The French, in 1754, had seated themselves at Logstown, and the Governor

of Virginia began to construct a fort on the site of Pittsburgh, but the

French surprised the little garrison, captured the works, finished it,

and named it Fort Duquesne.

The French held the fort until English forces, under General John

Forbes, invested it November 25, 1758. It was abandoned in 1771.

Some time prior to 1756 Virginia erected the District of West Augusta,

covering the territory of Pennsylvania west of the Laurel Hills and

south of the Ohio and Allegheny Rivers, and in that year divided it into

three counties, viz: Monongalia, Yohogania and Ohio.

Pennsylvania also erected upon this disputed territory Bedford County,

in 1771, and Westmoreland County, in 1773 Penn’s Manor of Pittsburgh,

too, was surveyed for the proprietaries early in 1769, and in the

beginning of 1771 magistrates were appointed by Pennsylvania and for

some time discharged the duties of their offices without having their

authority questioned.

The new Governor of Virginia was John, Earl of Dunmore, or Lord Dunmore,

of whom Bancroft says: “No royal governor ever showed more rapacity in

the use of royal power.” He at once determined on seizing control of the

“Forks of the Ohio,” for Virginia and for himself. He appointed Dr. John

Connolly, a man of much energy and talent, but without principle, to be

“captain commandant of Pittsburgh and its dependencies.”

Connolly arrived in Pittsburgh late in December, 1773, and early in

January, 1774, took possession of the dismantled fort, which he renamed,

calling it “Fort Dunmore,” required and commanded the people to assemble

themselves there as a militia.

He mustered the militia under Virginia law, intimidated the Pennsylvania

magistrates, marched some of them off to prison and established the

authority of Virginia throughout all the region between the Monongahela

and the Ohio.

While a large part of the inhabitants of that region were Virginians by

birth and predilection, there were some fearless and loyal Pennsylvania

adherents who did all in their power to resist Connolly’s high-handed

proceedings.

One of these, Arthur St. Clair (afterward General St. Clair), then

prothonotary of the new county of Westmoreland, issued a warrant against

Connolly and had him committed to jail at Hannastown, from which he was

soon released on giving bail for court appearance there.

Connolly returned to Virginia, was sworn in as a Justice of the Peace

for Augusta County, and when court met at Hannastown, he appeared with

his militia, armed and with colors flying, and refused to admit the

Pennsylvania magistrates. He arrested three of the magistrates and sent

them to Staunton, where they were confined in jail.

Subsequently, Simon Girty led a mob to Hannastown, stormed the jail and

released such prisoners as were Virginia partisans.

The Tory conduct of Connolly at Pittsburgh became so bold and obnoxious

that in June, 1775, he was seized by twenty men, under orders of Captain

St. Clair, and carried to Ligonier, with the intention of delivering him

to the Continental Government at Philadelphia. He was released, however,

and fled from Pittsburgh by night and made his way to Portsmouth,

Virginia, where he joined Lord Dunmore on a man-of-war, taking refuge in

Canada.

Virginia had revolted from Dunmore’s tyranny at home, but showed no

disposition to repudiate his aggressions in Pennsylvania nor the

machinations of Connolly.

The boundary dispute was maintained, although, in view of the troubles

with the mother country fast approaching, the Virginia and Pennsylvania

delegates in Congress, including such men as Thomas Jefferson, Patrick

Henry and Benjamin Franklin, had united in a circular urging the people

in the disturbed region to mutual forbearance.

This action of Congress and the constant fear of an Indian uprising

persuaded the Virginia Provincial Convention, in session at

Williamsburg, July 17, 1775, to pass a resolution which sent Captain

John Neville with one hundred men from the Shenandoah Valley to take

possession of Fort Pitt.

The following year the Virginia counties in the disputed territory were

organized with their loyal and administrative machinery, but the rancor

of the contest had, however, somewhat diminished and there were no such

acts of violence committed as during the regime of Connolly and his

master.

Captain John Neville continued to command until the Continental Congress

determined to take Fort Pitt under its care and provide a garrison at

the continental expense. The offer was accepted by Virginia and General

Washington selected Brigadier General Edward Hand to relieve Captain

Neville of his command.

----------

Susquehanna Company Organized in

Connecticut, July 18, 1753

Early charters granted to Massachusetts, Connecticut, Virginia and the

Carolinas made the Pacific Ocean the nominal western boundary of those

colonies. Prior occupancy by the Dutch and the settlement of the

boundaries had created an exception in favor of New York and New Jersey,

but all the country west of the Delaware River within the same parallel

of latitude with Connecticut was still claimed by that colony as part of

her domain.

The southern boundary was to be a straight line beginning at the mouth

of Narragansett Bay. The line extended west would have entered

Pennsylvania near Stroudsburg and crossed the North Branch of the

Susquehanna at Bloomsburg, the West Branch at Milton, and passing

through Clearfield and Newcastle would cut the State nearly through the

middle. Penn’s charter fixed the northern boundary of his province at

the forty-second degree of latitude. A large strip of territory was thus

granted to both Connecticut and Pennsylvania.

On July 18, 1753, about 250 men, mostly from Connecticut, met at

Windham, that State, and organized “The Susquehanna Company.” Then, with

the consent of the Connecticut Assembly, application was made to the

Crown for leave to plant a new colony west of the Delaware. It was

granted, and the company sent agents to the Indian treaty at Albany,

June, 1754, who succeeded in obtaining from representatives of the Six

Nations the cession of a tract of land on the northern branch of the

Susquehanna River, where eleven years before King Tedyuskung and his

tribe had built the town of Wyoming.

The Proprietaries of Pennsylvania protested against this purchase, and

claimed that this land was within the limits of their charter. They also

claimed that the purchase had not been made in open council, but had

been effected after making the Indians drunk.

As this council at Albany had been called to form a union of the

Colonies with the Six Nations as their allies against the French, the

purchase was not then seriously opposed. Besides, Pennsylvania bought a

large tract of land from the Six Nations at the same treaty, and in a

way not satisfactory to the Indians.

The French and Indian War prevented any attempt at settlement of the

Wyoming Valley until 1762, when about 200 colonists and their families

entered the valley and commenced building and planting near the site of

the present Wilkes-Barre. Before winter set in, extensive fields of

wheat had been sown upon lands covered with forest trees in August. But

owing to the scantiness of provisions, the settlers returned to

Connecticut for the winter.

About the same time another Connecticut association, called the

“Delaware Company,” had begun a settlement on the Delaware River.

Proclamations were issued and writs of ejectment were placed in the

hands of the Sheriff of Northampton County.

Early in the month of May, 1763, the settlers returned, accompanied by

many others. Notwithstanding the remonstrances of Northampton County, to

which the Wyoming Valley then belonged, settlements were made at

Wilkes-Barre, Kingston, Plymouth and Hanover.

Several hundred acres were improved with corn and other grain, and a

large quantity of hay cut and gathered, and everything was moving

forward in a prosperous and happy manner when, without the least

warning, on October 15, the settlers were attacked while dispersed and

engaged in their work, and about twenty of them slain.

Men, women and children fled to the mountains, from which they saw their

homes plundered and burned and their cattle taken away. They abandoned

their settlement and made their way back to Connecticut or to Orange

County, New York. This is known in the history of Pennsylvania as the

first massacre of Wyoming. It was the work of the Delaware Indians, led

by Captain Bull, son of King Tedyuskung.

Some believe the Iroquois convinced the Delaware that the white settlers

had murdered Tedyuskung and that this massacre was committed in

retribution.

For six years after this assault no settlement was attempted. The

Indians, anticipating revenge for the massacre, left the valley.

Meanwhile the Penn family made every effort to prove that the title

given to the Susquehanna Company was not complete and that their charter

was valid. Finally some chiefs, assisted by Sir William Johnson, openly

disclaimed the sale to the Susquehanna Company. Then the Six Nations

assembled in council at Fort Stanwix and on November 5, 1768, gave a

deed of the disputed lands to the Penns.

Meanwhile Pennsylvanians took possession of the Wyoming Valley and built

a fortified trading house there. They laid out two manors, one on each

side of the river, and extending over the farms abandoned by the New

Englanders.

In February, 1769, the Susquehanna Company sent forty men into the

valley, to be followed shortly by 200 more. They were given land and 200

pounds Connecticut currency to provide themselves with farming tools and

weapons, on condition that they would stay in the valley and defend it

against Pennsylvania. They built a blockhouse called, from their

numbers, Forty Fort. Their leader was Colonel Zebulon Butler, a hero of

the French and Indian War, a brave partisan commander.

A civil war prevailed for some years known as the “Pennamite and Yankee

War.” Forts were constructed and many sieges and skirmishes followed.

Both parties led men to prison, drove women and children away and

committed other outrages.

The Connecticut men were generally successful in this strife. They

organized a separate State, but could not maintain it. So in 1774 they

attached themselves to Connecticut, as the town of Westmoreland, in the

County of Litchfield.

During the Revolution there was a lull in the strife in Wyoming.

However, as soon as the war ended the old feud broke out in all its

former fury.

Pennsylvania having, in 1779, succeeded the heirs of William Penn, now

appealed to Congress to settle the dispute. A commission met at Trenton

in 1782 and, after five weeks of deliberation, decided that Connecticut

had no right to the land, and that the jurisdiction of the same belonged

to Pennsylvania.

----------

Tom Quick, the Indian Killer and Picturesque

Character, Born July 19, 1734

Early in the year 1733 a Hollander, named Thomas Quick, came to the

colony of New York, a few months later located on the Delaware River, on

what afterward became known as Upper Smithfield, near where Milford,

Pike County, now stands. He appears to have been the pioneer settler on

the Pennsylvania side; here he cleared lands, erected a log cabin and

barns, and raised wheat and maize. A son was born July 19, 1734, named

Thomas, and he was familiarly known in after years as Tom Quick, the

Indian killer.

He was the pet of the household, and even the Indians who roamed over

that region frequently visited Quick’s place and much admired the fine

looking, stout lad, and often made him presents of plumes, feathers,

skins and other articles.

Tom grew up among these Indians, learned their language, and was taught

by them how to hunt wild animals, and fish after the manner of the

Indians. He grew fond of the Indian life, and became such an expert

hunter, trapper and fisherman, that his father could never induce him to

follow any other occupation. He even refused to attend school with his

sisters, and in fact became almost an Indian by nature.

In the meantime Thomas Quick, Sr., had become the prosperous owner of a

grist and saw mill on a small stream entering the Delaware near Milford,

called the Vandemark. But Tom, Jr., never became an employe, but did

learn much of the beautiful Minisink Valley, with its high cliffs on the

Pennsylvania side and receding hills on the New Jersey side, as it

extends from Port Jervis to the Delaware Water Gap. The romantic water

falls and rocky glens were his hunting and fishing grounds. This

knowledge afterward served his purpose in waylaying and murdering

Indians.

The Delaware Indians viewed with alarm the steady encroachments of the

whites, and many had already taken up arms against the English. The

Quick family, however, had always lived on friendly terms with them, but

the Indians were not unmindful of the fact that this sturdy Hollander

had been the very first to push that far into their favorite hunting

grounds.

The prospect of plundering an opulent man like Quick overcame any

feelings of gratitude that might linger in the savage breast.

When the French and Indian War commenced, the Quicks were uneasy and

their alarm increased as the Indians grew less sociable, and finally

withdrew altogether from the Delaware River.

Quiet reigned until the Quicks became careless and one day the father

crossed the river to grind grist, accompanied by Tom and his

brother-in-law, all unarmed. As they rounded a point near the river they

were fired upon from ambush, and the old man fell mortally wounded.

The young men endeavored to carry him across the frozen river but as

they stepped on the ice they were fired on and Tom was hit in the foot.

They soon got out of danger, but not before they saw the savages take

Tom Quick’s scalp.

Young Tom was frantic with rage and grief, and that moment swore that he

would never make peace with the Indians as long as one remained upon the

banks of the river.

From this time forth the demon of unrelenting savage hatred entered

Tom’s heart and he became more like the savages he pursued than like a

civilized man. He never entered the army but took Indians at all times,

whether in peace or war, and without regard to age or sex.

He seems to have operated about the close of the Indian War, at a time

when they began to again visit their former haunts, supposing they would

be well received.

Among the Indians who returned was a drunken vagabond named Muskwink,

one who had assisted in murdering Tom’s father.

Tom met Muskwink at Decker’s Tavern, on the Neversink, where he had

become very bold and abusive, claiming Tom’s acquaintance and desiring

him to drink with him. Tom refused and cursed him, which caused a heated

exchange of words, during which Muskwink boasted of the part he played

in the murder of Tom Quick, Sr. He bragged that he scalped him with his

own hands, and at the same time mimicked the grimaces of the dying man,

to corroborate his assertion, exhibited the sleeve buttons worn by his

victim at the time.

Tom seized a musket, which was hanging in the bar room, and ordered

Muskwink to leave the place. He arose slowly and departed, pursued by

Tom until they had gone about a mile, when Tom overtook the savage and

shot him dead. Tom returned to the tavern, gave up the musket, drank a

glass of rum, and left the neighborhood.

His next exploit was when he espied an Indian family in a canoe near

Butler’s Rift. Tom concealed himself in the tall grass and as the canoe

glided nearer he recognized the Indian as one who had committed many

outrages on the frontier.

Only a few words were exchanged when Quick shot the man and tomahawked

the woman and three children. He sank the bodies and destroyed the

canoe, and did not tell of this crime for years, when he was asked why

he killed the children. He replied, “Nits make lice.”

There are many stories told of Tom Quick, which have been preserved by

tradition and which are firmly believed by descendants of the older

families of Pike County.

One story is told in which several Indians caught him splitting rails

and told him to go along with them. Tom asked them to assist him split

open the last log and as they put their fingers in the crack to help

pull it apart Tom knocked out the wedge and caught them all. He then

killed each one at his leisure.

He went on a hunting trip with an Indian and they killed seven deer. He

took the meat but gave the Indian the skins. He threw them across his

shoulder, Tom fell behind and shot the Indian and took the skins as well

as the meat, saying he had shot a buck with seven skins.

He was hunting with another Indian and pushed him off of the high rocks.

Tradition says that on his death bed he claimed to have killed

ninety-nine Indians, and that he begged them to bring an old Indian, who

lived near, in order that he might bring his record to an even hundred.

In his old age he was regarded as a hero by the pioneer hunters and

trappers. He died at James Rosencrantz’s in 1795, and was buried on his

farm.

The time has long since passed when such a revengeful murderer can be

exalted to the rank of a hero, yet Tom Quick, the Indian slayer,

weather-beaten, and with wornout accoutrements and costume in keeping,

presented a picturesque and Rip Van Winkle-like appearance that would

have formed no bad subject for an artist’s pencil.

----------

William Maclay, First United States Senator,

Born in Chester, July 20, 1737

William Maclay, son of Charles and Eleanor Query Maclay, was born July

20, 1737, in New Garden Township, Chester County, Pa. He attended the

classical school of the Reverend John Blair, in Chester County. He

studied law and was admitted to practice at the York County bar in 1760.

During the French and Indian War he served as a lieutenant in Colonel

Hugh Mercer’s battalion, and distinguished himself during General Forbes

expedition in 1758. In 1763 he participated at the Battle of Bushy Run,

and during the subsequent progress of Colonel Bouquet’s campaign was

stationed in command of a company at one of the stockades on the route

of the expedition.

On account of this service he never practiced his profession. Much of

his time was taken up in surveying lands allotted to officers, but at a

later period Governor John Penn was instrumental in having him admitted

to the Cumberland County bar, and for a short time he acted as

Prothonotary.

At the close of the French and Indian War he visited England and had an

interview with Thomas Penn, one of the Proprietaries, relative to

surveys in parts of the Province, and on his return became an assistant

of Surveyor General Lukens on the frontier.

In April, 1769, he married Mary McClure Harris, daughter of John Harris,

the founder of Harrisburg.

On the organization of Northumberland County March 21, 1772, he was

appointed Prothonotary and Clerk of the Courts.

In July, 1772, he laid out the town of Sunbury and erected for himself a

fine stone house, which, with modern improvements, is still standing.[5]

Footnote 5:

For many years the residence of Hon. Simon P. Wolverton, and now that

of his widow.

At the outset of the Revolution, although an officer of the Proprietary

Government, William Maclay took a prominent and active part in favor of

independence, not only assisting in equipping and forwarding troops to

the Continental Army, but marched with the associators which

participated in the Battles of Trenton and Princeton. He held the

position of assistant commissary of purchases.

During the “Great Runaway,” following the Wyoming massacre, July 3,

1778, William Maclay fled with his family from Sunbury to Harris’ Ferry,

and in a letter to the president of the Executive Council he gave a very

graphic picture of the distress. Again after the attack and destruction

of Fort Freeland by the British, Tories and Indians, July 28, 1779,

Maclay again wrote to the seat of government in which he described the

forlorn situation of the frontiers. In a later letter he deplored the

removal of soldiers from the West Branch Valley, where the Indians had

committed such terrible depredations.

In 1781 he was elected to the Assembly, and from that time forward he

filled the various offices of member of the Supreme Executive Council,

Judge of the Court of Common Pleas, deputy surveyor, etc. After the

Revolution he made a visit to England in the interest of the Penn

family.

In January, 1789, he was elected to the United States Senate, taking his

seat there as the first Senator from Pennsylvania. He drew the short

term, and his position terminated March 3, 1791, his colleague, Robert

Morris, securing the long term.

Maclay’s election to this body raised him upon a higher plane of

political activity, but contact with the Federal chiefs of the young

Republic only strengthened his political convictions, which, formed by

long intercourse with the people of Central Pennsylvania, were intensely

democratic.

Maclay differed with the opinions of President Washington; he did not

approve of the state and ceremony attendant upon the intercourse of the

President with Congress, he flatly objected to the presence of the

President in the Senate while business was being transacted, and in that

chamber boldly spoke against his policy in the immediate presence of

President Washington.

Maclay was the original promoter and later the actual founder of the

Democratic Party. Long before Thomas Jefferson’s return from Europe,

William Maclay assumed an independent position, and in his short career

of only two years in the Senate propounded ideas and gathered about him

elements to form the opposition which developed with the meeting of

Congress at Philadelphia, October 24, 1791, in a division of the people

into two great parties, the Federalists and Democrats, when, for the

first time, appeared an open and organized opposition to the

Administration.

The funding of the public debt and chartering the United States Bank

were opposed by Maclay, even at a sacrifice of personal popularity, for

he was succeeded in the Senate by James Ross, a pronounced Federalist.

While in the Senate Maclay preserved notes of his discussions, both in

open and executive sessions, with observations upon the social customs

of the statesmen of the Republic, which have since been published.

On his retirement from the Senate William Maclay resided on his farm

adjoining Harrisburg, where he erected a fine stone mansion, afterward,

for many years, occupied by the Harrisburg Academy.

In 1795 he was elected a member of the Pennsylvania House of

Representatives and was again elected in 1803. He was a presidential

candidate in 1796, and from 1801 to 1803 was one of the Associate Judges

of Dauphin County.

William Maclay’s brother, Samuel, was almost as distinguished a citizen

as his older brother. He, too, was a soldier in the Continental Army, a

surveyor and statesman. He served as Associate Judge, was in the Fourth

Congress, State Senate and Speaker of that body, and December 14, 1802,

he was elected to the United States Senate. William and Samuel Maclay

are the only brothers to sit in that body.

William Maclay was the father of nine children. He died at his home at

Harrisburg April 16, 1804, and was interred in the old Paxton

Presbyterian Church graveyard at Paxtang. An elegant stone marks the

final resting place of this distinguished Pennsylvanian.

----------

Colonel James Cameron, First Pennsylvania

Officer Killed in Civil War July 21, 1861

It may not be generally known that the first officer of his rank to be

killed in the Civil War was none other than Colonel James Cameron, who

commanded the Seventy-ninth New York Highlanders, yet was a native of

Lancaster County, Pa., a resident of this State, and a brother of the

distinguished General Simon Cameron.

Daily stories of Pennsylvania · 第 53 / 104 段