LETTER LXXXIX.

Vienna.

So the fate of poor —— is finally decided, and he now finds, that to

be ruined is not a matter of so much indifference as he once imagined.

I neither see the possibility of his extricating himself from his

present difficulties, nor in what manner he will be able to support

them. Accustomed to every luxuriant indulgence, how can he bear the

inconveniencies of poverty?—Dissipated and inattentive from his

childhood, how can he make any exertion for himself?—His good-humour,

genteel figure, and pliant disposition, made him well received by

all.—While he formed no expectations from their friendship, his company

seemed particularly acceptable to some who are at present in power:

Whether it will be equally so now, when he has nothing else to depend

on, is to be tried. And I really think it as well for him that it be

tried now, as five or six years hence.

This calamity has been long foreseen.—There seemed to be almost a

necessity that it should happen sooner or later; for he had neither

caution, plan, nor object in his gaming.—He continued it from habit

alone. Of all mankind, he was the least covetous of excessive wealth;

and exclusive of gaming, he always lived within his income, not from a

desire of saving money, but merely because he had no taste for great

expence.—How often have we seen him lose immense sums to those who could

never have paid the half, had he happened to win it; and to some of whom

he had lent the money which enabled them to stake against him?

There are many careless young men of great fortunes, who game in the same

style, and from no other motives than those of our unhappy friend.—What

is the consequence?—The money circulates for a while among them, but

remains finally with persons of a very different character.—I shall not

suppose that any of the very fortunate gamesters we have been acquainted

with, have used those means to correct fortune which are generally

reckoned fraudulent. I am fully persuaded, they are seldomer practised in

the clubs in London, than in any other gaming societies in the world.—Let

all slight of hand, and every species of downright sharping, be put out

of the question; but still we may suppose, that among a great number

of careless inattentive people of fortune, a few wary, cool and shrewd

men are mingled, who know how to conceal real caution and design under

apparent inattention and gaiety of manner;—who have a perfect command

of themselves, push their luck when fortune smiles, and refrain when she

changes her disposition;—who have calculated the chances, and understand

every game where judgment is required.

If there are such men, is not the probability of winning infinitely in

their favour?—Does it not amount to almost as great a certainty, as if

they had actually loaded the dice or packed the cards?—I know you live in

the habit of intimacy with some who answer to the above description; and

I have heard you say, that however fortunate they may have been, you were

fully convinced that nothing can be fairer than their manner of playing.

I accuse them of taking no other advantages than those above mentioned;

but I appeal to your own experience,—pray recollect, and I am greatly

mistaken, if you will not find, that by far the greater part of those

who have made fortunes by play, and have kept them when made, are men of

cool, cautious, shrewd, and selfish characters.

If any of these very fortunate people were brought to a trial, and

examined by what means they had accumulated such sums, while so many

others had entirely lost, or greatly impaired their fortunes (if the

word esprit be allowed to imply that artful superiority which belongs to

their characters), they might answer in the words of the wife of Concini

Marechal d’Ancre, when she was asked what charm she had made use of to

fascinate the mind of the Queen?—De l’ascendant, she replied, qu’un

esprit superieur a toujours sur des esprits foibles.—Certainly there can

be no greater weakness, than for a man of independent fortune to game

in such a manner as to risk losing it, for the chance of doubling or

tripling his income: because the additional happiness arising from any

supposable addition of wealth, can never be within a thousand degrees so

great, as the misery which would be the consequence of his being stripped

of his original fortune.

This consideration alone, one would imagine, might be sufficient to deter

any reasonable man from a conduct so weak and absurd: yet there are other

considerations which give much additional weight to the argument;—the

dismal effects which the continued practice of gaming has sometimes

been observed to produce in the disposition of the mind, and the most

essential parts of the character, destroying every idea of œconomy,

engrossing the whole time, undermining the best principles, perverting

the qualities of the heart, rendering men callous to the ruin of

acquaintances, and partakers, with a savage insensibility, in the spoils

of their unwary friends.

The peculiar instances with which you and I are acquainted, where the

long-continued habit of deep play has had no such effects, are proofs of

the rooted honour and integrity of certain individuals, and may serve as

exceptions to a general rule, but cannot be urged as arguments against

the usual tendency of gaming. If men of fortune and character adopted

the practice of gaming upon any principle of reasoning, there might be

a greater probability of their being reasoned out of it: but most of

them begin to game, not with any view or fixed plan of increasing their

wealth, but merely as a fashionable amusement, or perhaps by way of

showing the liberality of their spirit, and their contempt for money.

I would not be very positive, that some of them have not mistaken for

admiration that surprise which is expressed when any person has lost an

immense sum. And this mistake may have given them less repugnance to the

idea of becoming the objects of admiration in the same day. Afterwards

endeavouring to win back what they had so idly lost, the habit has

grown by degrees, and at length has become their sole resource from the

weariness which those born to great fortunes, and who have not early

in life acquired some faculty of amusing themselves, are more prone to

fall into than others. Men born to no such expectations, whatever their

natural dispositions may be, are continually roused from indolence by

avocations which admit of no delay. The pursuit of that independence, for

which almost every human bosom sighs, and whose value is unknown only

to those who have always possessed it, is thought a necessary, and is

often sound, an agreeable employment to the generality of mankind. This,

with the other duties of life, is sufficient to engross their time and

thoughts, and guard them from _the pains and penalties of idleness_.

As the pursuit of wealth is superfluous in men of rank and fortune, so it

would be unbecoming their situation. Being deprived of this, which is so

great an object and resource to the rest of mankind, they stand in more

need of something to supply its place. I know of nothing which can so

completely, and with so much propriety, have this effect, as a taste for

letters and love of science. I therefore think these are more essentially

necessary to the happiness of people of high rank and great fortune, than

to those in confined circumstances.

If independence be desired with universal ardour by mankind, the road

of science is neither the most certain, nor the shortest way to attain

it. But those who are already in possession of this, have infinite need

of the other to teach them to enjoy their independence with dignity and

satisfaction, and to prevent the gifts of fortune from becoming sources

of misery instead of happiness. If they are ambitious, the cultivation

of letters, by adorning their minds, and enlarging their faculties, will

facilitate their plans, and render them more fit for the high situations

to which they aspire. If they are devoid of ambition, they have still

more occasion for some of the pursuits of science, as resources against

the languor of retired or inactive life.—Quod si non hic tantus fructus

ostenderetur, et si ex his studiis delectatio sola peteretur; tamen,

ut opinor, hanc animi remissionem, humanissimam ac liberalissimam

judicaretis.

This love of letters considered merely as an amusement, and to fill up

agreeably the vacant hours of life, I believe to be more essentially

necessary to men of great fortune than to those who have none;—to men

without ambition, than to those who are animated by that active passion;

and to the generality of Englishmen more than to the natives of either

Germany or France.—The Germans require very little variety. They can

bear the languid uniformity of life always with patience, and often with

satisfaction. They display an equanimity under disgust that is quite

astonishing.—The French, though not so celebrated for patience, are of

all mankind the least liable to despondence. Public affairs, so apt to

disturb the repose of many worshipful citizens of London, never give a

Frenchman uneasiness. If the arms of France are successful, he rejoices

with all his heart;—if they are unfortunate, he laughs at the commanders

with all his soul. If his mistress is kind, he celebrates her goodness

and commends her taste;—if she is cruel, he derides her folly in the

arms of another.

No people ever were so fond of amusement, and so easily amused. It seems

to be the chief object of their lives, and they contrive to draw it

from a thousand sources, in which no other people ever thought it could

be found. I do not know where I met with the following lines; they are

natural and easy, and seem expressive of the conduct and sentiments of

the whole French nation.

M’amuser n’importe comment,

Fait toute ma philosophie.

Je crois ne perdre aucun moment

Hors le moment où je m’ennuie;

Et je tiens ma tâche finie,

Pourvu qu’ainsi tout doucement;

Je me defasse de la vie.

Our countrymen who have applied to letters, have prosecuted every branch

of science as successfully as any of their neighbours. But those of

them who study mere amusement, independent of literature of any kind,

certainly have not been so happy in their researches as the French. Many

things which entertain the latter, seem frivolous and insipid to the

former. The English view objects through a darker medium. Less touched

than their neighbours with the gaieties, they are more affected by the

vexations of life, under which they are too ready to despond. They feel

their spirits flag with the repetition of scenes which at first were

thought agreeable. This stagnation of animal spirits, from whatever cause

it arises, becomes itself a cause of desperate resolutions, and debating

habits.

A man of fortune, therefore, who can acquire such a relish for science,

as will make him rank its pursuits among his amusements; has thereby

made an acquisition of more importance to his happiness, than if he

had acquired another estate equal in value to his first. I am almost

convinced, that a taste of this kind is the only thing which can render

a man of fortune (especially if his fortune be very large) tolerably

independent and easy through life. Whichsoever of the roads of science

he loves to follow, his curiosity will continually be kept awake. An

inexhaustible variety of interesting objects will open to his view,—his

mind will be replenished with ideas,—and even when the pursuits of

ambition become insipid, he will still have antidotes against tædium, and

(other things being supposed equal) the best chance of passing agreeably

through life, that the uncertainty of human events allows to man.

A View of Society and Manners in France, Switzerland, and Germany, Vol. 2 (of 2) With Anecdotes Relating to Some Eminent Characters · 第 52 / 59 题