CHAPTER 7.

LOGICAL DIVISION AND CLASSIFICATION.

=1. NATURE OF LOGICAL DIVISION.=

The term _genus_ is used for any class name which stands for two or

more subordinate classes while the term _species_ is made to stand for

any one of the subordinate classes.

The proximate genus of any species is the _next_ class above. For

example the proximate genus of man is biped, not animal.

_Logical division is the process of separating a proximate genus into

its co-ordinate species._

ILLUSTRATIONS:

_Genus_ _Species_

{ Fixed stars

{ Planets

(1) Heavenly bodies { Satellites

{ Comets

{ Meteors

{ Nebulae

{ Leptocardians

{ Fishes

(2) Vertebrates { Amphibians

{ Reptiles

{ Birds

{ Mammals

{ Caucasian

{ Mongolian

(3) Man { Malay

{ Ethiopian

{ American Indian

{ Monarchy

(4) Government { Aristocracy

{ Democracy

=2. LOGICAL DIVISION DISTINGUISHED FROM ENUMERATION.=

When the genus is separated at once into _individual objects_ the

process is not logical division, but simple enumeration. Logical

division implies a separating into smaller class terms, each term being

a genus of still smaller subdivisions. This process may be continued

till the last division gives individuals as species. Enumeration takes

place when the first subdivision results in a list of individuals. To

illustrate:

_Logical Division._

{ Science teacher

Teacher { Mathematics teacher

{ English teacher

{ Modern language teacher

_Enumeration._

{ John J. Brown

Teacher { H. G. White

{ Mary Jones

{ Alice Smith

=3. LOGICAL DIVISION AS PARTITION.=

_Partition is the process of separating an individual thing into its

parts._

The partition is quantitative or mathematical when the separation is

in terms of space or time, but when otherwise the partition becomes

qualitative or logical. Or to put it in another way, the partition

is mathematical when the separation gives parts and logical when the

separation gives ingredients.

To illustrate:

{ { branches

{ quantitative { leaves

{ or { roots

{ (mathematical) { trunk

(1) Tree {

{ qualitative { woody fibre

{ or { capillary attraction

{ (logical) { sap

{ { chlorophyll

{ quantitative { roof

{ or { frame-work

{ (mathematical) { foundation

(2) House {

{ qualitative { wood

{ or { iron

{ (logical) { stone

{ { plaster

An easy way to determine that the separation involves logical division

proper and not partition is to affirm the connection between a class

and a sub-class. To wit: A man is a biped; a square is a rectangle;

a Caucasian is a man, etc. If such an affirmation cannot be made then

the separation involved is not properly logical division but probably

partition. For example it cannot be said that a _roof is a house_, or

that _sap is a tree_. It is seen, then, that a logical division of any

genus may be summarized in the form of a series of judgments of which

a species is the subject and the genus is the predicate. For example,

by a logical division quadrilaterals may be divided into trapeziums,

trapezoids and parallelograms; this process may then be summarized in

a series of three judgments: (1) A trapezium is a quadrilateral; (2) A

trapezoid is a quadrilateral; (3) A parallelogram is a quadrilateral.

=4. RULES OF LOGICAL DIVISION.=

When the logical division of a genus is under consideration there are

four rules which should be observed.

FIRST RULE. _There must be but one principle of division (fundamentum

divisionis)._ To divide mankind into white man, Australian, yellow man,

African and red man is a violation of this rule as the _two_ principles

of color and geographical location are involved. A division in which

more than one principle is used is sometimes referred to as _cross

division_ because the various species cross each other. For example in

the foregoing there are many white men who are Australians.

This rule applies only to one division. Where there is a series

of divisions a new principle may be employed in each division. For

example, in dividing triangles into scalene, isosceles and equilateral,

the equality of sides is the principle involved, but, in subdividing

isosceles triangles into right angled and oblique angled, the principle

employed concerns the nature of the angle.

SECOND RULE. _The co-ordinate species must be mutually exclusive._

There must be no overlapping. The illustration given in the first

rule is likewise a violation of this rule. Another example in which

this second rule is not obeyed may be found in most geometries where

triangles are divided into scalene, isosceles and equilateral. Here

the second and third classes are not mutually exclusive since all

equilateral triangles are isosceles according to the usual definition,

“An isosceles triangle is a triangle having two equal sides.” All

equilateral triangles have _two_ equal sides.

THIRD RULE. _The division must be exhaustive._ That is, the species

taken together must equal the whole genus. The sum of the species must

be co-extensive with the genus.

Dividing man into Caucasian, Ethiopian and Mongolian would be a

violation of this rule, as there are at least two other species of man,

Malay and American Indian.

A distinction should be made between an exhaustive division and

a complete division as the latter is not a logical requirement.

To divide government into monarchy, aristocracy and democracy is

exhaustive but incomplete. Exhaustive because there is no other kind

of government, all the species are included; but incomplete in that

monarchy may be divided into absolute and limited; democracy into pure

and representative.

FOURTH RULE. _The division must proceed from the proximate genus to the

immediate species._ There should be no sudden jumps from a high genus

to a low species. The division must be gradual and continuous; step by

step. To divide government into limited monarchy, absolute monarchy,

pure democracy and representative democracy would be a violation of

this rule, as government is the proximate genus of monarchy, not of

limited monarchy, therefore one step has been omitted. Such an omission

involves a step from grandfather to grandchild, so to speak, the

generation of father having been left out.

A violation of this rule is most insidious when some of the species

of a subdivision are immediate while others are not. To wit: dividing

government into monarchy, aristocracy, pure democracy and republic,

or dividing quadrilaterals into trapeziums, trapezoids, rectangles,

squares, rhomboids and rhombs.

=5. DICHOTOMY.=

Dichotomy comes from the Greek, meaning _to cut in two_. _Dichotomy

is a continual division of a genus into two species which are

contradictory in nature._

Contradictory terms are such as admit of no middle ground. They divide

the whole universe of thought into two classes. For example, honest and

not-honest, pure and impure, perfect and imperfect, are contradictory

terms. Dichotomy thus affords an easy opportunity for an exhaustive

division as in the use of contradictories nothing in the universe need

be omitted.

An historical illustration of dichotomy is the “Tree of Porphyry” named

after Porphyrius, a Neo-Platonic philosopher of the third century.

_Tree of Porphyry._

Substance.

/ \

/ \

Corporeal Incorporeal

\

\

Body

/ \

/ \

Animate Inanimate

\

\

Living Being

/ \

/ \

Sensible Insensible

\

\

Animal

/ \

/ \

Rational Irrational

\

\

Man

/ | \

/ | \

/ | \

Socrates Plato Other Men

This kind of division is not altogether satisfactory as the negative

side is too indefinite. On the other hand, if both subdivisions

are made positive then there is danger of making the opposing terms

contrary rather than contradictory. This, of course, would be a

serious logical fallacy, as contrary terms admit of middle ground while

contradictory terms give no choice, it is either the one or the other.

The use of dichotomy becomes evident in situations where new

and unexpected discoveries may be made. Without disturbing the

classification the new species may be appended to the negative side

of the division. The following illustrates:

Vertebrates

┌───────┴──────────┐

│ │

Leptocardians Not-leptocardians

┌──────────┴───┐

│ │

Fish Not-fish

┌───────────┴────┐

│ │

Amphibians Not-amphibians

┌──────────────┴────┐

│ │

Reptiles Not-reptiles

┌────────────────┴───┐

│ │

Birds Not-birds

┌──────────────────┴──┐

│ │

Mammals Not-mammals

│

_The New Species_

=6. CLASSIFICATION――COMPARED WITH DIVISION.=

_Classification is the process of grouping notions according to their

resemblances or connections._

So far as results are concerned there is no difference between

logical division and classification. Both processes may give us the

same orderly scheme of heads and subheads. The difference lies in

the process itself. Division is _deductive_ in nature as it proceeds

from the more general genus to the less general species. While

classification is _inductive_ as it groups the less general species

under the more general genus. Division differentiates unity into

multiplicity, while classification reduces multiplicity to unity. It

follows that the one is the inverse of the other. The difference in the

mode of procedure may be illustrated by using the common classification

or division of triangles. For example:

Without any knowledge of the kinds of triangles the student discovers

by examining the various shapes of many triangles that there is a

group in which _none_ of the sides are equal. For the lack of a better

name he terms these non-equilateral (scalene). Further observation

discloses another group in which two of the sides are equal. These he

names bi-equilateral (isosceles). Finally a third group is designated

as tri-equilateral (equilateral). This process is classification.

Division would consist in separating the genus triangle into the three

kinds――scalene, isosceles, equilateral.

=7. KINDS OF CLASSIFICATION――ARTIFICIAL AND NATURAL.=

_An artificial classification is one in which the grouping is made on

the basis of some arbitrary connection._ Cataloguing alphabetically the

books in a library illustrates this kind of classification. Likewise

the arrangement of the names in a directory or a telephone book. The

connecting mark being the initial letter of the title or name. The

reason why Mills and Meyers are put in the same group is that both

names happen to commence with the letter _M_.

Artificial classifications are resorted to for some special purpose,

designed by man, not by nature. Consequently artificial classifications

are sometimes called _special_ or _working_ classifications.

_A natural classification is one in which the grouping is made on the

basis of some inherent mark of resemblance._

Classifications in animal and plant life are the best illustrations

of this kind. Such classifications are suggested by nature and not by

man, and may, therefore, be called _general_ or scientific. The main

aim of natural classification is to derive general truths and arrange

knowledge so that it may be easily remembered.

=8. TWO RULES OF CLASSIFICATION.=

The rules of logical division are applicable in the making of a logical

classification. In addition to these an artificial classification

should be made to conform to the one rule: _The classification must be

appropriate to the purpose in hand._ Likewise a natural classification

should be made to conform to the rule: _Every classification should

afford opportunity for the greatest possible number of general

assertions._

=9. USE OF DIVISION AND CLASSIFICATION IN THE SCHOOL ROOM.=

It has been stated that classification and division aim at the

same result. Classification reduces multiplicity to unity while

division differentiates unity into multiplicity. In short, division is

_deductive_ while classification is _inductive_ in mode of procedure.

Therefore, classification should be used in those situations which

call for induction and division in cases where deduction is the better

method.

Speaking generally, classification should be used with small children

when the essential thing is to present the concrete facts with a view

of leading the children to discover for themselves the truths contained

therein.

With older pupils division may be used, if the purpose is to set in

order facts which are already known.

=10. TOPICAL OUTLINE.=

LOGICAL DIVISION AND CLASSIFICATION.

(1) Nature of Logical Division.

Genus――species.

Illustrations.

(2) Logical Division Distinguished from Enumeration.

Illustrations.

(3) Logical Division and Partition.

Quantitative――qualitative.

How summarized.

(4) Four Rules of Logical Division.

(1) One principle――cross division.

(2) Mutually exclusive.

(3) Exhaustive――complete.

(4) Immediate species.

(5) Dichotomy.

Contradictory terms.

Tree of Porphyry.

Use illustrated.

(6) Classification Compared with Division.

(7) Kinds. Artificial――Natural.

(8) Two Rules of Classification.

(1) Appropriate.

(2) Afford many Assertions.

(9) Use of Division and Classification.

=11. SUMMARY.=

(1) Logical division is the process of separating a proximate genus

into its co-ordinate species.

(2) The first subdivision in a logical division gives class terms,

while the first subdivision in an enumeration gives individual objects.

(3) Partition is the process of separating an individual thing into

its parts. These parts may be either quantitative or qualitative.

A logical division of any genus may be summarized in a series of

judgments of which a species is the subject and the genus is the

predicate.

(4) The four rules of logical division are: the division must (1) be

based on one principle, (2) have species mutually exclusive, (3) be

exhaustive and (4) proceed from proximate genus to immediate species.

A violation of the first rule gives a cross division.

Exhaustive division is easily confused with a complete or finished

division.

(5) Dichotomy is a continual division of a genus into two species which

are contradictory in nature.

An historical illustration of dichotomy is the Tree of Porphyry.

Dichotomy is of service in the field of new and unexpected discoveries.

(6) Classification is the process of grouping notions according to

their resemblances or connections.

Classification is inductive in nature, division deductive.

Classification unifies, division differentiates.

(7) An artificial classification is made on the basis of some

arbitrary connection; a natural classification, on some inherent mark

of resemblance.

(8) The rules of logical division are applicable in any classification.

In addition to these a classification should (1) be appropriate and

(2) afford opportunity for the greatest possible number of assertions.

(9) Classification should be the mode of procedure in the lower grades,

division in the higher grades.

=12. REVIEW QUESTIONS.=

(1) Define and illustrate logical division.

(2) What is the meaning of proximate genus?

(3) How does logical division differ from enumeration? Illustrate.

(4) Distinguish between logical division, and physical division or

partition.

(5) Illustrate a quantitative partition; a qualitative partition.

(6) Illustrate how a logical division may be summarized in the form

of a series of judgments.

(7) State and explain the rules of logical division.

(8) State the rules violated in the following divisions, explaining

in full:

{ Primary

{ Secondary

(1) Education { Collegiate

{ Technical

{ Scientific

{ Professional

{ Infancy

(2) Life { Childhood

{ Youth

{ Old age

{ Caucasian

{ Ethiopian

(3) Man { Malay

{ Mongolian

{ American

{ Cement

{ Frame

(4) Buildings { Stone

{ Dwellings

{ Barns

{ Churches

(9) Show the difference between contradictory and opposite terms.

(10) Define dichotomy.

(11) Illustrate the Tree of Porphyry and indicate its use to

scientists.

(12) Illustrate the difference between classification and division.

(13) Why should classification be the mode of procedure when dealing

with immature minds?

(14) Illustrate the difference between an artificial and a natural

classification.

(15) State and explain the two rules of classification.

(16) Show which of the following divisions are logical and which are

not:

(1) The manifestations of the mind into knowing, thinking and

feeling.

(2) Books into mathematical and non-mathematical.

(3) Students into those who are industrious, athletic and

shiftless.

(4) Flowers into roses, carnations and lilies.

(5) Planets into those which are larger than the earth and

those which are smaller.

=13. QUESTIONS FOR ORIGINAL THOUGHT AND INVESTIGATION.=

(1) Analyze by mathematical partition the terms world, plant, book.

(2) Analyze by logical partition the terms granite, water, air.

(3) What rule is violated if the logical division is applied to the

genus rather than the proximate genus?

(4) Divide logically the following terms: school, religion, book,

vegetable, life.

(5) “Each new subdivision may adopt a new principle of division.”

Illustrate this.

(6) Explain and illustrate the meaning of the terms super-ordinate,

sub-ordinate and co-ordinate.

(7) Define and illustrate metaphysical division and verbal division.

(8) Give a definition of an isosceles triangle which will make

logical the division of triangles into scalene, isosceles and

equilateral.

(9) “The evolution of all truth develops progressively through three

stages.” “The first is the thesis; the second is the antithesis;

the third is the synthesis.” Explain this in terms of trichotomy.

(10) Illustrate the difference between a complete division and an

exhaustive division.

(11) Show in what ways, if any, the following divisions violate the

rules of logical division.

{ 1 Memory (History)

Human Learning { 2 Imagination (Poetry)

(by Bacon) { 3 Reason (Philosophy)

{ or (the Sciences)

{ 1 Mathematics

{ 2 Astronomy

Sciences { 3 Physics

(by Comte) { 4 Chemistry

{ 5 Biology

{ 6 Sociology

{ 7 Morals

A Class Room Logic Deductive and Inductive, with Special Application to the Science and Art of Teaching · 第 7 / 21 章