CHICAGO, October 1, 189-

_Dear Pierrepont:_ Your Ma got back safe this morning and she wants me

to be sure to tell you not to over-study, and I want to tell you to be

sure not to under-study. What we're really sending you to Harvard for is

to get a little of the education that's so good and plenty there. When

it's passed around you don't want to be bashful, but reach right out and

take a big helping every time, for I want you to get your share. You'll

find that education's about the only thing lying around loose in this

world, and that it's about the only thing a fellow can have as much of

as he's willing to haul away. Everything else is screwed down tight and

the screw-driver lost.

I didn't have your advantages when I was a boy, and you can't have mine.

Some men learn the value of money by not having any and starting out to

pry a few dollars loose from the odd millions that are lying around; and

some learn it by having fifty thousand or so left to them and starting

out to spend it as if it were fifty thousand a year. Some men learn the

value of truth by having to do business with liars; and some by going to

Sunday School. Some men learn the cussedness of whiskey by having a

drunken father; and some by having a good mother. Some men get an

education from other men and newspapers and public libraries; and some

get it from professors and parchments--it doesn't make any special

difference how you get a half-nelson on the right thing, just so you get

it and freeze on to it. The package doesn't count after the eye's been

attracted by it, and in the end it finds its way to the ash heap. It's

the quality of the goods inside which tells, when they once get into the

kitchen and up to the cook.

You can cure a ham in dry salt and you can cure it in sweet pickle, and

when you're through you've got pretty good eating either way, provided

you started in with a sound ham. If you didn't, it doesn't make any

special difference how you cured it--the ham-tryer's going to strike the

sour spot around the bone. And it doesn't make any difference how much

sugar and fancy pickle you soak into a fellow, he's no good unless he's

sound and sweet at the core.

The first thing that any education ought to give a man is character, and

the second thing is education. That is where I'm a little skittish about

this college business. I'm not starting in to preach to you, because I

know a young fellow with the right sort of stuff in him preaches to

himself harder than any one else can, and that he's mighty often

switched off the right path by having it pointed out to him in the wrong

way.

I remember when I was a boy, and I wasn't a very bad boy, as boys go,

old Doc Hoover got a notion in his head that I ought to join the church,

and he scared me out of it for five years by asking me right out loud in

Sunday School if I didn't want to be saved, and then laying for me after

the service and praying with me. Of course I wanted to be saved, but I

didn't want to be saved quite so publicly.

When a boy's had a good mother he's got a good conscience, and when he's

got a good conscience he don't need to have right and wrong labeled for

him. Now that your Ma's left and the apron strings are cut, you're

naturally running up against a new sensation every minute, but if you'll

simply use a little conscience as a tryer, and probe into a thing which

looks sweet and sound on the skin, to see if you can't fetch up a sour

smell from around the bone, you'll be all right.

[Illustration: "_Old Doc Hoover asked me right out in Sunday School if I

didn't want to be saved._"]

I'm anxious that you should be a good scholar, but I'm more anxious that

you should be a good clean man. And if you graduate with a sound

conscience, I shan't care so much if there are a few holes in your

Latin. There are two parts of a college education--the part that you get

in the schoolroom from the professors, and the part that you get outside

of it from the boys. That's the really important part. For the first

can only make you a scholar, while the second can make you a man.

Education's a good deal like eating--a fellow can't always tell which

particular thing did him good, but he can usually tell which one did him

harm. After a square meal of roast beef and vegetables, and mince pie

and watermelon, you can't say just which ingredient is going into muscle,

but you don't have to be very bright to figure out which one started the

demand for painkiller in your insides, or to guess, next morning, which

one made you believe in a personal devil the night before. And so, while

a fellow can't figure out to an ounce whether it's Latin or algebra or

history or what among the solids that is building him up in this place

or that, he can go right along feeding them in and betting that they're

not the things that turn his tongue fuzzy. It's down among the sweets,

among his amusements and recreations, that he's going to find his

stomach-ache, and it's there that he wants to go slow and to pick and

choose.

It's not the first half, but the second half of a college education

which merchants mean when they ask if a college education pays. It's the

Willie and the Bertie boys; the chocolate eclair and tutti-frutti boys;

the la-de-dah and the baa-baa-billy-goat boys; the high cock-a-lo-rum

and the cock-a-doodle-do boys; the Bah Jove!, hair-parted-in-the-middle,

cigaroot-smoking, Champagne-Charlie, up-all-night-and-in-all-day boys

that make 'em doubt the cash value of the college output, and overlook

the roast-beef and blood-gravy boys, the shirt-sleeves and

high-water-pants boys, who take their college education and make some

fellow's business hum with it.

Does a College education pay? Does it pay to feed in pork trimmings at

five cents a pound at the hopper and draw out nice, cunning, little

"country" sausages at twenty cents a pound at the other end? Does it

pay to take a steer that's been running loose on the range and living

on cactus and petrified wood till he's just a bunch of barb-wire and

sole-leather, and feed him corn till he's just a solid hunk of

porterhouse steak and oleo oil?

You bet it pays. Anything that trains a boy to think and to think quick

pays; anything that teaches a boy to get the answer before the other

fellow gets through biting the pencil, pays.

College doesn't make fools; it develops them. It doesn't make

bright men; it develops them. A fool will turn out a fool, whether

he goes to college or not, though he'll probably turn out a

different sort of a fool. And a good, strong boy will turn out a

bright, strong man whether he's worn smooth in the

grab-what-you-want-and-eat-standing-with-one-eye-skinned-for-the-dog

school of the streets and stores, or polished up and slicked down in the

give-your-order-to-the-waiter-and-get-a-sixteen-course-dinner school of

the professors. But while the lack of a college education can't keep No.

1 down, having it boosts No. 2 up.

It's simply the difference between jump in, rough-and-tumble,

kick-with-the-heels-and-butt-with-the-head nigger

fighting, and this grin-and-look-pleasant,

dodge-and-save-your-wind-till-you-see-a-chance-to-land-on-the-solar-plexus

style of the trained athlete. Both styles win fights, but the fellow

with a little science is the better man, providing he's kept his muscle

hard. If he hasn't, he's in a bad way, for his fancy sparring is just

going to aggravate the other fellow so that he'll eat him up.

Of course, some men are like pigs, the more you educate them, the more

amusing little cusses they become, and the funnier capers they cut when

they show off their tricks. Naturally, the place to send a boy of that

breed is to the circus, not to college.

Speaking of educated pigs, naturally calls to mind the case of old man

Whitaker and his son, Stanley. I used to know the old man mighty well

ten years ago. He was one of those men whom business narrows, instead

of broadens. Didn't get any special fun out of his work, but kept right

along at it because he didn't know anything else. Told me he'd had to

root for a living all his life and that he proposed to have Stan's

brought to him in a pail. Sent him to private schools and dancing

schools and colleges and universities, and then shipped him to Oxford

to soak in a little "atmosphere," as he put it. I never could quite lay

hold of that atmosphere dodge by the tail, but so far as I could make

out, the idea was that there was something in the air of the Oxford

ham-house that gave a fellow an extra fancy smoke.

Well, about the time Stan was through, the undertaker called by for the

old man, and when his assets were boiled down and the water drawn off,

there wasn't enough left to furnish Stan with a really nourishing meal.

I had a talk with Stan about what he was going to do, but some ways he

didn't strike me as having the making of a good private of industry, let

alone a captain, so I started in to get him a job that would suit his

talents. Got him in a bank, but while he knew more about the history of

banking than the president, and more about political economy than the

board of directors, he couldn't learn the difference between a fiver

that the Government turned out and one that was run off on a hand press

in a Halsted Street basement. Got him a job on a paper, but while he

knew six different languages and all the facts about the Arctic regions,

and the history of dancing from the days of Old Adam down to those of

Old Nick, he couldn't write up a satisfactory account of the Ice-Men's

Ball. Could prove that two and two made four by trigonometry and

geometry, but couldn't learn to keep books; was thick as thieves with

all the high-toned poets, but couldn't write a good, snappy,

merchantable street-car ad.; knew a thousand diseases that would take a

man off before he could blink, but couldn't sell a thousand-dollar

tontine policy; knew the lives of our Presidents as well as if he'd been

raised with them, but couldn't place a set of the Library of the Fathers

of the Republic, though they were offered on little easy payments that

made them come as easy as borrowing them from a friend. Finally I hit on

what seemed to be just the right thing. I figured out that any fellow

who had such a heavy stock of information on hand, ought to be able to

job it out to good advantage, and so I got him a place teaching. But it

seemed that he'd learned so much about the best way of teaching boys,

that he told his principal right on the jump that he was doing it all

wrong, and that made him sore; and he knew so much about the dead

languages, which was what he was hired to teach, that he forgot he was

handling live boys, and as he couldn't tell it all to them in the

regular time, he kept them after hours, and that made them sore and put

Stan out of a job again. The last I heard of him he was writing articles

on Why Young Men Fail, and making a success of it, because failing was

the one subject on which he was practical.

I simply mention Stan in passing as an example of the fact that it isn't

so much knowing a whole lot, as knowing a little and how to use it that

counts.

Your affectionate father,

JOHN GRAHAM.

+----------------------------+

| No. 2 |

+----------------------------+

| From John Graham, at |

| the Union Stock Yards |

| in Chicago, to his son, |

| Pierrepont, at Harvard |

| University. |

| |

| Mr. Pierrepont's expense |

| account has just passed |

| under his father's eye, |

| and has furnished him |

| with a text for some |

| plain particularities. |

+----------------------------+

Letters from a Self-Made Merchant to His Son Being the Letters written by John Graham, Head of the House of Graham & Company, Pork-Packers in Chicago, familiarly known on 'Change as "Old Gorgon Graham," to his Son, Pierrepont, facetiously known to his intimates as "Piggy." · 第 5 / 63 题