He was interrupted by Slater—

“O, that’s all one, sir! Fit the cap on the right head. The answer’s

‘Protection,’ isn’t it? I ought to know, as I wrote, and am writing,

the stuff.”

“_You_, sir!”

All eyes were turned upon the beastly little genius, as he stood

ruffling with greed and arrogance, and thence to the sofa.

“O, shut up!” said Sweeting feebly. “It was only a joke. I paid him,

handsome I did, to let me have the kudos and letters and things. He’d

the best of the bargain by a long chalk.”

“He-he!” screeched Slater. “Why, you fool, did you think merit earned

such recognition in this suffering world? Hope you enjoyed reading

’em, Sweet, as I did writing ’em.” He turned, half-cringing,

half-defiant, upon the guest. “I’m the author of the ‘Love-Letters,’

sir—honour bright, I am; and I wrote every one of the testimonials,

too, that that ass sets such store by. You’ll take those into

consideration, I hope.”

“I shall, sir,” thundered the other—“in my estimate of a fool and his

decoy.”

He blazed round and snatched up his hat.

“Make way, gentlemen!” he roared, and strode for the door.

A slip of pasteboard fluttered from his hand to the carpet; he flung

wide the portal, banged it to behind him, and was gone.

Some one, in a sort of spasmodic torpor, picked up the card, and

immediately uttered a gasping exclamation. We all crowded round him,

and, reading the superscription at which he was pointing, “Mr.

Hannibal Withers, Momus Theatre,” exchanged dumbfounded glances.

“Why, of course,” stuttered a pallid youth; “it was Withers, Voules’s

pal; I reco’nize him now. He’s the Prime Minister’s double, you know,

and—and he’s been and goosed us.”

“What!” screamed Slater.

But I was off in a fit of hysterical laughter.

It was actually a fact. It is a mistake to suppose that your

professional scandal-monger is prepared to build except on a

substratum of truth. Voules had pricked the bubble as he had promised.

The bargain, it was admitted, had been struck—on Slater’s side for

such a consideration as would submerge him in champagne had he desired

it. He had written and sent the manuscripts to Sweeting, who had had

them typed, and passed them on to the “Argonaut” as his own. But the

real author knew that his tenure was insecure so long as the other’s

colossal vanity was not ministered to. Hence the correspondence, in

which the little monster burlesqued his own lucubrations. It might all

have ended in a case of perpetual blackmail (Sweeting never could see

beyond the end of his own nose) had not the bait answered so instantly

to Voules’s calculations.

There was a bitter attack on the immorality of the stage in the next

number of the “Argonaut,” which subsequently had to compound with

Voules under threat of an action for libel. But Sweeting had his wish.

He was “somebody,” as never yet. Until he took his notoriety for a

long sea-voyage, he was more crushingly than any gentleman in the

“Dunciad” “damn’d to fame.”

Loaves and fishes · 第 58 / 70 题