Down to the month of May, the Girondins had failed in their attacks

on individual deputies, but their position in the Assembly was

unshaken. By their divisions, and by means of occasional majorities,

especially by the uncertain and intermittent help of Danton,

Robespierre had carried important measures--the Revolutionary

Tribunal, the Committee of Public Safety, the employment of

commissaries from the Convention to enforce the levies in each

department. By a series of acceptable decrees in favour of the

indigent, he had established himself and his friends as the authors of

a new order of society, against the representatives of the middle

class. The people of Paris responded by creating an insurrectionary

committee to accomplish, by lawful pressure or otherwise, the purpose

of the deputation which had demanded the exclusion of the twenty-two.

On May 21 a commission of twelve was appointed to vindicate the

supremacy of the Convention against the municipality. The Girondins

obtained the majority. Their candidates received from 104 to 325

votes. No Jacobin had more than 98. It was their last parliamentary

victory. There was no legal way of destroying them. The work had to be

left to agitators like Marat, and the committee of insurrection. When

this came to be understood, the end was very near. The committee of

twelve, the organ of the Convention and of the moderate part of it,

arrested several of the most violent agitators. On May 26, Robespierre

summoned the people of Paris against the traitorous deputies. Next day

they appeared, made their way into the Convention, and stated their

demands. The men were released, and the commission of twelve was

dissolved. But on the 28th the Assembly, ashamed of having yielded

tamely to a demonstration which was not overwhelming, renewed the

commission, by 279 votes to 239.

A more decisive action was now resolved upon, and the Jacobins

prepared what they called a moral insurrection. They desired to avoid

bloodshed, for the tenure by which the Revolutionary Tribunal existed

was that it prevented the shedding of blood otherwise than by legal

forms. The Girondins, after expulsion, could be left to the enjoyment

of all the securities of a trial by jury. Meanwhile, the Girondin

scheme of Constitution was dropped, and five new members were

appointed to draw up a new one; and on May 30, for the first time, a

president was taken from the deputies of the Mountain. On May 31 the

insurrectionary masses invaded the Assembly. There was no actual

violence, and no resistance. The Girondins did nothing to defend their

cause, and their commission of twelve was again dissolved. The

deputies remained uninjured; but Roland fled, and his wife was sent to

prison. Two days later, June 2, the victory of moral force was

completed. The Tuileries were surrounded with cannon, the deputies

were not permitted to go out, and some of the Girondins agreed to

resign their seats in order to prevent an outbreak. It was called a

voluntary ostracism.

In the extreme weakness of the party Lanjuinais alone spoke and acted

with courage and decision. Legendre went up to the Tribune while he

was speaking, and threatened to kill him. As Legendre was a butcher,

Lanjuinais replied, "First decree that I am a bullock." When Chabot,

who had been a Capuchin, reviled the fallen statesmen, Lanjuinais

exclaimed, "The ancients crowned their victims with flowers, and the

priest did not insult them." This brave man lived through it all,

lived to witness the destruction of his enemies, to be the elect of

many departments, and to preside over the Chamber that decreed the

downfall of Napoleon. At the last moment, an obscure supporter of the

Girondins saw Danton, and called on him to interfere to save the

Convention from violence. Danton answered that he could do nothing,

for they had no confidence in him. It is a redeeming testimony. On the

evening of June 2 the more conspicuous Girondins, without being sent

to prison, were placed under arrest. In the capital, the victory of

the Jacobins was complete. They had conquered by the aid of the

insurrectionary committee, to which no man was admitted who did not

swear approval of the September murders.

Rout and extermination ensued upon the fall of the Gironde. They had

been scrupulous not to defend themselves by force, and preferred the

Republic to their party. While some remained as hostages in the power

of the foe, others went away to see what France would think of the

mutilation of its parliament. Their strength was in departments, and

in several departments the people were arming. In the west there was

no hope for them, for they had made the laws against which La Vendee

rebelled. They turned to the north. In Normandy the royalists were

forming an army, under the famous intriguer, Puisaye. Between such a

man and Buzot no understanding could subsist. There was no time for

them to quarrel, for the movement broke down at once. The people of

Normandy were quite indifferent. But there was one among them who had

spirit, and energy, and courage, and passion enough to change the face

of France. This extraordinary person was the daughter of M. d'Armont,

and she passed into the immortality of history as Charlotte Corday.

She was twenty-four. Her father was a royalist, but she had read

Raynal, and had the classical enthusiasm which was bred by Plutarch in

those as well as in other days. She had refused the health of Lewis

XVI., because, she said, he was a good man, but a bad king. She

preferred to live with a kinswoman, away from her own family, and her

mind was made up never to marry. Her bringing up had been profoundly

religious, but that influence seems to have been weakened in her new

home. There is no trace of it during the five days on which a fierce

light beats. In her room they found her Bible lying open at the story

of Judith. From the 31st of May she had learnt to regard Marat as the

author of the proscription of the Girondins, some of whom had appeared

at Caen in a patriotic halo. When the troops were paraded, on July 7,

those who volunteered for the march against Paris were so few that the

hope of deeds to be done by armed men utterly vanished. It occurred to

Charlotte that there may be something stronger than the hands and the

hearts of armed men. The Girondins were in the power of assassins, of

men against whom there was no protection in France but the dagger. To

take a life was the one way of saving many lives. Not a doubt ever

touched her that it is right to kill a murderer, an actual and

intending murderer, on condition of accepting the penalty. She told no

one of the resolution in her mind, and said nothing that was pathetic,

and nothing that was boastful. She only replied to Petion's clumsy

pleasantries: "Citizen, you speak like that because you do not

understand me. One day, you will know." Under a harmless pretext she

went to Paris, and saw one of the Girondin deputies. In return for

some civility, she advised him to leave at once for Caen. His friends

were arrested, and his papers were already seized, but he told her

that he could not desert the post of duty. Once more, she cried,

"Believe me, fly before to-morrow night!" He did not understand, and

he was one of the famous company that mounted the scaffold with

Vergniaud. Next morning, Saturday July 13, Charlotte purchased her

dagger, and called on Marat. Although he was in the bath where he

spent most of his time, she made her way in, and explained her

importunity by telling him about the conspirators she had seen in

Normandy. Marat took down their names, and assured her that in a few

days he would have them guillotined. At that signal she drove her

knife into his heart. When the idiotic accuser-general intimated that

so sure a thrust could only have been acquired by practice, she

exclaimed, "The monster! He takes me for a murderess." All that she

felt was that she had taken one life to preserve thousands. She was

knocked down and carried through a furious crowd to prison. At first

she was astonished to be still alive. She had expected to be torn in

pieces, and had hoped that the respectable inhabitants, when they saw

her head displayed on a pike, would remember it was for them that her

young life was given. Of all murderers, and of all victims, Charlotte

Corday was the most composed. When the executioner came for the

toilette, she borrowed his shears to cut off a lock of her hair. As

the cart moved slowly through the raging streets, he said to her, "You

must find the way long." "No," she answered, "I am not afraid of

being late." They say that Vergniaud pronounced this epitaph: "She has

killed us, but she has taught us all how to die."

After the failure in Normandy, of which this is the surviving episode,

Buzot and his companions escaped by sea to the Gironde. Having been

outlawed, on July 28, they were liable to suffer death without a

trial, and had to hide in out-houses and caverns. Nearly all were

taken. Barbaroux, who had brought the Marseillais, shot himself at the

moment of capture, but had life enough to be carried to the scaffold.

Buzot and Petion outlived their downfall for a year. Towards the end

of the Reign of Terror, snarling dogs attracted notice to a remote

spot in the south-west. There the two Girondins were found, and

recognised, though their faces had been eaten away. Before he went out

to die, Buzot placed in safety the letters of Madame Roland. Seventy

years later they came to light at a sale, and the suspected secret of

her life told in her _Memoirs_, but suppressed by the early editors,

was revealed to the world. She had been executed on November 10, 1793,

four days after the Duke of Orleans, and the cheerful dignity of her

last moments has reconciled many who were disgusted with her

declamatory emphasis, her passion, and her inhumanity. Her husband was

safe in his place of concealment near Rouen; but when he heard, he ran

himself through with a sword-cane. The main group had died a few days

earlier. Of 180 Girondin deputies, 140 were imprisoned or dispersed,

and 24 of these managed to escape; 73 were arrested at Paris, October

3, but were not brought to trial; 21, among whom were many

celebrities, went before the revolutionary tribunal, October 24, and a

week later they were put to death. Their trial was irregular, even if

their fate was not undeserved. With Vergniaud, Brissot, and their

companions the practice began of sending numbers to the guillotine at

once. There were 98 in the five months that followed.

During the agony of his party, Condorcet found shelter in a

lodging-house at Paris. There, under the Reign of Terror, he wrote

the little book on Human Progress, which contains his legacy to

mankind. He derived the leading idea from his friend Turgot, and

transmitted it to Comte. There may be, perhaps, a score or two dozen

decisive and characteristic views that govern the world, and that

every man should master in order to understand his age, and this is

one of them. When the book was finished, the author's part was played,

and he had nothing more to live for. As his retreat was known to one,

at least, of the Montagnards, he feared to compromise those who had

taken him in at the risk of their life. Condorcet assumed a disguise,

and crept out of the house with a Horace in one pocket and a dose of

poison in the other. When it was dark, he came to a friend's door in

the country. What passed there has never been known, but the fugitive

philosopher did not remain. A few miles outside Paris he was arrested

on suspicion and lodged in the gaol. In the morning they found him

lying dead. Cabanis, who afterwards supplied Napoleon in like manner,

had given him the means of escape.

This was the miserable end of the Girondin party. They were easily

beaten and mercilessly destroyed, and no man stirred to save them. At

their fall liberty perished; but it had become a feeble remnant in

their hands, and a spark almost extinguished. Although they were not

only weak but bad, no nation ever suffered a greater misfortune than

that which befell France in their defeat and destruction. They had

been the last obstacle to the Reign of Terror, and to the despotism

which then by successive steps centred in Robespierre.

XVIII

THE REIGN OF TERROR

The liberal and constitutional wave with which the Revolution began

ended with the Girondins; and the cause of freedom against authority,

of right against force was lost. At the moment of their fall, Europe

was in arms against France by land and sea; the royalists were

victorious in the west; the insurrection of the south was spreading,

and Precy held Lyons with 40,000 men. The majority, who were masters

in the Convention, had before them the one main purpose of increasing

and concentrating power, that the country might be saved from dangers

which, during those months of summer, threatened to destroy it. That

one supreme and urgent purpose governed resolutions and inspired

measures for the rest of the year, and resulted in the method of

government which we call the Reign of Terror. The first act of the

triumphant Mountain was to make a Constitution. They had criticized

and opposed the Girondin draft, in April and May, and only the new

declaration of the Rights of Man had been allowed to pass. All this

was now re-opened. The Committee of Public Safety, strengthened by the

accession of five Jacobins, undertook to prepare a scheme adapted to

the present conditions, and embodying the principles which had

prevailed. Taking Condorcet's project as their basis, and modifying it

in the direction which the Jacobin orators had pointed to in debate,

they achieved their task in a few days, and they laid their proposals

before the Convention on June 10. The reporter was Herault de

Sechelles; but the most constant speaker in the ensuing debate was

Robespierre. After a rapid discussion, but with some serious

amendments, the Republican Constitution of 1793 was adopted, on June

24. Of all the fruits of the Revolution this is the most

characteristic, and it is superior to its reputation.

The Girondins, by their penman Condorcet, had omitted the name of God,

and had assured liberty of conscience only as liberty of opinion. They

elected the executive and the legislative alike by direct vote of the

entire people, and gave the appointment of functionaries to those whom

they were to govern. Primary assemblies were to choose the Council of

Ministers, and were to have the right of initiating laws. The plan

restricted the power of the State in the interest of decentralisation.

The Committee, while retaining much of the scheme, guarded against the

excess of centrifugal forces. They elected the legislature by direct

universal suffrage, disfranchised domestic servants, and made the

ballot optional, and therefore illusory. They resolved that the

supreme executive council of twenty-four should be nominated by the

legislature from a list of candidates, one chosen by indirect voting

in each department, and should appoint and control all ministers and

executive officers; the legislature to issue decrees with force of law

in all necessary matters; but to make actual laws only under popular

sanction, given or implied. In this way they combined direct democracy

with representative democracy. They restricted the suffrage, abolished

the popular initiative, limited the popular sanction, withdrew the

executive patronage from the constituency, and destroyed secret

voting. Having thus provided for the composition of power, they

proceeded in the interest of personal liberty. The Press was to be

free, there was to be entire religious toleration, and the right of

association. Education was to become universal, and there was to be a

poor law; in case of oppression, insurrection was declared a duty as

well as a right, and usurpation was punishable with death. All laws

were temporary, and subject to constant revision. Robespierre, who had

betrayed socialist inclinations in April, revoked his earlier

language, and now insisted on the security of property, proportionate

and not progressive taxation, and the refusal of exemptions to the

poor. In April, an unknown deputy from the Colonies had demanded that

the Divinity be recognised in the preamble, and in June, after the

elimination of the Girondins, the idea was adopted. At the same time,

inverting the order of things, equality was made the first of the

Rights of Man, and Happiness, instead of Liberty, was declared the

supreme end of civil society. In point of spiritual quality, nothing

was gained by the invocation of the Supreme Being.

Herault proposed that a Grand Jury should be elected by the entire

nation to hear complaints against the government or its agents, and to

decide which cases should be sent for trial. The plan belonged to

Sieyes, and was supported by Robespierre. When it was rejected, he

suggested that each deputy should be judged by his constituency, and

if censured, should be ineligible elsewhere. This was contrary to the

principle that a deputy belongs to the whole nation, and ought to be

elected by the nation, but for the practical difficulty which compels

the division into separate constituencies. The end was, that the

deputies remained inviolable, and subject to no check, although the

oldest member, a man so old that he might very well have remembered

Lewis XIV., spoke earnestly in favour of the Grand Jury.

The Constitution wisely rescinded the standing offer of support to

insurgent nations, and renounced all purpose of intervention or

aggression. When the passage was read declaring that there could be no

peace with an invader, a voice cried, "Have you made a contract with

victory?" "No," replied Bazire; "we have made a contract with death."

A criticism immediately appeared, which was anonymous, but in which

the hand of Condorcet was easily recognised. He complained that judges

were preferred to juries, that functionaries were not appointed by

universal suffrage, that there was no fixed term of revision, that the

popular sanction of laws was reduced to a mere form. Condorcet

believed that nearly all inequality of fortune, such as causes

suffering, is the effect of imperfect laws, and that the end of the

social art is to reduce it. There were others who objected that the

Constitution did not benefit the poor. In regard to property, as in

other things, it was marked by a pronounced Conservatism. It was

adopted by a national vote of 1,801,918 to 11,610, and, with solemn

rites, was inaugurated on August 10. No term was fixed for it to come

into operation. The friends of Danton spoke of an early dissolution,

but the Convention refused to be dissolved, and the Constitution was

never executed. Although other acts of the legislature at that time

are still good law, French jurists do not appeal to the great

constitutional law of June 24 and August 10, 1793. In the course of

the autumn, October 10 and December 4, it was formally suspended, and

was never afterwards restored. France was governed, not by this

instrument, but by a series of defining enactments, which created

extraordinary powers, and suppressed opposition.

After the integrity of the Assembly, the next thing to perish was the

liberty of the Press. The journalists could not claim the sanctity

which had been violated in the representatives, and gave way. Marat

remained, and exercised an influence in Paris which his activity on

June 2 increased. He had his own following, in the masses, and his own

basis of power, and he was not a follower of either Danton or

Robespierre. By his share in the fall of the Girondins he became their

equal. When he died, the vacant place, in the Press and in the street,

was at once occupied by a lesser rival, Hebert. In a little time,

Hebert acquired enormous power. Marat's newspaper had seldom paid its

way; but Hebert used to print 600,000 copies of the _Pere Duchesne_.

Through his ally Chaumette, he controlled the municipality of Paris,

and all that depended from it. Through Bouchotte and Vincent, he

managed the War Office, with its vast patronage and command of money,

and distributed his journal in every camp. To a man of order and

precision like Robespierre, the personage was odious, for he was

anarchical and corrupt, and was the urgent patron of incapable

generals; but Robespierre could not do without his support in the

Press, and was obliged to conciliate him. Between Hebert and Danton

there was open war, and Danton had not the best of it. He had been

weakened by the overthrow of the Girondins whom he wished to save, and

was forced to abandon. In the Convention, he was still the strongest

figure, and at times could carry all before him. But when he lost his

seat on the governing Committee, and was without official information,

he was no match at last for Robespierre. All through the summer he was

evidently waning, whilst the Confederates, Chaumette, Hebert, and

Vincent, became almost invincible.

On the 10th of July the Committee of Public Safety, after acting as a

Committee of Legislation, was recomposed as an executive body. There

had been fourteen members, there were now nine. Barere had the highest

vote, 192; St. Just had only 126; and Danton was not elected. The

influence of Robespierre was supreme; he himself became a member, on a

vacancy, July 27. The fortunes of France were then at their lowest.

The Vendeans were unconquered, Lyons was not taken, and the Austrians

and English had broken through the line of fortresses, and were making

slowly for Paris. A few months saw all this changed, and those are the

earlier months of the predominance of Robespierre, with his three

powerful instruments, the Committee of Public Safety, the

Revolutionary Tribunal, and the Jacobin Club, which made him master of

the Convention. On July 27, the day before he was elected to the

Committee, an important change occurred. For the first time, an order

was sent from the Tuileries to the army on the frontier, in a quarter

of an hour. This was the beginning of the semaphore telegraph, and

science was laying hold of the Revolution. On August 1, the metrical

system was introduced, and the republican calendar followed; but we

shall speak of it in another connection.

In the middle of August, Prieur, an engineer officer, was elected to

the Committee, to conduct the business of war; but Prieur protested

that he was the wrong man, and advised them to take Carnot. Therefore,

August 15, very much against the wish of Robespierre, the organiser of

victory joined the government. The Hebertists had proposed that the

entire population should be forced into the army, more particularly

the richer class. Danton modified the proposal into something

reasonable, and on August 23, Carnot drew up the decree which was

called the _levee en masse_. It turned France into a nominal nation of

soldiers. Practically, it called out the first class, from eighteen to

twenty-five, and ordered the men of the second class, from twenty-five

to thirty, to be ready. It is to Danton and Carnot that France owed

the army which was to overrun the Continent; and by the end of the

year the best soldiers in the world, Hoche, Moreau, Massena,

Bonaparte, were being raised to command.

On August 9, an event occurred in the civil order which influenced the

future of mankind as widely as the creation of the French army. While

the Committee of Public Safety was busy with the Constitution, the

Committee of Legislation was employed in drawing up a Code of Civil

Law, which was the basis of the Code Napoleon. Cambaceres, who, with

the same colleagues, afterwards completed the work, presented it in

its first form on that day. Lastly, August 24, Cambon, the financial

adviser of the Republic, achieved the conversion and unification of

the Public Debt.

These were the great measures, undertaken and accomplished by the men

who accepted the leadership of Robespierre, in the first weeks of his

government. We come to those by which he consolidated his power.

At the beginning of September, the Committee was increased by the

admission of Billaud-Varennes, and of Collot d'Herbois, of whom one

afterwards overthrew Danton, and the other, Robespierre. The

appointment of Collot was a concession to Hebert. The same party were

persuaded that the hands of government were weak, and ought to be

strengthened against its enemies. Danton himself said that every day

one aristocrat, one villain, ought to pay for his crimes with his

head. Two measures were at once devised which were well calculated to

achieve that object. September 5, the Revolutionary Tribunal was

remodelled, and instead of one Revolutionary Tribunal, there were

four. And on September 17 the Law of Suspects was passed, enabling

local authorities to arrest whom they pleased, and to detain him in

prison even when acquitted. In Paris, where there had been 1877

prisoners on September 13, there were 2975 on October 20. On September

25, the mismanagement of the Vendean War, where even the Mentz

garrison had been defeated, led to a sharp debate in the Convention.

It was carried away by the attack of the Dantonists; but Robespierre

snatched a victory, and obtained a unanimous vote of confidence. From

that date to the 26th of July 1794, we count the days of his

established reign, and the Convention makes way for the Committee of

Public Safety, which becomes a Provisional government.

Lectures on the French Revolution · 第 22 / 31 段