This proposition, to use the words of Grote[1], "explains th

[Transcriber's note: Original spelling variations have not been

standardized. Characters with macrons have been marked in brackets with

an equal sign, as [=e] for a letter e with a macron on top. Underscores

have been used to indicate _italic_ fonts. A list of volumes and pages

in "Notes and Queries" has been added at the end.]

NOTES AND QUERIES:

A MEDIUM OF INTER-COMMUNICATION

FOR

LITERARY MEN, ARTISTS, ANTIQUARIES, GENEALOGISTS, ETC.

"When found, make a note of."--CAPTAIN CUTTLE.

VOL. V.--No. 123. SATURDAY, MARCH 6. 1852.

Price Fourpence. Stamped Edition, 5_d._

CONTENTS.

Page

NOTES:--

South Sea Playing Cards, by John Sudlow 217

Birthplace of the Empress Josephine, by Henry H. Breen 220

Notes on Homer, No. III., by Kenneth R. H. Mackenzie 221

Folk Lore:--Ancient Custom on Interment--Pure

Rain Water--Cure for Hooping Cough 223

Sainted Kings Incorruptible 223

Minor Notes:--Rev. A. Butler--Birthplace of Bishop

Hoadley--Humboldt's "Cosmos," and Nares' "Attempt"--Gough,

the Irish Portion of his Camden:

Ledwich--Chronogram--Junius and the Quarterly

Review again 224

QUERIES:--

Seven Queries 225

Plague Stones 226

Minor Queries:--The Cross on Counsels' Briefs--Sir

James Hayes, of Bedgebury, Kent--Authorship of the

Song "Oh Nanny," &c.--Hexameter Poem on English

Counties--Wild Oats, Origin of the Phrase--The Dr. Richard

Mortons--General Lambert--Cross-legged Effigies and Collars

of SS.--The Crooked Billet--Collins the Poet, and his Ode

on the Music of the Grecian Theatre--Bishop Kidder's

Autobiography--Shrine of Edward the Confessor--"Wise

above that which is written"--"Hoffman," a Tragedy by

Chettle--Inverted Commas--Quotations Wanted--Deacons,

a Phrase used by Foxe--The Count de Vordac 226

MINOR QUERIES ANSWERED:--Hoare's Charity--Dr.

Sacheverell's "Sermon at Derby"--Lucas Lossius--The

"Athenian Oracle" 229

REPLIES:--

French Revolutions foretold 231

Grimesdyke 231

Poet referred to by Bacon, by S. W. Singer 232

Johnson's House, Bolt Court 232

Cooper's Miniature of Cromwell, by Major-General

Fox 234

The Queen of the Isle of Man 234

Replies to Minor Queries:--Old Scots March--Elizabeth,

Equestrian Figure of--Meaning of Stickle--Latin

Names of Towns--Llandudno, on the Great Orme's

Head--Brozier--Passage in Troilus and Cressida--Nelson

Family--Maps of Africa--Muggleton--Passage in

Hamlet--Theoloneum--Donkey--Sir Samuel Garth--Princes

of Wales and Earls of Chester, &c.: Mr. Bush's

Collection--Litera scripta manet 235

MISCELLANEOUS:--

Notes on Books, &c. 237

Books and Odd Volumes wanted 238

Notices to Correspondents 238

Advertisements 239

Notes.

SOUTH SEA PLAYING CARDS.

It is pretty generally known that, during the South Sea mania, a pack of

playing cards was published in illustration of the prevailing folly.

Each card contained a caricature of one of the numerous bubble

companies, with a pertinent verse underneath. These cards are now

extremely rare. I never saw a complete set, nor do I know where one is

to be found. Some time ago a friend kindly furnished me with a copy of

all the verses (except one), and as I am not aware that they have been

printed separately, I beg to forward a transcript for preservation in

"N. & Q.;" not because I think they have any excellence to recommend

them, but because it is desirable that so curious a record of a very

extraordinary time should not be entirely lost.

Perhaps some of your correspondents can supply the missing verse:--

SPADES.

Ace. _River Douglas._

"Since bubbles came in vogue, new arts are found

To cut thro' rocks, and level rising ground;

That murmuring waters may be made more deep,

To drown the knaves and lull the fools asleep."

Two. _Grand Fishery._

"Well might this bubble claim the style of grand,

Whilst they that raised the same could fish by land;

But now the town does at the project pish,

They've nothing else to cry but stinking fish."

Three. _Cleaning the Streets._

"A cleanly project, well approved no doubt,

By strolling dames, and all that walk on foot.

This bubble well deserves the name of best,

Because the cleanest bite of all the rest."

Four. _Fish Pool._

"How famous is the man that could contrive,

To serve this gluttonous town with fish alive.

But now we're bubbled by his fishing pools,

And as the men catch fish, the fish catch fools."

Five. _York Buildings Water Company._

"You that are blest with wealth by your Creator,

And want to drown your money in Thames water,

Buy but York buildings, and the cistern there

Will sink more pence than any fool can spare."

Six. _Insurance on Lives._

"Come all ye gen'rous husbands with your wives

Insure round sums on your precarious lives,

That to your comfort, when you're dead and rotten,

Your widows may be rich when you're forgotten."

Seven. _Stockings Company._

"You that delight to keep your sweaty feet,

By often changing stockings, clean and neat,

Deal not in stocking shares, because I doubt

Those that buy most 'ere long will go without."

Eight. _Puckles Machine_ (Bullets round and square).

"A rare invention to destroy the crowd

Of fools at home, instead of foes abroad.

Fear not, my friends, this terrible machine,

They're only wounded that have shares therein."

Nine. _Welsh Copper._

"This bubble for a time may current pass,

Copper's the title, but 'twill end in brass;

Knaves cry it up, fools buy, but when it fails,

The losing crowd will cry 'lots splutter a'nails.'"

Ten. _Providing for and employing all the Poor of

Great Britain._

"The poor when managed and employ'd in trade,

Are to the public welfare useful made.

But if kept idle, from their vices spring

W----s for the stews, and soldiers for the king."

Knave. _Raddish Oil._

"Our oily project with the gaping town,

Will surely for a time go smoothly down.

We sow and press to carry on the cheat:

To bite Change Alley is not fraud, but wit."

Queen. _For erecting Hospitals for taking in and maintaining

Illegitimate Children._

"Love on, ye jolly rakes and buxom dames,

A child is safer than venereal flames;

Indulge your senses with the sweet offence,

We'll keep your bastards at a small expence."

King. _An inoffensive Way of emptying Houses of Office._

"Our fragrant bubble, would the world believe it,

Is to make human dung smell sweet as civet;

None sure before us ever durst presume

To turn a ... into a rich perfume."

CLUBS.

Ace. _Lute-string Co._

"These crafty managers have play'd for years

The world as many tricks as dancing bears,

By bubbling too they broke their ancient rules;

They first made lute-strings, but they now make fools."

Two. _Paste board Manufacturing Co._

"As empty sayings flow from windy fools,

So pasteboard bubbles rise from paper skulls.

Madness must surely be the town's disease

When knaves get money by such whims as these."

Three. _Trade to Harborough._

"You that delight to take up foreign linen,

At Harbro' made, a little town near Bremen,

Encourage trade abroad for time to come,

And, like kind fools, neglect your own at home."

Four. _Saltpetre._

"Come all ye black infernal powder makers,

And Rocketeers that deal in squibs and crackers,

Buy petre stock, let me be your adviser,

'Twill make you (tho' not richer) much the wiser."

Five. _For Bleaching Coarse Sugars._

"Fair tattling gossips, you that love to see

Fine sugar blended with expensive tea,

Since you delight in things both dear and sweet,

Buy sugar shares, and you'll be sweetly bit."

Six. _Fatting of Hogs._

"Come all ye bacon making, greasy rogues

That want good names for your meagre hogs,

Send them to us, and at a small expence,

We'll fat 'em up with offal, blood, and grains."

Seven. _Rose Insurance from Fire._

"Projecting sure must be a gainful trade,

Since all the elements are bubbles made;

They're right that gull us with the dread of fire,

For fear makes greater fools than fond desire."

Eight. _Buying Seamen's Tickets._

"As the case stands, the Wapping wives all buy

The seamen's tickets for a small supply;

But 'tis no matter whether spendthrift slaves

Are choused by Wapping w----s, or bubbling knaves."

Nine. _Liverpool Fresh Water._

"This town does to our Western Islands deal,

And serves 'em with malt liquors, and with meal,

Both excellently good! then how in nature

Can people brew fine drink, yet want fresh water."

Ten. _Bleaching of Hair Company._

"Here dirty brown, dark red, and yellow hair,

Are bleach'd to colours that are fine and fair,

Then blended,--so that half the w----s in town

Contribute to adorn one addled crown."

Knave. _Freeholders Company._

"Come all ye spendthrift prodigals that hold

Free land, and want to turn the same to gold,

We'll buy your all, provided you agree

To drown your purchase-money in South Sea."

Queen. _Lending Money on Bottomry._

"Some lend their money for the sake of more,

And others borrow to increase their store;--

Both these do oft engage in Bottomree,

But curse sometimes the bottom of the sea."

King. _Irish Sail Cloth._

"If good St. Patrick's friends should raise a stock,

And make in Irish looms true hollands duck,

Then shall this noble project, by my soul,

No longer be a bubble but a bull."

HEARTS.

Ace. _Hemp and Flax._

"Here hemp is served for stubborn rogues to die in,

And softer flax for tender skins to lie in,

But should the useful project be defeated,

The knaves will prosper, and the fools be cheated."

Two. _Manuring of Land._

"A noble undertaking, but abused,

And only as a tricky bubble used;--

Much they pretend to, but the public fear,

They'll never make corn cheap, or horse-dung dear!"

Three. _Coal Trade from Newcastle._

"Some deal in water, some in wind like fools,

Others in wood, but we alone in coals;

From such like projects a declining nation

May justly fear a fatal inflammation."

Four. _Water Engine._

"Come all ye culls, my water engine buy

To pump your flooded mines and coal-pits dry:

Some projects are all wind, but ours is water,

And tho' at present low, may rise herea'ter."

Five. _Royal Fishery of Great Britain._

"They talk of distant seas, of ships and nets,

And with the style of Royal, gild their baits;

When all that the projectors hope or wish for

Is to catch fools, the only chubs they fish for."

Six. _Erecting Houses of Office in Britain for Strangers

and Travellers._

"A useful project merrily advanced,

Tho' chiefly by town-nightmen countenanced,

Design'd to sweeten the North British nation,

And put close stools and bedpans out of fashion."

Seven. _Building Ships to let to Freight._

"Who but a nest of blockheads to their cost,

Would build new ships for freights when trade is lost?

To raise fresh barks must surely be amusing,

When hundreds rot in docks for want of using."

Eight. _Drying Malt by the Air._

"Of all the windy projects now in vogue

To fleece the fool, and feed the cunning rogue,

The malting bubble seems to be most fair,

Because our maltsters own they work by air."

Nine. _English Copper and Brass Company._

"The headlong fool that wants to be a swopper

Of gold and silver coin for English copper,

May in Change Alley prove himself an ass,

And give rich metal for adult'rate brass."

Ten. _Exporting Timber from Germany._

"You that are rich and hasty to be poor,

Buy timber export from the German shore;

For gallowses built up of foreign wood,

If rightly used, may do Change Alley good."

Knave. _For Erecting Salt-works in Holy Island._

"Here by mixt elements of earth and water,

They make a mud that turns to salt herea'ter,

To help the project on among Change dealers,

May all bad wives, like Lot's, become salt pillars,

Since crowds of fools delight to be salt sellers."

Queen. _Curing Tobacco for Snuff._

"Here slaves for snuffs are sifting Indian weed,

Whilst th' overseer does the riddle feed.

The dust arising gives their eyes much trouble,

To show their blindness that espouse the bubble."

King. _Whale Fishery._

"Whale fishing, which was once a gainful trade,

Is now by cunning heads a bubble made,

For round the Change they only spread their sails,

And to catch gudgeons, bait their hooks with whales."

DIAMONDS.

Ace. _Sir J. Lambert's Improvement of Land Company._

"The famous knight that is the sole projector,

Of this new bubble, is a South director;

But 'twod be better taken at his hands,

To raise poor South Sea, than improve poor lands."

Two. _Greenland Trade._

"This project was to catch, to cut or boil,

Huge whales and other monstrous fish to oil;

A stinking bubble tho' of late so dear,

Yet now the greatest sharers stink for fear."

Three. [Wanting.]

Four. _Insurance on Horses._

"You that keep horses to preserve your ease,

And pads to please your wives and mistresses,

Insure their lives, and if they die we'll make

Full satisfaction, or be bound to break."

Five. _Bahama Islands._

"Rare fruitful isles, where not an ass can find

A verdant tuft or thistle to his mind.

How then must those poor silly asses fare,

That leave their native land to settle there?"

Six. _Insurance on Ships._

"In vain are all insurances,--for still

The raging winds must answer heaven's hill;

To what wise purpose do we then insure,

Since some must lose whate'er the sea devour?"

Seven. _Rock-salt._

"You that are willing to preserve your meat

In winter savoury, and in summer sweet,

Encourage this salt project, and your coin

Will turn to some account--at least to brine."

Eight. _Settling Colonies in Acadia, N. America._

"He that is rich and wants to fool away

A good round sum in North America,

Let him subscribe himself a headlong sharer,

And asses' ears shall honour him or bearer."

Nine. _Pennsylvanian Company._

"Come all ye saints that would for little buy

Great tracts of land, and care not where they lie,

Deal with your Quaking friends, they're men of light;

The spirit hates deceit, and scorns to bite."

Ten. _Purchasing Estates illegally detained._

"You that have dormant titles to estates,

Piled on your closet shelves to feed the rats,

Sell them to us, we'll gratify your spite,

And plague the rogues that roil you of your right."

Knave. _Coral Fishery._

"Coral, that beauteous product only found

Beneath the water and above the ground,

If fish'd for as it ought, from thence might spring

A Neptune's palace for a British king."

Queen. _Furnishing Funerals to all Parts of Great

Britain._

"Come all ye sickly mortals, die apace,

And solemn pomps your funerals shall grace;

Old rusty hackneys still attend each hearse,

And scarecrows in black gowns complete the farce."

King. _Temple Mills._

"By these old mills strange wonders have been done,

Numbers have suffer'd, yet they still work on;

Then tell us, which have done the greater ills,

The Temple lawyers, or the Temple Mills?"

JNO. SUDLOW.

BIRTHPLACE OF THE EMPRESS JOSEPHINE.

It is commonly believed that the Island of Martinique was the birthplace

of Marie Josephine Rose Tascher de la Pagerie, better known as the

Empress Josephine. It would seem, however, from the following

circumstances, that St. Lucia has a preferable claim to that

distinction. By the treaty of Paris (10th February, 1763), St. Lucia,

until then one of the neutral islands, was ceded to France, and was made

a dependency of Martinique. The first step adopted by the local

authorities on that occasion, was to offer extensive grants of land in

St. Lucia to such families in Martinique as might be disposed to settle

in the former island; and among those who took advantage of the proposal

was M. de Tascher, the father of Josephine. In the course of the year

1763 he came over to St. Lucia, and settled with his family on the crest

of a hill called _Paix-Bouche_, within a few miles of the site now

occupied by the principal town. Here they continued to reside until

1771, when M. de Tascher, having been selected for the office of

President of the _Conseil Souverain_ in Martinique, returned with his

family to that island, taking with him a child seven years old, to whom

Madame de Tascher had given birth at _Morne Paix-Bouche_ on the 24th

June, 1764, and who was destined to become the wife of Bonaparte and the

Empress of France.

The fact that M. de Tascher and his family settled in St. Lucia after

the Treaty of Paris, is too well established to require corroboration.

The fact that his residence there extended from 1763 to 1771, is no less

certain. While collecting materials some years ago for the history of

St. Lucia, I met with the most authentic proofs of this circumstance;

but having returned the books and documents to the several parties to

whom they belonged, I am unable at this moment to give a special

reference under this head. As regards the particular date of

Mademoiselle De Tascher's birth, I am indebted for a knowledge of it to

no less an authority than M. Sidney Daney, the author of a voluminous

history of Martinique, who, while asserting that she was born on the

paternal estate in that island, records the date in the following words:

"Cette année 1764 fut signalée par la naissance d'une femme qui,

tout en parvenant à la plus glorieuse des destinées humaines,

devait être à la fois le symbole le plus doux de cette divine

charité. Le vingt-quatre Juin naquit aux Trois-Ilets, sur

l'habitation de ses parens, Marie Josephine Rose Tascher de la

Pagerie."

That the claim of St. Lucia to the honour of having given birth to that

remarkable woman is no idle dream, no imaginary pretension, now set up

for the first time, can be shown by many circumstances. From her

coronation in 1804, to her death in 1814, there were several persons in

St. Lucia who asserted their knowledge of the fact. Some of them were

still living in 1825, when the late Sir John Jeremie came to St. Lucia

and collected information on the subject. In 1831 that able judge

published in a local newspaper a short historical notice of St. Lucia,

in which he gives the following unequivocal testimony on this question.

I quote from the _St. Lucia Gazette and Public Advertiser_ of 23rd

February, 1831:

"On the summit of one of its (St. Lucia's) highest mountains, the

_Paix-Bouche_ (a word which in Negro-French is significantly

expressive of silence), on a spot surrounded by trees, apparently

the growth of centuries, it might be supposed that here at least

the very name of the extraordinary being who has given an impulse

to the age of Napoleon had scarcely reached. A few yards from the

almost impracticable and faintly traced path is the mouldering

foundation of a decayed cottage. _That was the birthplace of

Josephine._ The inhabitants of Martinique, with whom all the St.

Lucia families are connected, lay claim to Josephine as their

countrywoman. The fact is, however, as I have stated it; and this

was admitted by one of her own family at Martinique to a lady of

our island, but with the truly French addition, 'qu'elle n'avait

fait qu'y naître.' The companion of her childhood was Mr. Martin

Raphael, late a councillor of the royal court, who is still

living, and who on visiting France was kindly received by her at

Malmaison. Madame Delomel, who died but a few months ago at a very

advanced age, knew her well."

On my arrival in St. Lucia in 1831, an old woman of colour, named

_Dédé_, was pointed out to me as having been in the service of the

Taschers at _Morne Paix-Bouche_. She was then residing with the family

of Mr. R. Juge, the President of the Court of First Instance, and that

gentleman assured me that nothing was more certain than that Josephine

was born in St. Lucia. I afterwards had several conversations with

_Dédé_ on the subject, and she confirmed Mr. Juge's statement, adding

that she was present at the time of Josephine's birth, and was employed

as her _bonne_ until the departure of the family for Martinique. _Dédé_

was an intelligent old dame, then about eighty years of age, and was

greatly respected by every one.

I am aware that all this is at variance with the biographical records of

our time, which assign Martinique as the place of Josephine's birth. But

this inaccuracy may be accounted for on the following grounds. 1st. St.

Lucia is within a short distance of Martinique, and at the period of

Josephine's birth was a dependency, a portion, as it were, of that

colony. 2nd. The family had long been settled in Martinique before they

came to St. Lucia, and all their predilections were for the former

island. 3rd. Their sojourn in St. Lucia was not of long duration, and in

a few years the circumstance of their having been there at all was

probably forgotten by the public. 4th. There was no priest in St. Lucia

in 1764, by whom the child might have been christened, and the place of

her birth established beyond dispute. 5th. When at a subsequent period

she was baptized in Martinique, it happened naturally enough that there

was no one present who had any knowledge of her having been born in St.

Lucia, or who felt any concern in the matter. 6th. M. De Tascher had now

become a personage of some distinction, and he was probably not

unwilling to efface the recollection of his having been, at one time, a

needy planter in the wilds of St. Lucia. 7th. Facts which have since

acquired an obvious importance, were of none at all in 1771. The

suppression of such a circumstance, whether intentional or accidental,

would have attracted no notice at that period of the history of the

Taschers. It was not then anticipated that a member of the family would,

at no very remote period, become associated with the greatest actor in

the most extraordinary revolution in the world's history, and prove

herself not unworthy of so exalted a destiny.

All that relates to the Empress Josephine receives an added degree of

interest from recent occurrences. It would be strange if the wife who

was discarded by Napoleon because she could not give him an heir for the

imperial throne, should give him, if not an heir, his first successor,

in the person of her grandson, Prince Louis Napoleon. As regards St.

Lucia, too, there is a coincidence which may be worth mentioning. When

Napoleon fell into our hands after the battle of Waterloo, St. Lucia was

the place _first_ selected for his exile; but in consequence of the

dangers likely to arise frown its proximity to Martinique, the scheme

was relinquished, and the preference given to St. Helena.

HENRY H. BREEN.

St. Lucia.

NOTES ON HOMER, NO. III.

(_Continued from_ Vol. v., p. 172.)

_Lachmann and Grote. New Views._

Agreeably to my promise at the conclusion of my former article, I

continue and conclude my remarks on the Homeric question.

Nitzsch, one of Wolf's most indefatigable and learned opponents,

examined his theory with the closest critical nicety, and, by proving

its fallaciousness, he shook the stability of it very much--not wholly,

however, because disproof does not always engender disbelief; scholars

were beginning to lose faith therein, when, ten years ago, the late Carl

Lachmann revived it, with certain modifications, in his _Fernere

Betrachtungen über die Ilias_ (Abhandl. Berlin. Acad. 1841), where he

has proposed the following views:--

That the Homeric poems were not composed by one man, but by several,

working together; and that, after the collection of these lays by

Peisistratos, the history of them is precisely as given us by classical

writers.

This proposition, to use the words of Grote[1], "explains the gaps and

contradictions in the narrative, but it explains nothing else;" and is

further refuted by the actual facts of the poems themselves[2], where,

as we find, no contradictions bearing on this point occur, and the whole

sixteen poets (for such is Lachmann's number) concur in killing and

sending off the stage, so to speak, these considerable chieftains (and

all in the first battle after the secession of Achilles), Elephenor,

chief of the Euboeans[3], Tlepolemos, of the Rhodians[4]; Pandaros of

the Lycians[5]; Odios, of the Halizonians[6]; Pirous and Acamas, of the

Thracians[7]; besides many of inferior note. None of these reappear in

the whole course of the work; and it seems strange, as Mure continues,

that "any number of 'independent poets' should have so harmoniously

dispensed with the services of all six in the sequel." And he then cites

the solitary discrepancy, Pylæmenes, as the only exception[8], whose

death is related in the fifth, and who weeps at his son's funeral in the

thirteenth book. This however, Mure explains as an oversight on the part

of the poet (which is, however, _impossible_), or to the more probable

cause of an interpolation of verses 658 and 659 by an early rhapsodist,

"better versed in the 'Battle of the Ships,' as his habitual part in the

recital, than in the 'Prowess of Diomed.'"

[Footnote 1: Grote, vol. ii. p. 231.]

[Footnote 2: Mure, Appendix C., vol. i. p. 507.]

[Footnote 3: Ιλ. iv. 469.]

[Footnote 4: Ιλ. v. 659.]

[Footnote 5: Ιλ. v. 290.]

[Footnote 6: v. 39.]

[Footnote 7: iv. 527., vi. 7.]

[Footnote 8: v. 576., xiii. 658.]

Grote also objects to the modifications of Lachmann, and in the

following words:

"The advocates of the Wolfian theory appear to feel the

difficulties which beset it: for their language is wavering in

respect to these supposed primary atoms.... I will add in respect

to his [Lachmann's] dissertations, so instructive as a microscopic

examination of the poem, 1. That I find myself constantly

dissenting from that critical feeling on the strength of which he

cuts out parts as interpolations, and discovers traces of the

hands of distinct poets: 2. That his objections against the

continuity of the narrative are often founded upon lines which the

ancient scholiasts and Mr. Payne Knight had already pronounced to

be interpolations: 3. That such of his objections as are founded

upon lines undisputed admit, in many cases, of a complete and

satisfactory reply."[9]

[Footnote 9: _Hist. of Greece_, vol. ii. p. 232. n. 1.]

Grote's own opinions on the subject are difficult to arrive at, but what

he _has_ said is mostly true. These three different views of the Homeric

controversy have, as I have said, occupied the world since thinking on

the subject began; each hypothesis has found most able, critical, and

quibbling adherents and opponents, each affirming and proving, after his

own way, what the others denied and scouted.

There is another author who has likewise discussed the subject of Homer,

and in a way more attractive to the general reader; and that is the

finely-feeling and learned Walter Savage Landor, in his _Pericles and

Aspasia_. Speaking in the person of Pericles, he says[10]:--

"I have no paradox to maintain, no partiality to defend. Some tell

us there were twenty Homers; some deny that there was ever one.

_It were idle and foolish to shake the contents of a vase in order

to let them settle at last._ We are perpetually labouring to

destroy our delights, our composure, our devotion to superior

power. Of all the animals on earth we least know what is good for

us. My opinion is, that what is best for us is our admiration of

good. No man living venerates Homer more than I do. He was the

only author I read when I was a boy; for our teachers are usually

of opinion that wisdom and poetry are, like fruits for children,

unwholesome, if too fresh. Simonides had indeed grown somewhat

sound; Pindar was heating; Æschylus ... ay, but Æschylus was

almost at the next door. Homer then nourished my fancy, animated

my dreams, awoke me in the morning, marched with me, sailed with

me, taught me morals, taught me language, taught me music, and

philosophy, and war."

[Footnote 10: _Pericles and Aspasia_, Letter LXXXIV.--_Works_,

vol. ii. p. 387.]

Agreeing with my honoured friend in what I have italicised above, I

think it is time that the Homeric question were set at rest, and, to

atone for our error in shaking the vase, let it remain at peace forever.

I offer my reflections on the subject with extreme diffidence, yet,

though I confess myself open to correction, and desirous of it, as a

friend to literature, I cannot say that I think my views will be found

far from an approximation to the truth, which, at this remote age, is

all we can possibly arrive at. As Plinius Secundus held that there was

no book so bad but that something might be learned from it, so I hold

that there is no theory so bad (always excepting that one put forth by

some escaped Bedlamite, of Shakspeare's non-being, and that his works

were the composition of the monks), but that there lies some truth at

the bottom of it. On that principle I have endeavoured "to lay the keel"

(as Southey used to say of his planned poems) of a reconciliation

between all the beliefs of all the theorists.

I will state my theory, as I have done the others, in the plainest

possible terms; and, to begin at the beginning, I must go back to the

origin of song. Is it possible that an army like that of the Hellenes

when at Troy, had no idea of passing the weary evenings except in

drinking and talking? No: surely not. We find Phemios singing, in the

_Odyssea_, lays of much the same kidney as those in Athenæos, and in

Xenophon's _Symposion_. These were short recitals of some particular

circumstance of antiquity, half religious and half earthly. No doubt the

common soldiers of that age had, like the common sailors of some fifty

years ago, some one qualified to "discourse in excellent music" among

them. Many of these, like those of the negroes in the United States,

were extemporaneous, and allusive to events passing around them. But

what was passing around them? The grand events of a spirit-stirring war;

occurrences likely to impress themselves, as the mystical legends of

former times had done, upon their memory; besides which, a retentive

memory was deemed a virtue of the first water, and was cultivated

accordingly, in those ancient times. Ballads at first, and down to the

beginning of the war with Troy, were mere recitations with an

intonation. Then followed a species of recitative, probably with an

intoned burden. Tune next followed, as it aided the memory considerably.

It was at this period, about four hundred years after the war, that a

poet flourished of the name of Melesigenes, or Meonides, but most

probably the former. He saw that these ballads might be made of great

utility to his purpose of writing a poem on the social position of

Hellas, and as a collection he published these lays, connecting them by

a tale of his own. This poem now exists under the title of the

_Odyssea_. The author, however, did not affix his own name to the poem,

which, in fact, was great part of it remodelled from the archaïc dialect

of Crete, in which tongue the ballads were found by him. He therefore

called it the poem of _Homeros_, or the Collector.[11] But this is

rather a proof of his modesty and talent, than of his mere drudging

arrangement of other people's ideas, for, as Grote has finely observed,

arguing for the unity of authorship, "a great poet might have recast

pre-existing separate songs into one comprehensive whole; but no mere

arrangers or compilers would be competent to do so."[12]

[Footnote 11: Welcker, _Der Epische Cyclus_, p. 127. Professor

Wilson, in his _System of Hindu Mythology_ (Introduct. p. lxii.),

has the following passage, quoted by Grote: "The sage Vyasa is

represented not as the author, but as the arranger and compiler of

the Vedas and the Purânas. His name dates his character, meaning

the _arranger_ or _distributor_; and the recurrence of so many

Vyasas,--many individuals who new-modelled the Hindu

Scriptures,--has nothing in it that is improbable, except the

fabulous intervals by which their labours are separated."]

[Footnote 12: _Hist of Greece_, vol. ii. p. 232.]

While employed on the wild legend of Odysseus, he met with a ballad

recording the quarrel of Achilles and Agamemnon; his noble mind seized

the hint that there presented itself, and the _Achilleïs_[13] grew under

his hand. Unity of design, however, caused him to publish the poem under

the same pseudonyme as his former work; and the disjointed lays of the

ancient bards were joined together, like those relating to the Cid, into

a chronicle history, named the _Iliad_.[14] Melesigenes knew that the

poem was destined to be a lasting one; and so it has proved. But first,

the poems were destined to undergo many vicissitudes and corruptions, by

the people who took to singing them in the streets, assemblies, and

agoras. However, Solon first, and then Peisistratos, and afterwards

Aristoteles and others, revised the poems, and restored the works of

Melesigenes Homeros to their original integrity in a great measure. But

that this was of no great avail is evident from the corruption

οἰωνοῖσί τε πᾶσι, in the opening. _All_ birds are not carnivorous, and

therefore the passage must be wrong: besides, the words immediately

following, savouring somewhat of interpolation, and, indeed, being

condemned by some as such, would lead to the fair assumption that the

whole line was corrupted.

[Footnote 13: "The first book, together with the eighth, and the

books from the eleventh to the twenty-second inclusive, seem to

form the primary organisation of the poem, _then properly an

Achilleïs_," &c.--Grote, Vol. ii. pp. 235. fol.]

[Footnote 14: Mure, vol. i. p. 23 n. Ticknor, _History of Spanish

Literature_, vol. i. p. 11. seq.]

I said before (Vol. v., p. 99.) that the Cyclic poems illustrated the

history of the Homeric compositions, just as the letters of Poplicola,

and those of Philo Junius, illustrate the history of Junius; but I am

not inclined to deprive them all of credit as the compositions of the

same poet. For instance, part of the Ιλιας μικρα was probably

done from the notes of Melesigenes, who was, like Herodotos, always at

work upon some matter.

The origin of writing has been made a stumbling-block in the Homeric

question, and most foolishly; and I must again agree with Colonel Mure

on this subject. Mr. Grote, Mr. Granville Penn, and the Colonel, have

done more for the elucidation of the question than any other scholars of

the present or last age; and it is to them we must turn for further

assistance. I wish they would give their attention to the hymns,

especially that to Hermes; for "thereby hangs a tale."

As for me, I leave my speculations to the mercy of those who do not

think like myself. I am satisfied that they are not far from the truth,

and as near as we can hope to come in these days. Indeed, it is a

well-known fact, embodied in the old proverb, "What's one man's meat's

another's poison;" and that which is convincing to one is the contrary

to another.

Ere I "close" my "scribblings," however, I must tender my thanks to the

Editor of "N. & Q.," for his kind admission of these articles to his

pages. Haveto!

KENNETH R. H. MACKENZIE.

March 3. 1852.

FOLK LORE.

_Ancient Custom on Interment._--I have read that it was a custom to

inter an hour-glass with the deal, as an emblem of the sand of life

being run out; or perhaps (as I should rather suggest) to intimate that

the departed, having entered upon eternity, had done with time. I

believe that in the early part of the last century the custom had not

entirely disappeared, and that small hour-glasses were given to the

friends of the deceased attending at funerals, and were put beside the

corpse (like rosemary), or thrown into the grave? Does the custom still

linger in any remote parts of the country?

W. S. G.

Newcastle-on-Tyne.

_Pure Rain Water._--_Pure rain water_ is said to be an infallible cure

for sore eyes, and cases are reported to the writer by persons who have

tried and fancy they have proved its efficacy. The rain water must be

collected in a clean open vessel, _in the month of June_, and must not

be contaminated be being previously collected by any other means; it

will then remain pure for any length of time, if preserved in a bottle.

T. D.

Gainsbro'.

_Cure for Hooping Cough._--This complaint is very prevalent in my

neighbourhood just now. I overheard a conversation the other day between

some farmers: one was recommending the patient to inhale the breath of a

horse as a certain cure; another gravely informed his audience that the

sight of a piebald horse would afford immediate relief!

G. A. C.

SAINTED KINGS INCORRUPTIBLE.

In the Appendix to Evelyn's interesting _Diary_ (last edition, 1850),

your readers may recollect there is a note upon the "unexpected finding

the crucifix and gold chain of that pious prince, St. Edward the

Confessor." The note contains an extract from the narrative of the

circumstances attending the finding of those relics by "Charles Taylour,

Gent." (or, Henry Keepe--the writer's correct name). It appears from

that account, that when, in 1163, Thomas à Becket obtained a

canonisation of the king, and the coffin was opened, the body was found

uncorrupted; and that, 136 years after William I. had commanded the

coffin to be enshrined, when the abbot resolved to inspect the body,

then likewise "said to be incorruptible," he found it so, "being

perfect, the limbs flexible," &c.

A curious parallel to this presented itself recently to one in the

course of a reference to the 2nd volume of Mr. W. B. MacCabe's curious

and laborious _Catholic History of England_. [_En passant_, allow me to

express the hope, in which I well know many sympathise, that the

long-promised _third_ volume, bringing the history down to the accession

of William the Conqueror, will ere long appear. The work gives in a

well-arranged form so much that is curious in our early national

records, that it would be a matter of regret that it should not be

completed. It is a great pity indeed that the author's original plan, to

carry the history down to the Reformation, should have been abandoned.]

After describing the burial of Edgar (also a "Confessor," as well as St.

Edward), it is stated that "in the year 1052, upon his tomb being opened

by the Abbot Eilward, his body was found perfectly _free from_ the

slightest stain of _corruption_;" and that upon the body being

"profanely hacked," in order to make it fit the receptacle prepared for

it, "torrents of blood burst from the king's corpse." (W. Malmsb. _Ges.

Reg. Ang._) This, be it remembered, was eighty-seven years after burial.

The body was afterwards deposited in a shrine. Are there other examples

mentioned by the chroniclers of the incorruptibility of saintly kings?

Both Edward and Edgar were, it should be recollected, good friends to

the monks. William of Malmsbury, in the course of his eulogium upon

Edgar, mentions the important fact that the monarch not only gave--

"Templa Deo,"

but also--

"Templis Monachos, Monachis dedit agros."

Were not these strong reasons why the king should remain uncorrupted, at

all events in the memory, and also the records, of the brotherhood?

J. J. S.

Minor Notes.

_Rev. A. Butler._--The Rev. R. Gibbings, M.A., did some years since give

to the public an exact reprint of the first Roman _Index Expurgatorius_,

in the lengthened Introduction to which he has treated of the whole

literature pertaining to the question.

The same rev. gentleman is author of the following elegant inscription

on the monument of the Rev. Archer Butler, recently professor of moral

philosophy in Trinity College, Dublin. Your miscellany seems an

appropriate place wherein to enshrine matters of this order.

"D. O. M.

"GUILIELMUS ARCHER BUTLER, A.M.

Rathmothachiæ Rector in Dioecesi Rapotensi,

Apud Dublinienses in Ethicis Professor,

Theologus, Poeta, Philosophus,

Optimis ingenii dotibus, summâque eloquentiâ præditus,

Multa pro Ecclesiâ Christi feliciter conscripsit,

Plura moliebatur.

Viris ille bonis doctisque juxta carus,

Integer vitæ, maturus animi,

Religione devinctus, concionibus potens

Æqualium decus, simul et exemplar,

Malignâ febre correptus,

Eheu, quàm intempestivè!

E terris migravit A.D. MDCCCXLVIII. ætatis suæ XXXVII.,

Triste desiderium superstitibus relinquens,

Amici piè memores hoc illi monumentum poni voluere."

O. T. D.

_Birthplace of Bishop Hoadley._--On the west side of the London Road,

Westerham, Kent, are some neatly built brick cottages: before one of

them stands a yew tree, which, I was informed by an intelligent

inhabitant of the town, was planted by the Rev.--Hoadley, on the birth

of his son Benjamin. Although the tree still marks the spot, the house

itself does not now stand; it was razed to the ground some years since

to make room for the present buildings. Benjamin's brother, who was

afterwards Archbishop of Dublin, was also born in this house. I may add

that this is not generally known in the town, but I think the above

"Note" is accurate.

H. G. D.

_Humboldt's "Cosmos," and Nares' "Attempt."_--Observing that the learned

and accomplished Humboldt has concluded his _Cosmos_ in German, although

the English translation of the last portion has not yet appeared,--an

extremely valuable and interesting scientific contribution towards a

general view of human knowledge regarding the universe,--will you permit

me to observe, that as it perhaps did not enter into his plan to

consider the _religious_ considerations that arise from a _Christian's_

view of the universe in its relation to our small portion of its

apparently illimitable extent, any reader of Humboldt's work who wishes

to see how a scholar and a divine of a former generation has treated the

subject, will, if I mistake not, peruse the following work with singular

pleasure, making all due allowance for the imperfect state of

scientific knowledge at the time when the author wrote:--

"Εις Θεος Εις Μεσιτης; or, an Attempt to show how far

the Philosophical Notion of a Plurality of Worlds is consistent,

or not so, with the language of the Holy Scriptures. By the Rev.

Edward Nares, A.M., Rector of Biddenden, Kent, and late Fellow of

Merton College, Oxford. 8vo. London, 1801."

The author, I may add, was a friend of the eminent geologist, De Luc.

J. M.

_Gough, the Irish Portion of his Camden: Ledwich._--The following

cutting from a Dublin bookseller's Catalogue (Connolly, 6. Chancery

Place, Feb. 1852) may perhaps find a corner in "N. & Q." Dr. Ledwich was

the Will-o'-the-Wisp that led Gough astray in the matter of Irish

antiquities. Few, indeed, of the "additions" made to honest Camden's

original are of value, many of them are worse than valueless:--

"ANTIQUITIES OF IRELAND, from Gough's edition of Camden's

Britannia, profusely illustrated with plates and maps from various

works, including Ortelliu's (Ortelius') rare map of Ireland, all

of which were inserted by the Rev. Mr. Ledwich, the Irish

Antiquarian, royal folio, half russia, neat, 3_l._ 10_s._

"This unique copy was presented by Mr. Gough to the Rev. Mr.

Ledwich, and bears Gough's autograph: 'For the Rev. Mr. Ledwich.

From the author. 1789.'

"Mr. Ledwich presented the book to Wm. Monck Mason, Esq., having

written the following memorandum:--

"'I assisted Mr. Gough in this edition, and he spontaneously

promised a copy of the work in 3 vols. folio, but put me off with

this paltry volume. So he served my valuable friend, Mr. Beauford

of Athy.

"'Viveret in terris te si quis avarior uno?'

"'_Horace._

"'E. L., F.A.S., 1790.'

"A copy of the original note [to Mason] inserted in the book--

"'York Street, 3rd Feb. 1817.

"'Dear Sir--Having parted with all my books, for not one of my

family could or would read them, I have retained what I send you.

It is a small return for the presents you made me.

"'Small as it is, have the goodness to accept of it as a testimony

of my obligations and friendship.

"'Believe me yours sincerely,

"'E. LEDWICH.'

"The work is Gough's Britannia, the Irish Part."

JAMES GRAVES.

Kilkenny.

_Chronogram_ over the door of Sherborne school, marking the date 1670:

"Tecta, Draco custos, Leo vinDeX fLos Decus, auctor, ReX pius,

hæc servat, protegit, ornat, aLit."

The letters DLDXLDXL are capitals, and rubricated.

S. S.

_Junius and the Quarterly Review again._--The article on the Letters of

Junius, in the last number of the _Quarterly Review_, is very pleasantly

written. But I suppose it will not be considered to have rendered

probable the notion that Thomas Lord Lyttelton was the writer of those

letters. The reviewer observes that "Lord Lyttelton," meaning George,

the first Lord Lyttelton, is only once mentioned by Junius. Undoubtedly

Junius mentions "Lord _Littleton's_ integrity and judgment" (Woodfall,

ii. 305.) Can it be imagined that Thomas Lord _Lyttelton_ could have so

mis-spelled his father's name?

CAROLUS CURSITOR.

Queries.

SEVEN QUERIES.

1. On the 24th February, 1831, was published, at Speenhamland, the first

number of the _History and Antiquities of Newbury and its Environs_. Was

this work ever completed? If not, how many numbers were issued.

["The History and Antiquities of Newbury and its Environs,

including twenty-eight Parishes situate in the County of Berks,

also a Catalogue of Plants found in the Neighbourhood," was

completed in 1839, and makes a volume of 340 pages.]

2. Can any information be given as to Hannah Woolley beyond what she

gives in the curious autobiographical sketch prefixed to her

_Gentlewoman's Companion, or a Guide to the Female Sex_; 3rd edition.

London, 1682, 12mo. Her maiden name she omits to mention; and all she

discloses as to her family and fortunes is, that her parents died when

she was very young, and that she had suffered "all manner of

affliction," "by loss of husband, children, friend, estate."

3. Amongst Mr. C. K. Sharpe's MSS. was sold _The Force of Love, or the

Ephesian Matron; a Dramatick Poem, in Three Parts_. From a playbill,

which was pasted on the fly-leaf, it seems that this drama was produced

for the benefit of Mr. and Mrs. Wallace, at the theatre in Sadler

Street, Durham, April 7, 1777. The performance was "gratis;" but 2_s._

6_d._, 2_s._, and 1_s._, for boxes, pit, and gallery, were charged for

the "Concert of Music." The title was changed into the _Matron of

Ephesus_, and the authorship was ascribed to Mr. Wallace. No notice

either of play or author occurs in the _Biographia Dramatica_.

4. Does any MS. of the _Conquest of China_, a tragedy, by Sir Robert

Howard, exist? I have in my library a scene written by the Earl of

Rochester for the author, and which, so far as I can trace, from the

very defective state of the libraries of the north, was never printed.

It is a beautiful MS., and some of the lines possess considerable

vigour. It is written in rhyme.

5. Who was the author of the _History of Faction, alias Hypocrisy, alias

Moderation, from its first Rise, down to its present Toleration in these

Kingdoms_? &c. London, 1705, 8vo.

6. Where can the fourth and concluding(?) number of Wright's _History of

Ludlow_ be obtained?

[Only three Parts have been published. The last was issued in

1847.]

7. Can you inform me who was the translator of--

"_The Idea of Christian Love_; being a Translation, at the

Instance of Mr. Waller, of a Latin Sermon upon John xiii. 34, 35.,

preached by Mr. Edward Young, Prebend of Salisbury. With a large

Paraphrase on Mr. Waller's Poem of _Divine Love_. To which are

added, some Copies of Verses from that excellent Poetess Mrs.

Wharton, with others to her. London, 1688, 8vo."

The versification is extremely good, but as I never saw the sermon, I

can have no notion whether the translation be faithful, or the reverse.

I suspect a Latin "preachment" would have few hearers, especially

now-a-days: but it would be interesting to see a Latin sermon which

Waller thought highly of, and which he proposed should be turned into

verse.

I have not been able to procure any information as to the sermon, or its

poetical translation, in any bibliographical work; but perhaps some of

your numerous readers may know something either about Mr. Edward Young,

the father I presume of the poet, or the translator.

Mrs. Wharton was the daughter of Sir H. Lee, of Ditchly, and the first

wife of the future Marquis of Wharton. A manuscript tragedy by her, and

in her own handwriting, is in my possession. It is the presentation copy

to Miss Mary Howe, whose autograph is on the fly-leaf. It is beautifully

bound in old morocco, and formerly belonged to Horace Walpole, whose

book-plate is on it. Who was Miss Mary Howe? It was purchased at the

dispersion of the curious MSS. of Mr. Charles K. Sharpe, who had a great

fancy for the lady's poetry. She is erroneously styled Marchioness of

Wharton in Park's edition of Walpole's _Royal and Noble Authors_.

J. MT.

Notes and Queries, Vol. V, Number 123, March 6, 1852 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 1 / 5 段