “why not;” and capital is pouring into the

South faster than ever before. It would be suicidal to drive this

capital back. The South will be stupid if she exerts herself to keep

her children shut up to agricultural pursuits and continues to spend

more than half the value of her surplus products in sending them to

market and bringing them back in a manufactured condition (as she

always has done) instead of manufacturing them at home.

I AM DYING, EGYPT, DYING.

EVANSTON, Ill.

Who was the author of the touching poem commencing, “I am dying,

Egypt, dying?” It is said that he was an army officer.

J. H.

_Answer._—It was William Haines Lytle, who was born in Cincinnati,

Ohio, in 1826. He belonged to a cluster of brilliant young writers

whose early ambition was to build up a school of Western literature,

but who were drawn into the whirl of more active life, which left

little time for courting the muses. On the breaking out of the late

war he went into the army, serving as a Colonel in Western Virginia

in 1861. He was wounded at Perryville, Ky., in October, 1862, was

promoted for gallant services, and, finally, was killed at the

battle of Chickamauga, Sept. 20, 1863. He was greatly beloved by his

fellow officers for his noble social qualities as well as for his

martial bearing; and nothing could be more unjust, according to the

testimony of those who knew him well, than the story recently started

by a flippant penny-a-liner, that he wrote the poem above referred

to, properly entitled “The Death of Mark Antony,” on the walls of

a guard-house in St. Louis, in which he was held under arrest over

night for disorderly conduct on his way home from the theater, where

he had seen Booth in Shakespeare’s great drama of “Antony and

Cleopatra.” That the poem was suggested to him by witnessing Booth’s

representation of this play is probably true: and it is asserted

by some that he had written it, in part at least, some time before

the eve of his death, but the following version of the peculiar

circumstances under which this greatly admired lyric was completed

and transmitted to the world corresponds with the traditions of the

army, and is probably true. John M. Balthes, of Clifton, Ill., who

was once a fellow-townsman of General Lytle, at Zanesville, Ohio,

writing to a fellow-soldier of that gallant officer, says:

“I send you the following beautiful lines, written by him in the

middle of the night, just before the next day’s battle, in which he

lost his life. The General being strongly impressed, or having a

premonition that he should lose his life in the battle that was so

soon to open, sat absorbed and alone in his tent, when an officer

coming in admonished him that he needed rest before the serious

business planned for the next day. Thereupon General Lytle handed him

these verses, remarking that they would be the last he should ever

write.” This poem was published in THE SUNDAY INTER OCEAN of Oct.

7, almost precisely as given by Mr. Balthes, and as it appears in

“Famous Single and Fugitive Poems,” by Rossiter Johnson.

SPECIAL PARTNERS—CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS.

A. D. Bird, Tecumseh, Neb.—1. In limited partnerships the special

partner’s liability for the indebtedness of the firm is limited to

their total interest in the firm, whereas the other partners are

each liable for the whole indebtedness of the firm. In corporations

“limited” stockholders are liable only to the total amount of their

stock, or some specific amount over that. For a fuller answer see

page 87 of Curiosity Shop for 1882, in book form. 2. The twelfth

amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which terminated

the old rule that the candidate receiving the greatest number of

votes for President should be President, and the one receiving the

next greatest number for President should be Vice President, and

requiring electors to name in their ballots the person voted for as

President, and, in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice

President, was adopted in 1804.

SILK FROM OSAGE-ORANGE LEAVES.

GALESBURG, Ill.

Will silk-worms fed with the leaves of the Osage orange thrive as

well and produce as fine a quality of silk as if fed on the leaves

of the white mulberry?

FARMER’S WIFE.

_Answer._—They seem to thrive well, and they produce fine-looking

cocoons; but as to the value of these latter compared with those

produced from mulberry leaves, it is not yet time to speak

positively. The strength, fineness, and other elements of value have

not been fully tested and pronounced upon by experts. Miss Nellie

Lincoln Rossiter, of Philadelphia, who has written a little hand-book

on the raising of silk-worms, says that there is no _apparent_

difference between the silk crops from morette, a species of white

mulberry, and Osage orange leaves. It would be well for persons

interested in this question to correspond with the Woman’s National

Silk Association of Philadelphia. An interesting experiment in

raising silk-worms has been successfully carried on the past season

by the Misses Sarah Dewey and Alice Coykendall, at Canton, Ill.

They procured the eggs from Philadelphia, with instructions for the

management of them, and an exchange says: “They now have 3,500 worms

in all stages of development, from those just hatched to those which

have their cocoons fully formed. They are kept in an upstairs room

on perforated paper, over which fresh leaves of the Osage orange are

spread each morning. The ladies are enthusiastic over their success,

which certainly seems assured. They will be able to find a ready

market for their cocoons at Philadelphia at remunerative prices.”

AMERICAN KNIGHTS—SONS OF LIBERTY.

MINNEAPOLIS, Minn.

Give some of the facts as to the origin and acts of the disloyal

orders known during the war for the Union as “American Knights,”

“Sons of Liberty,” etc.; and of the trial of Dodd for conspiring

against the government.

JAS. BREWSTER.

_Answer._—The treasonable organization known during the late war, at

one time as the “Mutual Protection Society,” again as the “Circle of

Honor,” or the “Circle,” or “Knights of the Mighty Host,” but more

widely as “Knights of the Golden Circle,” first developed itself

in the West in 1862, about the time of the first conscription, or

draft of troops, which it was designed to obstruct and resist. An

association under the last of these names had existed for some

years at the South being one of the chief means used to foment the

rebellion before the outbreak. Because of some exposures of the

signs, rituals, etc., of the Knights of the Golden Circle, Sterling

Price, the Confederate general, had instituted as its successor in

Missouri a secret political order, known as the “Corps de Belgique,”

in honor of his chief coadjutor, Charles L. Hunt then Belgian Consul

at St. Louis. Its special object was to beat up recruits for Price

and otherwise co-operate with him in his design of overrunning

Missouri. This was afterward merged into another secret order,

called the “Order of American Knights,” commonly known as the “O.

A. K.,” organized in the autumn of 1863 by Clement L. Vallandigham,

of Ohio, and P. C. Wright, of New York. It is believed that it was

founded by Vallandigham in consultation with Jefferson Davis and

other arch-rebels at Richmond, during his banishment within the rebel

lines. At least, members of the order in Indiana boasted that the

ritual was prepared by Davis himself, and Mary Ann Pitman, at one

time attached to General Forrest’s command as a rebel spy, declared

that Davis was a member of the order. In Indiana, in May, 1864, owing

to the names of some of the leaders and the signs and passwords of

the order having got into the possession of the Federal authorities,

its name was finally changed to the “Order of the Sons of Liberty,”

or “Knights of the Order of the Sons of Liberty,” and a ritual

was instituted. These soon became general. Local branches of the

organization used other names outside their lodges, such as “Peace

Organization” in Illinois, “Star Organization” in Kentucky, “American

Organization” in Missouri, “McClellan Minute Men” in New York,

“Democratic Invincible Club” in Chicago, “Democratic Reading-room” in

Louisville, and so on.

This order had a Supreme Council for the United States at large, of

which the chief officers were a Supreme Commander, a Secretary and

a Treasurer. There was a Grand Council for each State, whose chief

officers were a Grand Commander, a Deputy Grand Commander, a Grand

Secretary, and a Grand Treasurer, and a certain number of Major

Generals, one for each of its “military districts.” There was also a

“Parent Temple” in each county and subordinate temples in townships.

The constitution of the order declared that “the Supreme Commander

shall be Commander-in-chief of all military forces belonging to

the order in the various States, when called into actual service.”

There were four Major Generals in Indiana, each commanding “a

military district and its army.” In Illinois, where its organization

was at one time very complete, the members in each Congressional

district constituted a brigade, under a “Brigadier General.” Those

of each county a “regiment,” commanded by a “Colonel,” and those

of each township a “company.” In Indiana companies were subdivided

into “squads.” The McClellan Minute Men of New York were similarly

organized.

The first Supreme Commander was P. C. Wright, editor of the New York

_News_, who was subsequently incarcerated in Fort Lafayette, New York

harbor, when he was succeeded by Vallandigham. Robert Holloway, of

Illinois, is said to have acted as Supreme Commander in the latter’s

absence in Canada. Charles L. Hunt, Grand Commander for Missouri,

Charles E. Dunn, Deputy Grand Commander, and Green B. Smith,

Secretary, being placed under arrest, divulged facts confirmatory

of the above. H. H. Dodd, the Grand Commander for Indiana, was

arrested and tried at Indianapolis before a military commission

“for conspiring against the government,” “violations of the laws of

war,” and other charges. He was finally turned over to the civil

authorities and liberated.

Vallandigham declared in a speech at Dayton, Ohio, in the summer of

1863, that the order numbered 500,000 men; others claimed 800,000,

and some still more. Statements of its officers at different times,

represented its numbers in Indiana as 75,000 to 125,000; in Illinois

as 100,000 to 140,000; in Ohio as 80,000 to 108,000; in Michigan

and New York as about 20,000 each, and so on. In March, 1864, it

was represented that the total force capable of being mobilized for

effective service was 340,000. Green B. Smith and other witnesses

testified to having purchased and shipped arms to various points

to arm the order. Another witness, once a member of the order

in Indiana, testified that there were 6,000 muskets and 60,000

revolvers, besides private arms in possession of the order in that

State.

The members were bound by the most rigorous oaths. Its “declaration

of principles” declared that it was the imperative duty of its

members to resist the functionaries of the Federal Government,

“and, if need be, expel them by force of arms.” The witnesses,

former members, testified that the duties of members were: 1. To aid

soldiers to desert and harbor and protect them. 2. To discourage

enlistments and resist the draft. 3. To circulate disloyal and

treasonable publications. 4. To communicate and give assistance to

the enemy. 5. To recruit for the Confederate army. 6. To furnish the

rebels with arms and ammunition. 7. To co-operate with the enemy

in raids and invasions. 8. To harass loyal men and destroy their

property when so ordered to do. 9. To assassinate officers of the

government when so directed to do. 10. To establish a Northwestern

Confederacy.

The above statements are compiled from the reports of the Hon.

J. Holt, Judge Advocate General, to Secretary Stanton on “Secret

Societies,” and other State papers. Unusual space has been given

to this question because it has been asked repeatedly, and our

attention is called to the fact that it is not treated in the popular

cyclopedias and histories.

CHIEF CITIES OF FRANCE AND ENGLAND.

RUSHVILLE, Ill.

What is the population of each of the principal cities of France?

JAMES P. CLARKE.

_Answer._—The population of each of the principal cities of France

and England in 1881 is given in the “Statesman’s Year Book” as in the

table below:

Paris 2,269,023

Lyons 376,613

Marseilles 360,099

Bordeaux 221,305

Lille 178,144

Toulouse 140,289

Nantes 124,319

St. Etienne 123,813

Rouen 105,906

Le Havre 105,867

Rheims 93,823

Roubaix 91,757

Amiens 74,170

Nancy 73,255

Toulon 70,103

Angers 68,041

Nice 66,279

Brest 66,110

Limoges 63,765

Nimes 63,552

London [12]4,764,312

Glasgow [13]647,095

Liverpool 552,425

Dublin [14]418,152

Birmingham 400,757

Manchester 393,676

Leeds 309,126

Sheffield 284,410

Edinburgh 236,002

Bristol 206,503

Bradford 180,459

Salford 176,223

Wolverhampton 164,303

Hull 161,519

Oldham 152,511

Newcastle-on-Tyne 145,228

Dundee 140,239

Brighton 128,407

Portsmouth 127,953

LIQUID GLUE AND CHINESE CEMENT.

BLACK OAK, Mo.

Please tell us how to make “Spaulding’s prepared glue” or some

substitute for it.

D. P. STUBLEFIELD.

_Answer._—The formula for making Spaulding’s prepared glue is not

available. The following (Dumoulin’s) is quite as good: Take soft

water, 1 quart; best pale glue, 2 pounds; dissolve in a covered

vessel by the heat of a water bath or in a vessel immersed in

boiling water; cool, and add, gradually, of nitric acid (specific

gravity 1.335) 7 ounces; when cold put it into bottles. It is very

strong and does not gelatinize.

The following formula, known as “Chinese cement,” produces a cement

for porcelain, glass, fancy work, jewelry, etc., so strong that wood

or porcelain can be joined together so firmly that they will break

anywhere else rather than where cemented: Take of finest pale orange

shell-lac (broken small) 4 ounces; strongest rectified spirits 3

ounces, and digest them together in a corked bottle in a warm place

until dissolved. It should have about the consistence of molasses.

THE MAN OF ROSS.

GREENVILLE, Ill.

Who was the “Man of Ross?”

IDA E. WHITE.

_Answer._—The “Man of Ross” is a title given to John Kyrle, of Ross

parish, Hereford County, Eng., because of his remarkable spirit of

enterprise and great benevolence. Although only an untitled, private

gentleman of moderate fortune, he did far more for the good of his

community than many a wealthy lord of the manor. Pope appreciated the

true nobility of Kyrle, and has done full honor to him in the third

epistle of his “Moral Essays,” “On the Use of Riches.” Coleridge,

too, has paid a beautiful tribute to his memory in the lines:

“Richer than miser o’er his countless hoards,

Nobler than kings or kings’ polluted lords,

Here dwelt the Man of Ross. O, traveler, hear!

Departed merit claims a reverent tear.”

EASTERN CENTRAL ARKANSAS.

CLARENDON, Ark.

Seeing an Inquirer, in the Curiosity Shop, asks information in regard

to Arkansas, I will say that the Eastern Central portion of the State

is nearly level, and very fertile. All fruits, vegetables, cereals,

tobacco, cotton, sorghum, sweet potatoes—in fact anything one may

plant—gives large returns. Owing to this locality lying in the great

cotton belt, and to the large quantities of cotton produced, the

usual price per bushel of Indian corn is $1; oats, 90c, and oats will

yield from forty to sixty bushels per acre, with the rude implements

and tillage here in vogue—a one-horse cast-iron plow, and a small

tree top for a harrow. After oats and wheat are harvested the same

land is frequently planted in corn, or sown with millet, or Hungarian

grass, thus producing two crops a year. Land here is cheap, water is

soft and pure, and timber abundant. The rivers abound in fish, and

the immense forests in game. I came from Indiana. I have lived here

twelve years. Have never seen a case of consumption in the State.

DR. H. C. YOUNG,

Formerly Surgeon U. S. N.

PSEUDONYMS OF AUTHORS.

AUBURN, Ill.

I should like to have a list of the noms de plume of modern authors

of reputation.

CHARLES HERSHMAN.

_Answer._—The following is as long a list as there is room for here;

although it contains but a small proportion of the over 5,000

pseudonyms known to literature:

Pseudonyms and real names. Born. Died.

The inter ocean curiosity shop for the year 1883 · 第 31 / 47 段