No further statement need be made to show that the charges of

American express companies are prohibitively excessive, and such

as to disqualify this service as a national economic agency. The

instances given represent merchandise carried by passenger trains

in all instances, and while higher charges for both the express and

freight tonnage in America are justified by the longer haul, there is

no necessary economic reason for a higher ratio of express charges

to freight charges. The presence of the “express company” is the

only circumstance distinguishing express transportation here from

that of the instances cited. In those the “express company” has no

part; the work is done exclusively by the railways. As we shall see

later, the deficiencies of the express companies are constitutional,

not gratuitous merely, and are such as can not be remedied through

corporate agencies.

_Inadequacy of Various Proposals--Regulation_

We have seen that the present express fails to reach the farm, in

itself a fundamental objection to its adequacy. It may be suggested

that where its high charges are such as to inhibit the traffic, they

might be corrected by appeals for reductions to the Interstate Commerce

Commission. A glance at the express report for 1909, it is true, will

show that the profits of the companies are clearly out of normal

proportion to the investment. But it will also show that such profits

amount to but 8.44 per cent of the gross receipts, i. e., to only 8.44

per cent of the rates charged. So that even if all the profits were

taken away, the modified rates would show but a wholly inadequate

reduction; so that the desired relief could not thus be obtained. As a

matter of course, no such reduction would even be asked. No one would

wish that they conduct the business without a profit. But in practice

even when the justification for a reduction is present, and the power

and purpose active, the regulating board will always hesitate to even

substantially reduce a rate in the fear of unduly trenching on private

rights.

It was this principle which Bismarck had in mind when in connection

with a similar subject he spoke of--

The attempts to bring about reform by (regulatory) laws have

shown the futility of hoping for a satisfactory improvement

through legal (regulatory) measures, without trenching

materially on established rights and interests. (Parsons, The

Railways and the People, p. 318.)

With a margin of but 8 per cent of the rate to work on, the board would

feel this constraint in a marked way; for under substantially reduced

rates a very slight perturbation of the customary traffic might place

in danger the whole net return. Substantial relief in the way of

regulation is thus shown to be wholly impracticable.

_Various Parcels-Post Schemes_

There remains to discuss the numerous proposals for limited carriage of

parcels up to 11 pounds, and so forth, by the postal department. These

all concern the present railway status quo of the post office. It is

apparent that such proposals can only result in two things--the express

companies taking the major portion of the short-haul, profitable

traffic and the postal department getting the long-haul and losing

traffic. But there is another fact recently disclosed by the express

report--a fact rendering any of these proposals, so far as they involve

railway transportation, wholly untenable.

The Post Office Department pays an average of 4 (4.06) cents per pound

to the railways for carrying the mail, excluding equipment.

The express companies pay an average of three-quarters (0.74) of a cent

per pound for carriage of express matter, excluding equipment.

It is manifest that not even the government could render substantial

service under conditions so utterly unequal. It could not pay--what

we shall see when we come to consider the length of the express and

the mail hauls amounts to--about three times as much as the express

companies pay to the railways for carrying its parcels. One is mail

service, which is naturally more costly; the other more closely

resembles a fast freight service, which lies midway between the mail

and the freight in the weight cost of railway movement.

Other difficulties in such proposals, based on the status quo of the

post office, need only be suggested:

(_a_) The government would have to install urban delivery wagons at a

cost its traffic might not justify.

(_b_) The express companies still in the field, the wastes of service

would merely be increased by the entrance of the Postal Department, and

the people would have to pay it all.

(_c_) The government, being a moral agent with the inelastic rate

proposed, would be at the mercy of its unrestrained competitors.

(_d_) The express companies’ contracts with the railways permit them

to reduce their compensation to the railways to the point of 150 per

cent of the freight rate--i. e., from the present ratio of about 8

(7.80) to 1 of the freight rate to about 1½. Of course, they could not

go to this extreme without destroying their own profits, but their

contracts permit them to go as far as they might wish. Thus, while the

government in the beginning might have to pay about three times as much

to the railways for its parcels per pound, in a struggle the express

companies could exaggerate this disparity to any point they wished for

the purpose of destroying the postal department as a competitor.

_Essential Elements of an Adequate System_

For the sake of brevity we state these elements categorically:

(_a_) Fast service.

(_b_) Greatest economically feasible extension of delivery and collect

service, necessitating coordination with both urban and rural free

delivery systems.

(_c_) Express railway contracts to secure the relatively low railway

rates.

(_d_) Cheap capital charges.

(_e_) Reliable public-service motive.

(_f_) Economies of single organization, in which all existing

serviceable plants should be merged.

With regard to the element of fast service, discussion is unnecessary.

It is now commonly rendered by the railways for the express companies

in connection with the passenger service. It seems worthy of

suggestion, however, that a single organization like the post office

might on the strong lines of traffic, where carload lots might be

regularly obtainable, employ for certain kinds of matter the fast

freight service, profiting enough on the carload rate reductions to

fully cover the expense of delivery and collection, the regular railway

100-pound charges to be paid to the postal express by the shipper. It

is further suggested that in this way agricultural products might be

received through the rural free delivery in small allotments from

the truck gardeners and farmers, consolidated into carload lots and

conveyed on the trunk lines to the branch lines and distributed over

the branches to destination by passenger trains. The Prussians do,

in fact, have this latter service, for which the charge is based on

a tariff of twice the freight rate, the regular service by passenger

train calling for a charge of four times the freight rate. The railways

would now perform such service if, of course, the collect service

existed to gather the shipments from the country and assemble them.

It is obvious that the element most wanting is the service described

as “collect and delivery,” necessary between consignor and railway at

the beginning and railway and consignee at the conclusion of the act of

transportation. Our country is utterly deficient in this respect as to

the “country” or farming population. In towns of about 3,000 or 4,000

population up the present express companies do render this service

for such traffic as their rates permit to move; but what is required

is a service as extensive as the postal agency, which reaches cities,

towns, and country with the degrees of efficiency of the urban and

rural deliveries, conceded to far excel such delivery as the express

companies give.

There can be no doubt that with regard to this collect and delivery the

postal department is the only agency to which we can look for a service

sufficiently extensive to be really efficient. It only remains to

observe that with regard to the farming part of the country the service

already exists in the form of rural free delivery, equipped and paid

for, and actually waiting with empty wagons to receive and execute the

work.

_Advantages of Postal Express_

In three years under a postal administration it is believed that the

reformed system will produce:

(a) A minimum charge of 7 cents for the first pound, graduated to 17

cents for a 11-pound package, for average distances.

(b) General reductions of about 28 per cent in all merchandise charges.

(c) The extension of the service to the out-of-town and agricultural

population.

(d) The elevation of the employees to the plane of the postal service.

(e) The coordination of country supply of the vital necessaries with

urban demand by a cheap and regular collect and delivery service.

(f) As a result, a greater attractiveness in rural life and improved

highways.

(g) In 10 years’ time, with the development of the traffic, a reduction

of rates to about one-half of the present rates.

It is as difficult to describe in detail the manifold economic

and social results of a great agency like this as to give a bill

of particulars of the benefits of the postal system. And in this

connection it seems not irrelevant to suggest that a proper

coordination of the railway mail with the railway express service may

indeed render penny postage feasible. As things are now the rural

free-delivery agency does not bring a direct fiscal return to pay

for itself. In a few years, as the traffic develops in parcels and

agricultural products, the proposed system would enable it to do so.

This would assure a considerable financial gift to the account of penny

postage.

_The Agricultural Post_

In the present state of things the truck farmer must devote a large

part of his time to marketing; that is, to the transportation of his

product, however little it may be, to the place of demand. He must

also for this purpose provide himself with transportation facilities,

however small his business. These involve a horse, and its maintenance

and care, and a barn; and the expense of both during the unproductive

seasons. And yet in a socio-economic sense his work and expense of

transportation is the smallest element in his service to the public,

although it requires the maximum of upkeep work and expense, if not

of capital. The proposed postal collect and delivery eliminates all

these, and would enable the truck farmer to enter into the business on

a minimum of capital, and pursue it on a minimum of labor and expense.

The field service of a horse he could hire as occasion might require.

Thus the truck-farming industry would receive a necessary impetus and

the cost of such foods be greatly reduced to the consumer, saying

nothing of the advantage in quality coming from a speedier forwarding

to the market by daily allotments instead of the delays now incurred to

garner a worth-while load.

This application of postal express, with its thoroughly articulated

service and regular schedules, may be taken as illustrative of the

close relations which may be established between the rural producer and

town consumer, as well as between producers and merchants generally.

It is manifestly unfair to the proposition to judge its social value

on a mere computation of the savings in rates which may be made. While

this saving would amount to some $35,000,000 a year on the traffic of

1909, and from seventy to a hundred millions a year when the traffic

reaches its normal dimensions, yet as large benefits will follow in

clearing the prohibitive rate clogs from this necessary conduit of

commerce that it may freely discharge its normal output, in placing the

50,000 express employees on a postal basis, in rendering it easier to

engage in and market food production, to relieve the towns and cities

of high prices for necessaries of life, and relieve them, too, of the

overplus of labor, and, perhaps, too, in aiding in reversing that

tendency of population movement from the country to urban centers to

which is due the most aggravated and most discouraging social problems

of our time.

Hearings before the Committee on the Post-Office and Post-Roads. April

20-29, 1910. pp. 296-7.

Postal Savings Bank and Parcels Post.

Letter of Dr. Barth.

Whilst the postal savings-banks system became firmly established

some time ago in Belgium, France, Great Britain, Italy, Holland,

Austro-Hungary, Russia, and Sweden, all efforts have failed to

introduce the system into the German Empire. In the year 1885 the

draft of a postal savings-bank law was laid before the Reichstag. The

draft never came out of the committee. The principal reason of this

opposition lay in the competitive interest of the many local savings

banks existing in Germany, which are generally under the control of

commercial boards of directors. Since the frustration of the plans for

the law in the year 1885 no further serious efforts have been made to

introduce postal savings banks.

All the greater has been the development of the parcels-post traffic

with us. This traffic dates in Prussia back to the eighteenth century.

Under Frederick William I there already had been introduced a postal

monopoly (the exclusive right of the mail to forward packages) for

packages up to 20 pounds. Under Frederick the Great this monopoly was

increased to 40 pounds. By a postal law of June 5, 1852, it was again

reduced to 20 pounds, and only entirely abolished by the law of March

20, 1860. This postal monopoly has never been revived in Germany;

nevertheless, the parcel postal traffic has developed tremendously

without the protection of a monopoly. In Germany the weight for postal

parcels has now been set at 50 kilograms (110 3-10 pounds); while, as

is well known, there has also existed since 1885 European international

parcels-post traffic with a maximum weight limit of 5 kilograms (about

11 pounds). Only very few articles within the aforementioned weight

limits are excluded from the postal traffic. Even live singing birds,

fish, crabs, fresh flowers, grapes, etc., are sent by us in postal

parcels. The parcels-post service in Berlin employs about 1,000

officials. The rate within the postal territories of Germany and

Austro-Hungary is 25 pfennigs (6 cents) for packages up to 5 kilograms

(about 11 pounds) in weight and 10 geographical miles in distance: at

50 pfennigs (12 cents) for further distances. With heavier parcels the

rate increases rapidly for every kilogram (2½ pounds) in excess of 11

pounds with the growing distance, so that, for instance, at a distance

of 150 geographical miles every kilogram over 5 costs 50 pfennigs (12

cents) more. This rate proves that the post lays its principal stress

on receiving parcels up to 5 kilograms (11 pounds) in weight.

The parcels-post traffic in 10-pound packages is therefore the normal

one. For many trades and producing branches a very strong direct

traffic between the producer and the consumer has grown up in these

10-pound packages, and many articles which in the locality in which

they were produced were either not utilizable, or forced to sale at

a very low figure, have found a market which without the cheap 50

pfennig (12 cents) postage they would never have attained. Mushrooms

gathered in the forests of Masuren near the Russian frontier come to

Berlin in postal parcels. Large crabs caught in the waters of western

Prussia come even to Paris. We ourselves, for example, obtain for our

household through the parcels post meat from Silesia, butter from

eastern Prussia, eggs from Mecklenburg, melons from Hungary, etc. For

the household this is not only cheaper but also more convenient than

the purchase in the market halls, for the post brings the parcels

(for delivery sum of 15 pfennigs; 3½ cents) to the door, also calls

for parcels, cashes in the amount in c. o. d. deliveries, in short,

makes it extremely convenient for the order. It is clear that this

postal traffic forced out many middlemen; the retailers especially in

small places have been made to feel very keenly the competition of

the large forwarding houses in the capital cities. Their complaints

therefore were formerly directed very actively against the cheap

parcels postage. But since the flat land in turn could derive benefits

for its agricultural products, such as fruits, meats, butter, eggs,

etc., from these self-same cheap rates, the complaints of the retailers

became silenced after awhile as far as the question refers to the

cheap parcels rates. They now turn so much the livelier against large

warehouses and forwarding businesses for whom one is seeking through

all sorts of lawful tricks to make the competition more difficult.

The parcels-post traffic has meanwhile become so firmly rooted that

it seems impossible to upset it. Considered from a politic-economic

viewpoint it presents itself as a most important and very beneficent

branch of the whole system transport.

Following the German example in the United States would, I believe,

be of enormous advantage, particularly for the agricultural districts

surrounding the large cities. For the producer of eggs, poultry,

butter, vegetables, fruits there would develop, with a cheap

parcels-post rate, entirely new market possibilities; also the

decentralization of many branches of industry would to a certain degree

become a possibility.

Monthly Consular and Trade Reports. No. 329. pp. 104-6. February, 1908.

German Parcels Post.

Consul W. T. Fee, of Bremen, states that the parcels post system of

Germany, as well as most of the railroads, is owned by and is under the

control and operation of the Imperial government. He adds:

The express companies in Germany are less developed than those in the

United States, where the largest part of parcels forwarded are handled

by these companies. Under the German parcel-post system, parcels are

divided into five classes namely: (1) Parcels with value declared; (2)

registered parcels; (3) common parcels, value neither declared nor

registered; (4) collect-on-delivery parcels; and (5) urgent parcels.

Each shipment of parcels must be accompanied by a waybill called

“packet addressee”; and no more than three packages which must be of

the same class, and which must bear the same address, are to be entered

on one waybill. Each c. o. d. or urgent package, however, must have its

own waybill.

Forms of waybills, with the respective postage stamp of the amount

of the charge printed thereon, are furnished by the postoffices at

the price of the postage charge, while waybills, without this stamps

imprint, are sold by the postoffices at the price of 1.19 cents for

five pieces. Forms of waybills, which are purchased from other sources,

must conform in every respect with those furnished by the postoffice

department. There are two different kinds of waybills in use, foreign

and domestic.

At times of increased postal traffic, before Easter, Whitsuntide

and Christmas, a waybill for each package is required. The prices

charged by the postoffice for forwarding parcels vary according to the

weight of the packages and distance. The fees charged are shown in the

following statement:

For distance up to-- over

46 92 230 461 702

miles miles miles miles miles

For parcels weighing up to--

cents

11 pounds 5.9 11.9 11.9 11.9 11.9

15.4 pounds 7.1 14.2 16.6 19.0 23.8

17.6 pounds 8.3 16.6 21.4 26.18 35.7

19.8 pounds 10.7 21.4 30.9 40.4 59.5

22 pounds 11.9 23.8 35.7 47.6 71.4

additional 2.2 pounds 1.1 2.38 4.76 7.1 11.9

The maximum weight for parcels to be forwarded by post is 110 pounds.

For registered packages an additional fee of 4.76 cents is charged,

while the insurance fee for packages with declared value is 1.19 cents

for each $71.40 or fraction thereof. For “not-prepaid” parcels up to

11 pounds a collection fee of 2.38 cents is levied. Besides this, in

places where there is delivery to the house, an extra fee of 3.5 cents

is charged for packages weighing up to 11 pounds.

Packages may be sent c. o. d. in the German Empire if the amount to be

collected does not exceed $190.40. These c. o. d. packages, if payment

is not made at presentation, will be held for seven days. Meanwhile

another request will be made on the consignee to pay the amount

charged, and then if payment is refused the package is returned to the

consignor. The fee charged for c. o. d. packages in addition to the

ordinary postage is 2.38 cents, and the fee for the postal money order,

by means of which the amount collected is returned to the consignor is

charged. The charges for these money orders for amounts not exceeding

$1.19 are 2.38 cents; not to exceed $23.80, 4.76 cents; $47.60, 7.14

cents; $95.20, 9.52 cents; $142.80, 11.9 cents; and $190.40, 14.28.

Printed matter, samples without value, newspapers and business cards do

not come under the heading of parcels or packages, different rates of

postage and also different limits of weight and measure being provided

for these classes.

In case of loss the postoffice refunds for common packages at the

maximum rate of 71.4 cents per 1.1 pounds, and for a registered package

at least $10.

Parcels are handled by the postoffice entirely separate from letters

and other mail matter. A request may be sent to the postoffice on an

unfranked postal card to call for a package, whereupon the parcelpost

wagon will call at the place designated in the request. An extra charge

of 2.38 cents is made for this service, regardless of the size or

weight of the package.

Under ordinary circumstances, a package sent from Bremen to Munich,

Bavaria, a distance of 470 miles, thus crossing Germany from north

to south, will be delivered on the evening of the second or on the

morning of the third day. If it weighs up to 11 pounds, it will cost

11.9 cents. If it is a c. o. d. package for $142.80 it will cost 11.9

cents for postage, 2.38 cents for collection fee, 11.9 cents for return

money order, and 1.19 cents for delivery charge for the money order, in

all 27.37 cents. The same package could be sent at the same rate from

Bremen to Königsberg, a distance of 579 miles.

There is no restriction as to the size of the packages to be shipped

within the German Empire, as long as they are not cumbersome, but the

size of packages to foreign countries, as a rule, must not exceed 23.6

inches in each dimension. Exceptions from this rule are made for goods

like umbrellas, canes, charts, furs, plants, etc., which may measure

39.37 inches in length, if they do not exceed 7.87 inches in breadth

and height. Besides this there is a space limit of 25 cubic decimeters

(1 cubic decimeter = .035 cubic foot) for packages destined for

Algiers, Tunis, Santo Domingo, and the French colonies, and 20 cubic

decimeters for packages to Bolivia, Brazil, and Canada, while packages

for Great Britain and nearly all its colonies may measure one meter in

each dimension, with a space limit of 54 cubic decimeters. Packages to

foreign countries, exceeding the before-mentioned limit in weight and

measurement, may be shipped as “postal freight.” The rates for such

shipments, however, vary too much to be quoted here, and they are, in

most instances, subject to contracts of the postoffice department with

prominent forwarding agents.

For packages to the United States--that is New York, Jersey City,

and Hoboken--the charges are from 30 cents for 2.2 pounds up to 64

cents for 11 pounds. To all other places in the United States, Alaska

excepted, the rates are 55 cents for 2.2 pounds up to 88 cents for 11

pounds.

According to a postal treaty between the United States and Germany,

which is in force since October 1, 1907, packages, which for any reason

cannot be delivered will not be returned after a period of thirty days,

as heretofore, but the consignor will be informed of this fact by the

postoffice in order to give him a chance to dispose of the package in

some other way. If the consignor has not disposed of the package within

two months it will be returned to him as undeliverable.

Selected Articles on the Parcels Post · 第 4 / 13 段