CLERICUS (D).

Queries.

Minor Queries.

_Count Konigsmark._--Horace Walpole, in his _Reminiscences_, says

distinctly that Count Konigsmark, the admirer of the ill-fated Princess

Sophia Dorothea of Zelle, was the same person as the instigator of Mr.

Thynne's assassination. Sir E. Brydges, in his edition of Collins's

_Peerage_, on the other hand, calls them brothers. Which of these

writers is correct? The fact may not be important otherwise than as

giving us an instance (if Walpole be correct) of the righteous judgment

of heaven in visiting a murderer with such fearful retribution. I cannot

find what became of Konigsmark, after the murder of Mr. Thynne, in

1681-2. It is said in the _Harleian Miscellany_, that he was taken by

one of Monmouth's attendants, who seized him as he was going on

ship-board. The three actual assassins were, we know, executed; but it

is added, "by some foul play, Konigsmark, who had employed them, and

came over to England expressly to see they executed their bloody

commission, was acquitted." What was this foul play, and how came the

greatest villain of the four to escape? I have not the _State Trials_ to

refer to: that work may give some explanation.

Walpole, who was familiar from childhood with the events of the courts

of the first three Georges, is likely to have been accurate as to the

identity of Konigsmark; but his occasional mistakes and

misrepresentations, as we are aware, have been frequently exposed by Mr.

Croker.

Notes and Queries, Vol. V, Number 117, January 24, 1852 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 41 / 157 题