CHAPTER XIX

SOCIAL CHARACTERISTICS, MANNERS, AND CUSTOMS

The essential principles in the drama of human life are ever

the same although its outward aspect changes with changing

circumstances. But in some ages events develop more rapidly than in

others under the urgency of peculiar conditions.

In colonial Virginia the story was told over and over again before

the final fall of the curtain. Scenes shifted with wonderful

rapidity. The curtain, in mimic drama, is usually rung down at the

church door after the early or late wooing and marriage; but in

Virginia in the eighteenth century this was only the first in a

drama of five or more acts. The early death of the first bride left

a vacancy speedily filled by new and successive unions with new

associations and combinations. Five times was not an unusual number

for men to remarry.

This meant five wooings, five weddings, five "infairs," many births

(varying in number from one to twenty-six), five funerals,--all to

be included in thirty adult years more or less. Then, too, there

were five tombstones to be erected and as many epitaphs to be

composed--no two of which to be alike. One wife (usually the first)

almost exhausts the vocabulary of adoring affection, another's piety

is emphasized, another "lived peacably with her neighbors"; each one

was "as a wife dutiful." "Obedient" was a word dear to the colonial

husband.

We have no authority for supposing that the officiating clergyman

at a funeral was ever actually retained for the ensuing nuptials of

the bereaved. Initial steps in that direction were never taken in

Virginia until a husband or wife was well under the sod. Divorce

being unknown, unthinkable indeed, husbands and wives were united

in bonds indissoluble, until death did them part. But when it

did--why, then there was no reasonable cause for delay. It was not

at all unusual for the new husband to offer for probate the will

of his predecessor. Man in those days did not believe he was made

to mourn, at least not for maid or matron, nor that charming women

were created to weep in widow's weeds beyond the decent period of

two months. The little hands were firmly drawn from their pressure

upon the tearful eyes, tucked comfortably under a new, strong arm,

and the widow's little baronry stitched to a new sleeve. There were

exceptions, of course, but not many. When one of the husbands of

Mary Washington's charming nieces (the Gregory girls) lay mortally

ill, he looked up with anguish at the lovely young wife bending

over him, and implored her to keep herself for him. She readily

promised never again to marry, and kept her promise. Another, left a

widow, essayed to follow the sublime example of her sister. One of

the masterful Thorntons sued for twenty years, but won at last. The

statute of limitations in Cupid's court held for twenty years only

in colonial Virginia.

Writers of the period explain these multiplied marriages by

the necessity of a protector for every woman owning land to be

cultivated by negro slaves and indented servants, and on the other

hand the woful state of a large family of young children left

motherless at the mercy of those servants. The new master and the

new mother became a necessity.

It sometimes happened that the newly contracting parties had already

many children from the three or four previous marriages. These must

now be brought under one sheltering roof. The little army must

be restrained by strict government; hence the necessity for the

stern parental discipline of colonial times. "It is gratifying, my

dear," said an amiable patriarch, "to find that _your_ children,

_my_ children, and _our_ children can live so peacefully together,"

nobody knowing so well as the patriarch and the children at what

price the peace had been purchased.

Thus it can be easily seen how maddening an enterprise is the

attempt to trace Virginia relationships, and how we so often lose a

woman and give her over as dead to find her resurrected under a new

name. We once lost Mary Washington's sister Hannah (Ball) Travers.

She turned up at last as Mrs. Pearson! To sort and label and

classify Virginia cousins means nervous prostration. In the families

of Thornton, Carter, and their kin, it means more! Madness lies that

way!

The spinster of uncertain age, known irreverently as an "old maid,"

was a rare individual in colonial Virginia. We all know Colonel

Byrd's "Miss Thekky, mourning her virginity." We really cannot name

another.

When a good man, addressing himself to the compilation of family

records for his children, was constrained to admit that one was

unmarried, he made haste to declare that she "lived single by her

own choice." Colonel Byrd Willis says of his daughter Mary, "She is

unmarried--but by her own choice. It will be a fine fellow who can

tempt her to leave her home. She has not seen him yet!" He goes on

to enumerate her social triumphs. There had been a "Bouquet Ball,"

of which a certain commodore was made king. He chose Miss Mary

Willis, and bestowed upon her the bouquet. A foot-note informs us

that she isn't single any more! She has married the commodore!

[Illustration: Colonel Byrd.]

Stern as was the parental discipline of the time, the spirit of the

young men, who were accounted grown and marriageable at nineteen,

was in no wise broken or quenched. Many of them ran away from their

masters at the schools in England and Scotland, and their fathers'

agents had much ado to find and capture them again. The sons of John

Spotswood were lost in England for many months, but were back home

again in time to be gallant officers in the Revolution. And even

the conservative blood of the Washingtons was not strong enough

to temper that of the Willises, for Mildred Washington's grandson

"Jack" Willis ran away from school and joined a party to explore

the wilderness of Kentucky. They were attacked by Indians, and were

scattered; Jack escaped in a canoe, and was the _first white man_ to

descend the Ohio and Mississippi rivers. His father had sewed some

doubloons in his jacket, but he gave them to a man in New Orleans to

purchase clothing and food, and never again beheld his agent or the

doubloons or their equivalent. He worked his way in a sailing vessel

to New York, and _walked_ from New York to his home in Virginia,

arriving, like the Spotswood boys, just in time to enter the army

with his father and serve to its close. He was a son of Lewis

Willis, Washington's schoolmate.

About 1740 the importation of horses of the English racing stock

commenced, also the breeding of horses for racing. Between 1740 and

1775 are recorded the names of fifty imported horses and thirty

mares of note: Aristotle, Babraham, Bolton, Childers, Dabster,

Dottrell, Dimple, Fearnaught, Jolly Roger, Juniper, Justice, Merry

Tom, Sober John, Vampire, Whittington, Janus, Sterling, Valiant,

etc. Owners of these horses among Mary Washington's neighbors were

Roger Gregory, Colonel John Mercer of "Marlboro," Mr. Spotswood,

William Fitzhugh of "Chatham," all the Thorntons, and _later_

Colonel George Washington of Mount Vernon, who was a steward of

the Alexandria Jockey Club and ran his own horses there and at

Annapolis! There was a fine race-course at Fredericksburg, and

purses were won from ten to a hundred pounds. This, the prime

amusement in spring, summer, and autumn, was varied (alas!) by

cock-fights, wrestling-matches, and rough games, in which the common

people, as in England, participated, while the gentry looked on and

awarded prizes. But in the long winter evenings, neighbors gathered

for Christmas and other house-parties, indulged in the gentle art of

story-telling. Later, old Fredericksburg boasted a notable, peerless

raconteur, John Minor, but his stories were built upon Virginia's

legends; his home, "Hazel Hill," was the rendezvous of all the

neighbors, young and old, in quest of sympathy or counsel, or advice

in the honorable settlement of quarrels, or for a season of genial

companionship. Around the fireside at "Hazel Hill" the children

would gather for their own story-telling hour "between daylight and

dark," and there the immortal "B'rer Rabbit" appears, but not for

the first time, in the annals of colonial history, and her Serene

Highness, the "Tar Baby," held her nightly court.

Around the winter fireside in the old colonial houses, the children,

and their seniors as well, learned the folk-lore of their native

colony, for, young as was the new country, Virginia had already her

legends: the mystic light on the lake in the Dismal Swamp, where the

lost lovers paddled their ghostly canoe; the footprints of the Great

Spirit on the rocks near Richmond; the story of Maiden's Adventure

on the James River; the story of the Haunted House--the untenanted

mansion at Church Hill--untenanted for eight decades because the

unhappy spirit of a maiden tapped with her fan on the doors where

wedded couples slept, invoking curses upon love that had failed her;

of sweet Evelyn Byrd, who rested not under her monument at Westover,

but glided among the roses, wringing her hands in hopeless grief

for the loss of a mortal's love; and of the legend of the wonderful

curative spring just discovered in Greenbrier County (learned from

an old Indian of the tribe of the Shawnees)--how one of the great

braves had once been missed from the council-fires and been found in

a valley, weak and supine, binding the brows of an Indian maid with

ferns and flowers; how two arrows had sped by order of the Great

Spirit, one destined for the man, one for the maid; how the recreant

warrior had been slain by the one, but the other arrow had buried

itself in the earth and when withdrawn a great, white sulphur spring

had gushed forth; how the maiden was doomed to wander as long as the

stream flowed, and not until it ceased could her spirit be reunited

to that of her lover in the happy hunting-grounds; also how the body

of the slain warrior was laid towards the setting sun, and the form

of the sleeping giant might be clearly discerned despite the trees

that grew over it.

[Illustration: WESTOVER.]

And one more Indian legend is so charming that we may be forgiven

for perpetuating it on these pages, remembering that these are

genuine Indian legends which have never before been printed. This

last was the story of the Mocking-bird. How once long ago there were

no wars or fightings, or tomahawks or scalpings among the Indians.

They were at perfect peace under the smile of the Great Spirit.

And in this beautiful time those who watched at night could hear a

strange, sweet song sweeping over the hills and filling the valleys,

now swelling, now dying away to come again. This was the music of

all things; moon, stars, tides, and winds, moving in harmony. But at

last Okee, the Evil One, stirred the heart of the red man against

his brother, and the nations arrayed themselves in battle. From that

moment the song was heard no more. The Great Spirit, Kiwassa, knew

that his children bemoaned their loss, and he promised them the song

should not be lost forever. It would be found some day by some

brave--loftier, better, stronger, than all others.

It fell at last that a chieftain loved the daughter of a hostile

chief. Both were captured and burned at the stake. Both died

bravely, each comforting the other. After death the chief, because

he had been so brave, was given the body of a bird, and sent in

quest of the Lost Song. When he found it, and only then, could

all be forgiven and the spirits of the lovers be reunited in the

happy hunting-grounds. Since then the bird has travelled north,

south, east, west, and wherever it goes it learns the songs of

all creatures, learns and repeats them. But the hatchet is not

yet buried; the Lost Song not yet found. Imagination can supply

few pictures fairer than this: firelight playing on the attentive

faces of old cavaliers and matrons, young men and lovely maidens,

the centre their accomplished host, "the pink of a chivalric

gentleman," gallant, cultured, refined, and at his knees, in his

arms, and seated on his shoulders, happy children, not only those

of his house-party, but others among his neighbors who dropped in

especially for the children's hour.

It is evident that Mary Washington's social life must have been an

active one. At the weddings and the christenings of her large circle

of neighbors and kindred she was certainly present. But I doubt

whether she ever attended the races, "Fish Frys, and Barbecues," of

which her neighbors were so fond. Not that she ventured to express

disapproval of things with which the clergy found no fault, but she

was a strict economist of time, never wasting it on trifles. She

kept her own accounts, managed her own plantation, and kept a stern

watch on the overseers of her son's estates.

To do this, and at the same time fill her place in her large circle

of friends, whose relations with her warranted their coming at will

for long visits, required all the method and management of which she

was capable.

Besides the householders, with their sons and daughters, who

regularly exchanged visits with each other at least once or twice

annually, Virginia had also her class of impecunious bachelors,

whose practice was to visit from house to house, taking in all

the well-to-do families. Until the Revolution--when they had

something else to do--they represented the class of hangers-on to

wealth, known to-day as "the little brothers of the rich,"--very

nice, adaptable, agreeable gentlemen, whom everybody likes, and to

whom society is willing to give much, exacting little in return.

In pre-Revolutionary Virginia, however, they could and did give

something. They gathered the news from house to house, brought

letters and the northern papers; were intelligent couriers, in

short, who kept the planter well-advised of all political rumors.

They possessed certain social accomplishments, could carve fairy

baskets out of cherry stones, cut profile portraits to be laid on

a black background, and make and mend pens to perfection. "When

I was in Stafford County a month ago," says the tutor at "Nomini

Hall," "I met[7] Captain John Lee, a Gentleman who seems to copy the

character of Addison's Will Wimble. He was then just sallying out on

his Winter's Visits, and has got now so far as here; he stays, as

I am told, about eight or ten weeks in the yeare at his own House,

the remaining part he lives with his Waiting Man on his Friends."

Captain Lee, by the way, is further recorded as "a _distant_ cousin

of the Lees of Westmoreland."

[7] Fithian's Diary.

In making these visits to the large country houses, young people

would naturally confer together and manage to meet those they knew

best and liked best. Thus it would sometimes happen (and who so

willing as the hosts?) that a large house-party would assemble

unheralded, and the house be filled with a merry company. "The usual

retinue," says General Maury, "at my wife's home was fifteen or more

well-trained servants when the house was full of company; and as

many as thirty or more of the family and friends daily dined there

together for weeks and months at a time." This was at Cleveland,

near Fredericksburg; and hospitality quite as generous ruled all the

homes in Mary Washington's neighborhood.

It sometimes happened that the capacity of the elastic house reached

its limit. On one such rare occasion a belated Presbyterian minister

alighted at the front gate and walked in with his baggage,--a pair

of well-worn saddle-bags. He was warmly welcomed, of course, but

the lady of the manor was in despair. Where could he sleep? Every

corner was full. One couldn't ask a clergyman to spend the night on

a settee in the passageway, nor lie upon a "pallet" of quilts on

the parlor floor. The children heard the troubled consultation as

to ways and means with their "Mammy," and were full of sympathy for

the homeless, unsheltered guest. The situation was still serious

when the household was summoned to family prayers. The clergyman--a

gaunt specimen with a beaklike nose and mournful voice--launched

into the one hundred and second Psalm, pouring out, as the pitying

children thought, his own soul in its homeless desolation. When he

reached the words, "I am like a pelican in the wilderness: I am like

an owl in the desert: I am as a sparrow alone upon the housetop,"

the exultant voice of the youngest little girl rang out, "_Mamma, he

can roost on the tester!_" One cannot wonder at this advice from a

hospitable man who had been literally "eaten out of house and home,"

"I advise my son to keep out of other people's houses, and keep

other people out of his own."

One can hardly imagine the care and labor involved in so much

entertaining. Nobody ever passed a house without calling; nobody

ever left it without refreshment for man and beast. Horses and

servants attended every visitor.

[Illustration: The Kitchen of Mount Vernon.]

Think of the quantity of food to be provided! And yet, a housewife's

_batterie de cuisine_ was of the simplest. The kitchen fireplace

held the iron pot for boiling the indispensable and much-respected

gammon of bacon (Virginia ham), and there were lidded ovens,

large and small, standing high on four feet, that coals might

burn brightly beneath them. There was a "skillet," with its ever

ascending incense from frying chickens and batter-cakes,--a

long-handled utensil with no feet at all, but resting upon the

portable, triangular "trevet,"--which, being light, could be thrust

into the very heart of the fire or drawn out on the fire-proof

dirt floor. There was a "hoe," known as a cooking utensil only in

Virginia, slanting before the coals for the thin hoe-cake of Indian

meal. In front stood the glory and pride of the kitchen,--the

spit, like two tall andirons with deeply serrated sides, on which

iron rods holding flesh and fowl could rest and be turned to roast

equally. An ample pan beneath caught the basting-butter and juices

of the meat. This spit held an exposed position, and has been known

to be robbed now and then by some unmannerly hound, or wandering

Caleb Balderstone, unable to resist such temptations. What would

the modern queen of the kitchen think of "a situation" involving

such trials,--her own wood often to be brought by herself, her

breakfast, including four or five kinds of bread (waffles, biscuit

thick and thin, batter-cakes, loaf bread), her poultry to be killed

and plucked by herself, her coffee to be roasted, fish scaled and

cleaned, meats cut from a carcass and trimmed, to say nothing of

cakes, puddings, and pies? And all this to be done for a perennial

house-party, with its footmen and maids!

True, the negro cook of colonial times had many

"kitchen-maids,"--her own children. But even with these her

achievements were almost supernatural. With her half-dozen utensils

she served a dinner that deserved--and _has_--immortality! "Old

Phyllis," the cook at "Blenheim," "Mammy Lucy" at Cleveland,

and many others have a high place in an old Virginian's Hall of

Fame,--his heart!

There was no lack of service in Mary Washington's day. The negro was

docile, affectionate, and quick to learn, at least these were the

characteristics of those employed in households. But even as late

as in Mary Ball's girlhood the negroes had no language intelligible

to their employers. One of the Lancaster clergymen, Mr. Bell,

writes that his congregation includes many "negroes, who cannot

understand my language nor I theirs." There is something infinitely

pathetic in this picture of the homeless savage in a strange land.

The African, finding himself not understood, made haste to acquire

the language spoken to him. His intimate association was with the

indented white men who labored with him, and he then and there

created a language distinctively known as his own, to which he still

clings and which contains, I believe, no word that can be traced

to African origin--at least this is true of the Virginia negro's

dialect. "It appears that the indented servants from whom he learned

must have come from Warwickshire. The negro dialect can be found in

Shakespeare;[8] for instance, 'trash,' afterwards accentuated by

'po' white trash.' 'What trash is Rome, what rubbish, what offal,'

says Cassius. 'They are trash,' says Iago, etc. 'Terrify,' for

'aggravate' or 'destroy,' is Warwickshire; also 'his'n,' 'her'n,'

for 'his' and 'hers'; 'howsomdever,' for 'however' (_Venus and

Adonis_); 'gawm,' for 'soiling hands or face'; 'yarbs,' for 'herbs';

'make,' for 'kindle' (make the fire); 'like,' for 'likely' (I was

like to fall); 'peart,' for 'lively'; 'traipsing,' for 'walking

idly about'; 'ooman,' for 'woman'; 'sallit,' for 'green stuff';

'yourn,' for 'yours.' These and many more negro words are taken from

Warwickshire dialect, and are to be found in Shakespeare." Upon

this root the negro grafted, without regard to its meaning, any and

every high-sounding word which he happened to hear, and which seemed

to him magnificent. The meaning signified so little that he never

deemed it necessary to ask it. The result was, to say the least,

picturesque.

[8] "Warwickshire Dialect," by Mr. Appleton Morgan.

The church being his earliest school, he was soon impressed by the

names of certain of the Hebrew Patriarchs, and the first names

with which he endowed his children were Aaron, Moses, Abraham,

Isaac, Jacob, and Isaiah. Why he scorned Jeremiah, Nahum, Ezekiel,

and others, is best known to himself. Later, he caught from

the companionship of the schoolboys the names of the heroes of

antiquity, giving decided preference to Pompey and Cæsar. There

was a Josephus in a Fredericksburg family, differentiated in the

next generation by _Jim_sephus. Later still his fancy was caught

by the shining lights of the Revolution. A goodly crop followed of

Washingtons, Jeffersons, and Randolphs. There was even a Rochambeau,

unhappily corrupted into "Rushingbow."

While the queen of the nursery was an ebony incarnation of faithful

love, tenderness, and patience, she never surrendered her sceptre

until her charges were actually married. She never condescended to

be taught by those to whom she had herself been teacher. "Mammy,"

exclaimed a little Fredericksburg maiden of ten, "what do you think?

I have found an ungrammatical error in the Bible." "Kill him, honey!

Kill him quick! He'll eat up the pretty book-mark!" exclaimed the

old nurse, too proud to acknowledge her ignorance of the beautiful

new word.

"Po' white trash" was a term applied to all householders who could

not afford style in living and equipage, notably to those (and they

were few) who owned no slaves. There was no squalor, no pauperism

in Virginia in 1740 and later. Even indented servants prospered

sufficiently after a few years to send to England for servants of

their own. The convict labor of Virginia was mainly employed in the

fields and on the boats; and it is recorded that these convicts were

short-lived, the hot sun giving them always a "seasoning fever"

which often proved fatal. Of course political convicts were of a

different class, and when found to have been educated were employed

as teachers.

Entirely distinct from these was the class who were entitled to

write "Gent" after their names, as their English fathers had done.

"The term 'Gentleman,'" says Mr. Lyon Tyler, "assumed a very general

meaning in the succeeding century, but its signification at this

time was perhaps what Sir Edward Coke ascribed to it, _qui gerit

arma_, one who bears arms."

It was not the custom then as now to address a man without some

prefix. He was "Squire" if he was a member of the King's Council;

"Gent" if he bore arms, otherwise "Mr."; and if in humble life,

"Goodman." Women of any degree were "Mistress"--Mistress Evelyn

Byrd, Mistress Mary Stagg; in middle class, "Dame"; of gentle blood,

"Madam" and "Lady." In the _Virginia Gazette_ "Lady Washington's"

comings and goings are duly chronicled. Even now the Virginian loves

to endow his fellows with a title, and risks "Colonel" in default of

a better.

The Virginia woman, at the period of which we write, felt keenly

the disadvantage of her remoteness from that centre of knowledge

and courtly usage, the mother country. Men who were educated abroad

began to accumulate books for ambitious libraries, but these books

were largely in the Latin tongue, and the Virginia girl had not

the courage of Queen Elizabeth, and did not address herself to

the study of the Classics that she might "match the men." She had

good, strong sense, and the faculty known as mother-wit, but I

am afraid I must confess she had small learning. What time had

she--married at fifteen--to read or study? As to Mary Washington,

her library, for ought we know to the contrary, seems to have begun

and ended with "Sir Matthew Hale." In 1736 Mr. Parks published his

_Virginia Gazette_ for fifteen shillings a year. Beverley & Stith

had published their "Histories," and William Byrd his "Pamphlets."

These she may have read; but it is extremely doubtful whether she

read the poems and other society doings, records of races and other

happenings, which appeared weekly in the _Gazette_, or approved of

seeing the names, qualities, and fortunes of the ladies recorded as

frankly as at the present day.

These ladies were the daughters, sisters, and wives of men of

brilliant genius and attainments. They could hardly sustain such

relations with such men without becoming themselves superior women.

Dr. Archibald Alexander knew Mrs. Meredith, the sister of Patrick

Henry. "She was, in my judgment, as eloquent as her brother;

nor have I ever met with a lady who equalled her in powers of

conversation."

Something then was said of a woman besides what she wore, whither

she went, and whom she entertained at dinner and tea. There were

women of whom the _Gazette_ kindly said they possessed "amiable

sweetness of disposition, joined with the finest intellectual

attainments," but I am constrained to challenge the latter if it

presupposes the attainments to have been literary. How could it

be otherwise when Thomas Jefferson prescribed that his daughter's

time should be divided between dancing, music, and French? And when

Charles Carter, of "Cleve," after ordering that his sons, John and

Landon, then in England, should master languages, mathematics,

philosophy, dancing, fencing, law, adds, "And whereas the

extravagance of the present age, and the flattering hopes of great

Fortunes may be a temptation to run into unnecessary Expenses of

Living, it is my positive Will and desire that my Daughters may be

maintained with great frugality, and _taught to dance_."

The young women whose brothers had tutors at home were fortunate.

They learned to "read and write and cypher." Then there were men

"Glad to turn itinerant

to stroll and teach from town to town"

and from plantation to plantation. From these the young ladies had

their music and dancing lessons. Their letters are very stilted and

polite,--poor dears,--but "intellectual attainments" do not appear

in many of them. They usually end with laying upon a bad pen all

the blame for all shortcomings. "Excuse bad spelling and writing,

for I have ane ill pen," said Jeanie Deans. The colonial ladies made

no apology for their phonetic spelling. Was not that all right?

If "hir" did not spell "her," pray, what did it spell? "Bin" was

surely more reasonable than "been"; "tha" than "they." There were

"Dixonaries" in the closets along with the Latin books, but they

were troublesome, and not always to be trusted. Dr. Johnson--if

we can imagine him as such--was in their day a sweet babe in long

clothes!

When the slow-sailing ships arrived from England one might have the

fashions of six months ago.

English cousins sometimes came over, and very nervous were the

Virginia girls lest the Western _ménage_ should be found to be

behind the times. Among old letters a certain Miss Ambler appears

to have been dreadfully aggrieved by the criticisms of some English

cousins. "Everything we eat, drink or wear seems to be wrong--the

rooms are too cold or too hot; the wood is not laid _straight_

on the Andirons:--and even poor Aunt Dilsey does not escape

censure,--dear Aunt Dilsey whom we all so love! Actually, Aunt

Dilsey came to me in tears, and said she had been ordered to pull

down her bandanna so that none of her wool would show in the back of

her poor neck, and to draw cotton gloves over her hands for they

were 'so black and nasty'!"

[Illustration: James Monroe.]

Many of the Virginians, at that early day, were advocates of negro

emancipation. James Monroe, who lived in Fredericksburg, was the

great friend of emancipation. Monrovia, the capital of Liberia,

was named in his honor. It was a citizen of Fredericksburg, in

1782, who introduced into the body, which had replaced the House

of Burgesses, the first resolution for the emancipation of negroes

and for the prohibition of the slave trade ever offered in America.

General John Minor, of "Hazel Hill," was the author and advocate of

this measure. In 1792 the first-published utterance against slavery

in this country appeared in a tract entitled, "Slavery Inconsistent

with Justice and Good Policy," by the Rev. David Rice. When estates

were settled large numbers of negroes were manumitted by common

consent and sent to Liberia.

We have reason to believe that house servants were treated with the

affectionate consideration they deserved. Mr. Custis distinctly

declares that this was true of Mary Washington,--that she was always

kind to her servants, and considerate of their comfort. The man

or woman who treated servants with severity was outlawed from the

friendship and respect of his neighbors, many of whom at a later day

freed their slaves and left them land to live upon.

The Mother of Washington and Her Times · 第 19 / 23 章