CHAPTER XVI.

TELEGRAPHIC BLUNDERS.

Although the work of sending and receiving telegraphic messages may be

regarded in a general way as partaking largely of a merely mechanical

nature, yet it is work to which the operator who is to achieve credit in

his sphere must bring much tact, good sense, intelligence, a knowledge

of the world, and a considerable amount of patience. Not only are the

terms in which telegrams are frequently written so far devoid of context

in themselves, owing to the curt way in which they are worded, as to

render the sense of little assistance in estimating the correctness of a

message received, but the letters of the telegraphic alphabet, being

nothing more than little groups of dots and dashes variously arranged,

are extremely susceptible of mutilation, owing to any lack of exact

spacing on the part of the sending operator. Nor does the liability to

error lie only in these directions. The dots and dashes frequently fail

or run together, owing either to feeble signals, contact of the wires

with one another, with trees, or other objects, or to the instruments

not being in perfect adjustment. A grain of grit or of dust getting

between the points of contact in a delicate instrument will sometimes do

much mischief in the way indicated. There is liability to mistakes, too,

in consequence of the handwriting of the senders, or of the operators

at a transmitting point where messages have to be again taken down, not

being very plain. Yet over and above these tendencies to error, there is

the fallibility of human nature, which will sometimes lead a person to

write "no" where "yes" is intended, or "black" where "white" is meant;

and of such mistakes probably no explanation can be given. So that the

work of a telegraphist is beset with pitfalls, and he requires all his

wits and a fair share of intelligence to keep him right in his work. It

may further be remarked that many errors in telegrams, which might be

supposed by the public to be gross or inexcusable, have occurred in the

most simple way, or have been shown to be due to failures of a very

trifling kind.

The following are illustrations of such mistakes:--

A pleasure-party, telegraphing to some friends, stated that they had

"arrived all right," but the message was rendered, "We have arrived all

tight." The words "right" and "tight" in the Morse code are as

follows:--

r i g h t

. - . . . - - . . . . . -

t i g h t

- . . - - . . . . . -

In another case, a poor person, desiring to state that her daughter was

ill, wrote in her message, "Mary is bad." This was rendered, "Mary is

dead," the sense being changed by a slight imperfection of spacing,

thus--

d e a d

- . . . . - - . .

instead of--

b a d

- . . . . - - . .

In a third case, owing to failing signals, possibly from so simple a

cause as the intermittent contact of the wire with a wet branch of a

tree, or a particle of grit or dust finding its way between the points

of the instrument, the import of the message was altogether changed.

Thus, "Alfred doing well, enjoyed egg to-day," was received, "Alfred

dying, enjoyed GG to-day."

A gentleman telegraphed from London to his brother in the country to

send a hack to meet him at the station; but when the gentleman arrived

at the station he found a _sack_ waiting for him. A firm in London

telegraphed, "_Send rails ten foot lengths_;" but the message was

delivered, "_Send rails in foot lengths_."

A person telegraphed to a friend to "take two stalls at the Haymarket,"

but the message conveyed directions to secure "two stables at the

Haymarket." In another telegram, the intimation, "mother is no worse,"

was changed to "mother is no more." Again, "You will be glad to hear

that your sister has accepted an engagement with your father's

approval," was rendered, "that your sister has accepted an engagement

with your father's apostle." In another case a plain business message,

thus--"Come to me as early as you can, that we may arrange Wednesday,"

was given a matrimonial turn by being delivered as, "that we may arrange

wedding." The next case is one in which a hungry man would doubtless be

made an angry man in consequence of the mistake which occurred. His

message, which was written thus,--"Shall arrive by train to-morrow

_morning_; provide a good _supply_ of bread, butter, eggs, milk, and

potatoes,"--was delivered as "provide a good _supper_ of bread," &c. In

another instance the notice that "Mr ---- will come to-night with me at

7 to tea," was rendered, "Mr ---- will come to-night with me, get 7 to

tea;" the only argument in favour of the mistake being "the more the

merrier." Then, on another occasion, a telegram sent by a person in the

country to "Madame ----, Costumier," at an address in London, conveying

an order for a fancy dress, was presented to the maker of costumes as

"Madame ----, Costermonger." In a telegram directed to "----, M.P.,

House of Commons," the address somehow got changed to "----, M.P., House

of Correction;" but the member not being found there, the clerks at the

delivering office suggested that it should be tried at the "House of

Detention,"--a not unlikely place for successful delivery of such a

message as things were at the time.

It has been left to America to produce a mistake in telegraphing which,

while it is very amusing, could not result in hurt or disappointment to

any one. Here it is, just as received from the other side of the

"ferry":--

A St Louis merchant, while in New York, received a telegram notifying

that his wife was ill. He sent a message to his family doctor asking the

nature of the sickness, and if there was any danger, and promptly

received the answer "_No danger; your wife has had a child; if we can

keep her from having another to-night she will do well._" The

mystification of the agitated husband was not removed until a second

inquiry revealed the fact that his indisposed lady had had a _chill_.

The Royal Mail: Its Curiosities and Romance · 第 16 / 25 章