_Answer._—In the year 1835 Michigan adopted a State constitution and

chose Stevens T. Mason, the Territorial Governor, as its first State

Governor. It then demanded of Congress a recognition as a State and

the rights of representation. This request Congress agreed to grant,

providing the petitioning State would accept the boundary line

claimed by Ohio. Not until January, 1837, would Michigan accept such

terms, and then only on condition that it should receive, in lieu

of the disputed strip on the south, the territory on Lake Superior

now known as the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Immediately after this

the State was formally admitted. By special permission the State was

allowed to cast three electoral votes in the Presidential contest

of 1836-7. In the same year in which it was admitted, Mr. Mason was

re-elected to the position of Governor, which office he continued to

hold until 1839.

THE LONGEST THROWS, LEAPS, AND RUNS.

CAMBRIDGE, Iowa.

What is the longest throw on record with a base ball? What is the

longest single standing jump? What is the fastest time ever made

by man running 100 yards? What is the fastest mile ever made by a

horse?

A. APLIN.

_Answer._—The longest throw with a base ball for the year 1882 was

132 yards 1 foot, made by E. N. Williamson, the third baseman of the

Chicago league nine. The longest standing jump with artificial aid

was made by G. W. Hamilton, at Romeo, Mich., Oct. 3, 1879. With 22

pound weights he jumped 14 feet 5½ inches. The longest standing jump

without artificial aid was performed by J. J. Tickle, Sept. 2, 1871,

at Manchester, England, who cleared 10 feet 5 inches. The fastest run

of 100 yards was made by George Seward, an American, at Hammersmith,

England, Sept. 30, 1844, who accomplished the feat in 9¼ seconds. The

fastest recorded time ever made by a horse for one mile was 1 minute

39¾ seconds, which was accomplished by Ten Broeck, a running horse,

at Louisville, Ky., May 24, 1877. The fastest mile in heat racing

was performed by Ada Glenn, in 1 minute 41¼ seconds, running, at

Sheepshead Bay, L. I., Sept. 21, 1880.

BOLIVAR, THE LIBERATOR.

ORANGE GROVE, Miss.

Give a short historical sketch or the life of General Bolivar.

FRANK.

_Answer._—Bolivar y Ponte, surnamed The Liberator, was a South

American patriot, who in July, 1783, was born in Caracas, a town in

the then Spanish province of Venezuela. His father, having obtained

considerable wealth, like many of the early adventurers, sent his

son to Madrid to pursue the study of law. When Venezuela in 1810

endeavored to throw off the yoke of Spanish oppression, Bolivar

joined the cause of the patriots and began service under Miranda.

Soon his own ability eclipsed that of his senior officer and he was

given a separate command. Defeating the Spaniards in August, 1813,

he entered Caracas at the head of his victorious army in triumph.

He was immediately appointed dictator; but his enjoyment of that

office was suddenly terminated by the reappearance of the Spaniards,

who in 1814 defeated and drove him from the province. His defeat,

however, did not discourage him. In 1817 he led the patriots in a

battle against Morillo and again found himself a conqueror. Venezuela

chose him to be her President, and in 1819 New Granada did him like

honor, the two States uniting to form Colombia. In 1823 his love

for liberty and hatred of Spain caused him to lend assistance to the

revolting Peruvians. The latter were successful, and as a reward for

the excellent service of the Liberator, Bolivia, named in his honor,

was erected into a separate State, and Bolivar was made its President

for life. For a few years he remained President of both Colombia and

Bolivia. He died in December, 1830.

ENGLISH SOVEREIGNS.

HUNTINGDON, Pa.

Who have been sovereigns of England since the reign of King John?

W. S. C.

_Answer._—The following, beginning with John, the grantor of Magna

Charta, have been sovereigns of England:

John—Sixth son of Henry II.

Henry III.—Eldest son of John.

Edward I.—Eldest son of Henry III.

Edward II.—Eldest surviving son of Edward I.

Edward III.—Eldest son of Edward II.

Richard II.—Son of the Black Prince, eldest son of Edward III.

Henry IV.—Son of John of Gaunt, fourth son of Edward III.

Henry V.—Eldest son of Henry IV.

Henry VI.—Only son of Henry V.

Edward IV.—Grandson of Richard, son of Edmund, son of Edward III.

Edward V.—Eldest son of Edward IV.

Richard III.—Younger brother of Edward IV.

Henry VII.—Son of Edmund, eldest son of Owen Tudor by Katharine,

widow of Henry V.

Henry VIII.-Only surviving son of Henry VII.

Edward VI.—Son of Henry VIII. by Jane Seymour.

Mary I.—Daughter of Henry VIII. by Katherine of Arragon.

Elizabeth—Daughter of Henry VIII. by Anne Boleyn.

James I.—Son of Mary Queen of Scots, granddaughter of James IV. and

Margaret, daughter of Henry VII.

Charles I.—Only surviving son of James I.

Commonwealth—{ Oliver Cromwell.

{ Richard Cromwell.

Charles II.—Eldest son of Charles I.

James II.—Second son of Charles I.

William III. { Son of William Prince of Orange

and { by Mary, daughter of Charles I.

Mary II. { Eldest daughter of James II.

Anne—Second daughter of James II.

George I.—Grandson of Elizabeth, daughter of James I.

George II.—Only son of George I.

George III.—Grandson of George II.

George IV.—Eldest son of George III.

William IV.—Third son of George III.

Victoria—Daughter of Edward, fourth son of George III.

WHO MADE MAXIMILIAN EMPEROR OF MEXICO?

TAYLOR, Ill.

What part did France take in placing Maximilian on the throne of

Mexico?

M. M. ALDIL.

_Answer._—Taking advantage of the war which occupied the attention

of the United States, Napoleon III., planned the conquest of Mexico.

With but little difficulty his army succeeded in this enterprise

and occupied the City of Mexico in 1863. He soon discovered the

barren nature of his conquest and the certainty of final failure.

To rid himself of the consequences of what had proved a most costly

enterprise, before he should be forced to a humiliating abandonment

of the country, he tempted Maximilian, Archduke of Austria, to accent

the crown of Mexico. To give eclat to the affair and the color of

popular approval, he ordered an election. This was dominated by

French troops and Napoleon’s Mexican accomplices, and the result was

an apparent popular vote to adopt an imperial form of government and

invite Maximilian to accept the throne. In 1864 he was received with

festivities and other marks of distinction planned by the French

and their Mexican supporters. The Mexican patriots, however, still

maintained an organization. When driven out of the capital President

Juarez retired to San Luis Potosi, then to Monterey, and finally

to Chihuahua, and with his Cabinet still maintained the form of a

central, national head of the republic. The French availed of the

excuse that Maximilian was in possession of the government to return

to France, and leave him to his own resources. The guerrilla bands

of patriots which had kept up the harassment of the imperial troops

with more or less persistency from the first, gathered strength, and

at last, deserted by Napoleon, attacked on all sides by the rallying

militia of the republic, the unhappy Emperor undertook to escape from

the country, was captured, and finally executed at Queretaro, June

19, 1867. The French were wholly responsible for placing Maximilian

in Mexico and for abandoning him to his unhappy fate.

TRADES UNIONS.

JACKSONVILLE, Ill.

Please give us information as to the origin, object, and extent of

trades unions.

W. A. LEWIS.

_Answer._—The various trade societies are the outgrowth of the old

English guilds, which originated in the beginning of the eleventh

century, and had for their prime object the relief or support of

infirm guild-brothers, the burial of the dead with proper religious

services, etc. In time, however, these organizations became better

classified and more exclusive. One guild was confined to the

merchants, another to the woolen manufacturers, another to the

cutlery manufacturers, etc.: the objects, at the same time, becoming

more comprehensive. In order to secure skilled workmen and prevent

competition with the inexperienced, the craftsmen secured the

passage of apprenticeship laws. In the case of woolen and several

other trades apprentices were required to serve manufacturers seven

years. Employers and employes were then united in these efforts, but,

finally, as the manufacturing industries became more profitable and

improved, and machinery was introduced, the rich masters withdrew

from the craftguilds, and began to hire children and men who had not

served a complete apprenticeship. This action on the part of the

employers caused the first “trade society” to be formed, in 1796,

called the Institution, which had for its object the protection of

its members against the encroachments of capitalists, and to secure

the passage of stricter apprenticeship laws. Since that time the

trades unions have increased in number and membership, until they

include nearly all the craftsmen of England, and from protective

associations they have grown into societies for the general

improvement of the laboring classes. To its efforts mainly are due

the passage of the eight-hour law of Great Britain and the statute

granting the Saturday half-holiday. In the United States similar

organizations are found, to which, especially in large cities, nearly

all the workmen belong.

THE RED SEA.

CHICAGO, Ill.

Is it generally believed by Bible scholars that the Red Sea was so

called because of the destruction of Pharaoh and the Egyptian army?

ANN HALLIDAY.

_Answer._—The drowning of Pharaoh and his host in the Red Sea had

nothing to do with its name. It takes this from a peculiar reddish

color remarked at certain seasons of the year in parts of this sea,

due to marine plants, or to reddish animalculæ, called by sailors

“whale feed,” which float on it like a scum; or to the reefs of red

coral which abound in many parts of it; or, possibly, to the fact

that its upper coast was one of the boundaries of Edom, “the red.” No

Biblical scholar of any repute has ever asserted that the sea took

its name from the overthrow of Pharaoh.

DESCRIPTION OF A CREAMERY.

FORT DODGE, Iowa.

The farmers of this section of the country need to know what a good

creamery is. Tell us what the inside of a really good creamery

looks like.

MANY READERS.

_Answer._—A Chicago inquirer says: “Oblige butter and cheese

consumers with a description of a first-class creamery. Some of us

have a very vague notion of such an establishment.—E. D. Smith.”

Another inquiry comes from Neligh, Neb. So some care has been taken

to obtain a description of a thoroughly well-constructed factory of

this kind. This is the more important as the dairy business of the

West is growing with wonderful rapidity, and nothing has done more

to develop this industry than the recent introduction of creameries.

The term creamery was formerly applied to an establishment fitted

up expressly for the purpose of manufacturing butter, but now the

name is given to factories where both butter and cheese are made.

Milk is brought in spring wagons from dairy-farms for a distance of

six miles or less, and cream is gathered anywhere within a radius

of fifteen miles to be manufactured into butter and cheese. This

product thus handled in larger quantities, in a scientific manner,

with effective labor-saving machinery and proper surroundings, makes

it possible to obtain the best results, and such product is always

marketable at prices much higher than dairy butter. The factory of

the Aurora Creamery Company, built at Aurora, Ill., about a year ago

is generally regarded as a model establishment, and will furnish an

example for this description. To operate a creamery successfully two

things are absolutely necessary, viz., a good spring of living water

of low temperature, say 50 to 54 deg., and good drainage; without

these features there is no prospect of permanent success in the

undertaking. The factory named has a spring located about 200 feet

off which discharges, both winter and summer, 750 gallons of pure

water per hour, temperature 52 deg., with 5 feet 9 inches fall, while

drainage is supplied by a 2-foot square stone sewer which empties

into the river, through which a slough is drained, and into which

there is a 5-foot fall from the factory. The main building is of

brick with a 12-inch wall: size, 32 × 70, 20 feet high; right wing,

20 × 24; left wing, 18 × 24, and rear extension, 18 × 26. The room

in which the cheese is manufactured is 30 × 40. It contains a fine

upright 9-horse-power engine, a Wir’s self-agitating rotary cheese

vat with a capacity for 12,000 pounds of milk and a gang cheese

press. The butter room, 30 × 30 feet, contains one churn with a

capacity of 400 gallons, and one with a capacity of 150 gallons, a

power butter worker, sink with steam pipes to scald, and revolving

brush for washing cans, 3 cream vats 300 gallons each, a receiving

vat into which the milk is strained, and from which it is drawn into

deep pails, or sets, which are placed in three cemented water vats

of capacity sufficient to cool 20,000 pounds of milk daily. The left

wing of the factory contains a 16-horse power boiler, which furnishes

steam to run the machinery and heat the building; a seventy-barrel

water tank, which is placed over the boiler; a Davidson steam pump

and coal bin which will store fifty tons of coal. An improvement

which, it is claimed, is found in no other factory, is an elevated

“whey vat” placed over the boiler-room, into which the whey is

raised by a rotary pump, and from which the farmers draw their

supply of whey to be carried into the country. When all that is

wanted has been drawn out a gate is opened, and the balance is run

into the river, after which the tank is scalded out and kept sweet

and clean. This is a vast improvement over the pestilence breeding

arrangement which is sunk in the ground, and is located near the

butter and cheese rooms of most other factories. The right wing of

the factory contains a driveway, a receiving-room, weighing platform,

and stairway to office. The extension holds 150 tons of ice, and

contains a refrigerator with a capacity of 30,000 pounds of butter.

In the second story is a neat office, store-rooms, and curing room,

to which the cheese are raised by an elevator. The lower floors are

made of 2 × 6 joists, dressed and matched and imbedded in cement;

under which is a four-inch coating of grout, so that there is no

possible chance for the milk to leak through the floor and produce

the sickening stench which is so common in many factories. Special

attention has been given to ventilation in every part of the building

and the whole establishment has the appearance in neatness of a tidy

farmhouse kitchen. The sum of $10,000 was expended in real estate,

buildings, and fixtures of this factory, but a good creamery with a

comfortable outfit of medium capacity could be put up for much less

money. The machinery for churning and working the butter is as simple

as it is ingenious. The churn is a great square chest revolving on

an axis running through its longest diameter; the butter-workers are

fluted wooden cones running around a circular disk inclined at an

angle to the horizon, so that the buttermilk runs off as fast as it

is expressed. The apparatus for stirring the cheese curd and pressing

the cheese, and a score of other nicely contrived instruments,

operate with the uniformity and precision of clock work.

SPEED OF RAILWAY TRAINS.

WAUKEGAN, Ill.

How does the speed of railroad trains in this country compare with

that of trains in Europe?

C. D. ADAMS.

_Answer._—The fastest recorded railroad speed in the United States

is given in the New York Clipper Almanac, as follows: The train

which left West Philadelphia for Jersey City over the Pennsylvania

Railroad at 7:35 a. m., Sept. 4, 1879 (Edward Osborn, engineer), made

1 mile in 50¼ seconds; 3 miles in 2 m. 36¼ sec., and 5 miles in 4

m. 50 sec. A train on the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railroad

made the run from Hamburg to Buffalo, N. Y., 10 miles, in 8 minutes.

The locomotive Hamilton Davis and six cars, on the New York Central

Railroad in 1855, made 14 miles in 11 minutes. A new Fontaine engine

and two coaches, carrying W. H. Vanderbilt and party, ran from

Amherstburg to St. Thomas, Can., over the Canada Southern Railroad,

111 miles, in 98 minutes—no stop. Probably the fastest run ever made

for any considerable distance in England was that of the special

train carrying the Duke of Wellington from Paddington to Slough, 18

miles, in 15 minutes. But these are exceptional runs; what is of

more importance is to compare regular time-table speed. The London

_Engineer_ says, commenting on a series of articles on this subject

which have appeared in the German journal, _Die Verkehrszeitung_, in

the _American Railroad Gazette_, and in other papers, “it appears

that railroad speeds in Great Britain, on the Continent, and in the

United States are much slower than most people suppose. If we take

for instance, the run from London to Edinburgh, a distance of 397

miles via York, this is made in 9 hours by great Northern trains, the

average speed being 44.1 miles per hour. From Euston the distance

is 401 miles, and London and Northwestern trains make the run in 10

hours, or 40.1 miles an hour. By the Midland Railway the distance is

404 miles, and the time 10 h. 5 min., or very nearly the same speed.

Some of the fastest trains in the world are those run between Leeds

and London. From King’s Cross the distance by the Great Northern is

186½ miles. From St. Pancras by the Midland is 196 miles. The fastest

train on the Great Northern makes the run in 4 h. 5 min., or an

average speed of 45.4 miles an hour. The Midland trains traverse the

distance in 4 h. 30 min., giving an average velocity of 43.5 miles an

hour. The fastest train in the world is the Flying Dutchman, broad

gauge, which makes the run to Swindon at 53½ miles an hour. The Great

Northern trains run from London to York, 188 miles, at 48 miles an

hour, and at least one train runs to Peterborough at 51 miles an

hour. The run from London to Grantham has been made repeatedly at 51

miles an hour. On the United States railways the quickest run appears

to be that made between Jersey City and Philadelphia, 89 miles, made

at the rate of 47⅔ miles an hour. There is not in the world a train

timed to run 60 miles an hour, although it is, of course, certain

that that velocity is often exceeded. If a speed of 60 miles an hour

could be maintained continually between London and Edinburgh, the

journey would occupy only 6 hours and 36 minutes; and allowing for

three stops of 10 minutes each on the route, the time would be under

7¼ hours, instead of 10 hours. So far as the machinery of a railway

is concerned—by which we mean the road, the rolling stock, and the

signals—there is nothing to prevent an average speed of 60 miles an

hour being maintained. That it is not attained is certain.”

THE UNITED STATES CIVIL LIST.

OSKALOOSA, Iowa.

What officers are included under the civil service?

L. A. H.

_Answer._—The civil officers of the United States are those employed

by the several departments. In 1876, in reply to an inquiry made

by order of Congress, the following official statement was made:

Department of State, 430; Treasury, 12,482; War Department, 1,489;

Navy Department, 131; Postoffice Department, 44,897; Interior, 2,475;

Department of Justice, 528. Total number of civil officers, 62,427.

GREAT FIRES.

JOLIET, Ill.

Which was the greatest fire, that of London, Moscow, or Chicago?

AN INQUIRER.

_Answer._—The great fire of London, which occurred in 1666, destroyed

about two-thirds of the city; but there is no estimate of the value

of the property. The burning of Moscow, in September, 1812, destroyed

property which has been valued at $150,000,000. The great Chicago

fire of 1871 consumed $192,000,000 worth of property. The area burnt

over in the Chicago fire was greater than that covered by either the

London or Moscow fire.

PRESIDENT JACKSON’S DOUBLE MARRIAGE.

OWENSVILLE, Ark.

Who was the first husband of Andrew Jackson’s wife, and what was

the cause of the separation?

SUBSCRIBER.

_Answer._—Mrs. Jackson was formerly the wife of Mr. Lewis Robards,

of Kentucky. While Mr. Robards and his wife were residing at the

home of Mrs. Donelson, the mother of Mrs. Robards, Andrew Jackson

became a boarder, and consequently quite intimate with the family.

In time, Mr. Robards became intensely jealous of his wife, which

culminated in his charging her with adultery and suing for divorce.

This charge, however, was neither proven nor generally believed.

Through the influence of Jackson, the Legislature in 1791 passed an

act legalizing the separation of Mr. and Mrs. Robards, but the legal

divorce from the courts was not obtained until 1793. After the act

of the Legislature, Jackson married Mrs. Robards, supposing that she

was lawfully divorced; but after the decision of the court, in order

to remove everything questionable, he was remarried.

THE BUNKER HILL FLAG.

CHICAGO, Ill.

What flag, if any, did the provincials use in the battle of

Bunker Hill, June 17, 1775? What was the first flag used by the

revolutionary army?

H. J. H.

_Answer._—Reference to that standard work, “The Origin and Progress

of the Flag of the United States of America,” by George Henry

Preble, U. S. N., and other sources of information, shows that it

is uncertain what flag, if any, was displayed by the Americans at

Bunker Hill, in the famous fight of June 17, 1775. The flag raised on

Prospect Hill by General Putnam, a month later, July 18, 1775, was

red, with the motto, _Qui Transtulit Sustinet_, (who transplanted

still sustains) on one side, and “An Appeal to Heaven” on the other.

This latter motto was emblazoned on the white flag with a green

pine tree carried by the privateers commissioned by Massachusetts,

soon after this. The first cruisers commissioned by Washington

also bore “the pine tree flag.” Before the battle of Bunker Hill,

indeed, immediately after the battle of Lexington, on the 19th of

the preceding April, the provincial troops of Connecticut carried

a standard bearing the arms of that colony and the Latin motto

above cited. As General Putnam and his Connecticut troops took a

prominent part in the battle of Bunker Hill, it is presumable that

this flag was displayed in that action, and by parity of reasoning

it may be inferred that the colonial flags of Massachusetts and

New Hampshire were carried into the action by the militia of those

colonies. Precisely what these were it is almost or quite impossible

to determine with certainty. Indeed, there seem to have been several

different flags. The “union-flags” so frequently mentioned in the

accounts left us of the revolutionary movements of 1774 and the

early part of 1775 were, in most instances, the English red ensign,

with such mottoes as “Liberty and Union,” “Liberty and Property,”

or simply “Liberty.” Peculiar devices were employed by the patriots

of different neighborhoods. Not until Jan. 2, 1776, was the first

common standard raised. This was the “Great Union,” as it was

christened, adopted by General Washington, and first displayed at

his headquarters in Cambridge, Mass., on the date above given. It

consisted of thirteen stripes, alternately white and red, with the

crosses of St. George and St. Andrew in the union where the stars now

glitter.

ORIGIN OF PORTERHOUSE STEAK.

CHICAGO, Ill.

Can Our Curiosity Shop tell us why steaks cut from the small end of

the sirloin are called porterhouse steaks?

EPICURE.

The inter ocean curiosity shop for the year 1883 · 第 5 / 47 段