I.--THE JEWISH PROHIBITION.

The bat was regarded as unclean. Two reasons may be given for

this--corresponding to the two classes of bats which are known to have

existed in Bible lands. We have first the _insectivorous_ bats, which,

both in habits and appearance, are so repugnant that no one would ever

dream of regarding them as food, or as fit objects for sacrifice. They

were rejected on the principle that nothing repulsive or hideous is to

be eaten or offered; for this would offend the _horror naturalis_ which

is so great a safeguard in human life. And indeed, if these were the

only bats known to the Jews, the prohibition as thus applied would seem

to be needless. But these were not the only bats. We have also the

large _frugivorous_ bats which have been used as food in various parts

of the world; and they may have been so used by the Jews themselves when

sojourning in the land of Egypt. The Egyptian monuments show that these

large fox-headed bats were not at all uncommon in the valley of the

Nile; and Canon Tristram secured two fine specimens even in Central

Palestine, which measured twenty and a half inches from wing to wing.

Now if surrounding nations ate these bats as a common article of diet,

would not this be a sufficient reason why the Jews should not be allowed

to touch them? I think it would. Israel as a nation was set apart to

Jehovah. They were His peculiar people. They were His chosen and

purchased possession; and therefore even in their food there must be a

separation in which this reference to Jehovah was expressed. They must

be made to feel that even in the prohibition of the bat and other

animals, the divine command had been addressed to them, "Come out from

among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord."

And yet one cannot but think that all this was rather hard on the bat.

"It is said that the African negroes depict and describe _their_ evil

spirits as white; and that in consequence, the negro children fly in

consternation if perchance a white man comes into their territory. Yet

a white man is not so very horrid an object after all, if one only dare

look at him, and the same remark holds good with the bats." (J. G.

Wood.) A very pretty and useful creature is the bat, and it is quite

qualified to teach us many valuable lessons.

Kingless Folk, and Other Addresses on Bible Animals · 第 53 / 64 题