VI

Constance did not see her husband again for twenty-four hours. He

returned at supper-time and took his place at the table without a word

of apology or explanation. He was in a state of great depression,

morose and uncommunicative. On previous occasions when misfortune had

befallen him, he had taken his wife into his confidence, but now it

seemed either that he had lost his grip on life so completely that

words failed him, or that the resentment which he had expressed toward

her was still dominant. When the meal was over, he went out and did

not return until late. He was boozy with drink, and threw himself on

his bed with the air of a man who would fain dispel consciousness by

the luxury of sleep.

Emil's mode of life for the next few weeks was substantially a

repetition of this programme. Glum, sour, and listless he went his way

in the morning; fuddled, indifferent, and sleepy he returned at night.

Concerning his circumstances and plans he said nothing to Constance.

She was left totally in the dark as to the extent and the effect of his

reverses. He had told her that they were ruined, yet he continued to

go down-town as though nothing had happened. Trusting that he would

enlighten her of his own accord, at first she asked no questions. Then

as he did not speak, she requested him one morning to tell her how his

affairs stood, urging her solicitude and affection. He listened

frowningly and put her off with the disconcerting utterance "You'll

know soon enough. It's just as well to let a drowning man grasp at

straws while there are any to grasp at."

His half-scornful, half-desperate manner forbade further inquiry at the

moment if she did not wish to widen the breach between them. Constance

was in deep distress. She yearned to comfort and help him, but this

wifely, loving impulse was haunted by the consciousness now forced upon

her with painful clearness that she had misjudged his nature and was

mated to a crank. How otherwise could she interpret his hostile

attitude toward herself? To what but a cross-grained perversity of

soul could she ascribe his disposition to blame her for his

misfortunes? Her duty was plain, to make the best of the situation,

and to ignore, so far as self-respect would permit, his laceration of

her feelings, trusting to time to restore his sense of justice and

renew concord between them. But what hope was there for the future?

Hope for the realization of that blissful, ennobling married state to

which she had looked forward as a bride and had believed in store for

her? Here was the thought which tormented her and gave poignancy to

the dismay and anxiety of the moment. Even if their immediate

circumstances were less serious than Emil had declared, was there any

reason to believe that his next experiment would be more successful?

She had accepted hitherto without question his declaration that

ill-luck had been responsible for all his troubles, but that

consolation was hers no longer. She found herself listening to the

voice of criticism to which until now she had turned a deaf ear. In a

new spirit, without bitterness, but in the assertion of her right as a

wife to judge the man to whom she had committed her happiness, she

recalled the incidents of their married life--his theories, arguments,

and point of view. He had declared her to blame for his misfortunes.

Surely if she had failed in her duty it had not been toward him. She

had sacrificed her opinions to his, and for his sake abnegated her most

precious predilections in order to make the union of their lives

sweeter and more complete. If she were guilty, was it not of treason

to her own instincts and her own conscience?

Emil indeed had persuaded himself not merely that fortune had betrayed

him, and the hand of the prosperous world was against him, but that his

wife was partly to blame for it. Looking back on his last fiasco, he

conjured up the circumstance that she had not fallen in with his

suggestion of an exodus to New York, and this he had promptly distorted

into a grievance, which grew the more he nursed it. To the notion that

she had thwarted him in everything and that their relations as husband

and wife had been wholly unsympathetic was only another step. It

suited him to feel that he was the injured party, for he was face to

face with the responsibility of supporting his family, which must be

met or avoided. The question of immediate funds was already pressing.

His last reverse had discouraged and angered him, but it had not

diminished his confidence that he would succeed in the right place. It

had only convinced him that Benham was not the right place; that Benham

was too small and provincial; too unappreciative of real ability. He

was unpleasantly in debt, but the bills which he had contracted for

political expenses could be disregarded for the present. He had no

property with which to meet them, and if he were pressed, he had merely

to go into insolvency in order to rid himself of them altogether. Nor

need he worry about the mortgage for the present. It would not be due

for two years, and, provided the interest were paid, they could not be

molested. These redeeming features of his plight were clear to him

after the first days of mental agitation, but his spirit did not

reassert its wonted elasticity. Analyzing the cause, he perceived that

his whole surroundings were repugnant to him, and that he shrank from

recommencing life at the foot of the ladder under the conditions in

which he found himself. He was determined to leave Benham, and he was

determined that his family, if they came with him, should toe the mark.

What this phrase meant precisely he did not formulate, but it suited

his mood. "Toe the mark." He kept repeating it to himself, as though

it promised relief from domestic insubordination. Yes, if his wife did

not choose to adopt his theories and abet him in his undertakings, she

could go her own way for all he cared. It was only on account of the

children that he did not put an end to their contract of marriage

to-morrow by leaving her. Except for them it were surely folly for a

man and woman whose ideas were utterly at variance to continue a

partnership the only fruit of which could be discord and

recriminations. So he argued, and it was only the thought of his

children which restrained him from precipitate action and caused him to

continue to go down-town every day seeking a bare livelihood. Since

the night of his defeat at the polls, Constance had not asked him for

money. Presumably she had some laid by, and was living on that, but by

the first of the month she must have recourse to him or starve, and

then would be the time for his ultimatum. The terms of this, beyond a

declaration of general discontent, were still hazy in his brain,

befogged by malt liquor and inflamed by hatred of the world, but a

glowing conviction that their marriage had been a failure through her

fault was a satisfactory substitute for definiteness. Brooding like a

spider in its web, secretive, hoping that something would turn up to

put him on his feet again, yet almost reckless in his attitude, and

drinking assiduously, he drifted on without aim. His evenings were

spent at his workingmen's club, where he continued as an outlet to his

feelings to deliver virulent philippics, which he realized as he

uttered them were a sorry equivalent for personal success.

While thus limp and embittered, a final mishap impelled Emil to action.

It happened that the broker on the same floor as the office where he

had desk-room, and with whom he was on familiar terms, let him in for a

disastrous tip and put the screws on when the market went the other

way. The sum involved was three hundred dollars, the total residue of

Emil's capital, which he had allowed to remain untouched with this

false friend in order not to be entirely without the means to

speculate. The advice offered had seemed to be friendly and

disinterested. When the result proved disastrous the victim promptly

suspected guile. Certainly he encountered a flinty demeanor, as though

the proprietor of the "bucket-shop" were cognizant of the impecuniosity

of his customer and had decided to squeeze him dry and break with him.

This from the man whose social status on the street he had championed

seemed to Emil rank ingratitude. Yet the broker was making no more

than ordinary business demands upon him. His margin was exhausted, and

the transaction would be closed unless he supplied additional security.

This was business-like, but not friendly, as it seemed to Emil,

especially as the ingrate, who had been so confident of the value of

the tip, chose now to be sphinx-like as to what the next day's price of

the stock would be. All he would vouchsafe was that it would go up

sooner or later.

Since it was necessary to act at once, and to sell meant the loss of

the remnant of his capital, Emil concluded to give himself a chance by

making use of five hundred dollars which had just been paid over to him

for a client in redemption of a mortgage. He argued that the stock,

having fallen in price contrary to expectation, was not likely to

decline further at once, and that if he protected his account, he would

be able to make inquiries and form a more intelligent opinion by the

end of a few days as to what he had best do. Besides, there was

lurking in his mind the bitter argument, which he chose to believe

sound, that the world owed every man a living, and assuredly owed it to

a man like himself. Since the hand of society seemed to be against

him, why should he not take advantage of the resources at his disposal

and save himself? He was simply borrowing; if he were not able to

return the money at once, he would do so later with interest. The

consequences of this performance were disastrous. As Emil had

predicted, the stock in question remained stationary for three days,

but by the end of them he felt no clearer regarding which course to

pursue. Estimates as to its value were contradictory; yet since a sale

at the market price meant the safety of the five hundred dollars at the

cost of his own financial obliteration, he remained hopeful. On the

fourth day the stock broke sharply, and again on the day after. His

holding was only one hundred shares--a paltry transaction from a

capitalistic point of view--yet it was rashness for him. Adversity and

his pressing needs had tempted him to disregard his meditated prudence

and to venture on thin ice. He perceived himself ruined and a

defaulter. The obliquity of his peculation was mitigated in his mind

by the conviction that fortune had been signally cruel to him. As for

the borrowed money, he would give his note and pay it presently when he

was on his feet again. Yet he appreciated that his opportunities for

making a living in Benham were at an end, and that if he remained, he

might find difficulty in inducing the owner of the five hundred dollars

to accept him as a creditor without demur. Clearly the simplest course

was to come to terms by post. To shake the dust of Benham from his

feet was his dearest wish, and the time had arrived for its fulfilment.

There was still one hundred dollars belonging to his client in his

hands which he had not used. This he drew to provide himself with

travelling expenses, arguing that the sooner he were able to reach New

York, the quicker the loan would be repaid, and slipped from the city

without a word to anyone. He had decided to cut adrift from all his

past associations, and an indispensable portion of his plan was to

sever forever his relations with his wife.

A week later he wrote this letter to her from New York:

Constance:

This is to let you know what has become of me. You may have

guessed the truth, but it's woman's way to worry, weep, and raise a

hue and cry, though she knows in her heart that she's mismated, and

that it would be a godsend to her if "hubby" had really blown his

brains out or were safely at the bottom of a well. I'm not dead

yet, nor am I contemplating suicide at present. Though if the time

ever does come when I think the game is played out, it will be

one-two-three-go! without any pause between the numbers. But I'm

as good as dead now, so far as you are concerned. You won't be

troubled by me further. You've seen the last of me. I told you I

was strapped. I'm cleaned out to the last dollar. But that

doesn't phaze me except for the moment. I'm going to make a fresh

start and a clean sweep at the same time. You know as well as I

that our marriage has not been a glittering success. In short,

we've made a mess of it. We thought we were suited to each other,

and we find we're not. That's all. I don't approve of you any

more than you do of me, and what's the use of making each other

miserable by protracting the relation until death do us part? It's

up to me to undo the Gordian-knot, and I've cut it.

You'll shed some tears, I suppose, over the situation, and your

friends will call me a brute. But when the shock is past and

sentimental considerations have evaporated, just ask yourself if

I'm not doing the sensible thing for us both. We don't look at

life in the same way and never will. I'm a radical, and you're a

conservative, and we were misled before marriage by the affinities

of flesh to suppose that oil and water would harmonize. From the

point of view of law I'm the offending party, and you'll be a free

woman to sue for divorce on the ground of desertion, by the end of

three years. In the meantime, you can go back to your kindergarten

work or whatever you see fit. You have your health, and your

philanthropic church friends will enable you to support yourself.

The only hitch is the children. If you had been ready to follow me

to New York when I first suggested it, we might not be separating

now. I expect and am anxious to provide for them. If you will

send them on to me, they shall want for nothing. But if you are

bent on keeping them, as I foresee may be the case, the

responsibility is yours. I should like one at least--preferably

the boy. If you insist on keeping them both, I can't help myself.

There's where you have the whip-hand over me. But don't delude

yourself with the notion that I don't love my own flesh and blood

because I'm not willing to live with their mother.

There will be no use in your coming on here or trying to find me.

I have made up my mind. We could never be happy together, so the

fewer words said about parting the better. Send your answer

regarding the children to the New York post-office. I shall expect

it for a week. The money you loaned me is gone with the rest, but

they can't turn you out of your house until the mortgage is due, if

you pay the interest. Some day I shall pay it back to you. I wish

you well, and consider I'm doing us both a service in cutting loose

from you.

Good-by, EMIL.

It seemed to Constance when she had finished this letter as though her

heart would stop. Was this reality? Could it be that her husband was

abandoning her and her children in cold blood, treating the sacred ties

of marriage as lightly as though they were straws? Alas! his cruel

words stared her in the face, freezing her soul, which had been sick

for days over his unexplained absence; sick from dread. Yes, she had

guessed; but she had put the horror from her as impossible, despite his

hints. Unbalanced and embittered as he was, he could not be so unkind.

Now she was face to face with certainty; there was no room for hope.

It was true; so cruelly inhumanly true that her brain felt dazed and

numb. She gazed at his writing stony-eyed and appalled, limp with

dismay and forlornness. To avoid falling she put out her hand to the

table, and the contact of her own flesh served to readjust her

consciousness. Seating herself she swept her fingers across her brow

to rally her senses, and read the letter again slowly. Then

mortification succeeded dismay, and resentment followed close on

mortification. The wounded pride of the wife, the indignation of the

mother protesting for her children asserted themselves, causing her to

flush to the roots of her hair and her pulses to tingle. Coward!

Unnatural father! What had she done to deserve this? What had they

done, helpless innocents? Give them up to him? Her children, now the

only joy of her life? Never. They could not both have them. Why

should he who had left them in the lurch have either? She could hear

their prattle in the adjoining room, poor little souls, unconscious of

their misery. Then her sense of wounded pride and her anger were

forgotten in the agony of a possible separation from her offspring, and

in the loss of her husband's love, and her tense nerves gave way. "Oh,

Emil, my husband, how could you?" she moaned, and burying her face in

her hands she let sorrow have full sway.

[Illustration: "Oh, Emil, my husband, how could you?" she moaned]

When she had dried her eyes she was prepared to face the situation and

to think more calmly. Certain points were now clear. Emil was right;

since he had ceased to love her, they could never be happy together.

So far as she could see, she had not been at fault, though he had

persuaded himself that she was to blame. She would never have left

him; but now that he had deserted her, she could dare to admit that

their souls were not in accord, and that her love and respect for him

had been waning in spite of herself for many months. She would not

attempt to follow him, and she desired to retain both the children.

Was it her duty to let Emil have one of them? Here was the only

harassing point in the plans for the future which she was formulating.

Would it be fair to the children to separate them? Would she be

justified in keeping them both, in view of the affection which their

father had professed for his own flesh and blood? As Emil had

declared, he and she had made a mess of their marriage, and they were

to separate. Was it fair to him to keep both the boy and the girl?

Ah, but she could not bear the thought of giving up either. She felt

the need of counsel. To whom could she turn? Who were her friends?

She thought of Mr. Prentiss, and she remembered her husband's taunt

concerning her philanthropic church friends with a sense of shrinking.

The church offered itself as a refuge to all in the hour of distress,

but it seemed to her as though she would rather starve than apply to

Mr. Prentiss. Not that she was afraid of starving. That side of the

situation had no terrors for her. She was almost glad at the idea of

supporting herself and her darlings, and she had entire confidence in

her ability to do so, even though she were forced to scrub floors. But

she yearned for the sympathy and advice of a friend. How lonely she

had suddenly become in this large, busy city! Emil had evinced little

desire, especially of late, to make friends in the neighborhood, and

she had been so absorbed in her home and her husband's interest that

she had disregarded her social opportunities. He had been apt to speak

slightingly of their acquaintances as people whom he would soon

outstrip in the struggle of life. And now she was the poorest of the

poor, the saddest of the sad, one of the lowly common people for whom

her doctor father's heart had ever cherished fond and patient sympathy.

She was one of them now herself. How different had been her dreams and

her ambition. To think that she, Constance Forbes, had come to this--a

wife abandoned by her husband, alone and friendless, with only the

semblance of a roof to shelter her and her children. But all this was

nothing if only she need not part with either of her babies. She would

be able to support them, never fear, and with them to support she could

be brave, even happy. But without them? No, no, Emil had forsaken

her, she had lost her faith in him, he was not worthy of the sacrifice;

she dared not trust him; he had no right to either. She could not, she

would not let either go.

When the morning came she was more firmly of the same opinion, and she

composed this reply to her husband:

Emil:

I have your letter and my heart is filled with sorrow. I cannot

compel you to live with me against your will. God knows I have

tried to be a loving, dutiful, and sympathetic wife, but it seems I

have failed to please you. It is true that our ideas of how to

live and what is right are very different. I have been aware of

that in my secret soul, but for your sake I did my best to adopt

your point of view. Now I shall be free to follow my own. Since

you no longer love me, I am not sorry that we are to live apart,

for I can see now that I have suffered much on your account. But I

do not choose to reproach you. What good would it do? Besides you

are the father of my children--poor little things. I do not think

that I should have written to you at all if it were not for the

question what is to become of them.

I am trying to do what is best for them and to be just; just to you

and to myself. I have decided to keep both the children. They are

babies still, and need a mother's love. A father's too, but it

seems they cannot have both. Let God judge between us, Emil. They

are my flesh and blood too, and it is you who are forsaking us, not

we you. As you say, I have my health and we shall not starve. I

am not afraid. There is nothing more to say, is there? It has all

been a dreadful mistake--and we thought we should be so happy.

Good-by. In spite of everything I shall always think of you kindly.

The Undercurrent · 第 13 / 51 题