That a considerable portion of the money expended in the Provincial

Government was raised by excise is evidenced from a report made by

Governor John Penn June 26, 1775, which was an account of the several

amounts of the excise tax collected for the years 1771, 72, 73 and 74,

the total amount of which, after deducting the commissions to the

Treasurer and collectors exceeded £28,000. Together with this report was

another indorsed “State of the Bills of Credit struck on the Excise for

several years, laid before the Governor with the bill for the support of

Government & paymt of public debts.”

In the Act of 1722 a duty was levied on domestic and foreign spirits. At

first, however, as to home-distilled spirits it was not executed, and,

indeed, hardly any steps were taken for the purpose particularly in the

older counties. But, during the Revolutionary War, the necessities of

the State and a temporary unpopularity of distillation, owing to the

immense amount of grain consumed, when the troops so much needed it as a

food, rendered the collection of duties both necessary and practicable,

and a considerable revenue was thereby obtained. Toward the end of the

war the act was repealed.

In 1780 Congress resolved that an allowance of an additional sum should

be made to the army, to compensate the troops for the depreciation in

their pay. This was distributed among the several States for discharge.

Pennsylvania made several appropriations for the purpose, but the

revenues so applied turned out to be unproductive.

The depreciation fund was always favorably regarded, and upon an

application of officers of the Pennsylvania Line, another effort was

made, the revenue arising from the excise remaining uncollected was

appropriated to this fund, and vigorous measures were taken for its

collection.

Great changes, however, had taken place in the disposition of the people

since the first imposition of these duties. The neighboring States were

free from the burden, and in New Jersey, where a law had been passed for

the purpose, its execution had been entirely prevented by a powerful

combination. The Pennsylvania law, therefore, met with great opposition,

especially west of the Allegheny Mountains and there is no evidence that

the excise was ever paid in that section.

The excise law of Pennsylvania, after remaining for years a dead letter,

was repealed, and the people were to submit to a similar law passed by

the Congress of the new Federal Government March 3, 1791. This laid an

excise of fourpence per gallon on all distilled spirits.

The members of Congress from Western Pennsylvania, Smilie, of Fayette,

and Findley, of Westmoreland, stoutly opposed the passage of the law,

and on their return among their constituents loudly and openly

disapproved of it. Albert Gallatin, then residing in Fayette County,

also opposed the law by all constitutional methods.

The majority of the people in the western counties of the State were of

Scotch-Irish descent. They had heard of the exaction and oppression in

the Old Country under the excise laws—that houses were entered by excise

officers, the most private apartments examined, and confiscation and

imprisonment followed if the smallest quantity of whisky was discovered

not marked with the official brand. They also remembered the effective

resistance to the Stamp Act, that those who forced the repeal of the

odious law were the real factors in bringing about the independence of

America. Holding these opinions, it is not to be wondered at that the

more hot-headed resorted to threats of violence and precipitated the

riotous proceedings known in Pennsylvania history as the Whisky

Insurrection.

----------

Pittsburgh Built in 1760, Incorporated April

22, 1794, and Chartered as City

March 18, 1816

On April 17, 1754, Ensign Ward was surprised by the appearance of

Frenchmen, who landed, planted their cannon and summoned the English to

surrender. The French soon demolished an unfinished fort and built in

its place a much larger and better one, calling it Fort Duquesne, in

honor of the Marquis Duquesne, the French Governor of Canada.

This was the actual beginning of what is now Pittsburgh, but there were

many stirring conflicts for permanent possession of the site at the

“Forks of the Ohio.”

When General John Forbes invested Fort Duquesne November 25, 1758, he

marched into a place which had been abandoned by the French and instead

of a formidable fortress it was now nothing but a mass of blackened and

smoldering ruins. The enemy, after burning the barracks and storehouses,

had blown up the fortifications. Forbes’ first care was to provide a

better defense and shelter for his troops, and a strong stockade was

built, which he named Pittsburgh, in honor of England’s great Minister

William Pitt.

A strong fort was subsequently built, which was known as Fort Pitt, and

which continued until after the Revolutionary War to be the western base

of the military department.

The first town of Pittsburgh was built near Fort Pitt in 1760. In a very

carefully prepared list of the houses and the inhabitants outside of the

fort, headed “a return of the number of houses of the names of the

owners and number of the names of the owners and number of men, women

and children in each house Fort Pitt, April 14, 1761,” the number of

inhabitants is 233, with the addition of ninety-five officers, soldiers

and their families residing in the town, making the whole number 328.

There were 104 houses. The lower town was nearer the fort, the upper on

higher ground, principally along the bank of the Monongahela, extending

as far as the present Market Street.

This town enjoyed comparative quiet until the Pontiac War, in 1763, when

Fort Pitt was completely surrounded by the savage foe and the garrison

reduced to dire straits until relieved by Colonel Bouquet.

The second town of Pittsburgh was laid out in 1765, by Colonel John

Campbell, by permission of the commandant of Fort Pitt. It comprised the

ground bounded by present Water Street, Second and Ferry Streets.

Campbell’s plan of lots was subsequently incorporated unaltered in the

survey made by George Woods for the Penns in 1784, and is known as the

“Old Military Plan.” Several of these houses built of hewn logs and

weather-boarded stood until quite recently and the old redoubt of

Colonel Bouquet, built in 1764, north of the present Penn Street, west

of Point, remains the most valued relic of the pre-Revolutionary days in

Western Pennsylvania.

The little building is of brick, five-sided, with two floors having a

squared oak log with loop holes on each floor. There are two underground

passages, one connecting it with the fort, and the other leading to the

Monongahela River. This building and ground upon which it stands is

owned by the Daughters of the American Revolution of Allegheny County,

who keep it in excellent repair. It was the gift of Mrs. Mary E.

Schenley, April 1, 1894.

During the Revolution the Assembly confiscated the property of the Penn

family, excepting certain manors and other property which the

Proprietaries held in their private capacities by devise, purchase, or

descent. The Manor of Pittsburgh contained 5766 acres and included the

present city of Pittsburgh and the country eastward of it and south of

the Monongahela; this was surveyed March 27, 1769, and remained as the

property of the Penns.

In 1784 Tench Francis, of Philadelphia, as agent for the Proprietaries,

laid out this Manor in town and outlots. The surveyor’s work was done by

George Woods, of Bedford. These lots found ready sale and by 1786 there

were 100 houses and 500 population. The fur trade was still the most

important, although the general business was improving.

The first newspaper published west of the Alleghenies was the Pittsburgh

Gazette, now the Pittsburgh Gazette-Times, established July 29, 1786.

Pittsburgh was incorporated as a borough April 22, 1794.

Another important event occurred May 19, 1798, when the galley President

Adams was launched at Pittsburgh. She was the first vessel built here

which was competent for a sea voyage, and was constructed by the

Government, in preparation for the threatened war with France. The

Senator Ross was launched the following spring.

The first glass works were established here in 1797 by James O’Hara and

Isaac Craig. William Eichbaum was brought from near Philadelphia to

superintend this new enterprise, the first real manufacturing venture in

this place. The first paper mill west of the Alleghenies was erected

this same year in Pittsburgh.

During the three years from 1802 to 1805 four ships, three brigs and

three schooners were built in Pittsburgh.

The first bank in the western part of the State was a branch of the Bank

of Pennsylvania, which opened for business January 1, 1804, on Second

Street, between Ferry and Chancery Lane. An iron foundry was established

by Joseph McClurg during 1804.

On March 24, 1811, the New Orleans, the first steamboat ever built or

run on Western waters, was launched at Pittsburgh. This boat started on

its initial trip to the Crescent City, December 24 following. The second

such boat was christened the Comet and launched in Pittsburgh in 1813. A

large number of boats was built in this city, and the trade was immense.

The first canal boat ever built or run west of the mountains was the

General Abner Lacock. She was owned by Patrick Leonard, of Pittsburgh,

but was built in Apollo. This was a fine packet boat, with berths and

dining service, as well as capacity for carrying freight.

The first railroad entered Pittsburgh in the fall of 1834, on the

completion of the Philadelphia and Columbia, and the Allegheny portage

railroads.

Pittsburgh became a city by an Act of Assembly at the sessions of

1815–1816, the date of the change in city government being March 18,

1816. At the first election for municipal officers under the City

Charter, Major Ebenezer Denny was chosen Mayor.

The first great consolidation was effected March 29, 1872, when the

South side was united with Pittsburgh. This brought into the city the

boroughs of Birmingham, East Birmingham, Ormsby, Allentown, St. Clair,

South Pittsburgh, Monongahela, Mount Washington, Union, West Pittsburgh

and Temperanceville.

The population of Pittsburgh according to the census of 1920 was

588,343.

----------

Margaret Junkin Preston, Poetess-Laureate,| Died March 19, 1897

It is a matter of just pride that the most brilliant and beloved poetess

of yesteryear was none other than a Pennsylvania girl, Margaret Junkin

Preston, who through her writings, both in prose and poetry, attained

Nation-wide distinction and won the title “Poetess-Laureate of the

South.”

Margaret Junkin was born in Milton, Northumberland County, Pennsylvania,

May 19, 1820, the eldest child of Rev. George and Julia Rush Miller

Junkin.

Her parents were of that stalwart, heroic race, the Covenanters of

Scotland.

Dr. Junkin’s life was devoted to religion and education, and at the time

of his marriage he was the minister of the Presbyterian Church at

Milton.

When Margaret was ten years old her parents moved to Germantown, where

her father assumed charge of the Manual Labor Academy of Pennsylvania.

After a delightful residence of two years Dr. Junkin was called to the

first presidency of Lafayette College, and the family moved to the

“Forks of the Delaware.”

It was during the incumbency of Dr. Junkin that the college, which for

two years was conducted on a farm south of the Lehigh, was moved to the

present site, on what has since been known as College Hill Easton, and

Old South College built. President and Mrs. Junkin and their seven

children moved into the original building, where they continued to

reside until March 30, 1841, when the doctor accepted the presidency of

Miami College, Oxford, O.

It was during her residence at Easton that Margaret and her sister,

Eleanor, became members of the First Presbyterian Church and that her

first productions in verse appeared in the columns of a local newspaper;

they were “Childhood,” “The Forest Grave” and “Where Dwelleth the Scent

of the Rose.” After her removal to Oxford, O., she wrote “Lines Written

on Reading Letters Bringing Sad News From Easton.”

In 1844 Dr. Junkin returned to Easton to again assume the presidency of

Lafayette College, in which position he capably served until 1848, when

he accepted the presidency of Washington College, now Washington and Lee

University, at Lexington, Va.

Upon Margaret Junkin’s return to Easton, she wrote “Love’s Tribute to

the Departed,” occasioned by the death of an intimate friend, and “The

Fate of a Raindrop.” These were followed after removing to Lexington, by

“Thoughts Suggested by Powers’ Proserpine,” “The Old Dominion,” “The

Solaced Grief,” “Galileo Before the Inquisition,” and “The Polish Boy.”

The life of Margaret Junkin at Lexington differed from that which she

experienced as a young girl at Germantown, Easton and Oxford. She had

reached the age of twenty-eight, and the old town in the Shenandoah

Valley, with its educational institutions, social atmosphere and local

culture brought many interesting persons as visitors, not to speak of

the quaint life among the slaves. This all appealed to her. She entered

into the spirit of this environment to the fullest extent. Her lovely

character, unusual attainments, literary and social, were fully

recognized at home and abroad.

The death, in 1849, of her brother, Joseph, followed by that of her

mother, in 1854, and only a few months later by that of her favorite

sister, Eleanor, brought profound grief to the Junkin household.

The sister, Eleanor, survived only a year her marriage to Major Thomas

J. Jackson, a graduate of West Point, and then a professor in the

Virginia Military Institute, who later achieved fame in the Civil War

and gained the sobriquet of “Stonewall Jackson,” second only to his

commander-in-chief, Robert E. Lee. After the death of Mrs. Jackson, her

husband continued to be a member of Dr. Junkin’s household for four

years.

Margaret Junkin married, August 3, 1857, Major T. L. Preston, professor

of Latin in the Virginia Military Institute, a widower with seven

children. To this family she proved to be an affectionate and devoted

mother.

Two sons were born to Major and Margaret Junkin Preston—George Junkin

Preston, for many years a successful specialist in nervous diseases at

Baltimore, now deceased, and Herbert Preston, now General Solicitor for

the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company.

The war clouds were lowering for a bitter conflict between the North and

South, and the Junkin family became divided. The father, Rev. George

Junkin, a pronounced abolitionist and opposed to secession, resigned the

presidency of Washington College, and, with his widowed daughter

departed for Philadelphia.

The story told of this trip, which was made overland, is that when the

Mason and Dixon line was reached the team pulling the heavy load of

household effects, and the one attached to the carriage in which the

doctor and his daughter were riding, were halted, the goods unloaded,

the horses, harness, wagon, carriage and themselves all carefully

washed, then again loaded and driven over the boundary line into

Pennsylvania. As the doctor afterwards related, no Southern soil should

be brought into Pennsylvania, he wanted to leave it all where it

belonged.

His son, William, espoused the Southern cause and became a captain, but

his son, John M., served as a surgeon in the Federal Army.

Following the close of the Civil War, Mrs. Preston devoted much time to

reviewing books for various publishers, and in compiling and arranging

for publication her own compositions in prose and verse, the latter

resulting in the publication, in 1866, of her “Bechenbrook,” a book of

poems voicing the sorrow and patriotism of the Southern people, and of

“Old Songs and New” in 1870.

These were followed by “Cartoons,” “Handful of Monographs,” “For Love’s

Sake,” “Colonial Ballads and Sonnets,” “Chimes for Church Children” and

“Aunt Dorothy.” In addition she contributed to Century Magazine in the

early eighties some reminiscences of General Robert E. Lee, and personal

reminiscences of General “Stonewall” Jackson.

Colonel Preston resigned his professorship in 1882, when he and his

talented wife traveled and visited among their children. The husband

died July 15, 1890, and Mrs. Preston continued to live at Lexington for

two years, but late in December, 1892, she removed to Baltimore and made

her home with her eldest son, Dr. George Junkin Preston.

Margaret Junkin Preston died March 19, 1897.

There was much written about this poetess at the time, and possibly the

best known was “An Appreciation of Margaret J. Preston, a Sketch of her

Fifty Years of Literary Life,” by Prof. James A. Harrison, of the

University of Virginia.

Mrs. Elizabeth Randolph Preston Allan compiled and published a volume

entitled “The Life and Letters of Margaret Junkin Preston,” and an

excellent sketch of her interesting life has also been written by Ethan

Allen Weaver, of Germantown, from which much of this story of the

“Poetess-Laureate of the South” has been taken.

----------

Military Laws of Province Repealed by

Import Act, March 20, 1780

On March 20, 1780, a law was passed to effect a reorganization of the

whole militia system in Pennsylvania. It provided for the appointment of

a lieutenant for each county, and two sub-lieutenants or more, not

exceeding the number of battalions, which were to be divided into

classes as heretofore. Fines, however for non-attendance on muster days

were fixed for commissioned officers at the price of three days’ labor.

When called out, the pay of privates was to be equal to one day’s labor.

Persons called out, but neglecting or refusing to go, were liable to pay

in each case the price of a day’s labor during the term of service,

beside a tax of fifteen shillings on the hundred pounds upon their

estates. As a relief to this class, the hiring of substitutes was

allowed. Pensions were promised the wounded in battle, and support to

the families of those militiamen who were killed, at rates to be fixed

by the courts. Considerable opposition was made to this law, from the

fact that by permitting the hiring of substitutes it would relieve the

disaffected and Tories.

While this bill, undoubtedly, had many defects, it was the first real

effort toward the establishment of a military system in the Commonwealth

upon a practical basis.

Militia companies were provided in each county, the State being divided

into districts, and all males were required to enroll, who were between

eighteen and fifty-three years of age.

This act was modified in 1783, when a more specific code of discipline

was adopted. This act remained in force until 1793.

The militia act of March 20, 1780, was the outgrowth or development of

the militia system of Pennsylvania which may be considered to have begun

in the year 1747. Altho in the charter given to William Penn, the

Governor was given authority to levy, muster and train men, to make war

upon and pursue the enemy, even beyond the limits of the province.

As early as 1702, Lieutenant Governor Hamilton asked the Assembly to

enact a bill to provide for “what may come against us by land or by

sea.”

Several years later Lieutenant Governor Evans urged a similar law, but

the idea was unpopular. Several other similar bills were subsequently

defeated, yet the Assembly occasionally appropriated funds for “the

King’s use,” for the purchase of bread, beef, pork, flour, wheat and

“other grain.” Franklin later commented that “other grain” meant black

grains of gunpowder.

It was through the effort and influence of Franklin, in 1747, that a

volunteer military association was effected, consisting of about 1200 of

the most influential men in the province. This soon grew to 10,000 and

the following year the “Associated Companies,” by which name the

organization became known, had enrolled 12,000 horse, foot and

artillery, each armed and equipped at personal expense, and the officers

chosen from the members. Franklin was one of the original colonels.

This association rendered conspicuous service in the French and Indian

wars and preserved its organization. Many of the companies volunteered

for service in the Revolution and formed the backbone of the State’s

militia.

In 1756 there were in Philadelphia three of these companies, with a

total of seventeen officers and 260 private men, one troop of horse with

five officers and forty men and one battery of artillery with three

officers and 150 men. In Bucks County there were nine companies with

thirty-nine officers and 513 men; in Chester County there were several

companies, under command of Captain John Singleton, Samuel West, Robert

Boyd and Jacob Richardson. In York County there were eight companies

with an enrollment of 642 men and in Lancaster County there were nine

companies and 545 men.

It was not until Braddock’s defeat that the Assembly voted a substantial

sum for the “King’s use,” but made no provision for an organized

military force. November 25, 1755, the Assembly passed “an Act for the

better ordering and regulating such as are willing and desirous to be

united for military purposes within the province.”

This was the first act of Assembly which in any way provided for the

organized defense of the province, and this was to remain in force only

until October 30, 1756.

By March 29, 1757, the Quakers had become a minority in the Assembly and

an act was passed which was more satisfactory. It also provided for the

compulsory enrollment of all male persons between the ages of seventeen

and fifty-five years. It also stated the financial responsibility

required of those who would serve as officers.

One section of this act provided “that all Quakers, Menonists, Moravians

and others conscientiously scrupulous of bearing arms, who shall appear

on any alarm with the militia, though without arms, and obey the

commands of the officers in extinguishing fires, suppressing

insurrection of slaves or other evil-minded persons during an attack, in

caring for the wounded, conveying intelligence as expresses or

messengers, carrying refreshments to such as are on duty, and in

conveying to places of safety women and children, aged and infirm, and

wounded persons are free and exempt from penalties of this act.” This

act remained in force until the close of the French and Indian War in

1763.

There was no special control of military affairs again until June 30,

1775, when the Assembly passed an act for “the defense of their lives,

liberty and property.”

At this same session there was established a Committee of Safety, of

twenty-five members, which constituted the Board of War, whose powers

enabled them to call into service so many of the associators as they

deemed necessary or the occasion required.

The Committee of Safety was organized July 3, 1775, with Benjamin

Franklin as president.

This committee exercised supreme control of the land and naval forces of

the province until October 13, 1777, when its powers were transferred to

the body known as the Council of Safety, this comprising the Supreme

Executive Council and nine others. The Council of Safety was dissolved

December 6, 1777, when the military authority was assumed by the Supreme

Executive Council and the Assembly.

The aggregate number of men furnished by the Associators during the

Revolution was in excess of 35,000.

Pennsylvania furnished in all arms of the service, under the various

calls, a total of 120,514 men, which number does not include many bodies

of militia and many men who were under arms for a brief period, a record

of which service was not kept during the early years of the war.

Laws were passed during the war relating to the military forces, but

these were all repealed by the formal act of March 20, 1780.

----------

Old Northumberland, Mother of Counties,

Erected March 21, 1772

The political development of Pennsylvania followed closely in the wake

of its expanding settlements. In 1682 the Counties of Philadelphia,

Bucks and Chester were formed, with limits intended to include not only

the populated area, but territory enough in addition to meet for a

considerable time to come the growing necessities of the rapidly

increasing immigration.

Daily stories of Pennsylvania · 第 22 / 104 段